99-30453. Natchiq, Inc., Anchorage, AK, et al.; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 65729-65730]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-30453]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    
    Employment and Training Administration
    [TA-W-35,893, et al.]
    
    
    Natchiq, Inc., Anchorage, AK, et al.; Notice of Negative 
    Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
    
        By application dated September 9, 1999, a company official (the 
    petitioner) requested administrative reconsideration of the 
    Department's negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for 
    Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former 
    workers of Natchiq, Incorporated and Alaska Petroleum Contractors, both 
    companies with locations in Anchorage, Alaska and Houston, Texas. The 
    denial notice was signed on July 26, 1999 and published in the Federal 
    Register, on August 11, 1999 (64 FR 43723).
        Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
    the following circumstances:
        (1) It it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
    that the determination complained of was erroneous;
        (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
    a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
        (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
    misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
    the decision.
        The petitioner states that perhaps the TAA petition was filed 
    prematurely, and provided employment date for May through August 1998 
    and May through August 1999; revenues for May through August 1998 and 
    May through August 1999 as well as the forecast revenues for the full 
    year 1999.
        The petitioner states that while hundreds of workers were being 
    laid off due to capital expenditure cuts, they were hiring a 
    significant number of employees for a one-year project. That resulted 
    in the revenues and employment numbers being skewed.
        The petitioner adds that the workers at Natchiq perform all 
    executive and administrative service functions for their entities, 
    including Alaska Petroleum Contractors. The workers at Alaska Petroleum 
    Contractors include construction, fabrication, maintenance, and project 
    management personnel, including general labor, welders, pipefitters, 
    ironworkers, and clerical for oil industry clients.
        The petition filed with the Department by the company on behalf of 
    workers of the subject firms was dated March 8, 1999. The petition 
    investigation for Natchiq, Incorporated and Alaska Petroleum 
    Contractors was conducted for full years 1997 and 1998, and the partial 
    year period of January through April for 1998 and 1999. Upon receipt of 
    the petition, the Department is required to examine the criteria for 
    certification for the representative base period consisting of the four 
    quarters immediately preceding the date of the petition. Therefore, the 
    Department could not conduct its investigation for a period ending 
    August 1999 when the petition was dated March 1999.
        The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers of Natchiq, 
    Incorporated, Anchorage, Alaska and Houston, Texas was denied because 
    the workers provided a service and did not produce an article within 
    the meaning of Section 222(3) of the worker group eligibility 
    requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
        The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers of Alaska Petroleum 
    Contractors, Anchorage, Alaska and Houston, Texas was denied because 
    criteria (1) and (2) of the worker group eligibility requirements of 
    Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended were not met. Revenues 
    and employment increased during the relevant time period.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After review of the application investigative findings, I conclude 
    that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the 
    facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's 
    prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
    
    
    [[Page 65730]]
    
    
        Signed at Washington, DC this 10th day of November, 1999.
    Grant D. Beale,
    Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
    [FR Doc. 99-30453 Filed 11-22-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/23/1999
Department:
Employment and Training Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-30453
Pages:
65729-65730 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
TA-W-35,893, et al.
PDF File:
99-30453.pdf