94-27145. Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1972 MG-B GT Coupe Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 1994)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-27145]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: November 2, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Docket No. 94-87; Notice 1]
    
     
    
    Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 1972 MG-B GT 
    Coupe Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 
    1972 MG-B GT Coupe passenger cars are eligible for importation.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic 
    Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that a 1972 
    MG-B GT Coupe that was not originally manufactured to comply with all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards is eligible for 
    importation into the United States because (1) it is substantially 
    similar to a vehicle that was originally manufactured for importation 
    into and sale in the United States and that was certified by its 
    manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) it is 
    capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
    
    DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is December 2, 
    1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice 
    number, and be submitted to: Docket Section, Room 5109, National 
    Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St., SW, Washington, 
    DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.]
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Ted Bayler, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5306).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) (formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) 
    of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (the Act)), a 
    motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused 
    admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the 
    motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally 
    manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, 
    certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act), and 
    of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be 
    compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either 
    manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 
    49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice 
    in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords 
    interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the 
    close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 
    petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is 
    eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in 
    the Federal Register.
        Champagne Imports, Inc. of Lansdale, Pennsylvania (``Champagne'') 
    (Registered Importer 90-009) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 
    1972 MG-B GT Coupe passenger cars are eligible for importation into the 
    United States. The vehicle which Champagne believes is substantially 
    similar is the 1972 MG-B GT Coupe that was manufactured for importation 
    into, and sale in, the United States and certified by its manufacturer, 
    British Leyland Motor Corp., Ltd., as conforming to all applicable 
    Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        The petitioner claims that it carefully compared the non-U.S. 
    certified 1972 MG-B GT Coupe to its U.S. certified counterpart, and 
    found the two vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to 
    compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
        Champagne submitted information with its petition intended to 
    demonstrate that the non-U.S. certified 1972 MG-B GT Coupe, as 
    originally manufactured, conforms to many Federal motor vehicle safety 
    standards in the same manner as its U.S. certified counterpart, or is 
    capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.
        Specifically, the petitioner claims that the non-U.S. certified 
    1972 MG-B GT Coupe is identical to its U.S. certified counterpart with 
    respect to compliance with Standards Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever 
    Sequence * * *., 103 Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield 
    Wiping and Washing Systems, 105 Hydraulic Brake Systems, 106 Brake 
    Hoses, 107 Reflecting Surfaces, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch 
    Systems, 116 Brake Fluid, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 
    202 Head Restraints, 203 Impact Protection for the Driver From the 
    Steering Control System, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 
    205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 
    207 Seating Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly 
    Anchorages, 211 Wheel Nuts, Wheel Discs and Hubcaps, 212 Windshield 
    Retention, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, 301 Fuel System Integrity, and 
    302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
        Petitioner also contends that the vehicle is capable of being 
    readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner 
    indicated:
        Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) Substitution of a lens 
    marked ``Brake'' for a lens with an ECE symbol on the brake failure 
    indicator lamp; (b) installation of a seat belt warning lamp.
        Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated 
    Equipment: (a) Installation of U.S.-model headlamp assemblies which 
    incorporate sealed beam headlamps; (b) installation of U.S.-model front 
    and rear sidemarkers; (c) installation of U.S.-model taillamp 
    assemblies.
        Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of a tire 
    information placard.
        Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Replacement of the convex 
    passenger side rearview mirror.
        Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a buzzer 
    microswitch and warning buzzer in the steering lock assembly.
        Standard No. 115 Vehicle Identification Number: Installation of a 
    VIN plate that can be read from outside the left windshield pillar, and 
    a VIN reference label on the edge of the door or latch post nearest the 
    driver.
        Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window Systems: Rewiring of the 
    power window system so that the window transport is inoperative when 
    the ignition is switched off.
        Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: (a) Installation of a 
    U.S.-model seat belt in the driver's position, or a belt webbing 
    actuated microswitch in the driver's seat belt retractor; (b) 
    installation of an ignition switch actuated seat belt warning lamp and 
    buzzer.
        Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition 
    described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be 
    submitted to: Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety 
    Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 
    20590. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
        All comments received before the close of business on the closing 
    date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for 
    examination in the docket at the above address both before and after 
    that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing 
    date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition 
    will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
    indicated below.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141 (a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
    delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on: October 24, 1994.
    William A. Boehly,
    Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 94-27145 Filed 11-1-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/02/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 1972 MG-B GT Coupe passenger cars are eligible for importation.
Document Number:
94-27145
Dates:
The closing date for comments on the petition is December 2, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 2, 1994, Docket No. 94-87, Notice 1