94-29224. Champion Parts Northeast Division, Beech Creek, PA and Lock Haven, PA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-29224]
    
    
    [Federal Register: November 28, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    [TA-W-30,105 and TA-W-30,106]
    
    
    Champion Parts Northeast Division, Beech Creek, PA and Lock 
    Haven, PA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for 
    Reconsideration
    
        By an application dated October 3, 1994, with support from the 
    Pennsylvania State Legislature, the workers- requested administrative 
    reconsideration of the subject petition for trade adjustment 
    assistance, TAA. The denial notice was issued on September 13, 1994 and 
    published in the Federal Register on October 4, 1994 (59 FR 50628).
        Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
    the following circumstances:
        (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
    that the determination complained of was erroneous;
        (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
    a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
        (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
    misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
    the decision.
        Investigation findings show that the workers produce rebuilt auto 
    parts. The Beech Creek plant produces waterpumps, starters, clutches 
    and alternators while the Lock Haven plant produces carburetors.
        Its claimed that the company has lost market share because 
    competitors are either importing components or importing the final 
    product.
        Investigation findings show that the decreased sales or production 
    criterion and the ``contributed importantly'' test of the Group 
    Eligibility Requirements of the Trade Act have not been met. The 
    findings show that sales at the subject firm increased in 1993 compared 
    to 1992 and in the first six months of 1994 compared to the same period 
    of 1993. Other findings show that the layoffs are the result of a 
    corporate decision to consolidate their operations by shifting 
    production to other domestic facilities. A domestic transfer of 
    production would not form a basis for a worker group certification.
        The findings also show that Champion takes broken and worn out 
    parts and rebuilds them into working parts. Other findings show 
    Champion imports only when a worn out or broken part is not available 
    to rebuild. These company imports account for a very small portion of 
    Champion's sales.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
    conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
    or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
    of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
    
        Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of November 1994.
    Victor J. Trunzo,
    Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
    Adjustment Assistance.
    [FR Doc. 94-29224 Filed 11-25-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/28/1994
Department:
Labor Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-29224
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 28, 1994, TA-W-30,105 and TA-W-30,106