E6-20262. Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.; Notice of Amendment

November 22, 2006.

Take notice that on November 16, 2006, Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P. (Creole Trail Pipeline), 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. CP05-357-004, an application to amend its pending amendment application filed on August 4, 2006, in Docket No. CP05-357-003. Creole Trail Pipeline explains that it was granted certificate authorization on June 15, 2006, in Docket Nos. CP05-357-000, et al., to, in part, construct 116.8-mile, dual 42-inch pipelines, referred to as Line 1 and Line 2—Segments 2 and 3. In the pending August 4, 2006 amendment application, Creole Trail Pipeline requests authorization to construct 18.1 miles of 42-inch pipeline, referred to as Segment 1, to interconnect the certificated 116.8-mile dual pipelines to Cheniere Sabine Pass Pipeline, L.P. On November 16, 2006, concurrently with the instant filing, Creole Trail Pipeline submitted, in Docket No. CP05-357-005, a motion to vacate the certificate authorization granted on June 15, 2006, to construct Line 2. Herein, Creole Trail Pipeline withdraws its pending request for deferred rate and accounting treatment and requests approval of revised initial system-wide transportation rates to reflect the effects of vacating its authorization to construct Line 2.

The application is on file with the Commission and open for public inspection. This application is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at [e-mail] or toll free at [phone], or for TTY, contact [phone].

Any questions regarding the application should be directed to Patricia Outtrim, Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P., 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas 77002, [phone] or Lisa Tonery, King & Spalding LLP, 1185 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036, [phone].

There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or before the comment date listed below, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of this filing and all subsequent filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy of all filing to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding.

However, other persons do not have to intervene in order to have comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to this project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the protest.

Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project, or in support of or in opposition to this project, should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated with the Commission's environmental review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. The Commission's rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the applicant. However, the non-party commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission's final order.

The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the “e-Filing” link.

Comment Date: December 13, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary.