94-28703. Accufilter International, Inc.; Notice and Order of Revocation of Registrations  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 223 (Monday, November 21, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-28703]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: November 21, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [OPP-66203; FRL-4915-2]
    
     
    
    Accufilter International, Inc.; Notice and Order of Revocation of 
    Registrations
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice; Notice and Order of Revocation of Registrations and 
    Final Determination Governing Sale and Use of Existing Stocks.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On November 6, 1992, EPA issued registrations for Accufilter 
    Straw, EPA Registration Number 64906-1, and Accufilter Sport Bottle, 
    EPA Registration Number 64906-2. These silver-activated carbon filters 
    are intended to remove the taste of chlorine and other sources of bad 
    taste, odor, and color from drinking water. These registrations were 
    based, in part, on receipt and review of water samples analyzed for 
    silver content. EPA has subsequently determined that the registrant did 
    not report the actual silver content in those water samples, but 
    instead submitted false information showing the silver values to be 
    lower than those actually obtained by the laboratory that conducted the 
    sampling. Registrations obtained through the submission of false data 
    are invalid for any purpose. By this notice, EPA announces and orders 
    the revocation of registrations 64906-1 and 64906-2. As a result of 
    these revocations, the sale, distribution, or use of existing stocks of 
    these water filters after November 21, 1994 would be unlawful.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: November 21, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Richard F. Mountfort, 
    Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office 
    location and telephone number: Rm. 713, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
    Arlington, VA 22202, 703-305-5446.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 6, 1992, EPA issued 
    registrations to Accuventure, Inc., Beaverton, OR, for the drinking 
    water filters Accufilter Straw, EPA Registration Number 64906-1, and 
    Accufilter Sport Bottle, EPA Registration Number 64906-2. The company 
    name was subsequently changed to Accufilter International, Inc., at the 
    Beaverton, OR, address.
        These registrations were for drinking water filters in which silver 
    was impregnated on activated carbon. The filters are intended to remove 
    sources of odors and taste from drinking water. Silver is an element, 
    and a secondary standard for silver in drinking water has been 
    established. Under provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act, a 
    secondary standard for a drinking water contaminant is not enforceble; 
    rather, it is established for aesthetic purposes. Exposure to silver 
    can cause argyria, a discoloration of skin or other tissues, which is 
    usually permanent. Although not a toxic response, it is an undesirable 
    cosmetic change.
        The registration applications for these filters include analyses of 
    water samples from tests utilizing these filters. The testing was 
    intended to reflect actual use conditions and included sufficient 
    flushing of the filters to represent use over varying portions of the 
    filter's useful life (new filters, 10%, 60%, 95% of filter life). 
    Twenty four (24) sample analyses were reported from the laboratory. EPA 
    has learned that in the testing performed by the laboratory and 
    reported to the registrant, 14 samples were at or exceeded 0.05 
    milligram/liter (mg/L) of silver in drinking water. At the time of 
    registration (1992) the secondary drinking water standard (maximum 
    contaminant level) for silver was 0.05 mg/L. (This standard has 
    subsequently been increased to 0.1 mg/L). When this report was 
    forwarded to EPA in support of the registration applications, all 14 
    values had been reduced below the standard. The original data suggest 
    that some of the filters may leak silver, that higher levels of silver 
    than reported occur in drinking water as a consequence of use of the 
    filters, and that quality control of the filters may be inadequate.
        This Notice has two parts: Part I describes the basis for the 
    revocation of registrations for Accufilter Straw and Accufilter Sport 
    Bottle; Part II describes the procedures which will be followed in 
    implementing the regulatory actions set forth in this notice, including 
    the treatment of existing stocks.
    
    I. Basis For Revocation
    
        The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 
    U.S.C. 135 et. seq., does not prescribe procedures to be used to revoke 
    a registration that has been obtained through a willful act of 
    misrepresenting data submitted in support of registration. In the 
    absence of such procedures, the termination of a license such as a 
    pesticide registration is governed by section 558 of the Administrative 
    Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 558. Section 558 states:
    
        Except in cases of willfulness or those in which public health, 
    interest, or safety requires otherwise, the withdrawal, suspension, 
    revocation, or annulment of a license is lawful only if, before the 
    institution of agency proceedings therefore, the licensee has been 
    given--
        (1) notice by the agency in writing of the facts or conduct 
    which may warrant the action; and
        (2) opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with all 
    lawful requirements.
    
    Courts have interpreted willfulness to mean ``an intentional misdeed or 
    such gross neglect of a known duty as to be the equivalent thereof.'' 
    Hutto Stockyard, Inc. v. USDA (903 F.2d 299, 304 (4th Cir. 1990) 
    (quoting Capitol Packing v. United States, 350 F.2d 67, 78-79 (10th 
    Cir. 1965); Capital Produce Co. v. United States, 930 F.2d 1077, 1079 
    (4th Cir. 1991). To establish willfulness, one need only show that an 
    act or failure to act was intentional, as opposed to accidental, and 
    proof of an evil motive is unnecessary. Emil Lawrence v. Commodity 
    Futures Trading Commission, 759 F.2d 767, 769 (9th Cir. 1985).
        In this case, the registrant submitted data which were changed from 
    the original, and did not reflect true results of the analyses of the 
    samples. The altered results suggested lower silver content in the 
    drinking water than actually occurred as a consequence of use of the 
    filters. This was an intentional act, not an accidental one; therefore, 
    it falls squarely within the definition of ``willful.'' Because the 
    registrations were obtained through misrepresentation and a willful 
    violation of the provisions of FIFRA, the registrations were not valid 
    when granted and section 558 does not require that EPA provide notice 
    to the registrant or an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve 
    compliance prior to revocation of the registration.
        Although not required in this case, the Agency did provide the 
    registrant written notice as well as an opportunity to respond to the 
    allegations against him. The registrant has responded that he did not 
    alter the data, but has not provided evidence to support his 
    contention. These procedures go beyond what is required by the APA in 
    cases of willful violations of law.
    
    II. Order
    
        This notice announces EPA's decision and order revoking 
    registrations for Accufilter Straw and Accufilter Sport Bottle. As a 
    consequence of this revocation, the sale, distribution, or use of any 
    existing stocks of either filter in the United States is unlawful. 
    Existing stocks are those currently in the United States and which have 
    been packaged, labeled, released for shipment, and/or distributed to 
    dealers, retailers, or other sellers.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures, 
    Agricultural commodities, Drinking water, Pesticides and pests, Records 
    and recordkeeping.
    
        Dated: November 8, 1994.
    
    Lynn R. Goldman,
    Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic 
    Substances.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-28703 Filed 11-18-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/21/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice; Notice and Order of Revocation of Registrations and Final Determination Governing Sale and Use of Existing Stocks.
Document Number:
94-28703
Dates:
November 21, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 21, 1994, OPP-66203, FRL-4915-2