03-29526. Grant for Injury Control Research Center

Announcement Type: New.

Funding Opportunity Number: 04057.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 93.136.

Key Dates:

Letter of Intent Deadline: December 26, 2003.

Application Deadline: February 23, 2004.

I. Funding Opportunity Description

Authority: This program is authorized under sections 301(a) and 391(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act, (42 U.S.C. 241(a)280b(a)(1)), as amended.

Purpose: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the availability of fiscal year (FY) 2004 funds for a grant for an Injury Control Research Center (ICRC). This program addresses the “Healthy People 2010” focus area of Injury and Violence Prevention. A copy of “Healthy People 2010” is available at the following Internet address: http://www.health.gov/​healthypeople.

The purposes of this program are:

1. To support an ICRC in a state predominately comprised of economically depressed rural communities where a relatively large portion of the work force is engaged in underground mining, family farming, and other rural occupations.

2. To support injury prevention and control research on priority issues as delineated in: “Healthy People 2010”; “Reducing the Burden of Injury: Advancing Prevention and Treatment”; and the research priorities published in the CDC Injury Research Agenda, located at http://www.cdc.gov/​ncipc.

3. To integrate, in the context of a national program, the disciplines of epidemiology, medicine, biomechanics and other engineering, biostatistics, public health, law and criminal justice, and behavioral and social sciences in order to prevent and control injuries more effectively.

4. To define the injury problem; identify risk and protective factors; develop and evaluate prevention and control interventions and strategies; and ensure widespread adoption of effective interventions and strategies.

5. To provide technical assistance to injury prevention and control programs within a geographic region.

Measurable outcomes of the program will be in alignment with the following performance goal for the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: Conduct a targeted program of research to reduce injury-related death and disability.

Research Objectives: Center funding is to be designated for two types of activities. One type of activity is considered core and includes administration, management, general support services (e.g., statistical, library, media relations, and advocacy for injury prevention and control) as well as activities associated with research development, technical assistance, and education (e.g., seed projects, training activities, and collaborative and technical assistance activities with other groups). Funds may be allocated for trainee stipends, tuition remission, and trainee travel in accordance with the current rates for the United States Public Health Service agencies. Indirect costs for these trainee-related activities are limited to eight percent. Defined research projects constitute the second type of activity, and ICRCs are encouraged to work toward addressing the breadth of the field. Core activities and defined research projects may each constitute between 25 percent and 75 percent of the operating budget, and should be balanced in such a way that the ICRC demonstrates productivity in research as well as teaching and service. Applicants with less demonstrated expertise in research are encouraged to devote a larger percentage of funds to defined research projects in order to establish their capability as research centers of excellence.

At least 80 percent of the costs (total direct and indirect costs) of the approved small and large research projects must be in alignment with the “CDC Injury Research Agenda,” http://www.cdc.gov/​ncipc.

Eligible applicants may enter into contracts, including consortia agreements, as necessary to meet the requirements of the program and strengthen the overall application.

Activities: Awardee activities for this program are as follows:

1. Applicants must demonstrate expertise and experience in conducting and publishing injury research in at least one of the three phases of injury control (prevention, acute care, or rehabilitation) and are encouraged to be comprehensive.

2. Applicants must document ongoing injury control-related research projects and activities currently supported by other sources of funding.

3. Applicants must provide a director (Principal Investigator) who has specific authority and responsibility to carry out the project. The director must report to an appropriate institutional official, e.g., dean of a school, vice president of a university, or commissioner of health. The director must have no less than thirty percent effort devoted solely to this project with an anticipated range of thirty percent to fifty percent.

4. Applicants must provide evidence of working relationships, including consultation and technical assistance, with outside agencies and other entities in the region in which the ICRC is located which will allow for implementation and evaluation of any proposed intervention activities.

5. Applicants must provide evidence of involvement of specialists or experts in medicine, biomechanics and other engineering, epidemiology, law and criminal justice, behavioral and social sciences, biostatistics, and public health as needed to complete the plans of the center. These are considered the disciplines and fields for ICRCs.

6. Applicants must have established curricula and graduate training programs in disciplines relevant to injury control (see item 5.above.).

7. Applicants must disseminate injury control research findings, translate them into interventions (i.e., programs or policies), and evaluate their effectiveness.

II. Award Information

Type of Award: Grant.

Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2004.

Approximate Total Funding: $905,500 (total of direct and indirect costs).

Approximate Number of Awards: One award.

Approximate Average Award: $905,500.

Floor of Award Range: None.

Ceiling of Award Range: Applicants will be allowed to apply for $1,055,500 ($150,000 above the expected award amount to allow for the inclusion of the description of an additional large project as described in Section IV. Application and Submission Information, Application 4.b. (2), but the award will be no more than $905,500 (total of direct and indirect costs).

Anticipated Award Date: September 1, 2004.

Budget Period Length: Twelve months.

Project Period Length: Three years.

Throughout the project period, CDC's commitment to continuation of awards will be conditioned on the availability of funds, evidence of satisfactory progress by the recipient (as documented in required reports), and the determination that continued funding is in the best interest of the Federal Government.

III. Eligibility Information

1. Eligible applicants: This announcement will provide funding for applicants in regions that do not have funded Injury Control Research Centers (ICRCs) and for applicants in regions that have funded Centers that must re-compete for funding.

Eligible applicants are limited to organizations in Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Region II (New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands), Region III (Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia), and Region VI (Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas).

Note:

ICRC grant awards are made to the applicant institution/organization, not the Principal Investigator.

Applications may be submitted by public and private nonprofit and for profit organizations and by governments and their agencies, such as:

• Public nonprofit organizations
• Private nonprofit organizations
• For profit organizations
• Small, minority, women-owned businesses
• Universities
• Colleges
• Research institutions
• Hospitals
• Community-based organizations
• Faith-based organizations
• Federally recognized Indian tribal governments
• Indian tribes
• Indian tribal organizations
• State and local governments or their Bona Fide Agents (this includes the District of Columbia)
• Political subdivisions of States (in consultation with States)

A Bona Fide Agent is an agency/organization identified by the state as eligible to submit an application under the state eligibility in lieu of a state application. If you are applying as a bona fide agent of a state or local government, you must provide a letter from the state or local government as documentation of your status. Place this documentation behind the first page of your application form.

2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Matching funds are not required for this program.

3. Other Eligibility Requirements: If you request a funding amount greater than the ceiling of the award range ($1,055,500), your application will be considered non-responsive and will not be entered into the review process. You will be notified that you did not meet the submission requirements.

Note:

Title 2 of the United States Code section 1611 states that an organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that engages in lobbying activities is not eligible to receive Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or loan.

IV. Application and Submission Information

1. Address to Request Application Package: To apply for this funding opportunity, use application form PHS 398 (OMB number 0925-0001 rev.5/2004). Forms and instructions are available in an interactive format on the CDC web site, at the following Internet address: http://www.cdc.gov/​od/​pgo/​forminfo.htm.

Forms and instructions are also available in an interactive format on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) web site at the following Internet address: http://grants.nih.gov/​grants/​funding/​phs398/​phs398.html.

If you do not have access to the Internet, or if you have difficulty accessing the forms on-line, you may contact the CDC Procurement and Grants Office Technical Information Management Section (PGO-TIM) staff at: [phone]. Application forms can be mailed to you.

2. Content and Form of Application Submission:

Letter of Intent (LOI): CDC requests that you send a LOI if you intend to apply for this program. Although the LOI is not required, not binding, and does not enter into the review of your subsequent application, your LOI will be used to gauge the level of interest in this program, and to allow CDC to plan the application review. Your LOI must be written in the following format:

• Maximum number of pages: Two
• Font size: 12-point unreduced
• Single Spaced
• Paper size: 8.5 by 11 inches
• Page margin size: one inch
• Printed only on one side of page
• Written in English, avoid jargon

Your LOI must contain the following information:

• Descriptive title of the proposed research
• Name, address, email address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator
• Names of other key personnel
• Participating institutions
• Number and title of this Program Announcement (PA)

Application: Follow the PHS 398 application instructions for content and formatting of your application. For further assistance with the PHS 398 application form, contact GrantsInfo, Telephone [phone], E-mail: [e-mail].

Your research plan should address activities to be conducted over the entire project period.

You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the Federal government. Your DUNS number must be entered in item 11 of the face page of the PHS 398 application form. The DUNS number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access http://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-5711. For more information, see the CDC web site at: http://www.cdc.gov/​od/​pgo/​funding/​pubcommt.htm.

The Program Announcement title and number must appear in the application. Use the information in Section I. Funding Opportunity Description, Activities; Section V. Application Review Information; and Section VI. Award Administration Information, Administration and National Policy Requirements to develop the application content. Applications should include the following information, detailing activities to be conducted for the first budget year, while briefly addressing activities to be conducted over the entire three-year project period.

1. Face page.

2. Description (abstract) and personnel.

3. Table of contents.

4. Detailed budget for the initial budget period: The budget should reflect the composite figures for the grant. In addition, separate budgets (direct and indirect costs) and justifications should be provided for the following categories of activities:

a. Core activities, including management and administrative functions, other non-research activities (e.g., education/training, consultation, technical assistance, translation/dissemination, program and policy development and evaluation, advocacy, and media activities, etc.), and small seed projects of less than $25,000 (total of direct and indirect costs) for one year or less.

b. Research Studies:

(1) Small studies of $25,000-150,000/year (total of direct and indirect costs) for one to three years duration. These projects might be expansions of seed projects, either further developing methods or hypotheses in preparation for a larger investigation leading to the submission of an RO1 level proposal, or might be stand-alone investigations sufficient to yield results worthy of publication in a peer-reviewed journal and/or a technical report for a legislative body, governmental agency, or injury control program.

(2) Larger scale studies with annual budgets exceeding $150,000/year (total of direct and indirect costs) and lasting up to three years. These projects typically will test hypotheses and employ more sophisticated methodologies and/or larger sample sizes than small studies.

For seed projects, only modest budget descriptions are required within the application. More detailed budget descriptions, commensurate with costs, are required for both small studies and large research projects.

An applicant organization has the option of having specific salary and fringe benefit amounts for individuals omitted from the copies of the application that are made available to outside reviewing groups. To exercise this option: On the original and two copies of the application, the applicant must use asterisks to indicate those individuals for whom salaries and fringe benefits are not shown; the subtotals must still be shown. In addition, the applicant must submit an additional copy of page four of Form PHS-398, completed in full, with the asterisks replaced by the salaries and fringe benefits. This budget page will be reserved for internal staff use only.

5. Budget for entire proposed project period including budgets pertaining to consortium/contractual arrangements.

6. Biographical sketches of key personnel, consultants, and collaborators, beginning with the Principal Investigator and core faculty.

7. Other support: This listing should include all other funds or resources pending or currently available. For each grant or contract include source of funds, amount of funding (indicate whether pending or current), date of funding (initiation and termination), and relationship to the proposed program.

8. Resources and environment.

9. Research plan:

a. ICRCs are to develop a range of research and other non-research activities that are designed to advance the field of injury control through development of new scientific or surveillance methods, creation of new knowledge, and translation of knowledge into training, program and policy development and evaluation activities or other applications that will ultimately reduce injuries or their effects. ICRC applications should articulate how the activities of their program are integrated with each other.

b. A detailed research plan (design and methods), in accordance with NCIPC's performance goal as stated in the purpose section of this announcement, including hypothesis, expected outcome, value to the field, and measurable and time-framed objectives consistent with the activities for each project within the proposed grant.

(1) Initial seed projects require a short write-up describing the injury control context of the study, the objective, the design, the setting and participants, the intervention being addressed, main outcome measurements, expected results, time lines, cost (total of direct and indirect costs), plans for translation/dissemination, and clear definition of procedures used to select the projects. Clear definitions of procedures used to select future out-year seed projects are also required.

(2) Small research projects require a ten to fifteen page summary describing the accomplishment of all the steps, including a description of the significance of the project, the development and testing of methods and instruments, and the collection of preliminary data needed to take an innovative approach and develop it to the level of a larger investigation leading to the submission of an RO1 level proposal or a stand-alone investigation sufficient to yield results worthy of publication in a peer-reviewed journal and/or a technical report for a legislative body, governmental agency, or injury control program.

(3) Large research projects require an RO1 level summary as described in the PHS 398 (Revised 5/01 and updated 6/28/02) guidelines. The summary should be included as an appendix of the application.

In the research plan section of the application include a description for each small and large research project:

a. Title of Project.

b. Project Director/Lead Investigator.

c. Institution(s).

d. Categorization as Prevention, Acute Care, Rehabilitation, or Biomechanics.

e. Categorization as to which NCIPC research agenda priority area the project addresses. Also, a brief description on how it addresses that priority area. If a priority area is not addressed, provide an explanation of why it is important.

f. Categorization as Seed Project, Small Project, or Large Project.

g. Categorization as New or Ongoing Project

h. Cost/Year (total of direct and indirect costs).

i. Research Training: Names, Degrees of Persons Trained or in Training.

j. Key Words.

k. Brief Summary of Project including Intended Application of Finding (Abstract).

c. A description of the core faculty and their roles in implementing and evaluating the proposed programs. The applicant should clearly specify how disciplines will be integrated to achieve the ICRC's objectives.

d. Charts showing the proposed organizational structure of the ICRC and its relationship to the broader institution of which it is a part and, where applicable, to affiliate institutions or collaborating organizations. These charts should clearly detail the lines of authority as they relate to the center, both structurally and operationally. ICRC directors should report to an appropriate organizational level (e.g. dean of a school, vice president of a university, or commissioner of health), demonstrating strong institution-wide support of ICRC activities and ensuring oversight of the process of interdisciplinary activity.

e. Documentation of the public health agencies and other public and private sector entities to be involved in the proposed program, including letters that detail commitments of support and a clear statement of the role, activities, and participating personnel of each agency or entity.

3. Submission Dates and Times:

LOI Deadline Date: December 26, 2003.

Application Deadline Date: February 23, 2004.

Explanation of Deadlines: Applications must be received in the CDC Procurement and Grants Office by 4 p.m. Eastern Time on the deadline date. If you send your application by the United States Postal Service or commercial delivery service, you must ensure that the carrier will be able to guarantee delivery of the application by the closing date and time. If CDC receives your application after closing due to: (1) Carrier error, when the carrier accepted the package with a guarantee for delivery by the closing date and time, or (2) significant weather delays or natural disasters, you will be given the opportunity to submit documentation of the carrier's guarantee. If the documentation verifies a carrier problem, CDC will consider the application as having been received by the deadline.

This announcement is the definitive guide on application submission address and deadline. It supersedes information provided in the application instructions. If your application does not meet the deadline above, it will not be eligible for review, and will be discarded. You will be notified that you did not meet the submission requirements.

CDC will not notify you upon receipt of your application. If you have a question about the receipt of your application, first contact your courier. If you still have a question, contact the PGO-TIM staff at: 770-488-2700. Before calling, please wait two to three days after the application deadline. This will allow time for applications to be processed and logged.

4. Intergovernmental Review: Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program.

5. Funding restrictions: Restrictions, which must be taken into account while writing your budget are as follows:

Grant funds will not be made available to support the provision of direct care. Studies may be supported which evaluate methods of acute care and rehabilitation for potential reductions in injury effects and costs. Studies may be supported which identify the effect on injury outcomes and cost of systems for pre-hospital, hospital, and rehabilitative care and independent living.

If you are requesting indirect costs in your budget, you must include a copy of your indirect cost rate agreement. If your indirect cost rate is a provisional rate, the agreement must be less than 12 months of age.

Awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs.

6. Other Submission Requirements:

LOI Submission Address: Submit your LOI by express delivery service, fax, or e-mail to (only one submission is required): Robin Forbes, Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford Hwy., NE, Mailstop K-62, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: [phone], Fax: [phone], Email: [e-mail].

Application Submission Address: Submit the original and five copies of your application by mail or express delivery service to: Technical Information Management-PA# 04057, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341.

Applications may not be submitted electronically at this time.

V. Application Review Information

1. Review: You are required to provide measures of effectiveness that will demonstrate the accomplishment of the various identified objectives of the grant. Measures of effectiveness must relate to the performance goals stated in the “Purpose” section of this announcement. Measures must be objective and quantitative, and must measure the intended outcome. These measures of effectiveness must be submitted with the application and will be an element of evaluation.

2. Review and Selection Process: Applications will be reviewed by CDC staff for completeness and responsiveness as outlined under the previous heading Application and Submission Information. Incomplete applications and applications that are not responsive will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.

Applications which are complete and responsive will be subjected to a preliminary evaluation (streamline review) by the Initial Review Group (IRG) to determine if the application is of sufficient technical and scientific merit to warrant further review by the IRG. Applications that are determined noncompetitive will not be considered, and NCIPC will promptly notify the investigator/program director and the official signing for the applicant organization. Applications determined to be competitive will be evaluated by a dual review process.

Awards will be made based on priority scores assigned to applications by the IRG, programmatic priorities and needs determined by a secondary review committee (the Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control), and the availability of funds.

1. Review by IRG

An initial streamline peer-review of ICRC grant applications will be conducted by the IRG. The IRG may recommend the application for a site visit review. For those applications recommended for a site visit review, a team of peer reviewers, including members of the IRG, will conduct on-site visits at each applicant institution, generate summary statements for the visits, and report the assessment to the IRG.

Factors to be considered by the IRG include:

a. The specific aims of the application, e.g., the long-term objectives and intended accomplishments. Approval of small and large research projects (including new research projects proposed during the three-year funding cycle), in accordance with NCIPC's performance goal as stated in section “B. Purpose”, is subject to peer review.

(1) Seed projects will be evaluated collectively on the mechanism for solicitation of projects and on their technical/scientific merit review. Evaluation criteria have equal value.

(2) Small projects will be evaluated individually on the significance of the project, the innovative approach, and the proposed methods for achieving an investigation sufficient to support a submission of an RO1 level proposal and/or worthy of publication in a peer-reviewed journal and/or a technical report for a legislative body, governmental agency, or injury control program.

(3) Large projects will be evaluated individually according to existing RO1 level project standards as described in the PHS 398 (Revised 5/01 and updated 6/28/02) guidelines. The application must have a minimum of one large research project approved in order to be recommended for further consideration.

(4) At least 80 percent of the costs (total direct and indirect costs) of the approved small and large research projects must be in alignment with the “CDC Injury Research Agenda,” http://www.cdc.gov/​ncipc in order to be recommended for further consideration.

b. The scientific and technical merit of the overall application, including the significance and originality (e.g., new topic, new method, new approach in a new population, or advancing understanding of the problem) of the proposed research.

c. The extent to which the evaluation plan will allow for the measurement of progress toward the achievement of stated objectives. Does the application specify how the effectiveness of the program will be measured?

d. Qualifications, adequacy, and appropriateness of personnel to accomplish the proposed activities.

e. The soundness of the proposed budget in terms of adequacy of resources and their allocation.

f. In addition to conducting defined research projects, ICRCs are expected to devote substantial attention to advancing the field through other activities that are designed to improve research capabilities and translate research into practice. Examples of activities include: consultation and technical assistance that are responsive to regional, State, national, or international priorities; professional training for researchers and practitioners; program development; and evaluation endeavors. The degree of effort devoted to these aspects of an ICRC's program should be clearly stated in the justification and the budget. The degree of effort may be varied and should reflect the specific focus and goals of the ICRC.

g. Details of progress in the most recent funding period should be provided in the application if the applicant is submitting a re-competing application. Documented examples of success include: Development of pilot projects; completion of high quality research projects; publication of findings in peer reviewed scientific and technical journals; number of professionals trained; awards received; ongoing provision of consultation and technical assistance; integration of disciplines; translation of research into implementation; and impact on injury control outcomes including legislation, regulation, treatment, and behavior modification interventions.

h. Does the application adequately address the requirements of title 45 CFR part 46 for the protection of human subjects?

i. Does the applicant meet the CDC Policy requirements regarding the inclusion of women, ethnic, and racial groups in the proposed research? This includes:

(1) The proposed plan for the inclusion of both sexes, racial and ethnic minority populations for appropriate representation.

(2) The proposed justification when representation is limited or absent.

(3) A statement as to whether the design of the study is adequate to measure differences when warranted.

(4) A statement as to whether the plans for recruitment and outreach for study participants include the process of establishing partnerships with community or communities and recognition of mutual benefits.

j. Does the application adequately address the requirements of the “PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by Awardee Institutions?'

k. Does the application include measures that are in accordance with CDC's performance plans?

2. Review by the CDC Advisory Committee for Injury Prevention and Control (ACIPC)

Secondary review of ICRC grant applications with a priority score of 350 or better from the initial peer-review by the IRG will be conducted by the Science and Program Review Section (SPRS) of the ACIPC. The SPRS consists of ACIPC members, Federal Ex Officio participants, and organizational liaisons. The Federal Ex Officio participants will be responsible for identifying proposals in overlapping areas of research interest so that unwarranted duplication in federally funded research can be avoided. The NCIPC Division Associate Directors for Science (ADS) or their designees will address the SPRS to assure that research priorities of the announcement are understood and to provide background regarding current research activities. The SPRS recommendations will be presented to the entire ACIPC in the form of a report by the Chairman of the SPRS. The ACIPC will vote to approve, disapprove, or modify these recommendations for funding consideration.

Factors to be considered by the ACIPC include:

a. The results of the peer-review.

b. The significance of the proposed activities as they relate to national program priorities, geographic balance, and the achievement of national objectives.

c. The overall balance of the ICRC program in addressing the three phases of injury control (prevention, acute care, and rehabilitation); the control of injury among populations who are at increased risk, including racial/ethnic minority groups, the elderly and children; the major causes of intentional and unintentional injury; and the major disciplines of injury control.

d. Budgetary considerations. The ACIPC will recommend annual funding levels as detailed in Section II. Award Information, Approximate Average Award of this announcement.

These recommendations, based on the results of the peer review by the IRG, the relevance and balance of the proposed research relative to the NCIPC programs and priorities, and the assurance of no duplication of federally-funded research, are presented to the Director, NCIPC, for funding decisions.

At the discretion of the Director, NCIPC, additional consideration may be given to re-competing ICRCs. These centers represent a long-term investment for NCIPC and an established resource for injury control-related issues for their States and regions.

3. Continued Funding

Continuation awards for new awards to this announcement after federal fiscal year 2004 and within the project period will be made on the basis of the availability of funds and the following criteria:

a. The accomplishments of the current budget period show that the applicant's objectives as prescribed in the yearly work plans are being met.

b. The objectives for the new budget period are realistic, specific, and measurable.

c. The methods described will clearly lead to achievement of these objectives.

d. The evaluation plan allows management to monitor whether the methods are effective by having clearly defined process, impact, and outcome objectives, and the applicant demonstrates progress in implementing the evaluation plan.

e. The budget request is clearly explained, adequately justified, reasonable, and consistent with the intended use of grant funds.

VI. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices: If your application is to be funded, you will receive a Notice of Grant Award (NGA) from the CDC Procurement and Grants Office. The NGA shall be the only binding, authorizing document between the recipient and CDC. The NGA will be signed by an authorized Grants Management Officer, and mailed to the recipient fiscal officer identified in the application.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: 45 CFR parts 74 and 92.

For more information on the Code of Federal Regulations, see the National Archives and Records Administration at the following Internet address: http://www.access.gpo.gov/​nara/​cfr/​cfr-table-search.html.

The following additional requirements apply to this project:

• AR-1 Human Subjects Requirements
• AR-2 Requirements for Inclusion of Women and Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Research
• AR-3 Animal Subjects Requirements
• AR-10 Smoke-Free Workplace Requirements
• AR-11 Healthy People 2010
• AR-12 Lobbying Restrictions
• AR-13 Prohibition on Use of CDC Funds for Certain Gun Control Activities
• AR-20 Conference Support
• AR-21 Small, Minority, and Women-Owned Business
• AR-22 Research Integrity
• AR-25 Release and Sharing of Data

Starting with the December 1, 2003 receipt date, all NCIPC funded investigators seeking more than $250,000 in total costs in a single year are expected to include a plan describing how the final research data will be shared/released or explain why data sharing is not possible. Details on data sharing/release, including the timeliness and name of the project data steward, should be included in a brief paragraph immediately following the Research Plan Section of the PHS 398 form. References to data sharing/release may also be appropriate in other sections of the application (e.g. background and significance, human subjects requirements, etc.) The content of the data sharing/release plan will vary, depending on the data being collected and how the investigator is planning to share the data. The data sharing/release plan will not count towards the application page limit and will not factor into the determination scientific merit or priority scores. Investigators should seek guidance from their institutions, on issues related to institutional policies, local IRB rules, as well as local, state and Federal laws and regulations, including the Privacy Rule.

Further detail on the requirements for addressing data sharing in applications for NCIPC funding may be obtained by contacting NCIPC program staff or visiting the NCIPC Internet Web site: at http://www.cdc.gov/​ncipc/​osp/​sharing_​policy.htm.

Additional information on these requirements can be found on the CDC web site at the following Internet address: http://www.cdc.gov/​od/​pgo/​funding/​ARs.htm.

3. Reporting:

You must provide CDC with an original, plus two copies of the following reports:

1. Interim progress report, (PHS 2590, OMB Number 0925-0001, rev. 5/2001) no less than 90 days before the end of the budget period. The progress report will serve as your non-competing continuation application, and must contain the following elements:

a. Current Budget Period Activities Objectives.

b. Current Budget Period Financial Progress.

c. New Budget Period Program Proposed Activity Objectives.

d. Detailed Line-Item Budget and Justification.

e. Additional Requested Information.

2. Financial status report, no more than 90 days after the end of the budget period.

3. Final financial and performance reports, no more than 90 days after the end of the project period.

VII. Agency Contacts

For general questions about this announcement, contact: Technical Information Management Section, PA #04057, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: [phone].

For scientific/research program technical assistance, contact:

Tom Voglesonger, Program Manager, Office of the Associate Director for Science, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford Highway, NE, (K02), Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, Telephone: [phone], Email: [e-mail].

For questions about peer review, contact: Gwendolyn Cattledge, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of the Associate Director for Science, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford Highway, NE, (K02), Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, Telephone: [phone], E-mail: [e-mail].

For financial, grants management, or budget assistance, contact: Van King, Grants Management Specialist, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2920 Brandywine Road, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: [phone], E-mail: [e-mail].

Dated: November 20, 2003.

Edward Schultz,

Acting Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.