96-29658. Wisconsin: Final Full Program Determination of Adequacy of State Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Permit Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 20, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 59096-59098]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-29658]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [FRL-5651-7]
    
    
    Wisconsin: Final Full Program Determination of Adequacy of State 
    Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Permit Program
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (Region 5).
    
    ACTION: Notice of final full program determination of adequacy on 
    Wisconsin's application.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Section 4005(c)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and 
    Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste 
    Amendments (HSWA) of 1984, requires States to develop and implement 
    permit programs to ensure that municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLFs) 
    which may receive household hazardous waste or small quantity generator 
    waste will comply with the revised Federal MSWLF Criteria (40 CFR Part 
    258).
    
    [[Page 59097]]
    
    RCRA section 4005(c)(1)(C) requires the United States Environmental 
    Protection Agency (USEPA) to determine whether States have adequate 
    ``permit'' programs for MSWLFs, but does not mandate issuance of a rule 
    governing such determinations. The USEPA has proposed a State/Tribal 
    Implementation Rule (STIR) (61 FR 2584, January 26, 1996) that provides 
    procedures by which the USEPA will approve, or partially approve, 
    State/Tribal landfill permit programs. The Agency intends to approve 
    adequate State MSWLF permit programs as applications are submitted. 
    Thus, these approvals are not dependent on final promulgation of the 
    STIR. Prior to final promulgation of the STIR, adequacy determinations 
    will be made based on statutory authorities and requirements. In 
    addition, States/Tribes may use the proposed STIR as an aid in 
    interpreting these requirements. The Agency believes that early 
    approvals have an important benefit. Approved State/Tribal permit 
    programs provide for interaction between the State/Tribe and the owner/
    operator regarding site-specific permit conditions. Only those owners/
    operators located in States/Tribes with approved permit programs can 
    use the site-specific flexibility provided by 40 CFR Part 258 to the 
    extent the State/Tribal permit program allows such flexibility.
        Wisconsin applied for a partial program determination of adequacy 
    under Section 4005 of RCRA on July 27, 1992. The USEPA reviewed 
    Wisconsin's application and made a final determination of adequacy (57 
    FR 61899, December 29, 1992) for those portions of the MSWLF permit 
    program that were adequate to ensure compliance with the revised 
    Federal MSWLF Criteria. Wisconsin amended its original application and 
    applied for full program approval on September 27, 1996. The USEPA 
    reviewed Wisconsin's amended application and today is issuing a 
    tentative determination of adequacy for all portions of Wisconsin's 
    MSWLF permit program. Wisconsin's amended application for full program 
    adequacy determination is available for public review and comment. The 
    tentative determination will become final and effective sixty (60) days 
    following the date of this publication if no adverse comments are 
    received.
    
    DATES: All comments on Wisconsin's application for a full determination 
    of adequacy must be received by the U.S. EPA Region 5 by the close of 
    business on December 20, 1996. The determination of adequacy for 
    Wisconsin shall be effective on January 21, 1997 unless adverse 
    comments are received. If adverse comments are received, a second 
    Federal Register Notice will be published describing these comments and 
    the US EPA's responses to the comments and decision on final adequacy.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of Wisconsin's application for a full determination 
    of adequacy are available for inspection and copying from 9AM to 4PM 
    during normal working days at the following addresses: Wisconsin 
    Department of Natural Resources, 101 South Webster Street, Madison, 
    Wisconsin, 53707, Attn: Mr. Paul Huebner; and U.S.EPA Region 5, 77 West 
    Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, Attn: Ms. Susan Mooney, 
    mail code DRP-8J. All written comments should be sent to the EPA Region 
    5 Office.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: USEPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
    Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604 Attn: Ms. Susan Mooney, mailcode 
    DRP-8J, telephone (312) 886-3585.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        On October 9, 1991, the USEPA promulgated revised Federal MSWLF 
    Criteria (40 CFR Part 258). Subtitle D of RCRA, as amended by the 
    Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA), requires States to 
    develop permitting programs to ensure that facilities comply with the 
    revised Federal Criteria. Subtitle D also requires in Section 4005 that 
    the USEPA determine the adequacy of State municipal solid waste 
    landfill permit programs to ensure that facilities comply with the 
    revised Federal MSWLF Criteria. To fulfill this requirement, the Agency 
    has proposed the State/Tribal Implementation Rule (STIR). The rule 
    specifies the requirements which State/Tribal programs must satisfy to 
    be determined adequate.
        The USEPA will review the State/Tribe's requirements to determine 
    whether they are ``adequate'' under Section 4005(c)(1)(C) of RCRA. The 
    USEPA interprets the requirements for States or Tribes to develop 
    ``adequate'' programs for permits or other forms of prior approval to 
    impose several minimum requirements. First, each State/Tribe must have 
    enforceable standards for new and existing MSWLFs that are technically 
    comparable to the revised Federal MSWLF Criteria. Second, the State/
    Tribe must have the authority to issue a permit or other notice of 
    prior approval to all new and existing MSWLFs in its jurisdiction. The 
    State/Tribe must also provide for public participation in permit 
    issuance and enforcement as required in Section 7004(b) of RCRA. Third, 
    the USEPA believes that the State/Tribe must show that it has 
    sufficient compliance monitoring and enforcement authorities to take 
    specific action against any owner or operator who fails to comply with 
    an approved MSWLF program.
        The USEPA Regions will determine whether a State/Tribe has 
    submitted an ``adequate'' program based on the interpretation outlined 
    above.
    
    B. State of Wisconsin
    
        On July 27, 1992, Wisconsin submitted an application to obtain a 
    partial program adequacy determination for the State's municipal solid 
    waste landfill permit program. On December 29, 1992, the USEPA 
    published a final determination of adequacy for Wisconsin's program. 
    Further background on the final partial program determination of 
    adequacy appears at 57 FR 61899, December 29, 1992.
        On September 27, 1996 Wisconsin amended its July 27, 1992 
    application to apply for full program approval. The amended application 
    includes a description of the changes made to Wisconsin's MSWLF permit 
    program since the partial program approval.
        The USEPA has reviewed Wisconsin's amended application and has 
    determined that the State's MSWLF permit program will ensure compliance 
    with all portions of the revised Federal Criteria. Specifically, 
    Wisconsin has adequately addressed those portions of its MSWLF permit 
    program that were not approved in the partial determination of adequacy 
    in December 1992. In addition to those portions of the State's MSWLF 
    permit program that were approved on December 29, 1992, the US EPA has 
    determined that the State's revised MSWLF permit program will ensure 
    adequacy with the following portions of the Federal criteria:
        1. Location restrictions for fault areas, seismic impact zones, and 
    unstable areas in 40 CFR 258.13, 258.14, and 258.15.
        2. Operating requirements for the exclusion of hazardous waste, 
    explosive gas control, run-on/run-off control systems, and 
    recordkeeping in 40 CFR 258.20, 258.23, 258.26, and 258.29.
        3. Design requirements in 40 CFR 258.40(a).
        4. Field filtering provisions in 40 CFR 258.53(b).
        5. Detection and assessment groundwater monitoring parameters that 
    are consistent with the revised Federal Criteria in 40 CFR 258.54 and 
    258.55.
        6. Financial assurance requirements in 40 CFR 258.70(a).
    
    [[Page 59098]]
    
        As described in the December 29, 1992 partial program approval, 
    Wisconsin's MSWLF permit program has the authority to issue permits 
    that incorporate the requirements in the revised Federal MSWLF Criteria 
    to all MSWLFs in the State. In addition, Wisconsin's permit program 
    contains provisions for public participation, compliance monitoring, 
    and enforcement.
        The Wisconsin compliance monitoring program has the authority to 
    obtain information from a MSWLF facility, as well as the authority to 
    enter and inspect any MSWLF site or record pertaining to solid waste 
    management, to determine compliance. Wisconsin has mechanisms to verify 
    the accuracy of information submitted by a MSWLF facility to verify the 
    sampling methods used by a MSWLF facility, and to produce evidence 
    admissible in an enforcement proceeding. Wisconsin has the authority to 
    conduct monitoring or testing to ensure compliance. Wisconsin inspects 
    MSWLFs to verify and document compliance with solid waste regulations, 
    deter violations, and provide opportunities to inform and educate the 
    regulated community.
        Wisconsin has the authority to implement the following remedies for 
    violation of program requirements:
        1. Authority to restrain a person from conducting an activity that 
    may endanger or cause damage of human health or the environment;
        2. Authority to sue an individual who is violating provisions of 
    any statutes, regulations, orders, or permits that have been issued by 
    the State; and
        3. Authority to administratively assess penalties for violating 
    statutes, regulations, orders, or permits.
    
    C. Decision
    
        After reviewing the amended application, I conclude that 
    Wisconsin's application for full program adequacy determination meets 
    all of the statutory and regulatory requirements established by RCRA. 
    Accordingly, Wisconsin is granted a full program determination of 
    adequacy.
        Section 4005(a) of RCRA provides that citizens may use the citizen 
    suit provisions of Section 7002 of RCRA to enforce the revised Federal 
    MSWLF criteria in 40 CFR Part 258 independent of any State enforcement 
    program. As the USEPA explained in the preamble to the revised Federal 
    MSWLF Criteria, the USEPA expects that any owner or operator complying 
    with provisions in a State/Tribal program approved by the USEPA should 
    be considered to be in compliance with the revised Federal MSWLF 
    Criteria. See 56 FR 50978, 50995 (October 9, 1991).
        Today's action takes effect 60 days after the date of publication 
    if no adverse comments are received.
    
    Compliance With Executive Order 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this rule from the 
    requirements of section 6 of Executive Order 12866.
    
    Certification Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 605(b), I hereby certify 
    that this final approval will not have a significant economic impact on 
    a substantial number of small entities. It does not impose any new 
    burdens on small entities. This rule, therefore, does not require a 
    regulatory flexibility analysis.
    
    Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business 
    Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report 
    containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
    the House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the General 
    Accounting Office prior to publication of this rule in todays Federal 
    Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
    804(2).
    
        Authority: This notice is issued under the authority of Section 
    4005 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended; 42 U.S.C. 6946.
    
        Dated: October 28, 1996.
    Valdas V. Adamkus,
    Regional Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 96-29658 Filed 11-19-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/21/1997
Published:
11/20/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of final full program determination of adequacy on Wisconsin's application.
Document Number:
96-29658
Dates:
All comments on Wisconsin's application for a full determination of adequacy must be received by the U.S. EPA Region 5 by the close of business on December 20, 1996. The determination of adequacy for Wisconsin shall be effective on January 21, 1997 unless adverse comments are received. If adverse comments are received, a second Federal Register Notice will be published describing these comments and the US EPA's responses to the comments and decision on final adequacy.
Pages:
59096-59098 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5651-7
PDF File:
96-29658.pdf