95-28535. Summer Flounder Fishery; Amendment 7  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 57955-57957]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-28535]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    
    50 CFR Part 625
    
    [Docket No. 95-0822210-5265-02; I.D. 081195A]
    RIN 0648-AH94
    
    
    Summer Flounder Fishery; Amendment 7
    
    AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to implement Amendment 7 to the 
    Fishery Management Plan for the Summer Flounder Fishery. This amendment 
    revises the fishing mortality rate reduction schedule for summer 
    flounder, by extending for 2 years the time at which the final fishing 
    mortality rate goal is reached. The rule continues the rebuilding of 
    summer flounder stock abundance under a schedule that reduces short-
    term economic losses for participants in the fishery.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of Amendment 7, the environmental assessment, the 
    regulatory impact review (RIR), and final regulatory flexibility 
    analysis (FRFA) are available from David R. Keifer, Executive Director, 
    Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Room 2115, Federal Building, 
    300 S. New Street, Dover, DE 19901-6790.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina L. Spallone, Fishery Policy 
    Analyst, 508-281-9221.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Amendment 7 was prepared by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
    Council (Council) in consultation with the Atlantic States Marine 
    Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) and the New England and South Atlantic 
    Fishery Management Councils. A proposed rule to implement the amendment 
    was published in the Federal Register on September 5, 1995 (60 FR 
    46105). The amendment revises management of the summer flounder 
    (Paralichthys dentatus) fishery pursuant to the Magnuson Fishery 
    Conservation and Management Act, as amended (Magnuson Act).
        Background concerning the development of the management measures 
    contained in Amendment 7 and the reasons they were adopted by 
    
    [[Page 57956]]
    the Council were provided in the preamble of the proposed rule and are 
    not repeated here.
        NMFS approved Amendment 7, which revises the target fishing 
    mortality rate (F) reduction schedule to allow for more stable landings 
    from 1 year to the next. The amendment will reduce short-term economic 
    burdens on the industry, yet slow the rate of stock rebuilding only 
    slightly. The revised schedule for the fishing mortality rate 
    reductions requires a reduction from the 1995 target (F = 0.53) to 0.41 
    in 1996, 0.3 in 1997, and Fmax (0.23) in 1998 and beyond. In 
    addition, this rule specifies that the quota for 1996 and 1997 may not 
    exceed 18.51 million lb (8,396 mt). This cap on the quota could result 
    in an F in 1996 and 1997 that is lower than 0.41 and 0.3, respectively, 
    but could not exceed these values. A quota level above the cap could be 
    set in 1996 or 1997, but only if the resulting quota had an associated 
    F of 0.23.
        Data from the updated stock assessment for summer flounder for 1995 
    from the 20th Stock Assessment Workshop (SAW) indicate that the stock 
    is in better condition than it appeared in 1994. A strong year class in 
    1994 will allow a more rapid rebuilding of the spawning stock biomass 
    while allowing moderate amounts of catch. As a result, the revised 
    rebuilding strategy will provide some short-term relief to the industry 
    without seriously compromising conservation.
    
    Comments and Responses
    
        Six comments were received from industry associations, state 
    agencies, conservationist organizations, and various individuals in 
    favor of the amendment. Five of those commenters opposed the 18.51 
    million lb (8,396 mt) quota cap. The Center for Marine Conservation 
    (CMC) commented that they oppose the amendment.
        Comment: The State of North Carolina supports the amendment because 
    it strikes a balance between achieving the necessary fishing mortality 
    reduction, alleviating economic hardship on the fishing industry, and 
    lending stability to the fishery.
        Response: NMFS agrees with this assessment.
        Comment: The East Coast Fisheries Federation, the United National 
    Fishermen's Association, the Seafarers International Union (SIU), Jones 
    Inlet Packing Co., and the North Carolina Fisheries Association all 
    support the amendment's reevaluation of the fishing mortality reduction 
    schedule, but do not support the 18.51 million lb (8,396 mt) cap on the 
    quota in 1996-97. Several commenters question the selection of 18.51 
    million lb (8,396 mt) as the cap value, and SIU notes that the cap 
    value would be higher if new stock assessment information were used. 
    One commenter added that 18.51 million lb (8,396 mt) should be set as 
    the minimum quota level, rather than the maximum.
        Response: The Council established the cap as a mechanism to provide 
    the industry with stable and predictable landings over time, while 
    still ensuring attainment of the target fishing mortality rate in 1998. 
    The cap may be exceeded if the quota specified has an associated F of 
    0.23, that is, attains Fmax prior to 1998.
        The Council and ASMFC are aware that if the summer flounder stock 
    size is larger than projected by the assessment, a cap of 18.51 million 
    lb (8,396 mt) could result in an associated F that is lower than the 
    targets established for 1996 and 1997. If good recruitment occurs in 
    1994, 1995, and 1996, and if the target F is reached in 1995 (0.53), 
    the cap could result in a F of 0.23 as early as 1997. The Council 
    established the cap with the intent that under these circumstances, 
    quotas constrained by the cap will accelerate recovery of the summer 
    flounder stock. This ``banking'' of fish will ensure that stock sizes 
    will be large enough the following years to support stable quota levels 
    even in the event of lower than expected recruitment.
        The 18.51 million lb (8,396 mt) value was calculated during the 
    development of Amendment 7 when the Council examined an alternative 
    that called for a constant quota for the years 1996 through 1998 that 
    will result in Fmax (0.23) in 1998. This projection of 18.51 
    million lb (8,396 mt) was based on the best scientific information 
    available at the time, the results of the 1994 summer flounder stock 
    assessment. The Council realized that spawning stock biomass for summer 
    flounder might increase after adoption of the cap, and the value chosen 
    reflects its intention to better ensure that its final fishing 
    mortality rate goal is reached by 1998, rather than sometime 
    thereafter. According to guidelines of the national standards (50 CFR 
    part 602), the Council is entitled to bring the development of an 
    amendment to closure for submission purposes, even though new 
    information will become available in the future.
        The establishment of 18.51 million lb (8,396 mt) as a minimum quota 
    level would be inconsistent with the use of target fishing mortality 
    rates to achieve stock rebuilding. By setting a minimum quota level, 
    the Council, in its recommendations, would be unable to address such 
    circumstances as poor recruitment.
        Comment: The SIU comments that there should be no cap on quota in 
    1996 or 1997 because the fishery is an alternative source of income for 
    Georges Bank groundfish vessels, which face impending new restrictions.
        Response: The quotas proposed through this amendment are designed 
    to continue rebuilding the stock of summer flounder while moderating 
    negative impacts on the industry. The Council has presented a plan to 
    balance the biological and economic impacts of summer flounder 
    management measures. While it is apparent that the Northeast 
    multispecies fishery faces additional future restrictions, those 
    vessels that qualified for the summer flounder moratorium permit will 
    have to continue to share the burdens of the rebuilding plan for summer 
    flounder. They will also share the future benefits of increased 
    harvests from a recovered stock.
        Comment: The East Coast Fisheries Federation comments that a higher 
    quota would result in fewer discards rather than an increased mortality 
    rate. They argue that many fish are discarded, not because they are 
    undersized, but due to state quota management measures such as trip 
    limits.
        Response: NMFS agrees that state quota management measures may 
    result in discard of fish larger than the minimum size. However, it 
    does not follow that a higher quota would result in no increase in the 
    overall mortality rate. Commercial landings represent the largest 
    component of summer flounder mortality. The advisory report issued by 
    the 20th Stock Assessment Workshop includes mean estimates of the 
    components of the total catch (landings and discards) for the period 
    1982-94. Commercial discards represent 8 percent of the total while 
    commercial landings represent 59 percent of the total (the remainder is 
    recreational catch and discard). As the stock rebuilds, the number of 
    larger, older fish in the population will increase and the fishery will 
    become less dependent on younger, smaller fish. At that point, the 
    contribution of discards to overall mortality would decrease.
        Comment: The CMC opposes the amendment, stating that the relaxation 
    of the mortality rate reduction schedule would serve to prolong 
    overfishing, and risk undoing the stock benefits achieved by the 
    existing management regime. CMC feels that, instead, improvements 
    should be made in compliance, enforcement and data collection, as well 
    
    [[Page 57957]]
    as in the reduction of bycatch and mortality on small fish.
        Response: While a relaxation of the mortality rate reduction 
    schedule will slow the rate of stock rebuilding, projections indicate 
    that the slowdown will be slight. In general, the total landing for all 
    years (1996-2000) is nearly identical for all the alternatives. The 
    difference between the options contained in the amendment is in how the 
    landings are allocated over the 5 year time period. A postponement in 
    the reduction to Fmax (i.e., F greater than 0.23 in 1996 and 1997) 
    will result in an increase in near term landings at the expense of 
    future landings. The adopted option contained in this amendment (Option 
    5B) produces the most stable landings pattern with landings ranging 
    from 18.5 to 26.7 million lb over the period. An alterative considered 
    but not adopted (Option 1) would have resulted in the largest 
    variability in landings from 1 year to the next with a 50 percent 
    decline from 1995 to 1996 followed by a 50 percent increase from 1996 
    to 1997.
        While the rate of spawning stock biomass (SSB) increase is slowed 
    under Amendment 7, the rate of growth differs only slightly during any 
    1 year, and is ultimately statistically insignificant. The stock 
    assessment indicates that as SSB rises, so does recruitment. Good 
    levels of recruitment are associated with SSB levels in excess of 33 
    million lb (14,968 mt). The analysis associated with this amendment 
    indicates an estimated SSB above 45 million lb (20,412 mt) in 1996, 
    indicating that the risk of recruitment failure is minimal. As the 
    stock rebuilds and the age structure becomes more evenly distributed, 
    the fishery will become less dependent on new recruits and the 
    likelihood of poor recruitment and stock collapse will become 
    increasingly remote.
    
    Classification
    
        The Director, Northeast Region, NMFS, determined that Amendment 7 
    is necessary for the conservation and management of the summer flounder 
    fishery and that it is consistent with the Magnuson Act and other 
    applicable laws.
        This final rule has been determined to be not significant for 
    purposes of E.O. 12866.
        NMFS prepared an FRFA as part of the RIR. A copy of this analysis 
    is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 625
    
        Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: November 14, 1995.
    Gary Matlock,
    Program Management Officer, National Marine Fisheries Service.
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 625 is amended 
    as follows:
    
    PART 625--SUMMER FLOUNDER FISHERY
    
        1. The authority citation for part 625 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
    
        2. In Sec. 625.20, paragraph (a) introductory text is revised to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 625.20  Catch quotas and other restrictions.
    
        (a) Annual review. The Summer Flounder Monitoring Committee will 
    review the following data on or before August 15 of each year to 
    determine the allowable levels of fishing and other restrictions 
    necessary to achieve a fishing mortality rate (F) of 0.53 in 1993 
    through 1995, 0.41 in 1996, 0.30 in 1997, and 0.23 in 1998 and 
    thereafter, provided the allowable levels of fishing in 1996 and 1997 
    may not exceed 18.51 million lb (8,396 mt), unless such fishing levels 
    have an associated F of 0.23:
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 95-28535 Filed 11-22-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/22/1995
Published:
11/24/1995
Department:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-28535
Dates:
December 22, 1995.
Pages:
57955-57957 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-0822210-5265-02, I.D. 081195A
RINs:
0648-AH94: Proposed Rule; Amendment 7 to the Summer Flounder Fishery Management Plan
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0648-AH94/proposed-rule-amendment-7-to-the-summer-flounder-fishery-management-plan
PDF File:
95-28535.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 625.20