[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 30, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-29486]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: November 30, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-219]
GPU Nuclear Corp.; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No.
DPR-16, issued to GPU Nuclear Corporation (the licensee), for operation
of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, located in Ocean
County, New Jersey.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would delete Technical Specification Section
2.3.0 and its associated bases. The amendment would remove the limiting
safety system setting for a high recirculation flow reactor scram based
on a maximum attainable recirculation flow analysis.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application for amendment dated June 24, 1994, as supplemented by
letter dated September 30, 1994.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action would delete the high recirculation flow scram
setpoint of 117% of rated flow since the licensee has
analytically demonstrated that the flow scram setpoint is not
necessary.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action
and concludes that deletion of the high recirculation flow reactor
scram based on a maximum attainable flow analysis performed by the
licensee with respect to safety system settings and thermal safety
limit analysis is acceptable.
The change will not increase the probability or consequences of
accidents, no changes are being made in the types of any effluents that
may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in the
allowable individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action does involve features located entirely within the restricted
area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not affect nonradiological
plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the
Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Since the Commission has concluded there is no measurable
environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any
alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be
evaluated. The principal alternative to the action would be to deny the
request. Such action would not enhance the protection of the
environment.
Alternative Use of Resources
This action does not involve the use of any resources not
previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The NRC staff consulted with the New Jersey State official
regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State
official had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has
determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the
licensee's letter dated June 24 1994, as supplemented by letter dated
September 30, 1994, which are available for public inspection at the
Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street,
NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at
the Ocean County Library, Reference Department, 1001 Washington Street,
Toms River, NJ 08753.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of November 1994.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Phillip F. McKee,
Director, Project Directorate I-4, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 94-29486 Filed 11-29-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
