99-30521. Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 65666-65668]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-30521]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-CE-64-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-12 and 
    PC-12/45 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to certain Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Models 
    PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes. The proposed AD would require replacing 
    the stick pusher capstan and the stick pusher servo with parts of 
    improved design. The proposed AD is the result of mandatory continuing 
    airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority 
    for Switzerland. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended 
    to prevent improper operation of the stick pusher system caused by the 
    existing design configuration, which could result in loss of control of 
    the airplane during a stall.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 23, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-CE-64-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas 
    City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans, 
    Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 63 19; facsimile: +41 41 610 33 51. 
    This information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the 
    address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roman T. Gabrys, Aerospace 
    Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas 
    City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4141; facsimile: (816) 329-
    4090.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 99-CE-64-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: 
    Rules Docket No. 99-CE-64-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, 
    Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Federal Office for Civil Aviation (FOCA), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for Switzerland, recently notified the FAA that 
    an unsafe condition may exist on certain Pilatus Models PC-12 and PC-
    12/45 airplanes. The FOCA of Switzerland reports high tolerances found 
    in the current stick pusher system design. These tolerances were found 
    during Pilatus's follow-on testing of the Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 
    airplanes.
        The stick pusher system is incorporated to meet certification stall 
    requirements. Higher tolerances can lead to a higher control column 
    force than was provided for during the original design of the aircraft. 
    Higher control forces will not allow the stick pusher system to operate 
    properly in preventing a stall. This condition, if not corrected in a 
    timely manner, could result in loss of control of the airplane during a 
    stall.
    
    [[Page 65667]]
    
    Relevant Service Information
    
        Pilatus has issued Service Bulletin No. 22-003, dated June 24, 
    1999, which specifies replacing the stick pusher capstan and the stick 
    pusher servo with parts of improved design. The procedures to 
    accomplish these actions are included in the applicable maintenance 
    manual.
        The FOCA of Switzerland classified this service bulletin as 
    mandatory and issued Swiss AD HB 99-406, dated August 16, 1999, in 
    order to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in 
    Switzerland.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in Switzerland and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the FOCA of Switzerland has kept the 
    FAA informed of the situation described above.
        The FAA has examined the findings of the FOCA of Switzerland; 
    reviewed all available information, including the service information 
    referenced above; and determined that AD action is necessary for 
    products of this type design that are certificated for operation in the 
    United States.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Pilatus PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes of the 
    same type design registered in the United States, the FAA is proposing 
    AD action. The proposed AD would require replacing the stick pusher 
    capstan and the stick pusher servo with parts of improved design. 
    Accomplishment of the proposed action would be required in accordance 
    with the applicable maintenance manual, as specified in Pilatus Service 
    Bulletin No. 22-003, dated June 24, 1999.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 69 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 8 
    workhours per airplane to accomplish the proposed action, and that the 
    average labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Pilatus will provide 
    parts free of charge until March 2000. Based on these figures, the 
    total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to 
    be $33,120, or $480 per airplane.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The proposed rule does not have Federalism implications as defined 
    in Exectutive Order No. 13132. This means it would not have substantial 
    direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. The FAA has 
    not consulted with state authorities prior to publication of this 
    proposed rule.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. 99-CE-64-AD.
    
        Applicability: Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes, manufacturer 
    serial number (MSN) 101 through MSN 180, certificated in any 
    category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated in the body of this AD, unless 
    already accomplished.
        To prevent improper operation of the stick pusher system caused 
    by the existing design configuration, which could result in the loss 
    of control of the airplane during a stall, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within the next 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the 
    effective date of this AD, replace the stick pusher capstan and 
    stick pusher servo with parts of improved design, in accordance with 
    the applicable maintenance manual, as specified in Pilatus Service 
    Bulletin No. 22-003, dated June 24, 1999. The new part numbers (P/N) 
    are as follows:
        (1) Stick Pusher Capstan: P/N 978.61.11.124 (or FAA-approved 
    equivalent part number); and
        (2) Stick Pusher Servo: P/N 978.61.11.103 (or FAA-approved 
    equivalent part number).
        (b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, 
    on any of the affected airplanes, a stick pusher capstan or stick 
    pusher servo that is not of the part number specified in paragraphs 
    (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, respectively.
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance times that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 
    Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. The request shall be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane 
    Directorate.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
    
        (e) Questions or technical information related to Pilatus 
    Service Bulletin No. 22-003, dated June 24, 1999, should be directed 
    to Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans, 
    Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 63 19; facsimile: +41 41 610 33 
    51. This service information may be examined at the FAA, Central 
    Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas 
    City, Missouri 64106.
    
        Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in Swiss AD HB 99-
    406, dated August 16, 1999.
    
    
    [[Page 65668]]
    
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 15, 1999.
    Marvin R. Nuss,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-30521 Filed 11-22-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/23/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-30521
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before December 23, 1999.
Pages:
65666-65668 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-CE-64-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-30521.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13