95-28700. Advisory; Customer Orders  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 226 (Friday, November 24, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 58047-58048]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-28700]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
    
    
    Advisory; Customer Orders
    
    AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
    
    ACTION: Advisory.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``Commission'') is 
    issuing an Advisory concerning customer orders transmitted to and 
    reported from exchange trading pits in an extremely rapid manner. The 
    purpose of this Advisory is to inform the exchanges that, for such 
    orders, an exchange will be deemed to have demonstrated good faith 
    towards meeting the objectives of Section 5a(b)(3) of the Commodity 
    Exchange Act (``Act''), provided that certain recordkeeping and 
    enforcement provisions are met.
    
    DATES: The Advisory is to be effective January 23, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    De' Ana H. Dow, Special Counsel, or Rachel F. Berdansky, Attorney/
    Advisor, Division of Trading and Markets, Commodity Futures Trading 
    Commission, 2033 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20581. Telephone: 
    (202) 418-5490.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The Commission is hereby issuing guidance concerning all customer 
    orders that are transmitted to and reported from the trading pit in an 
    extremely rapid manner through hand signals or verbally (``flashed 
    orders''). An exchange must satisfy the standards set forth in this 
    Advisory to demonstrate compliance with Commission Regulation 1.35(a-
    1)(2)(i) and 1.35(a-1)(4), as well as good faith compliance with 
    Section 5a(b)(3).
        Commission Regulation 1.35(a-1)(2) (i) and 1.35(a-1)(4) provides 
    that order tickets, among other things, must be timed upon receipt on 
    the trading floor (``entry time'') and when the execution price is 
    reported from the floor (``exit time''). Section 5a(b)(3) of the Act 
    sets forth heightened audit trail standards, including a heightened 
    audit trail for customer orders. The enhanced standards go into effect 
    in October 1995, in accordance with the terms thereof.
        The Commission has taken several steps with respect to 
    implementation of Section 5a(b)(3) of the Act. Specifically, the 
    Commission issued a Report to Congress on Futures Exchange Audit Trails 
    that assessed the progress of each exchange in complying with current 
    and future audit trail requirements, and 
    
    [[Page 58048]]
    stated that improvements to existing audit trail systems could 
    demonstrate good faith efforts to comply with enhanced audit trail 
    requirements. The Commission also has completed comprehensive testing 
    on four large exchanges to determine, among other things, the status of 
    their audit trails towards meeting the enhanced trade timing and 
    sequencing standards. Based on the test results, each of those 
    exchanges has been informed as to the specific actions that would be 
    needed to demonstrate good faith towards meeting Section 5a(b)(3). In 
    addition, the Commission evaluates exchange systems on a routine basis 
    when conducting rule enforcement reviews. As mandated by Section 
    5a(b)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, the Commission is in the process of 
    exempting from the requirements of Section 5a(b)(3), small exchanges 
    that have effective trade monitoring systems.
        This Advisory on flashed orders is a further step towards achieving 
    exchange compliance with existing statutory and regulatory 
    requirements. The Commission is concerned that the exchanges sometimes 
    are not adequately enforcing the requirements with respect to flashed 
    orders. Among other things, Commission staff has identified instances 
    in which an entry timestamp apparently was recorded after an order was 
    flashed, resulting in an inconsistency between the order ticket 
    timestamp and the pertinent time and sales print. Such action is a 
    direct violation of Commission Regulation 1.35(a-1)(2)(i), which 
    specifically requires that an entry timestamp be recorded on an order 
    ticket before the order is flashed to a broker.
    
    II. Current Flashed Order Practices
    
        The Commission has observed that the precise mechanics involved in 
    flashing orders vary from firm to firm and exchange to exchange. For 
    example, in Chicago, where flashing is most common, flashed orders 
    usually are transmitted to the floor broker by hand-signal.\1\ In New 
    York, most flashed orders are transmitted through verbal communication. 
    There is also some variation in how exchanges define flashed orders. 
    Specifically, one exchange considers all orders hand-signalled into a 
    trading pit to be flashed orders, while another exchange considers only 
    those orders that are hand-signalled into the trading pit immediately 
    upon receipt at the trading desk to be flashed orders. Further, not all 
    exchanges currently have recordkeeping procedures to distinguish 
    flashed orders from other paper orders for audit trail purposes.
    
        \1\ Flashing is most prevalent in the Chicago financial markets 
    because of the need for instantaneous trade execution. Trading in 
    the financial markets on the Chicago exchanges comprises 67 percent 
    of all trading volume in the United States and 49 percent of all 
    world volume. The CBT has stated that nearly 100 percent of the 
    customer orders executed in its financial markets are flashed to the 
    broker. Similarly, the CME estimates that 80-100 percent of the 
    customer orders in its interest rate markets and 60-80 percent of 
    customer orders in its currency markets are flashed.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In the recent notification by the Commission to the CBT and CME 
    concerning the audit trail test results, the Commission recommended, 
    among other things, that each Exchange require a trade submission 
    indicator for flashed orders. Both Exchanges now require clearing firms 
    to enter a special indicator into the clearing system for flashed 
    orders. The Commission also recommended that the Exchanges aggressively 
    enforce timestamping procedures for flashed orders. The Commission has 
    not made similar recordkeeping or enforcement recommendations for the 
    New York exchanges, where flashed orders are much less common. However, 
    because of the Commission's concern that the exchanges are not always 
    rigorously enforcing existing timestamp requirements for flashed 
    orders, the Commission is setting forth in this Advisory its 
    interpretation of relevant audit trail requirements and its 
    expectations for all exchanges subject to Section 5a(b)(3) of the Act.
    
    III. Standards for Flashed Orders to Comply With the Objectives of 
    Section 5a(b)(3) of the Act
    
        Any exchange subject to Section 5a(b)(3) of the Act, seeking to 
    have its audit trail deemed in good faith compliance with Section 
    5a(b)(3), must assure compliance with the following standards:
        (1) In accordance with Commission Regulation 1.35(a-1)(2)(i), an 
    entry timestamp must be recorded on an order ticket before an order is 
    flashed into a trading pit.
        (2) In accordance with Commission regulation 1.35(a-1)(4), upon 
    report of an order fill from the trading pit, an exit timestamp must be 
    immediately recorded on the corresponding order ticket.
        (3) Each flashed order must be identified as a flashed order on the 
    corresponding order ticket. Identification of these orders will 
    distinguish them from other paper orders and improve the audit trail 
    for flashed orders.\2\
    
        \2\ The Commission believes that identification of flashed 
    orders on the trade register required under Commission Regulation 
    1.35(e) would further enhance the audit trail and exchange trade 
    surveillance, and thus, should be a goal of all exchanges subject to 
    Section 5a(b)(3) of the Act.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (4) Maintain effective surveillance and enforcement procedures, 
    including without limitation, floor surveillance, periodic review of 
    trading documents, and disciplinary action as necessary.
        (5) Order tickets must accurately reflect the customer's 
    instructions when received, including whether the order is a market or 
    price order.
    
        Dated: November 16, 1995.
    
        By the Commission:
    Jean A. Webb,
    Secretary to the Commission.
    [FR Doc. 95-28700 Filed 11-22-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/23/1996
Published:
11/24/1995
Department:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Advisory.
Document Number:
95-28700
Dates:
The Advisory is to be effective January 23, 1996.
Pages:
58047-58048 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-28700.pdf