95-28796. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10, -30, and -40 Series Airplanes, and KC-10 (Military) Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 227 (Monday, November 27, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 58210-58212]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-28796]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-49-AD; Amendment 39-9435; AD 95-24-03]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10, -30, 
    and -40 Series Airplanes, and KC-10 (Military) Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10, -30, and -40 
    series airplanes, and KC-10 (military) airplanes, that requires 
    inspections to detect corrosion or cracking of the lower front spar cap 
    and the skin panel of the horizontal stabilizer, and repair of corroded 
    or cracked parts. This amendment also requires eventual modification of 
    the horizontal stabilizer, which terminates the inspection 
    requirements. This action is prompted by reports indicating that 
    corrosion, 
    
    [[Page 58211]]
    caused by water entrapment, was found on the horizontal stabilizer. The 
    actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent water entrapment 
    and subsequent damage to the horizontal stabilizer, which could result 
    in reduced controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective December 27, 1995.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of December 27, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, 
    Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications 
    Business Administration, Department C1-L51 (2-60). This information may 
    be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 
    California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol 
    Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Cecil, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (310) 627-5322; fax (310) 
    627-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model 
    DC-10, -30, and -40 series airplanes, and KC-10 (military) airplanes 
    was published in the Federal Register on June 13, 1995 (60 FR 31124). 
    That action proposed to require repetitive visual inspections to detect 
    corrosion or cracking of the lower front spar cap and the skin panel of 
    the horizontal stabilizer, and repair of corroded or cracked parts. 
    That action also proposed to require the eventual modification of the 
    lower front spar cap and the lower front skin panel of the horizontal 
    stabilizer, which would constitute terminating action for the 
    repetitive inspection requirements.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the single comment received.
        The commenter supports the proposed rule.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comment 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
        There are approximately 286 Model DC-10-10, DC-10-30, and DC-10-40 
    airplanes, and KC-10 (military) airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 142 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 26 work 
    hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the 
    average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $221,520, or 
    $1,560 per airplane.
        The FAA estimates that it will take approximately 241 work hours 
    per airplane to accomplish the terminating modification, at an average 
    labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts would cost 
    approximately $124,906 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the terminating modification is estimated to be $19,789,972, 
    or $139,366 per airplane.
        Based on the figures discussed above, the estimated cost impact of 
    the requirements of this AD is expected to total $20,011,492, or 
    $140,926 per airplane. This estimated cost impact figure is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    95-24-03 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-9435. Docket 95-NM-49-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model DC-10-10, -30, and -40 airplanes, and KC-10 
    (military) airplanes; as listed in McDonnell Douglas Service 
    Bulletin 55-14, Revision 6, dated January 11, 1993, certificated in 
    any category.
    
        -Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (c) of this AD to request approval from the 
    FAA. This approval may address either no action, if the current 
    configuration eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions 
    necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such 
    a request should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent reduced controllability of the airplane, due to a 
    damaged horizontal stabilizer, accomplish the following: -
        (a) Within one year after the effective date of this AD, perform 
    a visual inspection to detect corrosion or cracking of the lower 
    front spar cap and skin panel of the horizontal stabilizer, in 
    accordance with McDonnell Douglas DC-10 Service Bulletin 55-14, 
    Revision 5, dated August 24, 1990, or Revision 6, dated January 11, 
    1993.
        (1) If no corrosion or cracking is found during this inspection, 
    repeat this inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed one 
    year, until the modification required by paragraph (b) of this AD is 
    accomplished.
        (2) If any corrosion or cracking is found during this 
    inspection, prior to further flight, 
    
    [[Page 58212]]
    repair the corrosion and/or cracking, and add drain holes, in 
    accordance with Table 1 of the service bulletin. Accomplishment of 
    these repairs and modification constitutes terminating action for 
    the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.
        (b) Perform the modification of the lower front spar cap and the 
    skin panel of the horizontal stabilizer in accordance with McDonnell 
    Douglas Service Bulletin 55-14, Revision 5, dated August 24, 1990, 
    or Revision 6, dated January 11, 1993, at the applicable time 
    specified in paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD. Accomplishment 
    of this modification constitutes terminating action for the 
    repetitive inspection requirements of this AD. -
        (1) For Model DC-10-10 airplanes: Accomplish the modification 
    prior to the accumulation of 42,000 total landings, or within five 
    years after the effective date of the AD, whichever occurs later. -
        (2) For Model DC-10-30 and DC-10-40 airplanes: Accomplish the 
    modification prior to the accumulation of 30,000 total landings, or 
    within five years after the effective date of this AD, whichever 
    occurs later. -
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        -(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. -
        (e) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell 
    Douglas Service Bulletin 55-14, Revision 5, dated August 24, 1990, 
    or Revision 6, dated January 11, 1993. This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood 
    Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical 
    Publications Business Administration, Department C1-L51 (2-60). 
    Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at 
    the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., 
    suite 700, Washington, DC. -
        (f) This amendment becomes effective on December 27, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 9, 1995.
    S.R. Miller,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-28796 Filed 11-24-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/27/1995
Published:
11/27/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-28796
Dates:
Effective December 27, 1995.
Pages:
58210-58212 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-49-AD, Amendment 39-9435, AD 95-24-03
PDF File:
95-28796.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13