97-30664. Reclamation Projects, Grant of Lands in Reclamation Townsites for School Purposes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 62266-62267]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-30664]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Bureau of Land Management
    
    43 CFR Part 2760
    
    RIN 1004-AC91
    
    
    Reclamation Projects, Grant of Lands in Reclamation Townsites for 
    School Purposes
    
    AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule removes the regulations on sales and grants of land 
    in reclamation townsites for reclamation projects and school purposes. 
    The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is removing these regulations 
    because they consist of outdated material and restatements of statutory 
    language. Consequently, the regulations are unnecessary and can be 
    removed without any significant effect.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: You may send inquiries or suggestions to: Director (630), 
    Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20240.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Holdren, Bureau of Land 
    Management, Lands and Realty Group, (202) 452-7779.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    II. Final Rule as Adopted
    III. Responses to Comments
    IV. Procedural Matters
    
    I. Background
    
        The existing regulations at 43 CFR part 2760 were written for BLM 
    to assist the Bureau of Reclamation in disposing of lands through 
    public sale or grants to townsites for school purposes. BLM is removing 
    these regulations because they are rarely used and contain no 
    applicable, substantive provisions beyond what is already in the 
    statutes.
        The final rule published today is a stage of a rulemaking process 
    that will conclude in the removal of the regulations in 43 CFR part 
    2760. This rule finalizes a proposed rule that was published on October 
    3, 1996, in the Federal Register at 61 FR 51666. The rule provided for 
    a comment period of 60 days, and BLM received no comments from the 
    public.
    
    II. Final Rule as Adopted
    
        This rule will remove the regulations at 43 CFR part 2760 in their 
    entirety. Subpart 2764 consists entirely of unnecessary material. 
    Sections 2764.1 and 2764.3 concern procedures the Commissioner of 
    Reclamation must follow when appraising and selling the lots at issue. 
    These provisions are derived from 43 U.S.C. 561-573, and merely inform 
    the public of the role assumed by the Bureau of Reclamation in this 
    program. The regulations are redundant because they repeat language in 
    43 U.S.C. 564, and for this reason, these two sections have no 
    substantive effect. The remaining sections of subpart 2764 are direct 
    restatements of statutory language: section 2764.2 repeats 43 U.S.C. 
    564-565, and section 2764.4 largely repeats 43 U.S.C. 566. Finally, the 
    last sentence of section 2764.4, the part which does not merely repeat 
    the statute, is outdated because it directs municipal corporations to 
    comply with a CFR section that no longer exists.
        Subpart 2765 consists of the filing procedures school districts 
    must follow when applying for a land grant for school purposes. These 
    regulations elaborate on the statutory provisions at 43 U.S.C. 570 
    authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to grant school districts
    
    [[Page 62267]]
    
    up to six acres from a reclamation townsite. BLM is removing these 
    regulations to give itself and the Bureau of Reclamation added 
    flexibility in processing the rare application for a school grant. 
    Rather than requiring the school district to submit the lengthy 
    requirements currently contained in section 2765.1, BLM will only ask 
    that an application be submitted which complies with any Bureau of 
    Reclamation requirements and is otherwise adequate to inform BLM of its 
    request. The substantive provisions currently contained in subpart 
    2765, such as the 6-acre limit and the reversion held by the United 
    States in the event the land is used for purposes other than a school, 
    are entirely contained in the statute at Sec. 570.
    
    III. Responses to Comments
    
        BLM received no comments from the public, and is therefore adopting 
    the proposed rule without changes.
    
    IV. Procedural Matters
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        BLM has determined that because this final rule only eliminates 
    provisions that have no impact on the public and no continued legal 
    relevance, it is categorically excluded from environmental review under 
    section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act, pursuant to 
    516 Departmental Manual (DM), Chapter 2, Appendix 1, Item 1.10. In 
    addition, this action does not meet any of the 10 criteria for 
    exceptions to categorical exclusions listed in 516 DM, Chapter 2, 
    Appendix 2. Pursuant to Council on Environmental Quality regulations 
    (40 CFR 1508.4) and the environmental policies and procedures of the 
    Department of the Interior, the term ``categorical exclusions'' means a 
    category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a 
    significant effect on the human environment and that have been found to 
    have no such effect in procedures adopted by a Federal agency and for 
    which neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact 
    statement is required.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This final rule does not contain information collection 
    requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must approve 
    under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 
    U.S.C. 601 et seq., to ensure that Government regulations do not 
    unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA 
    requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a 
    significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a 
    substantial number of small entities. BLM has determined under the RFA 
    that this final rule would not have a significant economic impact on 
    substantial number of small entities. As discussed above, the rule 
    merely removes unnecessary regulations and causes no change in status 
    or rights of any entities.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    
        Removal of 43 CFR part 2760 will not result in any unfunded mandate 
    to state, local or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the 
    private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year.
    
    Executive Order 12612
    
        The final rule will not have a substantial direct effect on the 
    States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
    States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
    various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive 
    Order 12612, BLM has determined that this final rule does not have 
    sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a 
    Federalism Assessment.
    
    Executive Order 12630
    
        The final rule does not represent a government action capable of 
    interfering with constitutionally protected property rights. Section 
    2(a)(1) of Executive Order 12630 specifically exempts actions 
    abolishing regulations or modifying regulations in a way that lessens 
    interference with private property use from the definition of 
    ``policies that have takings implications.'' Since the primary function 
    of the final rule is to abolish unnecessary regulations, there will be 
    no private property rights impaired as a result. Therefore, BLM has 
    determined that the rule would not cause a taking of private property, 
    or require further discussion of takings implications under this 
    Executive Order.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        According to the criteria listed in section 3(f) of Executive Order 
    12866, BLM has determined that the final rule is not a significant 
    regulatory action. As such, the final rule is not subject to Office of 
    Management and Budget review under section 6(a)(3) of the order.
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule meets 
    the applicable standards provided in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 
    Executive Order 12988.
        Author: The principal author of this rule is Erica Petacchi, 
    Regulatory Management Group, Bureau of Land Management, 401LS, 1849 C 
    Street, NW, Washington, DC 20240; Telephone (202) 452-5084.
    
    List of Subjects for 43 CFR Part 2760
    
        Public lands--sale, Reclamation, Schools.
    
        For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of 
    43 U.S.C. 1740, part 2760 of Group 2700, Subchapter C, Chapter II of 
    Title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations is removed.
    
        Dated: November 4, 1997.
    Sylvia V. Baca,
    Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
    [FR Doc. 97-30664 Filed 11-20-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/22/1997
Published:
11/21/1997
Department:
Land Management Bureau
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-30664
Dates:
December 22, 1997.
Pages:
62266-62267 (2 pages)
RINs:
1004-AC91: Reclamation/Townsites
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1004-AC91/reclamation-townsites
PDF File:
97-30664.pdf
CFR: (1)
43 CFR 2760