95-27231. Floodplain Statement of Findings for Remedial Action at the Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Located Near Maybell and Naturita, CO  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 212 (Thursday, November 2, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 55702-55704]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-27231]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    
    Floodplain Statement of Findings for Remedial Action at the 
    Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Located Near Maybell and Naturita, CO
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Floodplain Statement of Findings.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This Floodplain Statement of Findings is prepared pursuant to 
    Executive Order 11990 and 10 CFR Part 1022, Compliance with Floodplain/
    Wetlands Environmental Review Requirements. Under authority granted by 
    the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978, the 
    Department of Energy (DOE) plans to clean up residual radioactive mill 
    tailings and other contaminated materials at the former uranium mill 
    tailings processing sites near Maybell and Naturita, Colorado. 
    Contaminated material occurs in the 100-year floodplains of rivers and 
    streams at and near these processing sites, and the 100-year floodplain 
    of the San Miguel River at the Naturita site is contaminated. Remedial 
    action activities to remove contaminated material would result in the 
    temporary disturbance of the 100-
    
    [[Page 55703]]
    year floodplain. Contamination occurs along Johnson Wash and Lay Creek 
    at the Maybell site; these areas may qualify for supplemental standards 
    and would therefore remain mostly undisturbed.
        Copies of the floodplain/wetlands assessments for the Maybell and 
    Naturita sites are available from: National Technical Information 
    Service, Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 
    22161, (703) 487-4650.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE NEPA PROCESS, CONTACT: Carol M. 
    Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Oversight, EH-25, U.S. Department 
    of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 
    586-4600 or 1-800-472-2756.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement Notification for remedial 
    action in the floodplains and wetlands at the Maybell and Naturita 
    sites was published in the Federal Register in 1988 (53 FR 5033). The 
    final environmental assessments (EA) were published in 1994 and 1995 
    for the Maybell (DOE/EA-0347) and Naturita (DOE/EA-0464) sites. In 
    addition, the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for each of 
    these sites was signed. Floodplain/Wetlands Assessments were prepared 
    for each site and are attached to the EAs.
    
    Project Descriptions
    
    Maybell Site
    
        The Maybell site is 25 miles (mi) west of the city of Craig, in a 
    rural area of Moffat County in northwestern Colorado. The Maybell site 
    was established by Trace Elements Corporation in 1955, and Umetco 
    assumed control in 1957. A total of 2.6 million tons of ore was 
    processed before the mill shut down in 1964. The tailings pile and most 
    of the surrounding land contaminated with windblown tailings are in 
    upland areas. However, water erosion has contaminated nearby Johnson 
    Wash and a portion of Lay Creek; approximately 61,000 cubic yards 
    (yd3) of contaminated material are in these two drainages.
        Johnson Wash begins in the sagebrush and pinon-juniper dominated 
    land northeast of the Maybell site and extends south about 1.5 mi to 
    Lay Creek. The wash is ephemeral and dry much of the year except at two 
    springs that create a surface flow that floods 600 to 900 feet (ft) of 
    the wash. Heavily grazed riparian vegetation occurs along 1 mi of the 
    wash, indicating that ground water is near the surface. Most of Johnson 
    Wash traverses a steep-sided valley, and sagebrush and/or pinon-juniper 
    plant communities occur along its entire length.
        Lay Creek is a meandering stream with a flat, broad floodplain. The 
    creek contains water all year; ground water discharge is the source of 
    this water during dry parts of the year.
        Various species of aquatic plants form a dense growth along the 
    stream, while higher areas are dominated by black greasewood and big 
    sagebrush. The area is heavily grazed by sheep and cattle.
        The proposed action at the Maybell site is to stabilize the 
    contaminated material in place at the existing tailings pile. In 
    addition, a supplemental standards application will be prepared for 
    most of the contaminated areas along Johnson Wash and Lay Creek. The 
    rationale for supplemental standards at these two drainages is based on 
    ecological, radiological, geomorphological, socioeconomic, and 
    engineering criteria (see the Floodplain/Wetlands Assessment for more 
    details). Two areas of contamination, totaling about 12 acres (ac), 
    will be cleaned up along Johnson Wash and Lay Creek; one is in the 
    upper portion of the wash, in the windblown contaminated area, and the 
    other is in the lower portion of the wash, near its confluence with Lay 
    Creek. Currently, additional radiological characterization is taking 
    place along Johnson Wash and Lay Creek to verify the levels of 
    contamination along these two drainages. These surveys may identify 
    additional areas that need to be cleaned up. At this time, it is 
    anticipated that any additional clean-up along Johnson Wash and Lay 
    Creek will be minimal and that most of these two drainages will 
    continue to qualify for supplemental standards. Land disturbed in the 
    100-year floodplains of Johnson Wash and Lay Creek would be 
    recontoured, covered with topsoil, and revegetated with native plant 
    species.
        Alternatives considered include no action and clean-up of all the 
    contaminated material along Johnson Wash and Lay Creek. Implementation 
    of no action would not be consistent with UMTRCA and would not be 
    protective of human health and the environment since it would not meet 
    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards (40 CFR 192). Clean-up 
    of all the contaminated material would cause more environmental harm 
    than good, given the occurrence of wetlands and other sensitive 
    habitats along these drainages and the relatively low levels of 
    contamination.
    
    Naturita Site
    
        The Naturita site is 2 mi northwest of the unincorporated town of 
    Naturita in Montrose County, Colorado. The Naturita mill site was 
    constructed in 1930. It became operational in 1939, when it was 
    modified for the recovery of vanadium. Uranium milling began in 1942 
    and continued until 1963, when the mill was shut down. The tailings 
    were removed from the site in 1979 for reprocessing at a facility in 
    the hills about 3 mi south of the site. There is an estimated 542,400 
    yd3 of contaminated material on 244 acres of land. Approximately 
    263,000 yd3 of this contaminated material covers 31 ac in the 100-
    year floodplain of the San Miguel River.
        The San Miguel River originates in the San Juan Mountains near 
    Telluride, Colorado, and joins the Dolores River 20 mi downstream from 
    the Naturita site. In the vicinity of the Naturita site, the river has 
    a drainage area of 1209 square miles. Flow in the river varies 
    seasonally with the average maximum and minimum flows of 2000 and 330 
    cubic feet per second. A vegetated riparian zone occurs along the river 
    with plant communities growing in distinct zones. The zone nearest the 
    river consists of vegetation growing on the frequently flooded rocky 
    bars; cottonwood and willow seedlings are common here. Further back and 
    a bit higher in elevation, thick growths of cottonwood and willow 
    saplings are typically encountered. Mature cottonwood stands frequent 
    higher terraces along the river and generally give way to upland plant 
    communities.
        The proposed action is to remove the contaminated material from the 
    floodplain of the river and upland areas and stabilize it in an off-
    site disposal cell. This clean-up effort will disturb 31 contaminated 
    acres in the 100-year floodplain of the river. The average depth of the 
    excavation in this area would be 3 ft. The removal of contaminated 
    material from the upper and lower mill yard terraces would increase the 
    width of the 100-year floodplain. Clean fill material would be 
    backfilled into excavated areas as the contaminated material is removed 
    to minimize any increase in the width of the 100-year floodplain. After 
    completion of remedial action, all disturbed areas would be recontoured 
    to promote surface drainage and the man-made upper and lower mill yard 
    terraces would be replaced with a gentle slope. As a result of this, it 
    is anticipated that the 100-year floodplain will increase from 31 to 38 
    ac after the completion of this work. The restoration 
    
    [[Page 55704]]
    of the floodplain following remedial action is not expected to affect 
    the path or flow regime of the San Miguel River. All disturbed areas 
    would be revegetated as soon as possible after completion of remedial 
    action to minimize erosion.
        Alternatives considered were on-site stabilization of the 
    contaminated material, no action, and other off-site disposal sites. 
    The impacts to the 100-year floodplain would be the same as described 
    above for other off-site disposal locations. The disposal of the 
    contaminated material on-site would also result in the disturbance of 
    the 100-year floodplain as described for the proposed action. No action 
    would result in leaving the contaminated material in the floodplain of 
    the San Miguel River and would not result in a reduction in public 
    health effects. In addition, the contaminated material would continue 
    to be susceptible to erosion, particularly during periods of high 
    water, which could result in negative impacts to the environment. In 
    addition, no action would not be consistent with the intent of UMTRCA 
    and would not result in compliance with the EPA environmental 
    protection standards.
    
    Findings
    
    Maybell Site
    
        Little of Johnson Wash and Lay Creek, would be disturbed if 
    supplemental standards were successfully applied to these areas. It is 
    likely that a supplemental standards application would be successful, 
    given that the areas are ecologically sensitive, are remote from human 
    habitation, and that they contain relatively low levels of 
    contamination.
        The clean-up of contaminated material of Johnson Wash and Lay Creek 
    would provide a long-term benefit by preventing impacts to human health 
    and the environment. Potential impacts to the 100-year floodplain that 
    may result from the excavation of contaminated material from Johnson 
    Wash would be mitigated by the following measures:
         Erosion control measures would be implemented to minimize 
    erosion during clean-up activities along Johnson Wash and Lay Creek.
         The 12 ac of land within the 100-year floodplain of 
    Johnson Wash and Lay Creek that would be disturbed would be recontoured 
    and revegetated following the completion of remedial action.
        The excavation of contaminated material from the floodplain of 
    Johnson Wash and Lay Creek is designed to conform to applicable federal 
    and state regulations. Permits required under these regulations will be 
    obtained before the start of remedial action. Wetlands along Johnson 
    Wash and Lay Creek have been delineated; the U.S. Army Corps of 
    Engineers (USACE) has agreed with this delineation. Consultation is 
    ongoing with other federal agencies, such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
    Service (FWS) and Bureau of Land management (BLM), and with the state 
    of Colorado.
        Based on the above, it was determined that the impacts to the 
    floodplain along Johnson Wash and Lay Creek would be insignificant.
    
    Naturita Site
    
        The clean-up of contaminated material from the floodplain of the 
    San Miguel River in the area of the Naturita site would be a long-term 
    benefit because of the reduction of impacts to potential human health 
    and the environment. Potential impacts due to excavation of 
    contaminated material from the floodplain of the San Miguel River would 
    be mitigated by the following measures.
         All excavated areas would be backfilled with clean fill as 
    soon as clean-up was completed.
         Riparian vegetation along the river not subject to 
    excavation would be left intact as much as possible to reduce river 
    velocities and associated erosion during flood events.
         All excavated areas would be regraded to a gentle slope to 
    promote positive drainage.
         The upper and lower mill yard terraces would be given a 
    gentle slope to promote positive drainage.
         All areas would be revegetated as soon as possible 
    following clean-up to minimize erosion into the river.
        The excavation of contaminated material from the floodplain of the 
    San Miguel River is designed to conform to applicable federal and state 
    regulations. Permits required under these regulations will be obtained 
    before the start of remedial action. Wetlands along the river have been 
    delineated, USACE has agreed with this delineation, and a 404 Permit is 
    being prepared. Consultation is ongoing with other federal agencies, 
    such as FWS and BLM, as well as with the state of Colorado and local 
    government agencies.
        Based on the above, it was determined that the impacts to the 
    floodplain along the San Miguel River would be insignificant.
    
        Issued at Albuquerque, New Mexico, on July 21, 1995.
    W. John Arthur III,
    Acting Assistant Manager for Environmental/Project Management.
    [FR Doc. 95-27231 Filed 11-1-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/02/1995
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Floodplain Statement of Findings.
Document Number:
95-27231
Pages:
55702-55704 (3 pages)
PDF File:
95-27231.pdf