98-31217. Pathfinder Mines Corporation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 225 (Monday, November 23, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 64740-64741]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-31217]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 40-6622]
    
    
    Pathfinder Mines Corporation
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final Finding of No Significant Impact Notice of Opportunity 
    for Hearing.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission (NRC) proposes to amend NRC Source Material License SUA-442 
    to authorize Pathfinder Mines Corporation (PMC) to reclaim the Shirley 
    Basin uranium mill site located in Carbon County, Wyoming. This license 
    currently authorizes PMC to possess byproduct material in the form of 
    uranium waste tailings generated by the licensee's milling operations 
    at the site. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was performed by the NRC 
    staff in support of its review of PMC's license amendment request, in 
    accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 51. The conclusion of 
    the Environmental Assessment is a Finding of No Significant Impact 
    (FONSI) for the proposed licensing action of approval of a reclamation 
    plan.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The PMC's Shirley Basin facility is licensed by the NRC under 
    Source Material License SUA-442 to possess byproduct material in the 
    form of uranium waste tailings generated by the licensee's milling 
    operations. Uranium milling started at the Shirley Basin site in 1971, 
    and continued until 1992. A total of 8,564,130 tons of ore was milled 
    using a conventional acid leaching process. The mill has been 
    dismantled, windblown tailings have been retrieved and placed on the 
    tailings pile, and placement of the interim cover to decrease the 
    potential for tailings dispersal and erosion has been completed. Based 
    on its review of PMC's mill decommissioning plan and its supplemental 
    environmental report, the NRC staff had prepared a supplemental 
    environmental assessment in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 
    Part 51, and published in the Federal Register on April 3, 1996, the 
    conclusion of the assessment. The conclusion was a FONSI. The current 
    site activities include surface reclamation and continuation of the 
    ground water corrective action program.
        PMC submitted a reclamation plan by its letter dated May 22, 1996, 
    and provided additional information by subsequent submittals. The 
    reclamation of the site consists of stabilizing the tailings for at 
    least 1,000 yrs and ensuring that the radon emanation from the tailings 
    pile will not exceed 20 pCi/m 2/s. The tailings pile will 
    incorporate excavated materials from other areas that are contaminated 
    above the release limit. The reclamation plan requires consolidation 
    and movement of all the contaminated materials from the processing area 
    to the tailing piles.
    
    Summary of the Environmental Assessment
    
        The NRC staff performed an appraisal of the environmental impacts 
    associated with the reclamation plan for the Shirley Basin site, in 
    accordance with 10 CFR Part 51, Licensing and Regulatory Policy 
    Procedures for Environmental Protection. The license amendment would 
    authorize PMC to stabilize and cover the tailings as proposed. In 
    conducting its appraisal, the NRC staff considered the following 
    information: (1) PMC's 1996 license amendment request, and PMC's 
    subsequent submittals providing additional information; (2) previous 
    environmental evaluations of the facility; (3) data contained in the 
    required environmental monitoring reports; (4) existing license 
    conditions; (5) results of NRC staff site visits and inspections of the 
    facility; and (6) consultations with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
    Service, and the Wyoming State Historic Preservation Officer. The 
    technical aspects of the reclamation plan will be discussed separately 
    in a Technical Evaluation Report (TER) that will accompany the final 
    agency licensing action.
        The results of the staff's appraisal are documented in an EA placed 
    in the docket file. Based on its review, the NRC staff has concluded 
    that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the 
    proposed action.
    
    Conclusions
    
        The NRC staff has examined actual and potential impacts associated 
    with
    
    [[Page 64741]]
    
    the reclamation of the Shirley Basin site, and has determined that the 
    requested amendment of Source Material License SUA-442, authorizing 
    implementation of the reclamation plan, will not have long-term 
    detrimental impacts on the environment. The following statements 
    summarize the conclusions resulting from the staff's environmental 
    assessment, and support the FONSI:
        (1) An acceptable environmental and effluent monitoring program is 
    in place to monitor effluent releases and to detect if applicable 
    regulatory limits are exceeded. Radiological effluents from facility 
    operations have been and are expected to remain below the regulatory 
    limits;
        (2) Present and potential risks of environmental damage from the 
    proposed reclamation were assessed. Given the remote location, limited 
    activities requested, small area of impact, and past activities on the 
    site, the staff determined that the risk factors for environmental 
    hazards are insignificant.
        Because the staff has determined that there will be no significant 
    impacts associated with approval of the license amendment, there can be 
    no disproportionally high and adverse effects or impacts on minority 
    and low-income populations. Consequently, further evaluation of 
    Environmental Justice concerns, as outlined in Executive Order 12898 
    and NRC's Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Policy and 
    Procedures Letter 1-50, Revision 1, is not warranted.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is to amend NRC Source Material License SUA-
    442, for reclamation of the Shirley Basin site, as requested by PMC. 
    Therefore, the principal alternatives available to NRC are to:
        (1) Approve the license amendment request as submitted; or
        (2) Amend the license with such additional conditions as are 
    considered necessary or appropriate to protect public health and safety 
    and the environment; or
        (3) Deny the amendment request.
        Based on its review, the NRC staff has concluded that the 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action do not 
    warrant either the limiting of PMC's future operations or the denial of 
    the license amendment. Additionally, in the TER for this action, the 
    staff will document its evaluation of the licensee's proposed action 
    with respect to the criteria for reclamation, specified in 10 CFR Part 
    40, Appendix A. Therefore, the staff considers that Alternative 1 is 
    the appropriate alternative for selection.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The NRC staff has prepared an EA for the proposed amendment of 
    Source Material License SUA-442. On the basis of this assessment, the 
    NRC staff has concluded that the environmental impacts that may result 
    from the proposed action would not be significant, and therefore, 
    preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not warranted.
        The EA and other documents related to this proposed action are 
    available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document 
    Room, in the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street N.W., Washington, DC 20555.
    
    Notice of Opportunity for Hearing
    
        The NRC hereby provides notice that this is a proceeding on an 
    application for a licensing action falling within the scope of Subpart 
    L, ``Informal Hearing Procedures for Adjudications in Materials and 
    Operators Licensing Proceedings,'' of the Commission's Rules of 
    Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings and Issuance of Orders in 
    10 CFR Part 2 (54 FR 8269). Pursuant to Sec. 2.1205(a), any person 
    whose interest may be affected by this proceeding may file a request 
    for a hearing. In accordance with Sec. 2.1205(c), a request for a 
    hearing must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of 
    publication of this Federal Register notice. The request for a hearing 
    must be filed with the Office of the Secretary either:
        (1) By delivery to the Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff of the 
    Office of the Secretary at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
    Rockville, MD 20852; or
        (2) By mail or telegram addressed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Rulemakings and 
    Adjudications Staff.
        Each request for a hearing must also be served, by delivering it 
    personally or by mail to:
        (1) The applicant, Pathfinder Mines Corporation, 935 Pendell 
    Boulevard, P.O. Box 730, Mills, Wyoming 82644, Attention: Tom 
    Hardgrove; and
        (2) The NRC staff, by delivery to the Executive Director of 
    Operations, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
    20852, or by mail addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, 
    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
        In addition to meeting other applicable requirements of 10 CFR Part 
    2 of the Commission's regulations, a request for a hearing filed by a 
    person other than an applicant must describe in detail:
        (1) The interest of the requestor in the proceeding;
        (2) How that interest may be affected by the results of the 
    proceeding, including the reasons why the requestor should be permitted 
    a hearing, with particular reference to the factors set out in 
    Sec. 2.1205(g);
        (3) The requestor's areas of concern about the licensing activity 
    that is the subject matter of the proceeding; and
        (4) The circumstances establishing that the request for a hearing 
    is timely in accordance with Sec. 2.1205(c).
        The request must also set forth the specific aspect or aspects of 
    the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes a 
    hearing.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mohammad Haque, Uranium Recovery 
    Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety 
    and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop T7-J9, 
    Washington, D.C. 20555. Telephone 301/415-6640.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of November 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Joseph J. Holonich,
    Chief, Uranium Recovery Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of 
    Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
    [FR Doc. 98-31217 Filed 11-20-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/23/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Final Finding of No Significant Impact Notice of Opportunity for Hearing.
Document Number:
98-31217
Pages:
64740-64741 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 40-6622
PDF File:
98-31217.pdf
CFR: (1)
10 CFR 2.1205(g)