95-27229. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Docket No. 28371] HEADStudy of FAA Regulation and Certification Capabilities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 212 (Thursday, November 2, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 55750-55751]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-27229]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF STATE
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    Federal Aviation Administration
    [Docket No. 28371]
    
    Study of FAA Regulation and Certification Capabilities
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Study and Request for Comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On July 13, 1995, the Federal Aviation Administration 
    initiated Challenge 2000, a comprehensive review of the FAA's safety 
    oversight mission. The purpose of Challenge 2000 is to position the 
    Agency to continue providing effective safety oversight in the face of 
    technological advances and other changes in the aviation operating 
    environment. An independent management consultant is undertaking a 
    review of the FAA's regulation, certification, and enforcement 
    capabilities and plans to make recommendations for appropriate actions. 
    This notice provides an opportunity for the public to participate in 
    this effort and comment on the future design and goal of FAA's 
    regulation and certification functions.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 15, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments in triplicate to: Federal Aviation 
    Administration, Office of Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket (AGC-
    200), Docket 28371, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591. 
    Comments must be marked Docket No. 28371. They will be on display in 
    Room 915G weekdays between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 pm., except on Federal 
    holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris Burnham, Office of Aviation 
    Policy and Plans, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
    Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591, (202) 267-7947.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Secretary of Transportation Federico Pena and FAA Administrator 
    David Hinson have committed to a safety goal of zero accidents for the 
    aviation community. Consistent with this Zero-accident goal, the FAA 
    has initiated Challenge 2000, a comprehensive review of the agency's 
    safety oversight capabilities. The review and subsequent report are 
    being undertaken by an independent management consultant. The FAA will 
    also receive input from its Research, Engineering, and Development 
    Advisory Committee (RE&D Committee), whose membership represents 
    various parts of the aviation industry. A committee of AA executives is 
    overseeing the effort.
        In the course of its review, the management consultant is studying 
    the structure of the aviation industry, current and anticipated risks 
    associated with air transportation, the structure and approach to 
    safety used by aviation authorities in other countries and in other 
    industries, and the FAA's safety organization. It is discussing 
    pertinent issues with aviation organizations from government and the 
    private sector. The RE&D Committee is evaluating the FAA's relationship 
    to the technology environment and the agency's ability to respond 
    strategically to rapid technological changes. A team of senior FAA 
    officials is responsible for assisting the consultant and the RE&D 
    Committee by providing essential expertise and perspective on the FAA 
    and its current practices.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        The FAA invites public comments to supplement the data gathered by 
    our management consultant. Taken together, the information will help 
    the agency appropriately adjust its regulation, certification, and 
    enforcement capabilities to respond to recent and expected changes in 
    the aviation 
    
    [[Page 55751]]
    operating environment. Unlike recent regulatory reviews, this Notice 
    does not seek suggestions on specific rules that commenters believe 
    should be changed or altered. Rather, comments should address general 
    policies, procedures, and the focus of FAA's mission and resources with 
    respect to safety oversight.
        The following are examples of questions relevant to Challenge 2000 
    and on which the FAA seeks comments. This list does not necessarily 
    encompass all issues of interest, and commenters are invited to submit 
    information on additional issues relevant to this review.
        Do you believe that the FAA's regulation, certification, and 
    enforcement functions currently provide an adequate level of safety 
    oversight? If not, why not? Are there safety oversight services that 
    should be provided by the FAA that currently are not? What changes in 
    statutory authority, resources, or process are needed to provide 
    adequate in the current and future environment? Are the FAA's 
    regulation and certification processes appropriate to allow the 
    aviation community to reap the benefits of modern technology in a 
    timely manner?
        What significant changes do you anticipate in the aviation 
    environment in the next decade that may require revision, termination, 
    or addition to current FAA safety oversight (e.g., technological 
    advances, changing business practices, impact of international 
    competition)? When possible, please provide specific examples.
        Based on the anticipated changes, do you believe that the FAA needs 
    to change the manner in which it (1) regulates the industry, (2) 
    enforces rules, or (3) certificates airmen, aircraft, or other elements 
    of the airport and airway system? Where appropriate, please comment on 
    the adequacy of existing statutory authority, anticipated need for 
    process changes, the timing of services provided, and the effectiveness 
    of the outcome.
        In the coming decade, do you believe that FAA should devote fewer 
    or greater resources than it currently does to (1) regulation, (2) 
    enforcement, and (3) certification? Why?
    
        Issued in Washington, DC, on October 27, 1995.
    Barry L. Valentine,
    Assistant Administrator for Policy, Planning, and International 
    Aviation.
    [FR Doc. 95-27229 Filed 11-1-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/02/1995
Department:
State Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Study and Request for Comments.
Document Number:
95-27229
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before December 15, 1995.
Pages:
55750-55751 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-27229.pdf