97-30951. Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Title V Operating Permits Program Revisions; State Implementation Plan Revision, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, California  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 62949-62951]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-30951]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
    
    [CA-002-PP; FRL-5926-2]
    
    
    Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Title V Operating 
    Permits Program Revisions; State Implementation Plan Revision, Santa 
    Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, California
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the approval of a revision to Rule 1301 of 
    Regulation XIII proposed in the Federal Register on September 3, 1997, 
    both as a revision to the federally-approved State Implementation Plan 
    (SIP) and as a revision to the title V operating permit program adopted 
    by the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (Santa 
    Barbara, SBCAPCD, or District) on September 18, 1997. This approval 
    action will incorporate this rule into the federally approved SIP. The 
    intended effect of approving this revision is to allow Department of 
    Defense (DoD) facilities to become exempt from title V of the Clean Air 
    Act permit requirements, if the source implements an emission reduction 
    plan that achieves a minimum reduction of 10 tons per year of ozone 
    precursors.
        Thus, EPA is finalizing the approval of this rule as a revision to 
    the title V operating permit program, and as a revision into the 
    California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP 
    submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air quality 
    standards and plan requirements for nonattainment areas.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This action is effective on December 26, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the rule revision and EPA's evaluation report is 
    available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office during normal 
    business hours. Copies of the submitted rule revision is available for 
    inspection during normal business hours at the following locations:
    
    Permits Office (AIR-3), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
    
    [[Page 62950]]
    
    Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA 
    94105
    Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, 26 Castilian Drive 
    B-23, Goleta, CA 93117
    California Air Resources Board, 2020 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' 
    Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Walser (telephone 415/744-1257), 
    Permits Office (AIR-3), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Applicability
    
        The following rule is being approved into the California SIP: 
    SBCAPCD Rule 1301--Part 70 Operating Permit Program--General 
    Information.
    
    II. Background
    
        On September 3, 1997, in 62 FR 46451, EPA proposed to approve the 
    following rule in the California SIP and as a revision to the title V 
    program: SBCAPCD Rule 1301--Part 70 Operating Permit Program--General 
    Information. On behalf of the District, Rule 1301 was submitted by the 
    California Air Resources Board to EPA on October 10, 1997 as a revision 
    to the title V program, and on October 31, 1997 as a SIP-submittal. A 
    detailed discussion of the background for the above rule is provided in 
    the Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) cited above.
        EPA has evaluated the above rule for consistency with the 
    requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations and EPA interpretation of 
    these requirements as expressed in the various EPA policy guidance 
    documents referenced in the NPRM cited above. EPA has found that the 
    rule meets the applicable EPA requirements. On October 31, 1997, EPA 
    reviewed this rule for completeness and found that the rule conformed 
    to the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, Appendix V.
    
    III. Response to Comments
    
        A 30 day public comment period was provided in 62 FR 46451. EPA 
    received no comments.
    
    IV. EPA Action
    
        EPA is finalizing action to approve the above rule as a revision to 
    the title V Operating Permit Program and for inclusion into the 
    California SIP. EPA is approving the submittal under section 110(k)(3) 
    as meeting requirements of section 110(a) and part D of the CAA. This 
    approval action will incorporate this rule into the federally approved 
    SIP and revise the title V program. These revisions apply to any source 
    under jurisdiction of the SBCAPCD that qualifies as a Part 70 source 
    and meets the requirements for exclusion of military tactical support 
    and/or infrastructure building maintenance equipment at a Department of 
    Defense facility. In Santa Barbara County, only Vandenberg Air Force 
    Base (VAFB) meets these requirements.
        The revision enables VAFB to comply with Rule 370, the District's 
    prohibitory rule, which limits the Base's potential to emit to below 
    the title V applicability thresholds and requires VAFB to reduce its 
    annual emissions rate of ozone precursors by at least 10 tons through 
    the ENVVEST initiative. The rule revision also includes emission 
    reduction plan requirements and milestones to be approved by the 
    District and made federally-enforceable by the EPA by incorporating the 
    rule revisions into the SIP for California, if EPA finds that the 
    planned emission reductions are real, quantifiable, surplus, and 
    enforceable.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to 
    the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light 
    of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
    relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
    
    V. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Docket
    
        Copies of Santa Barbara's submittal and other information relied 
    upon for final actions are contained in docket number CA-002-PP 
    maintained at the EPA Regional Office. The docket is an organized and 
    complete file of all the information submitted to, or otherwise 
    considered by, EPA in the development of this final rulemaking. The 
    docket is available for public inspection at the location listed under 
    the ADDRESSES section of this document.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The EPA's actions under section 502 of the Act do not create any 
    new requirements, but simply address revisions to Santa Barbara's 
    existing operating permits program that was submitted to satisfy the 
    requirements of 40 CFR part 70. Because this action does not impose any 
    new requirements, it does not have a significant impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
    
    C. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to 
    the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA 
    must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
    that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
    statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
    for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
    significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated today does 
    not include a federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of 
    $100 million or more to either state, local, or tribal governments in 
    the aggregate, or to the private sector. This federal action approves 
    pre-existing requirements under state or local law, and imposes no new 
    federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, 
    or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this 
    action.
    
    D. Executive Order 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from 
    review under Executive Order 12866.
    
    E. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business 
    Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report 
    containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
    the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the 
    General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's 
    Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
    804(2).
    
    F. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
    of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 26, 1998. Filing a 
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
    review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
    rule or action. This action may not
    
    [[Page 62951]]
    
    be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See 
    section 307(b)(2).)
    
    List of Subjects
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
    Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, 
    Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, 
    Volatile organic compounds.
    
    40 CFR Part 70
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental 
    relations, Operating permits, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
    Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
    
        Date Signed: November 14, 1997.
    Felicia Marcus,
    Regional Administrator.
    
        Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
    as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart F--California
    
        2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding and reserving paragraphs 
    (c)(247) through (c)(249) and by adding paragraph (c)(250) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (247) [Reserved]
        (248) [Reserved]
        (249) [Reserved]
        (250) New regulations for the following APCD were submitted on 
    October 31, 1997, by the Governor's designee.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District.
        (1) Rule 1301 adopted on September 18, 1997.
    
    PART 70--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
    
        2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by revising paragraph (aa) to 
    the entry for California to read as follows:
    
    Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating 
    Permits Programs
    
    * * * * *
    
    California
    
    * * * * *
        (aa) Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) 
    submitted on November 15, 1993, as amended March 2, 1994, August 8, 
    1994, December 8, 1994, June 15, 1995, and September 18, 1997; 
    interim approval effective on December 1, 1995; interim approval 
    expires on October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 97-30951 Filed 11-25-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/26/1997
Published:
11/26/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-30951
Dates:
This action is effective on December 26, 1997.
Pages:
62949-62951 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CA-002-PP, FRL-5926-2
PDF File:
97-30951.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.220