[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 227 (Wednesday, November 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65486-65499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-31516]
[[Page 65485]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part VI
Department of Housing and Urban Development
_______________________________________________________________________
Funding Availability for the HUD-Administered Small Cities Community
Development Block Grant Program and the Section 108 Loan Guarantee
Program for Small Communities in New York State; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 227 / Wednesday, 25, 1998 / Notices
[[Page 65486]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-4424-N-01]
Notice of Funding Availability for: the HUD-Administered Small
Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program--Fiscal Year
1999; and the Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program for Small Communities
in New York State
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of Funding Availability for Fiscal Year 1999.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) announces: (1) the
availability of approximately $54,558,000 in Fiscal Year (FY) 1999
funding for the HUD-administered Small Cities Program in New York State
under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program ($1,000,000
of this amount has been set aside for the Canal Corridor Initiative
which is being announced elsewhere in this Federal Register); and (2)
the availability of a maximum of approximately $200,000,000--
$250,000,000 in FY 1999 funding under the Section 108 Loan Guarantee
program for small cities in New York State. Amounts available under the
Section 108 Loan Guarantee program are not awarded competitively and
are not rated under the criteria of this NOFA. Grants awarded under
this NOFA for activities and projects for which Section 108 assistance
will also be needed, however, will be conditioned upon approval of the
requisite Section 108 application within a stated time.
The exact amount of funds that will be available from the
approximately $53,558,000 of FY 1999 funds that communities will be
able to compete for under this NOFA is not known at this time. In FY
1997 HUD carried out the Canal Corridor Initiative (see the NOFA for
this initiative in the Federal Register on December 3, 1996 (61 FR
64196) and the amendment published in the Federal Register on December
12, 1996 (61 FR 66692)). Pursuant to that NOFA, HUD approved Canal
Corridor applications for approximately $6.5 million in Fiscal Year
1997 New York Small Cities funds. HUD must also be prepared, pursuant
to 24 CFR 570.432, to use CDBG funds each year, as necessary, for the
sole purpose of paying any amounts due on debt obligations, for up to
20 years, issued by units of general local government (or their
designated public agencies) and guaranteed by the Secretary pursuant to
section 108 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended, for projects approved under the Canal Corridor Initiative
NOFA. At this time, the exact amount of CDBG funds that will be needed
to meet required debt obligation payments during Fiscal Year 1999 is
not known. However, in the December 3, 1996 NOFA, HUD estimated that
the average amount of CDBG funds required to meet the debt obligation
payments would not exceed an average of $3 million per year over a 20-
year period.
The funds announced in this NOFA provide small communities and
counties in New York State with an opportunity to propose programs that
focus on creating or expanding job opportunities, addressing housing
needs, or meeting local public facilities needs. HUD encourages
communities to propose programs that are creative and innovative in
addressing the needs of their community. A community may propose a
program that is ``single purpose'' in nature addressing a specific area
of need. The maximum amount for a Single Purpose grant is $400,000
($600,000 for counties).
DATES: Applications are due by February 8, 1999. Application kits may
be obtained from and must be submitted to either HUD's New York or
Buffalo Office. (The addresses for these offices are provided in
Section II. of this NOFA.) In addition, application kits and additional
information are available on HUD's website located at: www.hud.gov or
by contacting Community Connections at (800) 998-9999.
Applications, if mailed, must be postmarked no later than midnight
on February 8, 1999 and received within 10 calendar days of the
deadline. If an application is hand-delivered to the New York or the
Buffalo Office, the application must be delivered to the appropriate
office by no later than 4:00 p.m. (local time) on February 8, 1999.
Application kits will be made available by a date that affords
applicants no fewer than 45 days to respond to this NOFA. For further
information on obtaining and submitting applications, please see
Section II. of this NOFA.
The above-stated application deadline is firm as to date and hour.
In the interest of fairness to all competing applicants, HUD will treat
as ineligible for consideration any application that is not received by
4:00 p.m. on, or postmarked by, February 8, 1999. Applicants should
take this procedure into account and make early submission of their
materials to avoid any risk of loss of eligibility brought about by
unanticipated delays or other delivery-related problems.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvette Aidara, State and Small Cities
Division, Office of Community Planning and Development, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, Room 7184, 451 Seventh Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1322 (this is not a toll-free
number). Hearing or speech-impaired individuals may access this number
via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at
1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Contents
I. Purpose and Substantive Description
A. Authority and Background
1. Authority
2. Background
3. Other Program Requirements
a. Abbreviated Consolidated Plan
b. Section 3
4. Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance
a. HUD Responsibilities
(1) Documentation and Public Access
(2) Disclosures
b. Units of Local Government Responsibilities
B. Allocation Amounts
1. Total Available Funding
2. Imminent Threats
C. Eligibility
1. Eligible Applicants
2. Previous Grantees
3. Eligible Activities and National Objectives
4. Anti-pirating provision
5. Environmental Review Requirements
D. Grants
1. General
2. Grant Limits and Funding Requirements
3. Applications with Multiple Projects
E. Selection Criteria/Ranking Factors and Final Selection
1. General
2. Performance Evaluation
a. Community Development Activities
b. Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations
c. Performance Assessment Reports
3. Five Factor Rating
a. Need--Absolute Number of Persons in Poverty
b. Need--Percent of Persons in Poverty
c. Program Impact
(1) Program Impact--Housing
(a) Housing Rehabilitation
(b) Creation of New Housing
(c) Direct Homeownership Assistance
(2) Program Impact--Public Facilities Affecting Public Health
and Safety
(3) Program Impact--Economic Development
(a) Scoring
(b) The Appropriate Determination
(c) CDBG Assistance Must Minimize Business and Job Displacement
(d) Section 105(a)(17) Requirements
(e) National Objectives
(f) Application Requirements
[[Page 65487]]
d. Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Evaluation
(1) Housing Achievements
(a) Provision of Fair Housing Choice
(b) Implementation of a Fair Housing Strategy that Affirmatively
Furthers Fair Housing
(2) Entrepreneurial Efforts and Local Equal Opportunity
Performance
(3) Equal Opportunity Employment
e. Welfare to Work Initiative
4. Final Selection
II. Application and Funding Award Process
A. Obtaining Applications
B. Submitting Applications
C. The Application
1. Application Requirements
2. Streamlined Application Requirements for Certain Applicants
D. Funding Award Process
III. Technical Assistance
IV. Checklist of Application Submission Requirements
V. Corrections to Deficient Applications
VI. Findings and Certifications
I. Purpose and Substantive Description
A. Authority and Background
1. Authority
Title I, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.
5301-5320) (1974 HCD Act); 24 CFR part 570, subpart F, for the New York
State Small Cities program, and subpart M for the Section 108 Loan
Guarantee program.
2. Background
Title I of the 1974 HCD Act authorizes the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Section 106(d) of Title I permits States,
in such manner and at such time as the Secretary shall prescribe, to
elect to assume the administrative responsibility for the CDBG Program
for nonentitled areas within their jurisdiction. Section 106 provides
that HUD will administer the CDBG Program for nonentitled areas within
any State that does not elect to assume the administrative
responsibility for the program. HUD's regulations at 24 CFR part 570,
subpart F describe the requirements for HUD's administration of the
CDBG Program in nonentitled areas (Small Cities Program). This NOFA
supplements subpart F of 24 CFR part 570.
In accordance with 24 CFR 570.421(b), and with the requirements of
section 102 of the Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989
(HUD Reform Act), HUD is issuing this NOFA for New York State's Small
Cities Program for FY 1999. This NOFA announces the allocation of funds
for a Single Purpose grant competition, and establishes the deadline
for filing grant applications. The NOFA explains how HUD will apply the
regulatory threshold requirements for funding eligibility, and the
selection criteria for rating and scoring applications for Single
Purpose grants.
Other information about the Small Cities Program will be provided
in the application kit, which will be made available to applicants by
HUD's New York Office and Buffalo Office (see Section II. of this
NOFA). In addition, application kits and additional information are
available on HUD's website located at: www.hud.gov or by contacting
Community Connections at (800) 998-9999.
3. Other Program Requirements
a. Abbreviated Consolidated Plan. Each jurisdiction that applies
for funds under this NOFA must have submitted a consolidated plan, as
provided in 24 CFR part 91. An applicant for more than one grant under
this NOFA or for the Canal Corridor Initiative NOFA published else
where in this Federal Register need submit only one consolidated plan
or abbreviated consolidated plan, as applicable, covering the
activities proposed in all applications. A jurisdiction that does not
expect to be a participating jurisdiction in the HOME program under 24
CFR part 92 may submit an abbreviated consolidated plan that is
appropriate to the types and amounts of assistance sought from HUD (see
24 CFR 91.235). Any applicant that plans to undertake a housing
activity with funds under this NOFA needs to prepare and submit, at a
minimum, an abbreviated consolidated plan that is appropriate to the
types and amounts of housing assistance sought under this NOFA.
Even if the community's Small Cities application is approved, HUD
must also approve an abbreviated consolidated plan that covers
activities proposed in such application(s) before the community may
receive Small Cities funding. Further, that applicant must also include
a certification that the housing activities in its CDBG Small Cities
application are consistent with the consolidated plan. The applicant's
consolidated plan must describe the jurisdiction's priority nonhousing
community development needs eligible for assistance under the CDBG
program by eligibility category, reflecting the needs of families for
each type of activity, as appropriate, in terms of dollar amounts
estimated to meet the priority need for the type of activity (see 24
CFR 91.235(c)(2)).
The abbreviated consolidated plan is subject to the same citizen
participation requirements as is the jurisdiction's Small Cities CDBG
application. Both must meet the citizen participation requirements
before they may be submitted to HUD (see 24 CFR 570.431). A Section 108
Loan Guarantee application would also have to meet citizen
participation requirements, as described in 24 CFR 570.704, if the
jurisdiction submits one to HUD for consideration.
If possible, an applicant should submit the abbreviated
consolidated plan in advance of the Small Cities application due date.
The latest time at which the abbreviated consolidated plan will be
accepted by HUD for the HUD-administered Small Cities Program in New
York will be February 8, 1999 (the application due date for the Small
Cities application). Failure to submit the abbreviated consolidated
plan by the due date is not a curable technical deficiency. Questions
regarding the abbreviated consolidated plan should be directed to the
appropriate HUD field office.
Any application that is fundable but does not have an approved
consolidated plan will receive a conditional approval subject to HUD's
approval of the abbreviated consolidated plan. If HUD is unable to
approve the abbreviated consolidated plan within a reasonable period of
time (but not more than 60 days from the date that the conditional
approval is announced), HUD will rescind the award. In such event the
funding will be awarded to the highest rated fundable applicant that
did not receive funding under this competition.
b. Section 3. Assistance provided under this NOFA is subject to the
requirements of section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u), and HUD's implementing regulations in 24 CFR
part 135. One of the purposes of this NOFA, which is consistent with
section 3, is to give, to the greatest extent feasible and consistent
with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, job training,
employment and other contracting opportunities generated from certain
HUD financial assistance to low- and very low-income persons. Public
entities awarded funds under this NOFA that intend to use the funds for
housing rehabilitation, housing construction, or other public
construction must comply with the applicable requirements set forth in
24 CFR part 135.
4. Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance: Documentation and
Public Access Requirements; Applicant/Recipient Disclosures
Section 102 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
Reform Act of 1989 (42 U.S.C. 3545) (HUD Reform Act) and the
regulations
[[Page 65488]]
codified in 24 CFR part 4, subpart A, contain a number of provisions
that are designed to ensure greater accountability and integrity in the
provision of certain types of assistance administered by HUD. On
January 14, 1992 (57 FR 1942), HUD published a notice that also
provides information on the implementation of section 102. The
documentation, public access, and disclosure requirements of section
102 are applicable to assistance awarded under this NOFA as follows:
a. HUD Responsibilities.
(1) Documentation and Public Access. HUD will ensure that
documentation and other information regarding each application
submitted pursuant to this NOFA are sufficient to indicate the basis
upon which assistance was provided or denied. This material, including
any letters of support, will be made available for public inspection
for a 5-year period beginning not less than 30 days after the award of
the assistance. Material will be made available in accordance with the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and HUD's implementing
regulations at 24 CFR part 15. In addition, HUD will include the
recipients of assistance pursuant to this NOFA in its Federal Register
notice of all recipients of HUD assistance awarded on a competitive
basis.
(2) Disclosures. HUD will make available to the public for 5 years
all applicant disclosure reports (HUD Form 2880) submitted in
connection with this NOFA. Update reports (also Form 2880) will be made
available along with the applicant disclosure reports, but in no case
for a period less than 3 years. All reports--both applicant disclosures
and updates--will be made available in accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and HUD's implementing regulations at 24
CFR part 15.
b. Units of General Local Government Responsibilities.
Units of general local government awarded assistance under this
NOFA must ensure that documentation and other information regarding
each application submitted to the recipient by a subsequent recipient
applicant are adequate to indicate the basis upon which assistance was
provided or denied. The unit of general local government must make this
material, including any letters of support, available for public
inspection for a 5-year period beginning not less than 30 days after
the award of the assistance. Unit of general local government
recipients must also notify the public of the subsequent recipients of
the assistance. Each recipient will develop documentation, public
access, and notification procedures for its programs.
B. Allocation Amounts
1. Total Available Funding
The nonentitlement CDBG funds for New York State for FY 1999 total
approximately $54,558,000. The exact amount of funds available for this
Small Cities CDBG funding competition is not known at this time. In FY
1997 HUD carried out the Canal Corridor Initiative (see the NOFA for
this initiative in the Federal Register on December 3, 1996 (61 FR
64196) and as amended on December 18, 1996 (61 FR 66692)). HUD must be
prepared, pursuant to 24 CFR 570.432, to use CDBG funds each year, as
necessary, for the sole purpose of paying any amounts due on debt
obligations, for up to 20 years, issued by units of general local
government (or their designated public agencies) and guaranteed by the
Secretary pursuant to section 108 of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, for projects approved under the
Canal Corridor Initiative NOFA. HUD approved approximately $6.55
million in FY 1997 Small Cities funds for Canal Corridor grants.
However, at this time, the exact amount of CDBG funds that will be
needed to meet required debt obligation payments during Fiscal Year
1999 is not known. Of the approximately $53,558,000 available under
this NOFA, approximately $47,024,000 is allocated for distribution to
eligible units of general local government within the jurisdiction of
HUD's New York Buffalo Field Office. Approximately $6,534,000 is
allocated for distribution to eligible units of general local
government within the jurisdiction of HUD's New York Office. Once HUD
has determined the final amount of funds available for competitive
distribution under this NOFA, HUD will allocate such funds in the same
ratio as above to HUD's Buffalo and New York Offices. However, HUD has
the option to revise these final allocations between offices by up to
$400,000 in order to assure full distribution of funds. Finally, HUD
reserves the right, in its sole discretion, not to award all of the
funds available under this NOFA and to make any such funds available in
a future NOFA, if an insufficient number of applications are determined
fundable under this NOFA.
2. Imminent Threats
All imminent threat projects must meet the national objective of
benefitting low- and moderate-income persons. HUD may elect to set
aside up to 15 percent of the FY 1999 allocations for imminent threat
projects. These funds will be available until the rating and ranking
process for funds distributed under this NOFA is completed.
C. Eligibility
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible applicants are units of general local government in New
York State, excluding: (1) metropolitan cities; (2) urban counties; (3)
units of government which are participating in urban counties or
metropolitan cities even if only part of the participating unit of
government is located in the urban county or metropolitan city; and (4)
Indian tribes (as defined in section 102(a)(17) of the 1974 HCD Act).
Applications may be submitted individually, or jointly, as described in
24 CFR 570.422.
2. Previous Grantees
Eligible applicants that previously have been awarded Small Cities
Program CDBG grants are also subject to an evaluation of capacity and
performance (see generally, section I.E.2. of this NOFA). Numerical
thresholds for drawdown of funds have been established to assist HUD in
evaluating a grantee's progress in implementing its program activities.
(These standards apply to all CDBG Program grants received by the
community.) In FY 1996 an additional threshold was established which
relates to the submission of annual Performance Assessment Reports
(PARs). A PAR was due on October 31, 1998, for each grant which a local
government received prior to April 1, 1997. Failure to submit a PAR is
not a curable technical deficiency.
Applicants generally will be determined to have performed
adequately in the area(s) where the thresholds are met. Where a
threshold has not been met, HUD will evaluate the documentation of any
mitigating factors, particularly with respect to actions taken by the
applicant to accelerate the implementation of its program activities.
3. Eligible Activities and National Objectives
Eligible activities under the Small Cities CDBG Program are those
identified in subpart C of 24 CFR part 570. With respect to the Section
108 Loan Guarantee program, eligible activities are identified in
Sec. 570.703. Note that Sec. 570.703 does not include all CDBG-eligible
activities. Each activity under both programs must meet one of the
national objectives (i.e., benefit to
[[Page 65489]]
low- and moderate-income persons, elimination of slums or blighting
conditions, or meeting imminent threats to the health and safety of the
community; see Sec. 570.208), and each grant and use of Section 108
Loan Guarantee proceeds must meet the requirements for compliance with
the primary objective of principally benefitting low- and moderate-
income persons, as required under Sec. 570.420(e). The CDBG program
requires that not less than 70 percent of the total of grant funds from
a grant made under this NOFA and Section 108 Loan Guarantee funds
received within a fiscal year must be expended for activities that
benefit low- and moderate-income persons under the criteria of 24 CFR
Sec. 570.208(a). The method of calculating the use of these funds for
compliance with the 70 percent overall benefit requirement is set forth
in Sec. 570.420(e). In general, all applications must describe the
projects and activities proposed in sufficient detail that compliance
with these and other applicable statutory, regulatory, and NOFA
provisions can be determined.
4. Anti-pirating Prohibition
Section 588 of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of
1998, P.L. 105-276, amended section 105(h) of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 as follows:
``(h) PROHIBITION ON USE OF ASSISTANCE FOR EMPLOYMENT RELOCATION
ACTIVITIES. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no amount
from a grant under section 106 made in fiscal year 1999 or any
succeeding fiscal year may be used to assist directly in the
relocation of any industrial or commercial plant, facility, or
operation, from 1 area to another area, if the relocation is likely
to result in a significant loss of employment in the labor market
area from which the relocation occurs.''
Accordingly, HUD will not award any grant for any project that would
violate this prohibition.
5. Environmental Review Requirement
The HUD environmental review procedures contained in 24 CFR part 58
apply to this program. Under part 58, grantees assume all of the
responsibilities for environmental review, decisionmaking and action
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and the other provisions of law specified by the
Secretary in 24 CFR part 58 that would apply to the Secretary were he
to undertake such projects as Federal projects.
D. Grants
1. Single Purpose Grants
1. General. HUD will fund only Single Purpose grants which are
designed to address and resolve a specific community development need.
A Single Purpose grant may consist of more than one project. A project
may consist of one activity or a set of activities. Each project must
address community development needs in one of the following problem
areas:
Housing
Public Facilities
Economic Development.
Each project will be rated against all other projects addressing
the same problem area, according to the criteria outlined below. It
should be noted that each project within an application will be given a
separate impact rating, if each one is clearly designated by the
applicant as a separate and distinct project (i.e., separate Needs
Description, Community Development Activities, Impact Description and
Program Schedule forms have been filled out, indicating project names).
In some cases, it may be to the applicant's advantage to designate
separate projects for activities that can ``stand on their own'' in
terms of meeting the described need, especially where a particular
project would tend to weaken the impact rating of the other activities,
if they were rated as a whole, as has been the case with some economic
development and housing projects. If, however, the projects tend to
meet impact criteria to the same extent, or the weaker element is only
a small portion of the overall project, there is no discernable benefit
in designating separate projects.
2. Grant Limits and Funding Requirements
The maximum annual grant for a Single Purpose grant is $400,000,
except that counties may apply for up to $600,000 in Single Purpose
funds, if the project will be carried out in more than one community.
If other sources of funds are to be used with respect to a project, the
source of those funds must be identified and the level of commitment
indicated. With respect to grant limits for joint applicants, the
maximum amount that may be awarded pursuant to a joint application is
the maximum single grant limit established above for communities and
counties multiplied by the number of participants in the cooperation
agreement, provided that for purposes of determining such a multiple
grant limit, and in order to receive that amount, a participating joint
applicant must receive a substantial direct benefit from the activities
proposed in the application and must not be acting solely on behalf of
or in conjunction with another jurisdiction for the sole purpose of
raising the maximum grant amount that may be awarded. In addition, the
statistics of each participant counted for maximum grant limits
purposes shall also be used for purposes of the selection factors under
section I.E.3. of this NOFA.
3. Applications with Multiple Projects
If an application contains more than one project, each project will
be rated separately for program impact. Applicants should note that
regardless of the number of projects, the total grant amount cannot
exceed the limits identified in section I.D.2. of this NOFA.
E. Selection Criteria/Ranking Factors and Final Selection
1. General
Complete applications received from eligible applicants by February
8, 1999 will be rated and scored by HUD. Applications are rated and
scored against five factors. These five factors are discussed in more
detail in section I.E.3. of this NOFA. Note that when an applicant
proposes to use Section 108 Loan Guarantee assistance as a partial
funding resource for a proposed project under this NOFA, HUD, when
applying the rating factors to such projects, will consider the
applicant's description of the Section 108 assisted project in arriving
at the score for a particular factor. An applicant may have an approved
108 Loan Guarantee application, submit a full Section 108 Loan
Guarantee application or provide a description of the Section 108 Loan
Guarantee application. (The description must be specific as to the
amount of the Section 108 Loan Guarantee commitment that the applicant
will request and the purpose for which the 108 Loan Guarantee proceeds
will be used. See section II.C.1. of this NOFA for more information on
this subject.) However, any such CDBG application under this NOFA that
is fundable and relies upon Section 108 Loan Guarantee assistance to
partially carry out the activities and does not have an approved
Section 108 Loan Guarantee commitment will receive a conditional
approval. If the applicant does not submit and HUD does not approve the
required Section 108 Loan Guarantee application within a reasonable
period of time (see section II.C.1.(f)(2) of this NOFA), HUD may
rescind the award. In such event the funding will be awarded to the
highest rated fundable applicant
[[Page 65490]]
that did not receive funding under this competition.
2. Performance Evaluation
As noted in section I.C. of this NOFA, previous recipients of Small
Cities Program CDBG grants are subject to an evaluation of performance
and continuing capacity to undertake the proposed program. For purposes
of making performance evaluations, HUD will use any information that
becomes available before grant awards are announced. Performance also
will be evaluated using information which may be available already to
HUD, including previously submitted performance reports, site visit
reports, audits, monitoring reports and annual community assessments.
The HUD Office may request and consider additional information in cases
where it is essential to make the required performance judgments (see
24 CFR 570.423(d), Thresholds). No grants will be made to an applicant
that does not have the capacity to undertake the proposed program. A
performance determination will be made by an evaluation of the
following areas:
a. Community Development Activities. The following thresholds for
performance in expending CDBG funds have been established for FY 1999
and pertain to all Single Purpose Grants, including grants pursuant to
approved multiyear plans:
FY 1993 and earlier--Grants must be closed out
FY 1994--Grant funds 100 percent expended
FY 1995--Grant funds 75 percent expended
FY 1996--Grant funds 30 percent expended
FY 1997 and FY 1998--Recipients must be on target with respect to the
latest Small Cities Program Schedule received by HUD.
Note: These standards will be used as benchmarks in judging program
performance, but will not be the sole basis for determining whether the
applicant is ineligible for a grant due to a lack of capacity to carry
out the proposed project or program. Any applicant that fails to meet
the percentages specified above may wish to provide updated data to
HUD, either in conjunction with the application submission or under
separate cover, but in no case will data received by HUD after February
8, 1999 be accepted, unless specifically requested by HUD.
b. Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations. An applicant
will be considered to have performed inadequately if the applicant:
(1) Has not substantially complied with the laws, regulations, and
Executive Orders applicable to the CDBG Program, including applicable
civil rights laws as may be evidenced by: (1) an outstanding finding of
civil rights noncompliance, unless the applicant demonstrates that it
is operating in compliance with a HUD-approved compliance agreement
designed to correct the area(s) of noncompliance; (2) an adjudication
of a civil rights violation in a civil action brought against it by a
private individual, unless the applicant demonstrates that it is
operating in compliance with a court order designed to correct the
area(s) of noncompliance; (3) a deferral of Federal funding based upon
civil rights violations; (4) a pending civil rights suit brought
against it by the Department of Justice; or (5) an unresolved charge of
discrimination issued against it by the Secretary under section 810(g)
of the Fair Housing Act, as implemented by 24 CFR 103.400;
(2) Has not resolved or attempted to resolve findings made as a
result of HUD monitoring; or
(3) Has not resolved or attempted to resolve audit findings.
An applicant will be ineligible for a grant where the inadequate
performance in compliance with applicable laws and regulations
evidences a lack of capacity to carry out the proposed project or
program. For example, an application will not be accepted from a unit
of general local government which has an outstanding audit finding or
monetary obligation for any HUD program. Additionally, applications
will not be accepted from any entity which proposes an activity in a
unit of general local government that has an outstanding audit finding
or monetary obligation for any HUD program. The Director of the
Community Planning and Development Division of the HUD field office may
provide an exception to this prohibition if the unit of general local
government has made a good faith effort to clear the audit finding. No
exception will be provided if funds are due HUD, unless a satisfactory
arrangement for repayment of the debt has been made.
c. Performance Assessment Reports. Under 24 CFR 570.507, Small
Cities CDBG grantees are required to submit Performance Assessment
Reports (PARs) on October 31st, for the period ended September 30th,
for all open grants awarded before April 1st of the same year. For an
application for FY 1999 funds to be considered for funding, the
applicant must be current in its submission of PARs. Failure to submit
a PAR is not a curable technical deficiency under section V. of this
NOFA.
3. Five Factor Rating.
As noted in section I.E.1. of this NOFA, all applications are rated
and scored against five factors. These five factors are:
Need based on absolute number of persons in poverty;
Need based on the percent of persons in poverty;
Program Impact;
Outstanding performance in fair housing and equal
opportunity; and
Welfare to Work Initiative
A maximum of 605 points is possible under this system with the
maximum points for each factor being:
Need--absolute number of persons in 75 points.
poverty.
Need--percent of persons in poverty....... 75 points.
Program Impact............................ 400 points.
Outstanding performance--FHEO:
a. Provision of fair housing choice..... 20 points.
b. New Horizons Fair Housing Assistance 20 points.
Project.
c. Equal opportunity employment......... 10 points.
Welfare to Work Initiative.............. 5 points.
-----------------------------
Total................................. 605 points
Each of the five factors is outlined below. All awarded points for
each factor will be rounded to the nearest whole number.
a. Need--Absolute number of persons in poverty. HUD uses 1990
census data to determine the absolute number of persons in poverty
residing within the applicant unit of general local government.
Applicants which are county governments are rated separately from all
other applicants. For applications from joint applicants, data from
each participating unit of general local government (as described in 24
CFR 570.422) will be aggregated. Applicants in each group are compared
in terms of the number of persons whose incomes are below the poverty
level. Individual scores are obtained by dividing each applicant's
absolute number of persons in poverty by the greatest number of persons
in poverty of any applicant and multiplying by 75.
b. Need--Percent of persons in poverty. HUD uses 1990 census data
to determine the percent of persons in poverty residing within the
applicant unit of general local government. Applicants in each group
are compared in terms of the percentage of their population below the
poverty level. For applications from joint applicants, data from each
participating unit of general local government will be aggregated.
Individual scores are obtained by dividing each applicant's percentage
of
[[Page 65491]]
persons in poverty by the highest percentage of persons in poverty of
any applicant and multiplying by 75.
c. Program Impact. In evaluating program impact, HUD will consider
various factors. Within each activity type described below is a set of
factors and scoring weights that will be used. Each proposal will be
rated using the factors and scoring weights described in the selection
criteria below.
Assessments are done on a comparative basis and, as a result, it is
important that each applicant present information in a detailed and
uniform manner.
For projects consisting of more than one activity, the activity
that directly addresses the need must represent at least the majority
of funds requested. Other activities must be incidental to and in
support of the principal activity. For example, public improvements
included in a rehabilitation project that addresses housing need must:
(1) be a relatively small amount in terms of funds requested; (2)
clearly be in support of the housing objective; and (3) demonstrate a
positive and direct link to the national objective. For incidental
activities claiming benefit to low -and moderate-income persons on an
area basis, the application must document that at least 51 percent of
the residents of the service area meet the low -and moderate-income
requirement. Funds should not be requested for activities that are not
incidental to and in support of the principal activity.
In addressing Program Impact criteria, applicants should adhere to
the following general guidelines for quantification. Where appropriate,
absolute and percentage figures should be used to describe the extent
of community development needs and the impact of the proposed program.
This includes, but is not limited to, appropriate units of measure
(e.g., number of housing units or structures, linear feet of pipe,
pounds per square inch, etc.), and costs per unit of measure. These
quantification guidelines apply to the description of need, the nature
of proposed activities and the extent to which the proposed program
will address the identified need.
Appropriate documentation should be provided to support the degree
of need described in the application. Basically, the sources for all
statements and conclusions relating to community needs should be
included in the application or incorporated by reference. Examples of
appropriate documentation include planning studies, letters from public
agencies, newspaper articles, photographs and survey data.
Generally, the most effective documentation is that which
specifically addresses the subject matter and has a high degree of
credibility. Applicants which intend to conduct surveys to obtain data
are advised to contact the appropriate HUD office prior to conducting
the survey for a determination as to whether the survey methodology is
statistically acceptable.
There are a number of program design factors related to feasibility
which can alter significantly the award of impact points. Accordingly,
it is imperative that applicants provide adequate documentation in
addressing these factors. Common feasibility issues include site
control, availability of other funding sources, validity of cost
estimates, and status of financial commitments as well as evidence of
the status of regulatory agency review and approval.
Past productivity and administrative performance of prior grantees
will be taken into consideration when reviewing the overall feasibility
of the program. Overall program design, administration and guidelines
are other feasibility issues that should be articulated and presented
in the application, since they are critical in assessing the
effectiveness and impact of the proposed program.
Each project will be rated against other projects addressing the
same problem area, so that, for example, housing projects only will be
compared with other housing projects, according to the criteria
outlined below. It should be noted that each project within an
application will be given a separate impact rating, if each one is
clearly designated by the applicant as a separate and distinct project
(i.e., separate Needs Descriptions, Community Development Activities,
and Impact Description and Program Schedule forms have been filled out,
indicating separate project names).
In some cases, it may be to the applicant's advantage to designate
separate projects for activities that can ``stand on their own'' in
terms of meeting the described need, especially where a particular
project would tend to weaken the impact rating of the other activities,
if they were all related as a whole, as has been the case with some
economic development projects. If, however, the projects tend to meet
the impact criteria to the same extent, or the weaker element is only a
small portion of the overall program, there is no discernable benefit
in designating separate projects.
Applicants should bear in mind that the impact of the proposed
project will be judged by persons who may not be familiar with the
particular community. Accordingly, individual projects will be rated
according to how well the application demonstrates in specific,
measurable terms, the extent to which the impact criteria are met.
General statements of need and impact alone will not be sufficient to
obtain a favorable rating. HUD will not make a Small Cities grant when
it determines that the grant will only have a minimal or insignificant
impact on the grantee. For the purposes of this NOFA, any application
not scoring above 100 points of the possible 400 points for the Program
Impact factor will be deemed to have a minimal or insignificant impact
on the grantee and will not be funded regardless of the number of
points the applicant may otherwise receive or the ranking it attains as
a result of its score due to points received on other rating factors.
(1) Program Impact--Housing. There are three distinct types of
Housing projects: Housing Rehabilitation, Creation of New Housing and
Direct Homeownership Assistance. Separate rating criteria are provided
for each type of project.
(a) Housing Rehabilitation. The following factors and weights will
be used to evaluate proposed housing rehabilitation projects:
(i) Severity of Need (proportion of units that are substandard and
extent of disrepair) (up to 160 points of the total Program Impact
score). Each application should provide information on the total number
of units in the project area, the number that are substandard, and the
number of substandard units occupied by low- and moderate-income
households. The purpose of this information is to establish the
relative severity of housing conditions within the designated project
area compared to other housing rehabilitation applications. The
application also should describe the date and methodology of any
surveys used to obtain the information, including any explicit and
detailed definition of ``substandard.''
Surveys of Housing Conditions. Surveys of housing conditions serve
several purposes in evaluating applications for housing rehabilitation
activities. These include establishing the seriousness of need for such
assistance in the project area, providing a basis for estimating
overall budgetary needs, and providing an indication of the
marketability of the project.
(ii) Extent to which proposed program will resolve the identified
problem (up
[[Page 65492]]
to 50 points of the total Program Impact score). Note that programs
that propose minimal rehabilitation may not necessarily be addressing
the identified problem.
(iii) Feasibility (marketability, project design affecting timely
completion of the project) (up to 50 points of the total Program Impact
score). The application should describe the project in sufficient
detail to allow the reviewer to assess its feasibility and its probable
impact on the conditions described. It also should describe project
requirements in such a way that regulatory and policy concerns will be
addressed.
HUD encourages communities to support the Healthy Homes Secretarial
initiative. Applicants applying for Small Cities CDBG funds to
rehabilitate housing and/or construct new housing units may support
these initiatives by including Healthy Homes features in their program
design, such as window locks, deadbolt locks on doors, locks or safety
latches on medicine cabinets, smoke detectors, carbon monoxide
detectors, energy efficient windows, elimination of lead-based paint,
and any other activities that contribute to Healthy Homes, especially
regarding children.
(iv) Leveraging of other resources (up to 60 points of the total
Program Impact score). HUD encourages communities to design projects
supplementing Small Cities rehabilitation funds with private funds
wherever feasible and appropriate, especially in the case of rental
units and housing not occupied by lower-income persons. In such cases,
the Small Cities grant subsidy should be as low as possible, while
retaining sufficient incentive to attract local participants. On the
other hand, projects designed for low-income homeowners should not
require private contributions at a level that puts the project out of
reach of potential participants.
(v) Cost per unit (up to 80 points of the Program Impact score).
HUD will review the applicant's documentation to determine whether the
applicant's cost-per-unit is lower than other applicants' costs-per-
unit. All applications should provide documentation to justify the
cost-per-unit estimates, particularly grantees where past performance
does not support the estimates in the applications. In reviewing
applications from grantees with prior housing rehabilitation projects,
reasonableness of cost-per-unit, stated in the application, will be
compared against the grantee's actual past performance.
(b) Creation of New Housing. CDBG funds may be used to support the
construction of new housing units, the creation of new units proposed
through conversion of existing structures (currently vacant structures
or conversion of nonresidential structures for residential use) and, in
certain circumstances, to finance the actual cost of constructing new
units. New construction may be carried out by an eligible nonprofit
entity pursuant to 24 CFR 570.204, or as last resort housing. Note that
for purposes of specific uses of Section 108 Loan Guarantee proceeds,
eligibility is limited to assistance for community economic development
projects under Sec. 570.204(a)(2). See also 24 CFR 570.703(i)(2).
Support of new construction could include nonconstruction assistance
such as the acquisition and/or clearance of land, the provision of
infrastructure, or the payment of certain planning costs.
The following factors and weights will be used to evaluate proposed
projects for the creation of new housing:
(i) Severity of need for new housing affordable to low- and
moderate-income persons shown in the project area (up to 160 points of
the total Program Impact score). Where the creation of new units is
proposed, the application should document the need for additional units
based on vacancy rates, waiting lists, and other pertinent information.
(ii) Extent to which the proposed program will create new housing
units affordable to low- and moderate-income persons (up to 50 points
of the total Program Impact score). The proposed project clearly must
support, or result in, additional units for low- and moderate-income
persons. The units may result from new construction projects for which
the proposed project will provide nonconstruction assistance.
(iii) Feasibility (marketability, project design affecting timely
completion of the project) (up to 50 points of the total Program Impact
score). Applicants should address issues of site control and
marketability, in addition to addressing feasibility from the
standpoint of market financing.
(iv) Leveraging of other resources (up to 60 points of the total
Program Impact score). Where the proposed project involves the use of
Federally assisted housing, the applicant must identify and document
the current commitment status of the Federal assistance. Lack of a firm
financial commitment for assistance may adversely affect project
impact.
(v) Cost per unit (up to 60 points of the total Program Impact
score). HUD will review the applicant's documentation to determine
whether the applicant's cost-per-unit is lower than other applicants'
costs-per-unit. All applications should provide documentation to
justify the cost-per-unit estimates, particularly grantees where past
performance does not support the estimates in the applications. In
reviewing applications from grantees with prior housing projects,
reasonableness of cost-per-unit, stated in the application, will be
compared against the grantee's actual past performance.
(vi) Extent to which the project would affirmatively further fair
housing (either through spatial deconcentration of minorities
throughout the community or through spatial deconcentration of low- and
moderate-income households if there are no areas of minority
concentration) (up to 20 points of the total Program Impact score).
(c) Direct Homeownership Assistance. Homeownership activities are
defined as activities which would promote homeownership within the
applicant jurisdiction, focusing particularly on aiding low- and
moderate-income persons in becoming homeowners. This may include
activities authorized under 24 CFR 570.201(n) for purposes of use of
Small Cities grant funding. However, activities eligible solely under
24 CFR 570.201(n) are not permitted uses of Section 108 loan guarantee
proceeds. While declining to identify any particular type of proposed
project as superior, HUD is identifying several criteria which must be
addressed within the project design, in order for the application to
receive the maximum project impact.
Applications must include a well developed description of
homeownership needs in the applicant jurisdiction, focusing
particularly on the needs of low- and moderate-income persons. The
description also should include, if applicable, any alternative
approaches which have been considered in meeting homeownership needs.
Project feasibility must be addressed as part of the application.
The application must demonstrate that the proposed project would
make effective use of all available funds. This would include any
local, State or other Federal funds which would be utilized by the
proposed project. If other such funds are included as part of the
proposed project, the applicant must demonstrate that such funds are
committed and truly available for the project. Any efforts which would
affirmatively further fair housing, by promoting homeownership among
minorities as well as homeownership throughout the community, must be
outlined in the application.
The application must explain how the project would benefit low- and
moderate-income homebuyers,
[[Page 65493]]
particularly focusing on first-time and minority homebuyers. The
application also should address any homeownership counseling services,
including counseling pertaining to Federal, State, and local fair
housing laws and requirements, which would be provided to persons
selected to participate in the proposed project. Finally, the
application should describe how the project would utilize public/
private partnerships to promote homeownership, particularly in the
sense that private sector financing would be accessible, as necessary,
to project participants to complement available public sector funds,
including CDBG money.
The following factors and weights will be used to evaluate proposed
direct homeownership assistance projects:
(i) The extent to which the application demonstrates severity of
homeownership needs in the community (up to 160 points of the total
Program Impact score).
(ii) The extent to which: the project design is appropriate to meet
demonstrated homeownership needs; the project would make effective us
of available funds; alternative approaches to meeting the homeownership
needs have been considered; and the proposed project would target
first-time homebuyers (up to 60 points of the total Program Impact
score).
(iii) The extent to which the project is feasible and likely to be
implemented in accordance with a project schedule (up to 50 points of
the total Program Impact score).
(iv) The extent to which the proposed project would: complement
other Federal, State or local programs that promote homeownership; and
utilize public/private partnerships in attempting to promote
homeownership, particularly in regard to participation by local
financial institutions considering the cost per unit (up to 80 points
of the total Program Impact score).
(v) The extent to which the proposed project would provide
homeownership counseling to project participants (up to 30 points of
the total Program Impact score).
(vi) The extent to which the project would affirmatively further
fair housing through proposed initiatives to reach out to potential
minority homeowners and/or to promote homeownership opportunities
throughout the community (up to 20 points of the total Program Impact
score).
(2) Program Impact--Public Facilities Affecting Public Health and
Safety. In the case of public facility projects, documentation of the
problem by outside, third-party sources is of primary importance. In
the case of water and sewer projects, documentation from public
agencies is particularly helpful, especially where such agencies have
pinpointed the exact cause of the problem and have recommended courses
of action which would eliminate the problem. Such supporting
documentation should be as up-to-date as possible; the older the
supporting material, the more doubt arises that the need is current and
immediate. Applicants also should be sure to indicate how the project
would address public health and safety needs and conditions.
Quantification also is essential in describing needs. Documentation
from those affected should be included.
The following factors and weights will be used to evaluate proposed
public facilities projects affecting the public health and safety:
(a) Severity of Need (up to 160 points of the total Program Impact
score). The applicant should describe, including appropriate
documentation, as best as possible, the degree to which the need is
serious, current and requires prompt attention.
(b) Extent to which the proposed program will resolve the
identified problem and public health and safety concerns (up to 50
points of the total Program Impact score). The applicant should
demonstrate that the project will completely solve the problem and, if
applicable, the applicant should address whether the proposal would be
satisfactory to other State/local agencies which have jurisdiction over
the problem.
(c) Feasibility (up to 50 points of the total Program Impact
score). The applicant should address whether the proposal is the most
cost effective and efficient among the possible alternatives
considered, and the funding requested will be sufficient to resolve the
problem. Total project costs should be documented by qualified third-
party estimates, and be as recent as possible.
(d) Extent of benefit to affected persons and the cost per
household (up to 80 points of the total Program Impact score).
(e) Leveraging other resources to minimize project costs (up to 40
points of the total Program Impact score). To the extent that Small
Cities grant funds will not cover all costs, the source of other funds
should be identified and committed. If local funds are to be used, the
applicant should show both the willingness and the ability to provide
the funds.
(f) Extent to which the project addresses deficiencies in
accessibility for disabled persons and/or provides a significant
increase in the number of public facilities accessible to disabled
persons (up to 20 points of the total Program Impact score).
(3) Program Impact--Economic Development Projects. As discussed
earlier in this section of the NOFA, each individual Single Purpose
project will receive a separate impact rating. Applicants whose
proposed economic development program will include multiple proposals
should determine the most appropriate form of submission. This
determination will require a choice as to either the incorporation of
all proposals into a single project or the submission of separate
projects for each proposal (each transaction will be considered a
separate project). The single project format presents an ``all or
nothing'' situation. In determining the appropriate submission format,
applicants should consider the ability of a transaction to rate well on
its own, based on the magnitude of employment impact, size of the
financial transaction and the other factors discussed in this section.
The submission of proposals as separate projects must be clearly
designated by the applicant with individual Needs Descriptions,
Community Development Activities, Impact Descriptions and Program
Schedule forms, including an appropriate name for each project on HUD
Form 4124.1.
Section 807(c)(3) of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1992 (42 U.S.C. 5305 note) provides that it is the sense of Congress
that each grantee should devote one percent of its grant for the
purpose of providing assistance under section 105(a)(23) of the 1974
HCD Act to facilitate economic development through commercial
microenterprises. A ``microenterprise'' is defined as a commercial
enterprise with five or fewer employees, one or more of whom owns the
enterprise. While not a requirement, this intent should be considered
in developing an economic development application.
It is noted that in accordance with section 105 of the 1974 HCD
Act, HUD published on January 5, 1995 (60 FR 1922), a final rule
relating to evaluation and selection of Economic Development activities
by grantees, including evaluation of public benefit (generally codified
at 24 CFR 570.209). Economic Development applications must be specific
enough to permit a determination that such threshold public benefit
standards are met.
(a) Scoring. The following factors and weights will be used to
evaluate
[[Page 65494]]
proposed economic development projects:
(i) The extent to which the project will have a direct and positive
impact on employment opportunities for persons from low-and moderate-
income households (up to 160 points of the total Program Impact score).
Applicants are reminded that for an activity to be consistent with the
statutory objective of low-and moderate-income benefit, as a result of
the creation or retention of jobs, at least 51 percent of created or
retained employment opportunities must be held by, or made available
to, persons from low-and moderate-income families. Applicants must
fully document and describe employment benefits. In addition,
applicants should address the following issues:
a. All employment data must be expressed in terms of full-time
equivalents (FTEs). Only permanent jobs may be counted, and applicants
must take into account such factors as seasonal and part-time
employment. A seasonal job may be considered permanent if the season is
long enough to be considered the person's principal occupation;
permanent part-time jobs must be converted to the full-time equivalent.
b. The amount of CDBG assistance required to produce each full-time
equivalent job will affect the impact assessment by HUD. Lower CDBG
costs per job are preferable to higher CDBG costs per job. Such
assessments of impact will be done on a comparative basis among all
projects submitted, rather than by comparison to a given standard.
c. The use of CDBG funds to assist a business with transferring to
a different community will generally be considered as having no
employment impact. Exceptions to this rule may include an expansion to
the business as a result of, or concurrent with, the transfer; or if
the business can demonstrate that it is infeasible to continue
operations at the current site. An applicant that fails to document a
basis for such an exception could receive a substantially lower score
under this ranking factor. Applicants are encouraged to use CDBG funds
for projects that provide as many jobs as possible for individuals that
are currently receiving public assistance. Providing employment to
recipients of public assistance will help break the cycle of dependency
and empower low-income citizens to take control of their lives.
(ii) The extent to which market analysis and other risk data
provides assurance that the proposed project will be successful (up to
50 points of the total Program Impact score).
(iii) The extent to which the proposed project addresses all
appropriate feasibility issues (including extent of firm private
financing commitments) and the extent to which there is reasonable
assurance that the project will be completed in a timely manner (up to
50 points of the total Program Impact score). Projects that are likely
to encounter feasibility issues which would hinder the timely
completion of the project will receive a lower score under this
criterion. Such issues include, but are not limited to: site control,
zoning, public approvals and permits, infrastructure, environment, and
relocation. Applicants should address these and any other applicable
issues and provide documentation where appropriate.
Applicants also must demonstrate the reasonable likelihood of the
project's success, from both a financial and employment standpoint. An
analysis or market data, which indicates an inordinate risk in the
undertaking of the project, will affect the overall rating of program
impact. In order to receive a higher rating, the costs must be
reasonable (i.e., not inflated).
(iv) Extent to which the project provides Public Benefits relative
to other proposals' cost per job (up to 80 points of the total Program
Impact score).
(v) The extent to which Small Cities grant funds will leverage the
investment of private and other dollars and the extent to which Small
Cities grant funds are NOT used to substitute for private financing (up
to 60 points of the total Program Impact score). Leverage is defined as
the amount of private debt and equity to be invested as a direct result
of the CDBG-funded activity. Projects which provide the maximum
feasible level of private investment will be considered as having
appropriate leverage. The extent of firm commitments for private
financing will be reviewed as well as the amount of equity investment.
The project will be reviewed to determine whether CDBG funds are
replacing private sources of funds. In order to receive maximum impact
CDBG funds may not replace private financing, CDBG assistance must be
limited to the amount necessary to fund the project without replacing
CDBG funds for private funds, and equity funds should bear the greatest
risk in the project.
In addition to the standard submission requirements, HUD will
evaluate the following as part of its Eligibility Review prior to
considering an application for funding in the FY 1997/1998 competition.
(b) The Appropriate Determination. HUD has developed guidelines for
review of economic development activities undertaken with CDBG funds.
These guidelines are composed of two components: guidelines for
evaluating project costs and financial requirements; and standards for
evaluating public benefit. The standards for evaluating public benefit
are mandatory, but the guidelines for evaluating project costs and
financial requirements are not. The guidelines for evaluating project
costs are to ensure:
(i) Reasonableness of Proposed Costs. The applicant must review
each project cost element and determine that the cost is reasonable and
consistent with third-party, fair-market prices for that cost element.
The general principle is that the level of CDBG assistance cannot be
adequately determined if the project costs are understated or inflated.
(ii) Commitment of Other Sources of Funds. The applicant shall
review all projected sources of funds necessary to complete the project
and shall verify that all sources (in particular private debt and
equity financing) have been firmly committed to the extent practicable,
and are available to be invested in the project. Verification means
ascertaining that: the source of funds is committed; that the terms and
conditions of the committed funds are known; and the source has the
capacity to deliver.
(iii) No Substitution of CDBG Funds (including Section 108 Loan
Guarantee proceeds) for Private Sources of Funds. The applicant shall
financially underwrite the project and ensure to the extent possible
that CDBG funds are not being substituted for available private debt
financing or equity capital. The analysis must be tailored to the type
of project being assisted (e.g., real estate, user project, capital
equipment, working capital, etc.). Real estate projects require
different financial analysis than working capital or machinery and
equipment projects. Applicants should ensure that both a significant
equity commitment by the for-profit business exists and that the level
of certainty of the end use of the property or project is sufficient to
ensure the achievement of national objectives within a reasonable
period of time.
(iv) Establishment of Small Cities Grant Financing Terms. The
amount of Small Cities grant assistance provided to a for-profit
business ideally should be limited to the amount, with appropriate
repayment terms, sufficient to go forward without substituting Small
Cities grant funds for available private debt or cash equity. The
applicant should structure its repayment terms so
[[Page 65495]]
that the business is allowed a reasonable rate of return on invested
equity, considering the level of risk of the project. Equity funds
generally should bear the greatest risk of all funds invested in a
project.
(v) Public Benefit Determination. The applicant's activities must
meet the public benefit standards found in 24 CFR 570.209(b).
Activities covered by these guidelines (subject to certain exceptions)
must, in the aggregate, either:
Create or retain at least one full-time equivalent,
permanent job per $35,000 of CDBG funds used; or
Provide goods or services to residents of an area, such
that the number of low- and moderate-income persons residing in the
areas served by the assisted businesses amounts to at least one low-
and moderate-income person per $350 of CDBG funds used.
(c) CDBG Assistance Must Minimize Business and Job Displacement.
Each applicant will evaluate the potential of each economic development
project for causing displacement of existing businesses and lost jobs
in the neighborhood where the project is proposed to be located. When
the grantee concludes that the potential exists to cause displacement,
given the size, scope or nature of the business, then the grantee must,
to the extent practicable, take steps to minimize such displacement.
The project file must document the grantee's review conclusions and, if
applicable, the steps the grantee will take to minimize displacement.
(d) Section 105(a)(17) Requirements. Section 105(a)(17) of the 1974
HCD Act requires that an activity assisted under that section achieve
one of the following criteria:
(i) Creates or retains jobs for low- and moderate-income persons
(note that a project which meets the national objective of principally
benefitting low- and moderate-income persons by creating or retaining
jobs, 51 percent of which are for low- and moderate-income persons,
will be deemed to have met this criterion without any additional
documentation);
(ii) Prevents or eliminates slums or blight (note that a project
which meets the national objective of aiding in the prevention or
elimination of slums or blight on an area basis will be deemed to have
met this criterion without any additional documentation);
(iii) Meets an urgent need (note that a project which meets the
national objective of meeting community development needs having a
particular urgency will be deemed to have met this criterion without
any additional documentation);
(iv) Creates or retains businesses owned by community residents;
(v) Assists businesses that provide goods or services needed by and
affordable to low- and moderate-income residents;
(vi) Provides technical assistance to promote any of the activities
under (i) through (v) of this subsection.
(e) National Objectives. As previously stated in this NOFA, all
CDBG-assisted activities must address one of the three broad national
objectives. Since economic development projects usually result in new
employment or the retention of existing jobs, these activities most
likely would be categorized as principally benefitting low- and
moderate-income persons in this manner. Such projects will be
considered to benefit low- and moderate-income persons where the
criteria of 24 CFR 570.208(a)(4) are met. HUD will consider an activity
to qualify under this provision where the activity involves jobs at
least 51 percent of which are taken by or made available to such
persons, or retained by such persons. The extent to which the proposed
project will directly address employment opportunities for low- and
moderate-income persons in the applicant jurisdiction will be a primary
factor in HUD's assessment of the proposed program.
The application must contain adequate documentation to explain
fully, and to support, the process that will be used to ensure that
project(s) comply with the low- and moderate-income employment
requirements. The documentation must be sufficient to show that the
process has been developed and that program participants have agreed to
adhere to that process. In determining whether the person is a low- and
moderate-income person for these activities, it is the person's family
income at the time the CDBG assistance is provided that is
determinative. When making judgments concerning whether an individual
qualifies as a low- and moderate-income person, both family size and
the income of the entire family must be considered. This consideration
is necessary because a ``low- and moderate-income person'' is defined
as a member of a low- and moderate-income family.
HUD will accept a written certification by a person of his or her
family income and size to establish low- and moderate-income status.
The certification may simply state that the person's family income is
below that required to be low- and moderate-income in that area. The
form for such certification must include a statement that the
information is subject to verification.
In addition to person-by-person income certifications discussed
above, under section 105(c)(4) of the 1974 HCD Act, an employee may be
presumed to be a low- and moderate-income person if the employee
resides in a census tract where not less than 70 percent of the
residents are low- and moderate-income persons, and a presumption of
low- and moderate-income may also be made if the business is located in
and/or the employee resides in a census tract (or block numbering
group) where 20 percent of the residents are in poverty. The key
consideration in this presumption is the location of the business or
employee. The documentation to support the presumption must contain the
location. (See 24 CFR 570.209(b)(2)(v) for more information on this
subject.)
In cases where an activity (e.g., a shopping center or a super
market) provides goods and services to residents of an area, the low-
and moderate-income objective may be met by the area benefit
requirements at 24 CFR 570.208(a)(1). To document low and moderate
income, 51 percent of the residents of the area or block numbering
group must be low- and moderate-income persons.
(f) Application Requirements. To the extent feasible, the material
listed below should be submitted for economic development projects. The
material should be submitted for each proposed activity, whether the
proposed activity is presented as a separate project or as part of a
project involving multiple activities. Since economic development
projects are rated against each other, the more completely these
submission requirements are met, the greater the potential exists for
enhancing the impact score of the project.
(i) A letter from each appropriate developmental entity which
includes at least the following information:
a. A detailed physical description of the project with a schedule
of events and maps or drawings as appropriate.
b. The estimated costs for the project, including any working
capital requirements.
c. A discussion of all financing sources, including the need for
CDBG, the terms of the CDBG assistance, and the proposed lien
structure. The amount, source, and nature of any equity investment(s)
must also be provided as well as a commitment to invest the equity.
d. A discussion of employment impact which includes a schedule of
newly created positions. The schedule
[[Page 65496]]
should identify the number, salary and skill level of each permanent
position to be created. If jobs are made available to low- and
moderate-income persons, the applicant must also demonstrate and
document how persons from low- and moderate-income households will be
accorded first consideration for employment opportunities.
e. A discussion of all appropriate feasibility issues including,
but not limited to: site control, zoning, public approvals and permits,
impact fees, corporate authorizations, infrastructure, environment and
relocation.
f. An analysis and summary of market and other data which supports
the anticipated success of the project.
g. A statement as to whether or not the project will result in the
relocation of any industrial or commercial plant, facility, or
operation from one area to another. If the CDBG funded project will
result in the relocation of a plant, facility, or operation, then the
application shall include a statement as to the total number of jobs
that are currently filled at the existing/current plant, facility, or
operation and the number of jobs that are projected to exist at that
former plant, facility, or operation after the proposed CDBG funded
project is complete and fully operational.
(ii) A development budget showing all costs for the project,
including professional fees and working capital.
(iii) Documentation to support project costs. Documentation
generally should be from a third-party source and be consistent with
the following guidelines:
a. Acquisition costs should be supported by an appraisal.
b. Construction/renovation costs should be certified by an
architect, engineer or contractor. Use of Federal Prevailing Wage Rates
should be cited where applicable.
c. Machinery and equipment costs should be supported by vendor
quotes.
d. Soft costs (e.g., legal, accounting, title insurance) need be
substantiated only where such costs are anticipated to be abnormally
high.
(iv) Letters from all financing sources discussing (at a minimum)
the amount and terms of the proposed financing, and the current status
of the application for funding.
(v) Historical financial data of the development entity, preferably
for the last 3 years. This information may be submitted under separate
cover with confidentiality requested. It is recognized that historical
financial data may be unavailable or inappropriate for some projects
(e.g., start-up companies and real estate transactions).
(vi) A 2- to 5-year cash flow pro forma with accompanying notes
citing basic assumptions.
(vii) The applicant's assessment of the project's consistency with
the CDBG program eligibility requirements and standards for evaluating
project cost, financial requirements and public benefit.
d. Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Evaluation. Documentation for
the 50 points for these items is the responsibility of the applicant.
Claims of outstanding performance must be based upon actual
accomplishments. Clear, precise documentation will be required. Maps
must have a census tract or block numbering area (BNA), and they must
be in accordance with the 1990 Census data. Additionally, maps must
identify the locations of areas with minorities by census tract or BNA.
If there are no minority areas, state so on the map. Only population
data from the 1990 Census will be acceptable for purposes of this
section.
Please note that a ``minority'' is a person belonging to, or
culturally identified as, a member of any one of the following racial/
ethnic categories: Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, and
American Indian or Alaskan Native. For the purposes of this section,
the separate category of ``women'' is not considered a minority.
Counties claiming points under this criterion must use county-wide
statistics (excluding entitlement communities). In the case of joint
applications, points will be awarded based on the performance of the
lead entity only.
The following factors will be used to judge outstanding performance
in these areas. Please note that points for outstanding performance may
be claimed under each criterion:
(1) Housing Achievements (40 points total).
(a) Provision of Fair Housing Choice (20 points)
(i) HUD will consider the extent to which the applicant
demonstrates that it has provided housing assistance for low- and
moderate-income families that results in housing choice in areas
outside of minority or low- and moderate-income concentration. Such
actions may include the construction or rehabilitation of housing in
areas outside of minority or low- and moderate-income concentration;
the provision of Section 8 Existing Certificate or Voucher assistance
in ways that lessen concentration of such assisted units within
minority and low- and moderate-income concentrated areas; or the
provision of direct homeownership assistance such as homeownership
counseling, downpayment assistance, or first-time homebuyer assistance.
If applicable, the applicant may use a map to show the general
location(s) of individual projects and/or housing occupied by Section 8
Existing Program participants.
(ii) Points also may be awarded for efforts which enable low- and
moderate-income persons to remain in their neighborhood when such
neighborhoods are experiencing revitalization and substantial
displacement as a result of private reinvestment. Applicants requesting
points under this criterion would not need to meet the requirements of
paragraphs (a) and (b) in order to receive points. Points will be
awarded where more than one-half of the families displaced were able to
remain in their original neighborhood through the assistance of the
applicant. Applicants must show that:
The neighborhood experienced revitalization;
The amount of displacement was substantial;
Displacement was caused by private reinvestment;
Low- and moderate-income persons were permitted to remain
in the neighborhood as a result of action taken by the applicant.
If the community is inhabited predominantly by persons who are
members of minority and/or low-income groups, points will be awarded
where there is a balanced distribution of assisted housing throughout
the community.
(b) Implementation of a Fair Housing Strategy that Affirmatively
Furthers Fair Housing (20 points). The applicant must demonstrate that
it is implementing or plans to implement a Fair Housing Strategy on its
own or demonstrate that it does or plans to participate in a county/
State or regional analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. A
fair housing strategy must include the following elements:
Local compliance activities;
Educational programs to enhance the clarity and
understanding of the community's fair housing policy. For communities
with few or no minorities, this should include publication in the
surrounding communities of the applicant's policy of fair housing for
minorities and persons with disabilities;
Assistance to minority families; and
Special programs (e.g., utilization of Community Housing
Resource Board (CHRB) Programs, efforts to encourage local realtors to
enter into voluntary agreements to encourage equal access to financial
institutions, etc.).
Assistance to minority families through mobility
counseling programs
[[Page 65497]]
and other activities that encourage such families to pursue such
housing opportunities outside of minority concentrated areas;
Special programs targeted at lenders, builders, realtors,
and other housing industry groups;
Affirmative marketing strategies targeted at those groups
in the eligible population considered least likely to apply without
special outreach.
The fair housing strategy must include goals for each of the above
elements. The date of adoption or development of the strategy should be
indicated, as well as the date proposed activities will be or have been
implemented.
(2) Entrepreneurial Efforts and Local Equal Opportunity
Performance. HUD encourages the use of minority contracting, although
it will not be used as an evaluation factor in this NOFA.
(3) Equal Opportunity Employment. (10 points) Under this factor,
the applicant must document that its percentage of minority, permanent
full-time employees is greater than the percentage of minorities within
the county or the community, whichever is higher. Applicants with no
full-time employees may claim points based on part-time employment
provided that they document that the only permanent employment is on a
part-time basis.
e. Welfare to Work Initiative. (5 points) Five bonus points will be
added to proposals which support the Welfare to Work Initiative. These
points will be added to those proposals that include activities which
will provide assistance to persons moving from welfare to work.
Examples of such activities are: jobs, day care slots, training or
transportation assistance.
4. Final Selection
The total points received by a project for all of the selection
factors are added, and the project is ranked against all other projects
from all applications, regardless of the program areas in which the
projects were rated. The highest ranked projects will be funded to the
extent funds are available. If an applicant submits two applications
under this NOFA, it may receive up to two single grants in the amounts
of the project or projects applied for in those applications which were
ranked high enough to be funded. In the case of ties at the funding
line, HUD will use the following criteria in order to break ties:
The project receiving the highest program impact rating
will be funded;
If tied projects have the same program impact rating, the
project having the highest combined score on the needs factors will be
funded;
If tied projects have the same program impact ratings and
equal needs factor scores, the project having the highest score on the
percent of persons in poverty needs factor will be funded; and
If tied projects have the same program impact ratings,
equal needs factor scores, and an equal percent of persons in poverty
needs factor score, the application having the most outstanding
performance in fair housing and equal opportunity will be funded.
As soon as possible after the rating and ranking process has been
completed, HUD will notify all applicants regarding their rating scores
and funding status. Thereafter, applicants may contact HUD to discuss
scores or any aspects of the selection process.
II. Application and Funding Award Process
A. Obtaining Applications
All nonentitled communities in New York State may obtain
application kits through HUD's New York or Buffalo Offices. The
addresses for HUD's Buffalo and New York offices are:
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Community
Planning and Development, Attention: Small Cities Coordinator, 26
Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278-0068, Telephone (212) 264-2885
x3401.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Planning and
Development Division, Attention: Small Cities Coordinator, 465 Main
Street, Lafayette Court, Buffalo, NY 14203, Telephone (716) 551-5755
x5800.
In addition, application kits and additional information are available
on the HUD website located at: www.hud.gov or by contacting Community
Connections at (800) 998-9999.
B. Submitting Applications
A final application must be submitted to HUD no later than February
8, 1999. A final application includes an original and two photocopies.
Final applications may be mailed, and if they are received after the
deadline, must be postmarked no later than midnight, February 8, 1999.
If an application is hand-delivered to the New York or Buffalo Offices,
the application must be delivered by 4:00 p.m. on the application
deadline date. Applicants in the counties of Sullivan, Ulster, Putnam,
and in nonparticipating jurisdictions in the urban counties of
Dutchess, Orange, Rockland, Westchester, Nassau, and Suffolk should
submit applications to the New York Office. All other nonentitled
communities in New York State should submit their applications to the
Buffalo Office. Applications must be submitted to the HUD office at the
addresses listed above in section II.A.
The above-stated application deadline is firm as to date and hour.
In the interest of fairness to all competing applicants, HUD will treat
as ineligible for consideration any application that is not received
on, or postmarked by February 8, 1999. Applicants should take this
practice into account and make early submission of their materials to
avoid any risk of loss of eligibility brought about by unanticipated
delays or other delivery-related problems.
C. The Application
1. Application Requirements
An application for the Small Cities Program CDBG Grants is made by
the submission of:
(a) A completed HUD Form 4124, including HUD Forms 4124.1 through
4124.6 and all appropriate supporting material;
(b) A completed Standard Form 424;
(c) A signed copy of certifications required under the CDBG
Program, including, but not limited to the Drug-Free Workplace
Certification, and the Certification Regarding Lobbying pursuant to
section 319 of the Department of Interior Appropriations Act for Fiscal
Year 1990 (31 U.S.C. 1352), generally prohibiting use of appropriated
funds, and, if applicable, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL);
(d) Form HUD-2880, Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/Update Report, as
required under subpart A of 24 CFR part 4 (Accountability in the
Provision of HUD Assistance); and, if applicable,
(e) Abbreviated Consolidated Plan.
(f) A Section 108 Loan Guarantee application or request, if
applicable, consisting of one of the following:
(1) A formal application for Section 108 Loan Guarantee(s),
including the documents listed at Sec. 570.704(b);
(2) A brief description of a Section 108 Loan Guarantee
application(s) to be submitted within 60 days (with HUD reserving the
right to extend such period for good cause on a case-by-case basis) of
a notice of CDBG Small Cities grant award. (The CDBG grant award will
be conditioned on approval of actual Section 108 Loan Guarantee
commitments within a stated period of time.) This description must be
sufficient to support the basic eligibility of the proposed project or
activities for Section 108 assistance; or
(3) If applicable, a copy of a Section 108 Loan Guarantee approval
document with grant number and date of approval.
[[Page 65498]]
2. Streamlined Application Requirements for Certain Applicants
Single Purpose applications submitted under the FY 1997/98 NOFA but
not selected for funding will be reactivated for consideration under
this NOFA, if the applicant notifies HUD in writing by February 8, 1999
that the applicant wishes the prior application to be considered in
this competition. Applications which are reactivated may be updated,
amended or supplemented by the applicant provided that such amendment
or supplementation is received no later than the due date for
applications under this NOFA. If there is no significant change in the
application involving new activities or alteration of proposed
activities that will significantly change the scope, location or
objectives of the proposed activities or beneficiaries, there will be
no further citizen participation requirement to keep the application
active for a succeeding round or competition.
D. Funding Award Process
In accordance with section 102 of the HUD Reform Act and HUD's
regulation in 24 CFR part 4, HUD will notify the public by notice
published in the Federal Register of all award decisions made by HUD
under this competition. In accordance with the requirements of section
102 of the Reform Act and HUD's regulations at 24 CFR part 4, HUD also
will ensure that documentation and other information regarding each
application submitted under this NOFA is sufficient to indicate the
basis upon which assistance was provided or denied. Additionally, in
accordance with Sec. 4.5(b) of these regulations, HUD will make this
material available for public inspection for a period of 5 years,
beginning not less than 30 calendar days after the date on which
assistance is provided.
III. Technical Assistance
Prior to the application deadline, the Buffalo and New York offices
will provide technical assistance on request to individual applicants,
including explaining and responding to questions regarding program
regulations, and defining terms in the application package. In
addition, HUD will conduct informational meetings around the State to
discuss the Small Cities Program, and will conduct application
workshops in conjunction with these meetings. Please contact the New
York or Buffalo Office for further information regarding these
meetings. Application kits will be available at these meetings, as well
as from the New York or Buffalo Offices. In order to ensure that the
application deadline is met, it is strongly suggested that applicants
begin preparing their applications immediately and not wait for the
informational meetings.
IV. Checklist of Application Submission Requirements
The following checklist is intended to aid applicants in
determining whether their application is complete:
Application Completeness Checklist
Applicant: __________
Amount Requested $________
1. Is amount of funds requested within established maximum?
2. Part I--Needs Description (HUD Form 4124.1)
a. Program Area
____Housing
____Target Area
____Nontarget Area
____Public Facilities
____Economic Development (If an ``appropriate'' analysis is
required but is not included, the application cannot be rated.)
b. Is description of community development needs included in
application?
3. Part II--Community Development Activities (HUD Form 4124.2)
a. Has national objective been identified for each activity?
b. Will 70 percent of grant funds primarily benefit low- and
moderate-income persons? (If not, the application cannot be rated.)
4. Part III--Impact Description (HUD Form 4124.3)
5. Part IV--Outstanding Performance (HUD Form 4124.4)
6. Part V--Program Schedule (HUD Form 4124.5)
7. Part VI--Maps
a. Location of proposed activities. (Applicants must show the
boundaries of the defined area or areas.)
b. Location of areas with minorities by census tract. (If there are
no minority areas, state so on the map.)
c. Housing conditions if project involves housing rehabilitation.
(Number and location of each standard and substandard unit should be
clearly identified.)
8. a. Is Standard Form 424 complete? Yes No
b. Is original signature on at least one copy? Yes No
9. Is Certification signed with original signature? Yes No
10. Has the abbreviated consolidated plan been prepared and submitted
to HUD (or included with this application)?
11. Form HUD-2880, Application/Recipient Disclosure/Update Report.
12. Do proposed economic development activities meet the public benefit
standards as defined in 24 CFR 570.209?
V. Corrections to Deficient Applications
Under no circumstances will HUD accept from the applicant
unsolicited information regarding the application after the application
deadline has passed.
HUD may advise applicants of technical deficiencies in applications
and permit them to be corrected. A technical deficiency would be an
error or oversight which, if corrected, would not alter, in either a
positive or negative fashion, the review and rating of the application.
Examples of curable technical deficiencies would be a failure to submit
the proper certifications or failure to submit an application
containing an original signature by an authorized official. Situations
not considered curable would be, for example, a failure to submit
program impact descriptions.
HUD will notify applicants in writing of any curable technical
deficiencies in applications. Applicants will have 14 calendar days
from the date of HUD's correspondence to reply and correct the
deficiency. If the deficiency is not corrected within this time period,
HUD will reject the application as incomplete.
Applicants should note that if an abbreviated consolidated plan is
not submitted, the failure to submit it in a timely manner is not
considered a curable deficiency.
VI. Findings and Certifications
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
The information collection requirements related to this CDBG
program have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520), and have been assigned OMB approval number 2506-0020. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless the collection displays a valid
control number.
Environmental Impact
This NOFA provides funding under, and does not alter environmental
requirements of, a regulation previously published in the Federal
Register. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(5), this NOFA is
categorically excluded
[[Page 65499]]
from environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act.
The environmental review provisions of this regulation are in 24 CFR
570.604.
Federalism
The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under section 6(a)
of Executive Order 12612, Federalism, has determined that this NOFA
will not have substantial, direct effects on States, on their political
subdivisions, or on their relationship with the Federal Government, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between them and
other levels of government. While the NOFA will provide financial
assistance to the Small Cities Program of New York State, none of its
provisions will have an effect on the relationship between the Federal
Government and New York State, or the State's political subdivisions.
Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance
See Section I.A.4. of this NOFA.
Prohibition Against Lobbying Activities
Applicants for funding under this NOFA are subject to the
provisions of section 319 of the Department of Interior and Related
Agencies Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (31 U.S.C. 1352) (the
Byrd Amendment) and to the provisions of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-65; December 19, 1995).
The Byrd Amendment, which is implemented in regulations at 24 CFR
part 87, prohibits applicants for Federal contracts and grants from
using appropriated funds to attempt to influence Federal executive or
legislative officers or employees in connection with obtaining such
assistance, or with its extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or
modification. The Byrd Amendment applies to the funds that are the
subject of this NOFA. Therefore, applicants must file a certification
stating that they have not made and will not make any prohibited
payments and, if any payments or agreement to make payments of
nonappropriated funds for these purposes have been made, a form SF-LLL
disclosing such payments must be submitted. The certification and the
SF-LLL are included in the application package.
The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, which repealed section 112 of
the HUD Reform Act and resulted in the elimination of the regulations
at 24 CFR part 86, requires all persons and entities who lobby covered
executive or legislative branch officials to register with the
Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives
and file reports concerning their lobbying activities.
Prohibition Against Advance Information on Funding Decisions
Section 103 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
Reform Act of 1989, and HUD's implementing regulation codified at
subpart B of 24 CFR part 4, applies to the funding competition
announced today. These requirements continue to apply until the
announcement of the selection of successful applicants. HUD employees,
including those conducting technical assistance sessions or workshops
and those involved in the review of applications and in the making of
funding decisions, are limited by section 103 from providing advance
information to any person (other than an authorized employee of HUD)
concerning funding decisions, or from otherwise giving any applicant an
unfair competitive advantage. Persons who apply for assistance in this
competition should confine their inquiries to the subject areas
permitted under section 103 and subpart B of 24 CFR part 4.
Applicants who have ethics related questions should contact the HUD
Office of Ethics, (202) 708-3815. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance Number for this program is 14.219.
Dated: November 20, 1998.
Joseph A. D'Agosta,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development.
[FR Doc. 98-31516 Filed 11-20-98; 1:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-P
