Home »
1994 Issues »
59 FR (11/28/1994) » 94-29224. Champion Parts Northeast Division, Beech Creek, PA and Lock Haven, PA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
94-29224. Champion Parts Northeast Division, Beech Creek, PA and Lock Haven, PA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page ]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-29224]
[Federal Register: November 28, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,105 and TA-W-30,106]
Champion Parts Northeast Division, Beech Creek, PA and Lock
Haven, PA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By an application dated October 3, 1994, with support from the
Pennsylvania State Legislature, the workers- requested administrative
reconsideration of the subject petition for trade adjustment
assistance, TAA. The denial notice was issued on September 13, 1994 and
published in the Federal Register on October 4, 1994 (59 FR 50628).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
Investigation findings show that the workers produce rebuilt auto
parts. The Beech Creek plant produces waterpumps, starters, clutches
and alternators while the Lock Haven plant produces carburetors.
Its claimed that the company has lost market share because
competitors are either importing components or importing the final
product.
Investigation findings show that the decreased sales or production
criterion and the ``contributed importantly'' test of the Group
Eligibility Requirements of the Trade Act have not been met. The
findings show that sales at the subject firm increased in 1993 compared
to 1992 and in the first six months of 1994 compared to the same period
of 1993. Other findings show that the layoffs are the result of a
corporate decision to consolidate their operations by shifting
production to other domestic facilities. A domestic transfer of
production would not form a basis for a worker group certification.
The findings also show that Champion takes broken and worn out
parts and rebuilds them into working parts. Other findings show
Champion imports only when a worn out or broken part is not available
to rebuild. These company imports account for a very small portion of
Champion's sales.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of November 1994.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 94-29224 Filed 11-25-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Document Information
- Published:
- 11/28/1994
- Department:
- Labor Department
- Entry Type:
- Uncategorized Document
- Document Number:
- 94-29224
- Pages:
- 0-0 (None pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- Federal Register: November 28, 1994, TA-W-30,105 and TA-W-30,106