98-29190. Prevailing Rate Systems; Lead Agency Responsibility  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 58659-58660]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-29190]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 1998 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 58659]]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
    
    5 CFR Part 532
    
    RIN 3206-AI48
    
    
    Prevailing Rate Systems; Lead Agency Responsibility
    
    AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed 
    rule that would change the lead agency responsibility for certain 
    Federal Wage System (FWS) appropriated fund wage areas from the 
    Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to the Department of Defense (DOD). 
    A lead agency under the FWS is the Federal agency designated by OPM to 
    conduct local wage surveys and establish wage schedules for FWS 
    employees according to local prevailing rates within a wage area. There 
    are currently 133 FWS appropriated fund wage areas. DOD is currently 
    the lead agency in 110 wage areas, and VA is the lead agency in 23 wage 
    areas. VA has requested that OPM designate DOD as the lead agency in 
    all of the wage areas where VA currently has lead agency 
    responsibility. This change would make DOD the lead agency in all FWS 
    wage areas and is proposed because it would make more efficient use of 
    the resources devoted by agencies to determining FWS pay rates.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 2, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Donald J. Winstead, Assistant 
    Director for Compensation Administration, Workforce Compensation and 
    Performance Service, Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E 
    Street NW., Washington, DC 20415, or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark A. Allen at (202) 606-2848, or 
    email: maallen@opm.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5 U.S.C. 5343(a)(2), the Office of 
    Personnel Management (OPM) is responsible for designating lead agencies 
    in Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. Lead agencies are responsible 
    for conducting surveys of private sector employers to establish wage 
    schedules for FWS employees based on local prevailing rates. The 
    Department of Defense (DOD) is the lead agency in 110 FWS wage areas, 
    and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the lead agency in 23 
    FWS wage areas. VA is currently the lead agency in the New Haven-
    Hartford, Connecticut; Miami, Florida; Tampa-St. Petersburg, Florida; 
    Champaign-Urbana, Illinois; Chicago, Illinois; Cedar Rapids-Iowa City, 
    Iowa; Des Moines, Iowa; Augusta, Maine; Boston, Massachusetts; 
    Southwestern Michigan; Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; New York, New 
    York; Rochester, New York; Asheville, North Carolina; Charlotte, North 
    Carolina; Cincinnati, Ohio; Cleveland, Ohio; Southwestern Oregon; 
    Pittsburg, Pennsylvania; Eastern Tennessee; Houston-Galveston-Texas 
    City, Texas; Roanoke, Virginia; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, FWS wage 
    areas.
        VA has requested that OPM designate DOD as the lead agency in the 
    wage areas where VA is currently designated as the lead agency. Since 
    the establishment of the FWS in 1972, VA has played a key role in the 
    administration of the pay program for FWS employees. However, for the 
    past few years, VA has experienced reductions in overall employment in 
    the human resources management areas both in field and headquarters 
    activities. At the headquarters level, two out of three experienced 
    specialists assigned to oversee FWS wage surveys are no longer 
    available to work in that area because of retirements and 
    reassignments. VA believes that a consolidation of the FWS survey 
    function within one agency would be more efficient and would provide a 
    consistency in the survey process that would strengthen the FWS program 
    nationwide. DOD has expressed its willingness and indicated its ability 
    to assume lead agency responsibility in the wage areas where VA is 
    currently assigned lead agency responsibility.
        This proposed change was reviewed by the Federal Prevailing Rate 
    Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the national labor-management committee 
    responsible for advising OPM on matters that affect the pay of FWS 
    employees. The Committee recommended approval of the change by majority 
    vote. The management members of FPRAC proposed this change because 
    diminishing staff resources within VA headquarters have made it very 
    difficult for VA to accomplish its wage survey work in an effective 
    manner, and DOD has expressed its ability and willingness to assume 
    lead agency responsibility in all FWS wage areas. All Committee members 
    voted for the proposal except for the National Federation of Federal 
    Employees, which abstained. The remaining labor members of FPRAC 
    supported the proposed change with reservations, stating that although 
    no reasonable alternative exists, they are concerned about the 
    placement of Governmentwide FWS wage determinations within a single 
    agency.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        I certify that these regulations would not have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
    would affect only Federal agencies and employees.
    
    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
    Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
    
    Office of Personnel Management.
    Janice R. Lachance,
    Director.
    
        Accordingly, the Office of Personnel Management is proposing to 
    amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
    
    PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under 5 
    U.S.C. 552.
    
        2. Appendix A to subpart B is amended for the New Haven-Hartford, 
    Connecticut; Miami, Florida; Tampa-St. Petersburg, Florida; Champaign-
    Urbana, Illinois; Chicago, Illinois; Cedar Rapids-Iowa City, Iowa; Des 
    Moines, Iowa; Augusta, Maine; Boston, Massachusetts; Southwestern 
    Michigan; Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; New York, New York; 
    Rochester, New York; Asheville, North Carolina; Charlotte, North
    
    [[Page 58660]]
    
    Carolina; Cincinnati, Ohio; Cleveland, Ohio; Southwestern Oregon; 
    Pittsburg, Pennsylvania; Eastern Tennessee; Houston-Galveston-Texas 
    City, Texas; Roanoke, Virginia; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, wage areas by 
    revising the lead agency listings for those areas from ``VA'' to 
    ``DOD''.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-29190 Filed 10-30-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6325-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/02/1998
Department:
Personnel Management Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
98-29190
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before December 2, 1998.
Pages:
58659-58660 (2 pages)
RINs:
3206-AI48
PDF File:
98-29190.pdf
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 532