96-30196. Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; NuflorRegister  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 26, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 60106-60107]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-30196]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Food and Drug Administration
    [Docket No. 96E-0315]
    
    
    Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
    Extension; Nuflor
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
    regulatory review period for Nuflor and is publishing this 
    notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the 
    determination because of the submission of an application to the 
    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the 
    extension of a patent which claims that animal drug product.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 
    12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health 
    Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
    Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
    Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
    and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
    that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
    the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
    device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
    review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
    product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
    amount of extension an applicant may receive.
        A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
    testing phase and an approval phase. For animal drug products, the 
    testing phase begins on the earlier date when either a major 
    environmental effects test was initiated for the drug or when an 
    exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
    Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and runs until the approval 
    phase begins. The approval
    
    [[Page 60107]]
    
    phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market 
    the animal drug product and continues until FDA grants permission to 
    market the drug product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review 
    period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the 
    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the 
    testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have 
    occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the 
    length of a regulatory review period for an animal drug product will 
    include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 
    U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
        FDA recently approved for marketing the animal drug product 
    Nuflor (florfenicol). Nuflor is indicated for 
    treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD), associated with 
    Pasteurella haemolytica, P. multocida, and Haemophilus somnus. 
    Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a 
    patent term restoration application for Nuflor (U.S. Patent 
    No. 4,235,892) from Schering Corp. and the Patent and Trademark Office 
    requested FDA's assistance in determining the patent's eligibility for 
    patent term restoration. In a letter dated September 17, 1996, FDA 
    advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this animal drug product 
    had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of 
    Nuflor represented the first commercial marketing of the 
    product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested 
    that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
        FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
    Nuflor is 4,209 days. Of this time, 4,205 days occurred 
    during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 4 days 
    occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived 
    from the following dates:
        1. The date an exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug, and Cosmetic Act became effective: November 23, 1984. FDA has 
    verified the applicant's claim that November 23, 1984, was the date 
    that the investigational new animal drug application became effective.
        2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
    the animal drug product under section 512(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act: May 28, 1996. FDA has verified the applicant's claim 
    that May 28, 1996, was the date that the new animal drug application 
    (NADA) for Nuflor (NADA 141-063) was initially submitted.
        3. The date the animal drug was approved: May 31, 1996. FDA has 
    verified the applicant's claim that NADA 141-063 was approved on May 
    31, 1996.
        This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
    maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
    Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
    its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
    application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,096 days of 
    patent term extension.
        Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is 
    incorrect may, on or before January 27, 1997, submit to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a 
    redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA, 
    on or before May 27, 1997, for a determination regarding whether the 
    applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory 
    review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient 
    facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th 
    Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format 
    specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
        Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that 
    individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket 
    number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and 
    petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. 
    and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
        Dated: November 18, 1996.
    Stuart L. Nightingale,
    Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 96-30196 Filed 11-25-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/26/1996
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
96-30196
Pages:
60106-60107 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96E-0315
PDF File:
96-30196.pdf