2021-25042. Air Plan Approval; Washington; Update to the Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency Wood Heater and Burn Ban Regulations  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    ACTION:

    Proposed rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve submitted revisions to the Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA) regulations designed to control particulate matter from residential wood heaters, such as woodstoves and fireplaces. The updated YRCAA regulations set fine particulate matter trigger levels for impaired air quality burn bans, consistent with statutory changes enacted by the Washington State Legislature. The submission also contains updates to improve the clarity of the language and align with the statewide solid fuel burning device regulations already applicable in YRCAA's jurisdiction. We are proposing to approve these changes because they meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act and strengthen the Washington SIP.

    DATES:

    Comments must be received on or before December 20, 2021.

    ADDRESSES:

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2021-0750 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission ( i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/​dockets/​commenting-epa-dockets.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue—Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-0256, or hunt.jeff@epa.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Throughout this document whenever “we,” “us,” or “our” is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA. Start Printed Page 64439

    Table of Contents

    I. Background

    II. Summary of SIP Revision

    III. Proposed Action

    IV. Incorporation by Reference

    V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    I. Background

    On July 1, 1987, the EPA published revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter focused on inhalable coarse particles (PM10) that are 10 micrometers in diameter or smaller (52 FR 24634). The PM10 standard most relevant to Washington was the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS.[1] The EPA set the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS at 150 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m[3] ), not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a three-year period. On August 7, 1987, the EPA identified the Yakima area as a PM10 “Group I” area of concern, i.e., an area with a 95% or greater likelihood of violating the PM10 NAAQS (52 FR 29383). The U.S. Congress subsequently designated the Yakima area as a moderate PM10 nonattainment area upon enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (November 15, 1990).[2] On March 24, 1989, the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) submitted a plan for attaining the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS, amended with additional submissions between 1992 and 1995. The EPA approved the plan on February 2, 1998 (63 FR 5269). One element of the approved PM10 attainment plan was the residential wood smoke curtailment program codified in local regulation at YRCAA, Article IX, Woodstove and Fireplaces. On February 8, 2005, the EPA redesignated the Yakima area to attainment for PM10 based on the existing set of control measures contained in the attainment plan (70 FR 6591).[3]

    On July 18, 1997, the EPA published a revision to the particulate matter standards to establish the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS for particles that are 2.5 micrometers in diameter or smaller, based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with exposures to PM2.5 (62 FR 38652). The EPA's revised 1997 particulate matter standards included a 24-hour NAAQS of 65 μg/m3 for PM2.5, based on a three-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations. On October 17, 2006, the EPA published a revision to the PM2.5 24-hour NAAQS, lowering the level from 65 μg/m3 to 35 μg/m3 , based on additional evidence and health studies (71 FR 61144).

    On February 2, 1998, the EPA approved Article IX, Woodstoves and Fireplaces, adopted by YRCAA in 1993 and 1995 (63 FR 5269). This set of adopted regulations predated the EPA's promulgation of the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and focused on the 1987 PM10 NAAQS for residential woodstove curtailment. In a series of amendments beginning in 2005, the Washington State Legislature revised the underlying statutory authority contained in Chapter 70.94 [4] Revised Code of Washington (RCW) (Washington Clean Air Act) regarding residential wood smoke curtailment programs to focus on the more recent 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. In a SIP revision approved by the EPA on May 9, 2014, Ecology provided an analysis covering former PM10 nonattainment areas in both Western and Eastern Washington, including the Yakima area, to demonstrate that wood smoke curtailment programs focused on the more recent 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS will provide continued maintenance of the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS (79 FR 26628). The EPA agreed with Ecology's analysis and approved revisions to the statewide regulations contained in Chapter 173-433 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Solid Fuel Burning Devices (May 9, 2014, 79 FR 26628). These revisions removed the PM10 burn ban trigger levels and replaced them with PM2.5 trigger levels, consistent with the changes to RCW 70.94.473 [5] of the Washington Clean Air Act.[6]

    II. Summary of SIP Revision

    In the October 14, 2021 submission that is the subject of this action, Ecology and YRCAA requested that the EPA approve changes to Regulation 1, sections 3.04 Wood Heaters and 3.05 Burn Bans, adopted by YRCAA on October 8, 2020, to replace the outdated 1993 and 1995 Article IX provisions previously approved into the SIP.[7] The submitted revisions, state effective on November 9, 2020, align the YRCAA wood heater and impaired air quality burn ban regulations with the Washington Clean Air Act statutory changes discussed above, as well as the EPA-approved changes to Ecology's statewide solid fuel burning device regulations. The definition of “wood heater” in Regulation 1, section 3.04 is consistent with the term “solid fuel burning device” in the Washington Clean Air Act. Specifically, section 3.04(B) Applicability states, “This section applies to any solid fuel burning device which, as defined by RCW 70A.15.3510, burns wood, wood products, or other nongaseous or non-liquid fuels, including those rated less than one million British thermal unit (Btu) per hour.” Aside from this difference in terminology, the YRCAA regulations generally mirror and cite to the statewide Chapter 173-433 WAC provisions already applicable in YRCAA's jurisdiction. An analysis of the YRCAA regulations is included in the docket for this action.

    We note that the former Article IX regulations adopted in 1993 and 1995 included a “Woodsmoke Control Zone,” which imposed impaired air quality burn ban requirements on a portion of Yakima County generally corresponding to the boundaries of the northern half of the county which encompassed the former PM10 nonattainment area.[8] YRCAA's current regulations expand applicability of impaired air quality burn bans to all of Yakima County, except for lands located within the external boundaries of the Yakama Indian Reservation. Because this revision strengthens the SIP by expanding the geographic scope of the curtailment program, we are proposing to approve YRCAA's elimination of the Woodsmoke Control Zone from the regulations.

    III. Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to approve and incorporate by reference Regulation 1, sections 3.04 Wood Heaters and 3.05 Burn Bans, adopted by YRCAA effective November 9, 2020. These revisions strengthen the SIP in several ways, including by revising burn ban trigger Start Printed Page 64440 levels to align with the Washington State Legislature's statutory changes focused on the more recent 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS and expanding the burn ban applicability beyond the former Woodsmoke Control Zone. The EPA is also proposing to determine that Regulation 1, sections 3.04 Wood Heaters and 3.05 Burn Bans, adopted by YRCAA effective November 9, 2020 are consistent with section 110 of the Clean Air Act. The EPA is soliciting public comments on YRCAA Regulation 1, sections 3.04 Wood Heaters and 3.05 Burn Bans which will be considered before taking final action. We are also proposing to remove from the SIP the outdated 1993 and 1995 Article IX provisions Woodstoves and Fireplaces, which are replaced by sections 3.04 and 3.05. We note that the October 14, 2021 submission also includes outdoor burning regulations and other general air quality regulations which the EPA will address in separate actions.

    IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include in a final rule, regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference YRCAA Regulation 1, sections 3.04 and 3.05 discussed in section III of this preamble and remove from the incorporation by reference YRCAA Regulation 1, Article IX which is replaced by sections 3.04 and 3.05. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

    V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:

    • Is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);

    • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. );

    • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. );

    • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
    • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
    • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of the requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
    • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, this proposed action would not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA provided an opportunity to request consultation to the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation in a letter dated April 5, 2021.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    • Environmental protection
    • Air pollution control
    • Carbon monoxide
    • Incorporation by reference
    • Intergovernmental relations
    • Lead
    • Nitrogen dioxide
    • Ozone
    • Particulate matter
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Sulfur oxides
    • Volatile organic compounds
    End List of Subjects Start Signature

    Dated: November 9, 2021.

    Michelle L. Pirzadeh,

    Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    Footnotes

    1.  No areas in Washington violated the annual PM10 NAAQS, which the EPA subsequently revoked on October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144).

    Back to Citation

    2.  See 40 CFR 81.348 for legal description and current designation.

    Back to Citation

    3.  Ibid.

    Back to Citation

    4.  This statute was re-codified on June 11, 2020, to Chapter 70A.15 RCW. There were no substantive changes to the statutory text except updated cross references.

    Back to Citation

    5.  Re-codified to RCW 70A.15.3580 with no substantive changes to the statutory text.

    Back to Citation

    6.  YRCAA continues to operate a PM10 monitor, in addition to the collocated PM2.5 monitor, to verify compliance with both the PM10 and PM2.5 NAAQS (Yakima-4th Ave S, monitor ID #530770009). Ecology's 2014 analysis, based on these collocated monitors, determined that PM2.5 concentrations would need to reach 62 μg/m3. before triggering the former PM10 level for a stage 1 impaired air quality burn ban. Therefore, the current trigger level established under Chapter 70A.15.3580 of the Washington Clean Air Act (forecasted to reach or exceed PM2.5 concentrations of 30 μg/m3. ) is the controlling standard. Similarly, PM2.5 concentrations would need to reach 76 μg/m3. to exceed the former PM10 trigger level for a stage 2 impaired air quality burn ban. See 79 FR 26628 (May 9, 2014).

    Back to Citation

    7.  We note that the October 14, 2021 submission also includes outdoor burning regulations and other general air quality regulations which the EPA will address in separate actions.

    Back to Citation

    8.  See 40 CFR 81.348 for legal description and current designation.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2021-25042 Filed 11-17-21; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Document Information

Published:
11/18/2021
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
2021-25042
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before December 20, 2021.
Pages:
64438-64440 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
EPA-R10-OAR-2021-0750, FRL-9189-01-R10
Topics:
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds
PDF File:
2021-25042.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: Washington; Update to the Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency Wood Heater and Burn Ban Regulations
» 103_wsr_20-21-016
» 102_WSR 20_14_122
» 101_Clean copy YRCAA Regulation 1- 2020 adopted 8Oct2020
» 100_EPA review_wood heaters_preadoption review
» 400_Yakama tribal consultation letter
» 005_SIP Revision_Appendix H SIP adoption order and transmittal letter
» 004_SIP Revision_Appendix G Public Comments
» 003_SIP Revision_Appendix F Public Notification
» 002_SIP Revision_Appendices A through E_supporting documents
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52