99-28612. Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Debbies Creek, New Jersey  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 59624-59625]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-28612]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    
    33 CFR Part 117
    
    [CGD05-98-111]
    RIN 2115-AE47
    
    
    Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Debbies Creek, New Jersey
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the regulations governing the 
    operation of the Monmouth County highway bridge, at mile 0.4, across 
    Debbies Creek, at Manasquan, New Jersey. This rule will continue to 
    provide the current opening schedule, except that from January 1 
    through April 1, from 4:30 p.m. to 8 a.m., a four-hour advance notice 
    will be required. This change is intended to relieve the bridge owner 
    of the burden of having a bridge tender staff the bridge during periods 
    when there are few or no requests for openings, while still providing 
    for the reasonable needs of navigation.
    
    DATES: This final rule is effective December 3, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
    documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
    are part of docket CGD05-98-111 and are available for inspection or 
    copying at the office of Commander (Aowb), Fifth Coast Guard District, 
    Federal Building, 4th Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 
    23704-5004, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays. The telephone number is (757) 398-6222.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Deaton, Bridge Administrator, 
    Fifth Coast Guard District, (757) 398-6222.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Regulatory History
    
        On January 22, 1999, we published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    (NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Debbies Creek, New 
    Jersey'' in the Federal Register (64 FR 3464). We received 10 letters 
    commenting on the proposed rulemaking. One of the comments included a 
    request for a public hearing, but after reading and considering the 
    comments, we determined that a public hearing would provide no 
    additional information and would not aid the rulemaking process.
        On July 6, 1999, we published a Supplemental Notice of Proposed 
    Rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Debbies 
    Creek, New Jersey'' in the Federal Register (64 FR 36318). We received 
    no comments on the supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking. No 
    public hearing was requested, and none was held.
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        The Monmouth County highway bridge is owned and operated by the 
    Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Monmouth (BCFCM) in New 
    Jersey. Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 117.715 
    requires the bridge to open on signal, except that, from Memorial Day 
    through Labor Day from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., the draw need be opened only 
    on the hour and the half hour if any vessels are waiting to pass.
        The BCFMC had initially requested a change in the regulation by 
    requiring a 24-hour advance notice for bridge openings from January 1 
    through March 31. Bridge logs from 1989 through 1997 revealed a total 
    of 496 bridge openings in the months of January, February and March. 
    During this period, bridge tenders received an average of approximately 
    18 bridge-opening requests per month. Considering the minimal number of 
    openings identified by the bridge logs, the Coast Guard believed that 
    the initial proposal would more fairly balance the competing needs of 
    vehicular and vessel traffic. However, the Coast Guard received 10 
    comments objecting to the proposed rule. After consideration of the 
    comments and further discussions with BCFCM, the Coast Guard determined 
    that since vessel use from January 1 through March 31 was primarily 
    during the daylight hours, an alternative proposal, as set forth in the 
    SNPRM was appropriate. The Coast Guard also believes that enumeration 
    and rewording will clarify the current regulation.
    
    Discussion of Comments and Changes
    
        The Coast Guard received 10 comments on the NPRM in opposition to a 
    24-hour advance notice for vessel openings from January 1 to March 31. 
    Nine comments opposed the proposed change as unreasonable and unfair. 
    The remaining comment suggested manning the bridge between the hours of 
    8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. during January and February, and between 8 a.m. 
    and 6 p.m. or 7 p.m. in the month of March with a 24-hour advance 
    notice at all other times. All commenters generally indicated that a 
    24-hour advance notice would be inconvenient and was excessive due to 
    the unpredictable weather conditions. Further review of the bridge logs 
    from 1995 through 1997 revealed a total of 61 bridge openings for 
    vessels from January 1 to March 31, from 4:30 p.m. to 8 a.m. During the 
    same timeframes, bridge logs from 1989 to 1997 showed a total of 104 
    vessel openings. The Coast Guard responded to the comments by reducing 
    the 24-hour advance notice requirement in our original proposal to only 
    four hours.
        The Coast Guard received no comments opposing our new proposal and 
    is amending 33 CFR 117.715 by inserting a new provision requiring a 
    four-hour advance notice for bridge openings from January 1 through 
    April
    
    [[Page 59625]]
    
    1, between the hours of 4:30 p.m. to 8 a.m. Additionally, to ensure 
    clarity and consistency of the operating regulation, the text of the 
    current 33 CFR 117.715 will be enumerated and reworded.
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
    3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
    potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The 
    Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. 
    It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures 
    of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 
    1979).
        The Coast Guard reached this conclusion based on the fact that the 
    final rule will not prevent mariners from transiting the bridge, but 
    merely require mariners to plan their transits and to provide the four-
    hour advance notice to the bridge tender.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), we 
    considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
    on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
    comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
    independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
    and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
        The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. This conclusion is based on the fact that this rule will 
    continue to provide openings to mariners on a schedule they are 
    accustomed to, and merely require advance notice for openings during 
    nighttime transits.
    
    Assistance for Small Entities
    
        Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
    Fairness Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small 
    entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
    its effect on them and participate in the rulemaking process. This was 
    accomplished by publication of a NPRM in the Federal Register, 
    consideration of comments received in response to the NPRM, and 
    subsequent issuance of a SNPRM based on those comments.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
    
    Federalism
    
        We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12612 and have 
    determined that this rule does not have sufficient implications for 
    federalism to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and Enhancing the Intergovernmental 
    Partnership
    
        The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) and 
    E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, 
    October 28, 1993) govern the issuance of Federal regulations that 
    require unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that 
    requires a State, local, or tribal government or the private sector to 
    incur direct costs without the Federal Government's having first 
    provided the funds to pay those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will 
    not impose an unfunded mandate.
    
    Taking of Private Property
    
        This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
    have taking implications under E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and 
    Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
    
    Civil Justice Reform
    
        This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
    of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate 
    ambiguity, and reduce burden.
    
    Protection of Children
    
        We have analyzed this rule under E.O. 13045, Protection of Children 
    from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an 
    economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental 
    risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect 
    children.
    
    Environment
    
        We considered the environmental impact of this rule and concluded 
    that, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32e) of Commandant Instruction 
    M16475.1C, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
    environmental documentation. This rule only deals with the operating 
    schedule of an existing drawbridge, and will have no effect on the 
    environment. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is available in 
    the docket for inspection or copying where indicated under ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
    
        Bridges.
    
    Regulations
    
        For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
    33 CFR part 117 as follows:
    
    PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Section 
    117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 
    Stat. 5039.
    
        2. Section 117.715 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 117.715  Debbies Creek.
    
        (a) The draw of the Monmouth County highway bridge, mile 0.4 at 
    Manasquan, shall open on signal, except as follows:
        (1) From 4:30 p.m. January 1 through 8 a.m. April 1, from 4:30 p.m. 
    to 8 a.m., the draw need open only if at least four-hours advance 
    notice is given.
        (2) From Memorial Day through Labor Day from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., the 
    draw need open only on the hour and half hour if any vessels are 
    waiting to pass.
        (b) The owners of the bridge shall provide and keep in good legible 
    condition two board gauges painted white with black figures not less 
    than eight inches high to indicate the vertical clearance under the 
    closed draw at all stages of the tide. The gauges shall be so placed on 
    the bridge that they are plainly visible to operators of vessels 
    approaching the bridge either up or downstream.
    
        Dated: October 20, 1999.
    John E. Shkor,
    Vice Admiral, U. S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
    [FR Doc. 99-28612 Filed 11-2-99; 8:15 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/3/1999
Published:
11/03/1999
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-28612
Dates:
This final rule is effective December 3, 1999.
Pages:
59624-59625 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD05-98-111
RINs:
2115-AE47: Drawbridge Regulations
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2115-AE47/drawbridge-regulations
PDF File:
99-28612.pdf
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 117.715