96-30289. Wisconsin Central Ltd.Acquisition ExemptionLines of Union Pacific Railroad Company  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 27, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 60320-60321]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-30289]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    Surface Transportation Board 1 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ The ICC Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA), Pub. L. No. 104-88, 
    109 Stat. 803, abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and 
    transferred certain functions to the Surface Transportation Board 
    (Board) effective January 1, 1996. This notice relates to a 
    transaction that is subject to Board jurisdiction pursuant to 49 
    U.S.C. 10902.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [STB Finance Docket No. 33116]
    
    
    Wisconsin Central Ltd.--Acquisition Exemption--Lines of Union 
    Pacific Railroad Company
    
    AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
    
    ACTION: Notice of filing of a petition for exemption and a request for 
    public comments, including comments on labor protective arrangements to 
    be provided by a Class II railroad under 49 U.S.C. 10902.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Wisconsin Central Ltd. (WCL), a Class II rail carrier, seeks 
    an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the prior approval requirements 
    of 49 U.S.C. 10902 for its acquisition of two lines of railroad from 
    Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) in central Wisconsin. Section 10902 
    is a new provision added by the ICCTA governing purchases of active 
    rail lines by Class II (medium sized) and Class III (small) carriers. 
    Under subsection 10902(d), a Class II railroad that acquires a rail 
    line subject to the Board's jurisdiction must provide a fair and 
    equitable arrangement for the protection of employees who may be 
    affected by the transaction. The arrangement shall consist exclusively 
    of 1 year of severance pay equal to the employee's earnings during the 
    12 months preceding the application filing date.
        WCL has proposed an employee protective arrangement to comply with 
    subsection 10902(d). The labor protective arrangement that results from 
    this proceeding may be used as a model for conditions we impose 
    governing the minimum labor protective arrangements we require with 
    respect to acquisitions by Class II railroads. Such arrangements have 
    in the past consisted of two elements: (1) Procedural (i.e., when must 
    employees be notified of their options and by whom); and (2) 
    substantive (i.e., how many years of protection should be provided and 
    what should that level of protection be). Plainly the new provision 
    explicitly limits substantive aspects of any arrangement we may 
    require. We seek comments on whether WCL's proposed arrangement meets 
    the statutory requirements, and on whether and to what extent we should 
    establish and/or oversee the procedural aspects of labor protective 
    arrangements under this statute.
    
    DATES: Comments are due on December 27, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send comments (an original and 10 copies) referring to STB 
    Finance Docket No. 33116 to: Surface Transportation Board, Office of 
    the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
    Washington, DC 20423. In addition, send one copy of comments to 
    petitioner's representative: Janet H. Gilbert, General Counsel, 
    Wisconsin Central Ltd., P.O. Box 5062, Rosemont, IL 60017-5062.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar (202) 927-5660. [TDD 
    for hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: WCL, a wholly owned subsidiary of Wisconsin 
    Central Transportation Corporation, proposes to acquire from UP two 
    rail lines, the ``Hayward Line'' between Hayward and Hayward Junction, 
    WI, and the ``Wausau Pocket'' between Kelly and Wausau-Schofield, WI, 
    totaling 17.8 miles in central Wisconsin. There are two shippers on the 
    Hayward Line and eight shippers on the Wausau Pocket that jointly 
    generate approximately 12,300 carloads a year. WCL submitted supporting 
    statements from each shipper on the two lines. The Board seeks comments 
    on the proposed transaction.
        As noted, the ICCTA included a new statutory provision--49 U.S.C. 
    10902--that applies to the acquisition or operation of additional rail 
    lines by Class II and Class III railroads. As enacted, subsection 
    10902(c) requires the Board, after application by a Class II or III 
    rail carrier, to issue a certificate
    
    [[Page 60321]]
    
    authorizing the transaction ``unless the Board finds that such 
    activities are inconsistent with the public convenience and 
    necessity.'' Under subsection 10902(d), a Class II railroad receiving 
    such a certificate must provide a fair and equitable arrangement for 
    the protection of employees who may be adversely affected by the 
    transaction. The arrangement shall consist exclusively of 1 year of 
    severance pay equal to the employee's earnings during the 12 months 
    preceding the application filing date. The parties may agree to terms 
    other than as provided. The Board may approve the requested certificate 
    as filed or may include conditions (other than labor protection 
    conditions) the Board finds necessary in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. 
    10902(c). While petitioner seeks an exemption from subsection 10902, 
    the Board's exemption authority may not be used to relieve a rail 
    carrier of its obligation to protect the interests of employees. 49 
    U.S.C. 10502(g).
        Petitioner expects that the transaction, while eliminating nine UP 
    positions, will create eight new positions on WCL. WCL indicates that 
    it will offer these new positions to displaced UP employees on a 
    priority basis, subject to application and employee qualification. WCL 
    will provide affected UP employees with written notice of the 
    positions, including wage and benefit levels, job responsibilities, and 
    other relevant data, at least 1 month before consummation of the 
    transaction. WCL proposes to inform displaced UP employees of any 
    option they may have to decline a WCL job and elect a severance 
    payment.
        Under petitioner's protective arrangement, for any severed UP 
    employee not hired by WCL, WCL will provide a single payment equal to 
    the employee's railroad earnings for the 12-month period ending October 
    18, 1996. For severed UP employees hired by WCL, severance payments 
    will be paid for 1 year on a prorated, monthly basis, reduced each 
    month by the employee's WCL earnings for the corresponding month. WCL 
    estimates that its pay scales are 90% of those of Class I carriers.
        In view of the requirement of subsection 10902(d) that a Class II 
    railroad provide a fair and equitable arrangement for the protection of 
    employees adversely affected by the carrier's acquisition, the Board 
    invites comments on whether WCL's proposed employee protective 
    arrangement meets the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10902. As noted, such 
    arrangements have in the past consisted of two elements: (1) Procedural 
    (i.e., when must employees be notified of their options and by whom); 
    and (2) substantive (i.e., how many years of protection should be 
    provided and what should that level of protection be). Plainly the new 
    provision explicitly limits substantive aspects of any arrangement we 
    may require. Thus, specifically we seek comments on whether and to what 
    extent we should establish and/or oversee the procedural aspects of 
    labor protective arrangements under this statute.
        Comments may address such issues as the minimum standards or 
    conditions for the arrangement, the carrier's responsibility to 
    negotiate an arrangement or, failing agreement, to disclose those 
    standards or conditions prior to consummation, and criteria for 
    determining whether the arrangement is fair and equitable. The 
    resulting labor protective arrangement imposed in this proceeding may 
    be used as precedent for the labor protection we impose on future 
    acquisitions by Class II railroads.
        Comments (an original and 10 copies) must be in writing, and are 
    due on December 27, 1996. Additional information may be obtained from 
    petitioner's representative. We encourage any commenter to submit its 
    comments as computer data on a 3.5-inch floppy diskette formatted for 
    WordPerfect 5.1, or formatted so that it can be readily converted into 
    WordPerfect 5.1. Any diskette submission (one diskette will be 
    sufficient) should be in addition to the written submission.
        This action will not significantly affect the quality of the human 
    environment or the conservation of energy resources.
    
        Decided: November 15, 1996.
    
        By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Simmons, and 
    Commissioner Owen.
    Vernon A. Williams,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-30289 Filed 11-26-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/27/1996
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of filing of a petition for exemption and a request for public comments, including comments on labor protective arrangements to be provided by a Class II railroad under 49 U.S.C. 10902.
Document Number:
96-30289
Dates:
Comments are due on December 27, 1996.
Pages:
60320-60321 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
STB Finance Docket No. 33116
PDF File:
96-30289.pdf