[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66366-66368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-30624]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-NE-52-AD; Amendment 39-11438; AD 99-24-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-80E1A2
Series Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
is applicable to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80E1A2 series
turbofan engines. This action requires removing from service stage 2
high pressure turbine (HPT) disks and impeller spacers prior to
exceeding new, lower cyclic life limits and imposes a drawdown program
for those parts that currently exceed, or will exceed, the new lower
limits. This amendment is prompted by the results of a refined low
cycle fatigue (LCF) analysis. The actions specified in this AD are
intended to prevent LCF cracking and failure of stage 2 HPT disks and
impeller spacers, which could result in an uncontained engine failure
and damage to the aircraft.
DATES: Effective December 13, 1999.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before January 25, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention:
Rules Docket No. 99-NE-52-AD, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may also be sent via the Internet
using the following address: 9-ane-adcomment@faa.gov''. Comments sent
via the Internet must contain the docket number in the subject line.
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from
General Electric Company via Lockheed Martin Technology Services, 10525
Chester Road, Suite C, Cincinnati, OH 45215; telephone (513) 672-8400,
fax (513) 672-8422. This information may be examined at the FAA, New
England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John E. Golinski, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781)
238-7135, fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
received results of a refined low cycle fatigue (LCF) analysis for
stage 2 high pressure turbine (HPT) disks and impeller spacers
installed on General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80E1A2 series turbofan
engines. GE has advised the FAA that the retirement lives of the CF6-
80E1A2 HPT stage 2 disk and impeller spacer identified in Chapter 5 of
the Engine Manual need to be reduced. Updated stress analysis showed
the operating stresses to be higher than originally predicted,
resulting in lower calculated cyclic retirement lives for these
components. The lower calculated cyclic lives are below the current
retirement lives found in Chapter 5 of the Engine Manual. There have
been no reports to date of LCF cracking or distress on these components
attributed to parts exceeding the new reduced Chapter 5 retirement
lives. The LCF analysis completed as part of a CF6-80E1 derivative
model certification program showed significantly different retirement
lives for the two engine models with similar components. GE initiated
an investigation and assessment of the LCF analysis to understand the
disparity and determined the updated and refined analysis resulted in a
more complete understanding of the operating stresses for certain
critical features for these components. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in LCF cracking and failure of stage 2 HPT
disks and impeller spacers, which could result in an uncontained engine
failure and damage to the aircraft.
Service Information
GE CF6-80E1A2 SB 72-0169, dated July 22, 1999, that describes the
new, lower life cyclic life limits and a drawdown plan for both the
stage 2 HPT disks and impeller spacers.
Difference Between AD and SB
The SB, unlike this AD, includes a drawdown plan for impeller
spacers.
A recent reassessment of the need for a drawdown program for the
impeller spacer occurred when a high cycle engine with the affected
stage 2 HPT disk and impeller spacer had recently been removed from
service due to high vibration. The assessment shows a drawdown program
was not required for the impeller spacer.
[[Page 66367]]
In addition, the SB includes a drawdown program for the diffuser
vane ring which is not included in the AD.
Required Actions
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other engines of the same type design, this AD is
being issued to prevent an uncontained engine failure. This AD requires
removing from service stage 2 HPT disks, part number (P/N) 1639M50P03,
prior to exceeding new, lower cyclic life limits, and replacing with
serviceable parts. The AD also imposes a drawdown program for those
parts that currently exceed, or will exceed, the new lower limits. The
HPT impeller spacers, P/N 1473M85P02, need only to be removed and
replaced prior to exceeding the new, lower cyclic life limit. The FAA
has determined, based on a current fleet histogram, that a separate
drawdown program for the HPT impeller spacer is not needed since there
are no impeller spacers in service which exceed the new reduced cyclic
life limit. The new life limits are based on an updated stress and life
analysis.
Immediate Adoption
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the
Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that
summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this
AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 9X-NE-XX-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Regulatory Impact
This rule does not have federalism implications, as defined in
Executive Order No. 13132, because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
the FAA has not consulted with state authorities prior to publication
of this rule.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this
action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined
that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will
be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may
be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
99-24-14 General Electric Company: Amendment 39-11438. Docket 99-NE-
52-AD.
Applicability: General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80E1A2 series
turbofan engines, with stage 2 high pressure turbine (HPT) disks,
part number (P/N) 1639M50P03, and HPT impeller spacers, P/N
1473M85P02, installed. These engines are installed on but not
limited to Airbus Industrie A330 series airplanes.
Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine
identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of
whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area
subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been
modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the
requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this AD. The request should include an assessment
of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the
unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition
has not been eliminated, the request should include specific
proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent low cycle fatigue (LCF) cracking and failure of stage
2 HPT disks and impeller spacers, which could result in an
uncontained engine failure and damage to the aircraft, accomplish
the following:
Stage 2 HPT Disks Drawdown Plan
(a) Remove from service stage 2 HPT disks, P/N 1639M50P03, and
replace with serviceable parts, as follows:
Note 2: GE CF6-80E1A2 Service Bulletin (SB) 72-0169, dated July
22, 1999, describes the stage 2 HPT disk drawdown plan.
(1) For disks that have accumulated greater than or equal to
3,800 cycles-since-new (CSN) on the effective date of this AD,
remove within 200 cycles-in-service (CIS) after the effective date
of this AD, but not to exceed 6,400 CSN.
(2) For disks that have accumulated greater than or equal to
2,500 CSN on the effective date of this AD and less than 3,800 CSN
on the effective date of this AD, remove from service prior to
accumulating 4,000 CSN.
(3) For disks that have accumulated greater than or equal to
1,900 CSN on the effective date of this AD and less than 2,500 CSN
on the effective date of this AD, remove from service within 1,500
CIS after the effective date of the AD.
(4) For disks that have accumulated less than 1,900 CSN on the
effective date of this AD, remove prior to accumulating 3,400 CSN.
New, Stage 2 HPT Disk Lower Life Limit
(b) Except for the provisions of paragraph (d) of this AD, no
stage 2 HPT disk, P/N 1639M50P03, may be installed with 3,400 or
greater CSN.
[[Page 66368]]
New, Lower HPT Impeller Spacer Life Limit
(c) Remove from service HPT impeller spacers, P/N 1473M85P02,
prior to accumulating 5,100 CSN. Except for the provisions of
paragraph (d) of this AD, no HPT impeller spacer, P/N 1473M85P02,
may be installed with 5,100 or greater CSN.
Note 3: GE CF6-80E1A2 SB 72-0169, dated July 22, 1999, describes
an HPT impeller spacer drawdown plan that is not utilized in this
AD.
Alternative Method of Compliance
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office (ECO).
Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, ECO.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive,
if any, may be obtained from the ECO.
Ferry Flights
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on December 13, 1999.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on October 18, 1999.
David A. Downey,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 99-30624 Filed 11-24-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U