98-31436. Airworthiness Directives; The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA- 31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, PA-31-350, and PA-31P-350 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 227 (Wednesday, November 25, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 65147-65149]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-31436]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-CE-32-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models PA-
    31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, PA-31-350, and PA-31P-350 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to certain The New Piper Aircraft, Inc. (Piper) 
    Models PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, PA-31-350, and PA-31P-350 
    airplanes. The proposed AD would require installing access holes for 
    the inspection of the elevator spar; inspecting the elevator ice 
    protection boots for looseness and reinstalling or replacing the 
    elevator ice protection boots if looseness is found. The proposed AD 
    also requires repetitively inspecting the elevator spars for cracks, 
    and replacing the elevators or elevator spar assemblies with parts of 
    improved design either at a certain time period or when cracks are 
    found, whichever occurs first. The proposed AD is the result of reports 
    of cracks developing in the elevator spar inboard of the outboard hinge 
    location on the affected airplanes. The actions specified by the 
    proposed AD are intended to prevent failure of the elevator spar caused 
    by fatigue cracking, which could result in reduced airplane 
    controllability.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 27, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-CE-32-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from The New Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Services, 2926 Piper Drive, 
    Vero Beach, Florida 32960. This information also may be examined at the 
    Rules Docket at the address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Herderich, Aerospace Engineer, 
    FAA, Atlanta Certification Office, One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix 
    Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia 30349; telephone: (770) 703-
    6084; facsimile: (770) 703-6097.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 97-CE-32-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: 
    Rules Docket No. 97-CE-32-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas 
    City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received several reports of cracks in the elevator spar 
    inboard of the outboard hinge attachment location on Piper Models PA-
    31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, PA-31-350, and PA-31P-350 airplanes. 
    Initiation of these cracks is at the end rivets in the reinforcement 
    doubler on the aft surface of the spar. These cracks are occurring at 
    the end row of rivets that attach the spar and reinforcement doubler. 
    The FAA has also received reports of cracks at the outboard end of the 
    spar.
        Poorly installed or maintained ice protection boots on the affected 
    airplanes may aggravate the occurrence and growth of these cracks. If 
    these ice protection boots become loose, they may set up a vibration 
    and promote fatigue cracking of the elevator spar.
        These conditions, if not corrected in a timely manner, could result 
    in failure of the elevator spar with reduced airplane controllability.
    
    Relevant Service Information
    
        Piper has issued Service Bulletin No. 998A, dated August 4, 1997, 
    which specifies procedures for installing access holes for the 
    inspection of the elevator spar; inspecting the elevator ice protection 
    boots for looseness and reinstalling or replacing the elevator ice 
    protection boots if looseness is found; and repetitively inspecting the 
    elevator spars for cracks.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available 
    information related to the incidents described above,
    
    [[Page 65148]]
    
    including the referenced service information, the FAA has determined 
    that AD action should be taken to prevent failure of the elevator spar 
    caused by fatigue cracking, which could result in reduced airplane 
    controllability.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Piper Models PA-31, PA-31-300, PA-31-325, PA-
    31-350, and PA-31P-350 airplanes of the same type design, the FAA is 
    proposing AD action. The proposed AD would require installing access 
    holes for the inspection of the elevator spar; inspecting the elevator 
    ice protection boots for looseness and reinstalling or replacing the 
    elevator ice protection boots if looseness is found. The proposed AD 
    also requires repetitively inspecting the elevator spars for cracks, 
    and replacing the elevators or elevator spar assemblies with parts of 
    improved design either at a certain time period or when cracks are 
    found, whichever occurs first.
        Accomplishment of the proposed inspection access holes 
    installation, inspections, and elevator ice protection boots 
    reinstallation or replacement is required in accordance with Piper 
    Service Bulletin No. 998A, dated August 4, 1997.
        Accomplishment of the installation of the improved design elevators 
    or elevator spar assemblies is required in accordance with the 
    maintenance manual.
    
    The FAA's Aging Commuter Aircraft Policy
    
        The actions proposed in this NPRM are consistent with the FAA's 
    aging commuter aircraft policy, which briefly states that, when a 
    modification exists that could eliminate or reduce the number of 
    required critical inspections, the modification should be incorporated. 
    This policy is based on the FAA's determination that reliance on 
    critical repetitive inspections on airplanes utilized in commuter 
    service carries an unnecessary safety risk when a design change exists 
    that could eliminate or, in certain instances, reduce the number of 
    those critical inspections. In determining what inspections are 
    critical, the FAA considers (1) the safety consequences of the airplane 
    if the known problem is not detected by the inspection; (2) the 
    reliability of the inspection such as the probability of not detecting 
    the known problem; (3) whether the inspection area is difficult to 
    access; and (4) the possibility of damage to an adjacent structure as a 
    result of the problem.
        The alternative to replacing the elevators or elevator spar 
    assemblies with ones of improved design would be to repetitively 
    inspect this area for the life of the airplane.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 1,739 airplanes in the U.S. registry would 
    be affected by the proposed AD.
        The proposed inspection holes installation and inspections would 
    take approximately 2 workhours per airplane to accomplish with an 
    average labor rate of approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost 
    approximately $26 per airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the proposed inspection access holes installation and 
    inspections on U.S. operators is estimated to be $253,894, or $146 per 
    airplane.
        The proposed elevator spar assembly replacements would take 
    approximately 36 workhours per airplane to accomplish with an average 
    labor rate of approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost approximately $600 
    per airplane ($300 per elevator spar assembly with 2 elevator spar 
    assemblies per airplane). Based on these figures, the total cost impact 
    of the proposed elevator spar assembly replacement on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $4,799,640, or $2,760 per airplane.
        According to Piper, numerous airplanes already have complied with 
    the proposed initial inspection requirements of this NPRM, specifically 
    most of the Model PA-31-350 airplanes since many of these are used in 
    commuter service.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    The New Piper Aircraft, Inc.: Docket No. 97-CE-32-AD.
    
        Applicability: The following airplane model and serial numbers, 
    certificated in any category, that are not equipped with the 
    applicable improved design elevators or elevator spar assemblies 
    specified in the ``Replacement Elevator P/N'' and ``Replace Spar P/
    N'' columns of the ``Material Required Table'' on page 4 of Piper 
    Service Bulletin No. 998A, dated August 4, 1997:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Models                                               Serial numbers
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    PA-31, PA-31-300, and PA-31-325...............  31-2 through 31-8312019.
    PA-31-350.....................................  31-5001 through 31-8553002.
    PA-31P-350....................................  31P-8414001 through 31P-8414050.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [[Page 65149]]
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated in the body of this AD, unless 
    already accomplished.
        To prevent failure of the elevator spar caused by fatigue 
    cracking, which could result in reduced airplane controllability, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Upon accumulating 2,500 hours time-in-service (TIS) on each 
    elevator spar assembly or within the next 100 hours TIS after the 
    effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, accomplish the 
    following in accordance with the INSTRUCTIONS section of Piper 
    Service Bulletin No. 998A, dated August 4, 1997:
        (1) Install access holes for the inspection of the elevator 
    spar;
        (2) Inspect the elevator spars for cracks; and
        (3) Inspect the elevator ice protection boots for looseness.
        (b) If the elevator ice protection boots are found loose during 
    the inspection required by paragraph (a)(3) of this AD, prior to 
    further flight, reinstall or replace the elevator ice protection 
    boots in accordance with the INSTRUCTIONS section of Piper Service 
    Bulletin No. 998A, dated August 4, 1997.
        (c) If no cracks are found in the elevator spars during the 
    inspection required by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD, reinspect the 
    elevator spars for cracks at intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS, 
    provided no cracks are found (if cracks are found, refer to 
    paragraphs (d) and (d)(1) of this AD).
        (d) At whichever of the compliance times presented in paragraphs 
    (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this AD that occurs first, replace each 
    elevator or elevator spar assembly with a part of improved design as 
    specified in the ``Replacement Elevator P/N'' and ``Replace Spar P/
    N'' columns of the ``Material Required Table'' on page 4 of Piper 
    Service Bulletin No. 998A, dated August 4, 1997. Accomplish these 
    replacements in accordance with the applicable maintenance manual.
        (1) Prior to further flight on any elevator spar assembly where 
    any cracks are found during the initial inspection required by 
    paragraph (a)(2) of this AD or any repetitive inspection required by 
    paragraph (c) of this AD; or
        (2) Within 1,000 hours TIS after the initial inspection required 
    by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD.
        (e) Replacing both the left and right elevators or elevator spar 
    assemblies with parts of improved design as specified in the 
    ``Replacement Elevator P/N'' and ``Replace Spar P/N'' columns of the 
    ``Material Required Table'' on page 4 of Piper Service Bulletin No. 
    998A, dated August 4, 1997, is considered terminating action for the 
    repetitive inspection requirement of this AD.
        (1) This action may be accomplished at any time to terminate the 
    repetitive inspections, but must be accomplished prior to further 
    flight on any elevator spar found cracked or within 1,000 hours TIS 
    after the initial inspection, whichever occurs first.
        (2) If one elevator spar assembly is replaced prior to further 
    flight when a crack is found, the other elevator spar assembly must 
    still be repetitively inspected every 100 hours TIS until 
    replacement at 1,000 hours TIS after the initial inspection or when 
    cracks are found, whichever occurs later.
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent 
    level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft 
    Certification Office (ACO), One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix 
    Boulevard, Suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia 30349. The request shall be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Atlanta ACO.
    
        (h) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the document referred to herein upon request to The New Piper 
    Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; or may 
    examine this document at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the 
    Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, 
    Missouri 64106.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 17, 1998.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-31436 Filed 11-24-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/25/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
98-31436
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before January 27, 1999.
Pages:
65147-65149 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-CE-32-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-31436.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13