95-28879. Procurement List; Addition  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 227 (Monday, November 27, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 58335-58336]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-28879]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED
    
    
    Procurement List; Addition
    
    AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
    Disabled.
    
    ACTION: Addition to the Procurement List.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List a service to be 
    furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
    other severe disabilities.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
    Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
    Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 30, 1995, the Committee for Purchase 
    From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notices (60 FR 
    34235) of proposed addition to the Procurement List.
        Comments were received from the current contractor for this service 
    challenging the fair market price established for the service, the 
    capability of the designated nonprofit agency to perform the service, 
    and the impact on the current contractor. The contractor also 
    questioned the amount of time it took for the final materials 
    supporting the proposed addition to the Procurement List to be provided 
    to the Committee.
        The contractor questioned the fair market price established for 
    this service because it is nearly 60 percent above the price which the 
    contractor claimed to have been paid in its last contract year. The 
    contracting officer informed us, however, that the contractor is being 
    paid somewhat more than it told the Committee, and that the frequency 
    of performance of most tasks to be done in providing the service has 
    been increased substantially from that required of the commenting 
    contractor. The fair market price is within the Committee's guidelines 
    for the work to be performed and has been accepted by the contracting 
    officer.
        The contractor's challenge to the capability of the designated 
    nonprofit agency mentioned three factors: the existence of a year-long 
    phase-in of workers with severe disabilities to reach the final ratio 
    of disabled to nondisabled workers; the nonprofit agency's total lack 
    of experience in performing contracts of this type and size; and the 
    length of time it took after the proposal to add this service to the 
    Procurement List was published in the Federal Register for the 
    Committee to receive the information it needed from the central 
    nonprofit agency to satisfy the regulatory requirements of an addition 
    to the Procurement List. The contractor also questioned the lack of 
    detail in the central nonprofit agency's description of how the 
    designated nonprofit agency would perform the tasks required for this 
    service.
        The nonprofit agency's plan to take a year to move from its initial 
    ratio of disabled to nondisabled direct labor to the final projected 
    ratio is well within the Committee's procedures for startup of a 
    project of this type. The procedures are intended to guarantee that 
    quality performance is maintained during the longer training period 
    which people with severe disabilities require to perform janitorial 
    functions. The process does not reflect a shortage of workers with 
    severe disabilities as the contractor assumed. The nonprofit agency 
    will offer to retain many of the current workers during this phase-in 
    period, which is consistent with the industry practice of retaining 
    direct 
    
    [[Page 58336]]
    labor employees of a previous contractor.
        As the contractor noted, the designated nonprofit agency does not 
    have experience in contracts of this type. However, this is not an 
    unusual situation in the Committee's program, which is intended to 
    create jobs for people with severe disabilities by encouraging the 
    nonprofit agencies which employ these people to engage in new 
    businesses. The central nonprofit agency which is providing technical 
    support to the producing nonprofit agency has extensive experience in 
    assisting similar nonprofit agencies perform such services, and it has 
    demonstrated to the Committee that this addition to the Procurement 
    List has very close parallels with other successful additions. The 
    nonprofit agency intends to employ the contractor's project supervisor 
    to provide knowledge of the work site's requirements, including the 
    hospital grade/aseptic cleaning requirements noted by the commenting 
    contractor, and how to fulfill them.
        The Committee does not agree with the contractor's contention that 
    the length of time spent developing the project after its announcement 
    in the Federal Register is an indication the nonprofit agency is 
    incapable of performing the service. The changes in the Statement of 
    Work for the service in July 1995 required a reassessment of the labor 
    needed to perform the service, and revision of the pricing proposal 
    which is the basis of the Committee's establishment of a fair market 
    price. These tasks required more time and negotiations with the 
    contracting officer than was contemplated when the proposed addition 
    was published in the Federal Register.
        In contending that addition of this service to the Procurement List 
    would have a severe economic impact on the company, the contractor 
    noted that losing the ability to provide this service to the Government 
    would cause the contractor to abandon two commercial contracts in the 
    same area which its Government contract supports. However, the 
    contractor did not provide information on the value of these contracts. 
    The contractor also noted that its sales have declined substantially in 
    the past year, and it is in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
        The Committee's information on the contractor's current sales, 
    based on an August 1995 projection by the company, shows that the 
    contract for this service is less than five percent of its total sales. 
    It should also be noted that a Chapter 11 bankruptcy is a 
    reorganization with the intent of continuing the company in business, 
    and in this case appears to have been initiated for technical reasons. 
    Accordingly, the Committee does not agree with the contractor that the 
    proposed addition of the service to the Procurement List threatens the 
    contractor's viability and, thus, does not believe that the addition 
    will have a severe adverse impact on the contractor.
        After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
    capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the service, fair 
    market price, and impact of the addition on the current or most recent 
    contractors, the Committee has determined that the service listed below 
    is suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 
    46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
        I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
    considered for this certification were:
        1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
    recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
    than the small organizations that will furnish the service to the 
    Government.
        2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on the current 
    contractor for the service.
        3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
    the service to the Government.
        4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
    accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
    48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
    Procurement List.
        Accordingly, the following service is hereby added to the 
    Procurement List:
    
    Janitorial/Custodial Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina
    
        This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
    effective date of this addition or options exercised under those 
    contracts.
    Beverly L. Milkman,
    Executive Director.
    [FR Doc. 95-28879 Filed 11-24-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/27/1995
Published:
11/27/1995
Department:
Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Addition to the Procurement List.
Document Number:
95-28879
Dates:
December 27, 1995.
Pages:
58335-58336 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-28879.pdf