95-28770. Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens Promotion and Information OrderPostponement of Payment of Assessments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 227 (Monday, November 27, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 58253-58255]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-28770]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 1208
    
    [FV-95-702PR]
    
    
    Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens Promotion and Information 
    Order--Postponement of Payment of Assessments
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This proposed rule specifies general rules and regulations to 
    be established under the Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens 
    Promotion and Information Order (Order). The Order is authorized under 
    the Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens Promotion and Information 
    Act of 1993. This rule would implement a provision of the Order 
    concerning the postponement of the payment of assessments. This action 
    would create a form and establish procedures for qualified handlers to 
    request the postponement of the payment of up to six months of 
    assessments to the National PromoFlor Council. In addition, in 
    accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this proposed rule 
    specifies the public reporting burden for the collection of information 
    for requesting a postponement of payment of assessments.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by January 26, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning the proposed rule to: Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), USDA, 
    P.O. Box 96456, Room 2535-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456. Three copies of 
    all written material should be submitted, and they will be made 
    available for public inspection at the Research and Promotion Branch 
    during regular business hours. All comments should reference the docket 
    number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal 
    Register. Also send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden 
    estimate, ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
    automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
    technology, or any other aspect of this collection of information, to 
    the above address.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sonia N. Jimenez, Research and 
    Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, PO Box 
    96456, Room 2535-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, telephone (202) 720-
    9916.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under the Fresh 
    Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens Promotion and Information Act of 1993 
    (Pub. L. 103-190), (7 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.) hereinafter referred to as 
    the Act.
        This proposed rule has been issued in conformance with Executive 
    Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil 
    Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. This 
    rule would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 8 of the Act, a 
    person subject to the order may file a petition with the Secretary 
    stating that the order or any provision of the order, or any obligation 
    imposed in connection with the order, is not in accordance with law and 
    requesting a modification of the order or an exemption from the order. 
    The petitioner is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After such hearing, the Secretary will make a ruling on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district courts of the United 
    States in any district in which a person who is a petitioner resides or 
    carries on business are vested with jurisdiction to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, if a complaint for that purpose is 
    filed within 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Administrator of AMS has considered the economic impact 
    of this proposed action on small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened.
        Only those wholesale handlers, retail distribution centers, 
    producers, and importers who have annual sales of $750,000 or more of 
    cut flowers and greens and who sell those products to exempt handlers, 
    retailers, or consumers are considered qualified handlers and assessed 
    under the Order. There are approximately 900 wholesaler handlers, 150 
    importers, and 200 domestic producers who are qualified handlers.
        The majority of these qualified handlers would be classified as 
    small businesses. Small agricultural service firms have been defined by 
    the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having 
    annual receipts of less than $5 million. Statistics reported by the 
    National Agricultural Statistics Service show that 1994 sales at 
    wholesale of domestic cut flowers and greens total approximately $559.6 
    million while the value of imports during 1994 was approximately $382 
    million. The leading States in the United States producing cut flowers 
    and greens, by wholesale value, are California, which produces 
    approximately 59 percent of the domestic crop, followed by Florida, 
    Colorado, and Hawaii. Major countries exporting cut flowers and greens 
    into the United States, by value, are Columbia, which accounts for 
    approximately 60 percent, followed by The Netherlands, Mexico, and 
    Costa Rica.
        The Administrator of the AMS has determined that this rule would 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        While this proposed rule would impose certain recordkeeping 
    requirements on qualified handlers that request a postponement of the 
    payment of assessments, most of the information required under the 
    proposed rule could be compiled from records currently maintained. 
    Thus, any added burden resulting from increased recordkeeping would not 
    be significant when compared to the benefits that should accrue to such 
    businesses.
        In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
    Chapter 35), a form to request the postponement of the payment, 
    ``Application for Postponement of Payment of PromoFlor Assessment'', 
    has been submitted to OMB for approval.
        Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
    information is estimated to average .25 hours per response for each 
    qualified handler requesting a postponement of payment of assessment. 
    
    [[Page 58254]]
    
        Respondents: Qualified handlers as defined in the Act.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 5.
        Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1.25 hours.
        Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Sonia N. 
    Jimenez at (202) 720-9916 or at the address listed above.
    
    Background
    
        The Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) to 
    establish a national cut flowers and greens promotion and consumer 
    information program. The program is funded by an assessment of \1/2\ 
    percent of gross sales of cut flowers and greens which is levied on 
    qualified handlers.
        This proposed rule would provide rules and regulations needed to 
    implement provisions of the Order. Section 1208.55 of the Order 
    provides for postponement of collections (7 CFR 108.55; 59 FR 67139). 
    That section provides that the Council may grant a postponement of the 
    payment of an assessment for any qualified handler that establishes 
    that it is financially unable to make the payment.
        Section 1208.100 of this rule would provide that the definitions 
    for this subpart are the same as those prescribed in Secs. 1208.1 
    through 1208.24 of the Order.
        Section 1208.150 would provide for the postponement of the payment 
    of assessments under certain circumstances. The Order provides for the 
    postponement of the payment of assessments by a qualified handler if 
    the payment of such assessment is determined to be a financial burden 
    for the handler. Section 1208.55 of the Order states that ``The Council 
    may grant a postponement of an assessment under this subpart for any 
    qualified handler that establishes that it is financially unable to 
    make the payment * * * '' In addition, the Order establishes that the 
    Council shall develop forms and procedures for a qualified handler to 
    request and for the Council to grant the postponement of the payment of 
    assessments.
        The Council met on September 11, 1995, and determined that, in 
    order for a request for the postponement of assessments to be granted, 
    the requester should comply with the following: (1) Submit a written 
    opinion from a Certified Public Accountant stating that the handler 
    making the request is insolvent or will be unable to continue to 
    operate if the handler is required to pay the assessment when due and 
    (2) submit copies of the last three years' federal tax returns. These 
    two requirements are needed to verify that the qualified handler is 
    financially unable to make the payment of the assessments due and that 
    the postponement of payment, if granted, complies with the requirements 
    set forth in the Order. In addition, the requester should submit to the 
    Council a form ``Application for Postponement of Payment of PromoFlor 
    Assessments.'' This collection of information would be authorized under 
    OMB number 0581-0093 and would have an expiration date of January 31, 
    1997.
        The period for which the postponement of the payment of the 
    assessments is requested may not exceed six (6) months. Within that 
    period of six (6) months, the qualified handler would be exempt from 
    paying assessments beginning with the month for which the request for 
    postponement is filed with the Council and for no more than six (6) 
    months. The handler must provide a reason for the request as well as 
    detailed information concerning the handler's name, address, telephone 
    and fax numbers, the month(s) for which the request is made, the 
    percent of the outstanding debt to be paid by month after the 
    postponement of payment is granted, and the starting date for the 
    payment. Furthermore, an authorized individual must sign and return the 
    form to the Council's office.
        Any late payment would make the agreement null and all assessments 
    due would need to be paid in their entirety at that time. In addition, 
    the Council agrees to forgo any late fee charges and interest for the 
    duration of the agreement.
        The request must be made no later than 30 days after the 
    assessments were due. In addition, after the postponement period has 
    concluded, the requester must pay the percentage of the outstanding 
    debt agreed to be paid by month and the assessments due for the current 
    month. Assessments due after the postponement of payment is completed 
    would not be postponed unless an extension of time for payment is 
    granted. If an extension of time is requested, new documentation must 
    be provided for the Council to determine whether to grant the extension 
    of time for the postponement of the payment of assessments. The same 
    procedures used for the initial request must be used to grant an 
    extension.
        A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
    respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be 
    considered before a final determination is made on this matter. All 
    responses regarding the information collection will be summarized and 
    included in the request for OMB approval.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1208
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer 
    information, Marketing agreements--Cut flowers, Cut greens, Promotion, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1208 is 
    proposed to be amended as follows:
    
    PART 1208--FRESH CUT FLOWERS AND FRESH CUT GREENS PROMOTION AND 
    INFORMATION ORDER
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 1208 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.
    
        2. In Part 1208 a new subpart B is added to read as follows:
    
    Subpart B--Rules and Regulations
    
    Definitions
    
    Sec.
    1208.100  Terms defined.
    
    Assessments
    
    1208.150  Procedures for postponement of assessments.
    
    Subpart B--Rules and Regulations
    
    Definitions
    
    
    Sec. 1208.100  Terms defined.
    
        Unless otherwise defined in this subpart, definitions or terms used 
    in this subpart shall have the same meaning as the definitions of such 
    terms which appear in Subpart A--Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens 
    Promotion and Information Order.
    
    Assessments
    
    
    Sec. 1208.150  Procedures for postponement of collections.
    
        (a) For a request for postponement of the payment of assessments to 
    be granted the qualified handler must comply with the following: Submit 
    a written opinion from a Certified Public Accountant stating that the 
    handler making the request is insolvent or will be unable to continue 
    to operate if the handler is required to pay the assessments when due 
    and submit copies of the last three years' federal tax returns. The 
    request must be in writing no later than 30 days after the assessments 
    for which the postponed payment is requested are due. The period for 
    which the postponement of the payment of assessments is requested may 
    not exceed six (6) months. The written request must specify:
        (1) A reason for the request; 
    
    [[Page 58255]]
    
        (2) Detailed information concerning the qualified handler's name, 
    address, and telephone and fax numbers;
        (3) The month(s) for which the request is made;
        (4) Total assessments due;
        (5) The percent of the outstanding debt to be paid each month after 
    the postponement of payment is granted; and
        (6) The starting date for the payment of assessments due.
        (b) At the end of the postponement period, the qualified handler 
    must pay the percentage of assessments due specified per month and the 
    current month assessment due. If an extension of time is requested, new 
    documentation must be provided for the Council to determine whether to 
    grant the extension. The same procedures used for the initial request 
    will be used to grant any extension.
    
        Dated: November 20, 1995.
    Robert C. Kenny,
    Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 95-28770 Filed 11-24-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/27/1995
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-28770
Dates:
Comments must be received by January 26, 1996.
Pages:
58253-58255 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FV-95-702PR
PDF File:
95-28770.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 1208.100
7 CFR 1208.150