96-30484. Walnuts Grown in California; Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 231 (Friday, November 29, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 60512-60513]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-30484]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 984
    
    [Docket No. FV96-984-1 IFR]
    
    
    Walnuts Grown in California; Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This interim final rule establishes an assessment rate for the 
    Walnut Marketing Board (Board) under Marketing Order No. 984 for the 
    1996-97 and subsequent marketing years. The Board is responsible for 
    local administration of the marketing order which regulates the 
    handling of walnuts grown in California. Authorization to assess walnut 
    handlers enables the Board to incur expenses that are reasonable and 
    necessary to administer the program.
    
    DATES: Effective on August 1, 1996. Comments received by December 30, 
    1996 will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this rule. Comments must be sent in triplicate to the Docket 
    Clerk, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 
    2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, FAX 202-720-5698. Comments should 
    reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue 
    of the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in 
    the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kate Nelson, Marketing Assistant, 
    California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, 
    USDA, suite 102B, 2202 Monterey Street, Fresno, California 93721, 
    telephone 209-487-5901; FAX 209-487-5906, or Martha Sue Clark, Program 
    Assistant, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-
    6456, telephone 202-720-9918; FAX 202-720-5698. Small businesses may 
    request information on compliance with this regulation by contacting: 
    Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-
    6456; telephone 202-720-2491; FAX 202-720-5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 984, both as amended (7 CFR part 984), 
    regulating the handling of walnuts grown in California, hereinafter 
    referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
    674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California 
    walnut handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the 
    order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the 
    assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable 
    walnuts beginning August 1, 1996, and continuing until amended, 
    suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local 
    laws, regulations, or policies unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(a) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United 
    States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has 
    his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this rule on small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 5,000 producers of California walnuts in 
    the production area and approximately 55 handlers subject to regulation 
    under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    having annual receipts of less than $500,000, and small agricultural 
    service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than 
    $5,000,000. The majority of California walnut producers and handlers 
    may be classified as small entities.
        The California walnut marketing order provides authority for the 
    Board, with the approval of the Department, to formulate an annual 
    budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer 
    the program. The members of the Board are producers and handlers of 
    California walnuts. They are familiar with the Board's needs and with 
    the costs of goods and services in their local area and are thus in a 
    position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The 
    assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, 
    all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and 
    provide input.
        The Board met on September 6, 1996, and unanimously recommended 
    1996-97 expenditures of $2,301,869 and an
    
    [[Page 60513]]
    
    assessment rate of $0.0117 per kernelweight pound of merchantable 
    walnuts certified. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures 
    were $2,280,175. The assessment of $0.0117 is $0.0001 higher than last 
    year's established rate. Major expenditures recommended by the Board 
    for the 1996-97 marketing year include $232,684 for general expenses, 
    $150,508 for office expenses, $1,840,677 for research expenses, $48,000 
    for a production research director, and $30,000 for the reserve. 
    Budgeted expenses for these items in 1995-96 were $246,847, $140,908, 
    $1,828,420, $34,000, and $30,000, respectively.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected merchantable certifications 
    of California walnuts. Walnut shipments for the year are estimated at 
    198,000,000 kernelweight pounds which will yield $2,316,600 in 
    assessment income, which will be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. 
    Unexpended funds may be used temporarily to defray expenses of the 
    subsequent marketing year, but must be made available to the handlers 
    from whom collected within five months after the end of the year.
        While this rule will impose some additional costs on handlers, the 
    costs are in the form of uniform assessments on all handlers. Some of 
    the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these 
    costs will be offset by the benefits derived from the operation of the 
    marketing order. Therefore, the AMS has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. Interested persons are invited to submit information on the 
    regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small 
    businesses.
        The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in 
    effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the Board or 
    other available information.
        Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite 
    period, the Board will continue to meet prior to or during each 
    marketing year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
    recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
    times of Board meetings are available from the Board or the Department. 
    Board meetings are open to the public and interested persons may 
    express their views at these meetings. The Department will evaluate 
    Board recommendations and other available information to determine 
    whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further 
    rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Board's 1996-97 budget 
    and those for subsequent marketing years will be reviewed and, as 
    appropriate, approved by the Department.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good 
    cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public 
    interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into 
    effect, and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective 
    date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal 
    Register because: (1) The Board needs to have sufficient funds to pay 
    its expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the 1996-97 
    marketing year began on August 1, 1996, and the marketing order 
    requires that the rate of assessment for each marketing year apply to 
    all assessable walnuts handled during such marketing year; (3) handlers 
    are aware of this action which was unanimously recommended by the Board 
    at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions 
    issued in past years; and (4) this interim final rule provides a 30-day 
    comment period, and all comments timely received will be considered 
    prior to finalization of this rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
    
        Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Walnuts.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        2. A new subpart titled ``Assessment Rates'' and a new Sec. 984.347 
    are added to read as follows:
    
        Note: This section will appear in the Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
    Subpart--Assessment Rates
    
    
    Sec. 984.347   Assessment rate.
    
        On and after August 1, 1996, an assessment rate of $0.0117 per 
    kernelweight pound is established for California merchantable walnuts.
    
        Dated: November 22, 1996.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 96-30484 Filed 11-27-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/1/1996
Published:
11/29/1996
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
96-30484
Dates:
Effective on August 1, 1996. Comments received by December 30, 1996 will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
Pages:
60512-60513 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV96-984-1 IFR
PDF File:
96-30484.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 984.347