98-29363. Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company 180 and 185 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 213 (Wednesday, November 4, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 59460-59463]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-29363]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-CE-138-AD; Amendment 39-10865; AD 98-23-02]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company 180 and 185 
    Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 80-10-
    01, which applies to certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) 180 and 
    185 series airplanes that have either Airglas Engineering Company, 
    Inc., (AECI) Model LW3600-180 (single position) or Model LW3600-180A 
    (two position) fixed penetration wheel skis installed in accordance 
    with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA213AL. AD 80-10-01 requires 
    modifying the ski bungee assemblies, safety cables, and check cables, 
    and their attachments to the airplane and the skis; limiting the 
    maximum airspeed to 160 knots with skis installed; and installing an 
    airspeed limitation placard. This AD is the result of field reports of 
    incidents occurring on the affected airplanes that were in compliance 
    with AD 80-10-01, and the fact that Cessna Model 180K airplanes were 
    inadvertently left out of the existing AD. This AD retains the actions 
    required by AD 80-10-01; requires re-marking the airspeed indicator to 
    display the reduced airspeed limits and placing a certain airplane 
    flight manual (AFM) supplement in the cockpit; and adds Cessna Model 
    180K airplanes to the Applicability section of the AD. The actions 
    specified by this AD are intended to prevent one or both wheel skis 
    from rotating into a nose-down position during flight, which could 
    result in loss of control of the airplane and/or possible airplane 
    damage during flight or landing operations.
    
    DATES: Effective December 22, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of December 22, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained 
    from Airglas Engineering Company, Inc., P.O. Box 190107, Anchorage, 
    Alaska 99519-0107; telephone: (907) 344-1450; facsimile: (907) 349-
    4938. This information may also be examined at
    
    [[Page 59461]]
    
    the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of 
    the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-CE-138-AD, Room 
    1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office 
    of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gordon K. Mandell, Aerospace 
    Engineer, FAA, Anchorage Aircraft Certification Office, 222 West 7th 
    Avenue, #14, Room 128, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587; telephone: (907) 
    271-2670; facsimile: (907) 271-6365.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Events Leading to the Issuance of This AD
    
        A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR part 39) to include an AD that applies to certain Cessna 180 and 
    185 series airplanes that have either Airglas Engineering Company, 
    Inc., (AECI) Model LW3600-180 (single position) or Model LW3600-180A 
    (two position) fixed penetration wheel skis installed in accordance 
    with STC SA213AL was published in the Federal Register as a notice of 
    proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on June 26, 1998 (63 FR 34833). The NPRM 
    proposed to supersede AD 80-10-01, Amendment 39-3762, which currently 
    requires modifying the ski bungee assemblies, safety cables, and check 
    cables, and their attachments to the airplane and the skis; limiting 
    the maximum airspeed to 160 knots with skis installed; and installing 
    an airspeed limitation placard. The NPRM proposed to require the 
    following:
        --Modifying the ski bungee assemblies, safety cables, and check 
    cables, and their attachments to the airplane and the skis;
        --Installing a placard adjacent to the airspeed indicator limiting 
    the never exceed speed to 160 knots with the skis installed;
        --Re-marking the airspeed indicator to display the reduced never 
    exceed speed (160 KIAS) and the reduced maximum structural cruising 
    speed (139 KIAS) with the skis installed; and
        --Placing AECI Document No. AE97-13FM, ``Supplemental Airplane 
    Flight Manual and Airplane Flight Manual Supplement'', dated October 
    10, 1997, in the airplane cockpit.
        Accomplishment of the proposed actions as specified in the NPRM 
    would be required in accordance with AECI Service Bulletin (SB) No. 
    LW3600-3, originally issued: September 21, 1979; Amended: October 10, 
    1997; AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180A-1 and -2, Revision ``B'', dated 
    September 21, 1979; AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180A-3, Revision ``A'', 
    dated April 30, 1979; AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180, Revision ``F'', 
    dated September 21, 1979 (for single position wheel ski installations) 
    or AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180A, Revision ``E'', dated September 21, 
    1979 (for two position wheel ski installations); AECI Drawing No. 
    LW3600-180A-11, originally issued: September 21, 1979; and AECI 
    Document AE97-13FM, ``Supplemental Airplane Flight Manual and Airplane 
    Flight Manual Supplement'', dated October 10, 1997.
        The NPRM was the result of field reports of incidents occurring on 
    the affected airplanes that were in compliance with AD 80-10-01, and 
    the fact that Cessna Model 180K airplanes were inadvertently left out 
    of the existing AD.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the following comments received.
    
    Comment Disposition
    
        The one commenter states that requiring re-marking of the airspeed 
    indicator to display the reduced airspeed limits will not fix the 
    problem because airplane operators that ignore placard requirements 
    will also ignore the airspeed indicator requirements. This commenter 
    operates one of the affected airplanes with skis for 6 months out of 
    each year.
        The commenter states that, if the proposed AD is adopted, he will 
    have to accomplish pitot and static pressure checks required by current 
    regulation every 6 months when he changes the airspeed indicator during 
    ski installation and removal.
        The commenter also states that skis are similar to other devices, 
    such as landing gear, flaps, ramps, and doors that are affixed to or 
    incorporated into aircraft. The commenter states that the maximum speed 
    at which the other devices can be extended or opened in flight are 
    specified only by placards and not by markings on the airspeed 
    indicator.
        The commenter goes on to state that, based on the above 
    information, the costs of installing and removing the skis will become 
    extremely high, and the commenter asks the FAA to remove the 
    requirement of re-marking the airspeed indicator to display the reduced 
    airspeed limits.
        The FAA does not concur that the requirement in the proposed AD of 
    re-marking the airspeed indicator is not justified.
        The FAA's intent of requiring that the airspeed indicator be re-
    marked is not to provide another airspeed limit indication for certain 
    pilots to ignore, but to provide consistent indications of airspeed 
    limits, i.e., to eliminate the confusion generated by having the 
    information in an airspeed limitation placard contradicting the 
    airspeed indicator.
        The proposed AD requires re-marking the airspeed indicator, but 
    does not specifically require removing the existing airspeed indicator 
    and replacing it with one marked differently. If the existing airspeed 
    indicator is left in place and re-marked, no pitot and static pressure 
    checks would be required. Each airplane owner/operator has the choice 
    of changing the markings of the airspeed indicator either by replacing 
    the airspeed indicator or by re-marking the existing airspeed indicator 
    without removing it.
        The FAA understands that an owner/operator who decides to replace 
    the airspeed indicator will have to accomplish pitot and static 
    pressure checks each time the airspeed indicator is replaced and that 
    there are costs involved with this. However, the FAA has determined 
    that the safety benefits of eliminating the confusion caused when the 
    airspeed indicator contradicts current placards far outweigh this 
    burden.
        In addition, the FAA does not consider skis similar to other 
    devices, such as landing gear, flaps, ramps, and doors that are affixed 
    to or incorporated into aircraft. The compared items are all ones that 
    can be extended or opened and retracted or closed during flight. On the 
    other hand, the installation of skis on aircraft changes the aircraft's 
    configuration until the skis are removed. Fixed penetration wheel skis 
    cannot be extended or opened and then retracted or closed.
        The commenter's assertion that the maximum speed at which wing 
    flaps can be extended in flight is not specified by airspeed indicator 
    markings is incorrect. The range of airspeeds over which the flaps of a 
    small airplane can be extended in flight is specified by a white arc on 
    the airspeed indicator. The upper end of the white arc is the maximum 
    speed at which the flaps can be extended.
        No changes have been made to the final rule as a result of these 
    comments.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        After careful review of all available information related to the 
    subject presented above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the 
    public interest require the adoption of
    
    [[Page 59462]]
    
    the rule as proposed except for minor editorial corrections. The FAA 
    has determined that these minor corrections will not change the meaning 
    of the AD and will not impose any additional burden upon the public 
    than was already proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 170 airplanes in the U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 4 workhours per 
    airplane to accomplish this action, and that the average labor rate is 
    approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost approximately $350 per airplane. 
    Based on these figures, the total cost impact of this AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $100,300, or $590 per airplane.
        AECI has informed the FAA that approximately 12 of the affected 
    airplanes have the modification required by this AD already 
    incorporated. Based on this, the cost impact of the proposed AD is 
    reduced by $7,080, from $100,300 to $93,220.
        None of the above figures take into account the costs involved if 
    operators would have to re-accomplish the work, i.e., ski removal and 
    re-installation.
        AD 80-10-01 currently requires most of the same actions on the 
    affected airplanes that are required by this AD. The only differences 
    between this AD and AD 80-10-01 are the addition of Cessna Model 180K 
    airplanes to the applicability and the requirements for re-marking the 
    airspeed indicator and placing an AFM supplement in the cockpit. 
    Fabricating and installing the placard, placing the AFM supplement in 
    the cockpit, and re-marking the airspeed indicator (provided the 
    indicator is re-marked by painting the outside of the glass) can be 
    accomplished by:
        --For airplanes operated in accordance with part 91 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 91): An owner/operator who holds at 
    least a private pilot's certificate; and
        --For airplanes operated in accordance with part 135 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 135): An operator who holds an 
    operating certificate issued under part 135 of the Federal Aviation 
    Regulations (14 CFR part 135), as authorized by sections 43.3, 43.7, 
    and 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.3, 43.7, and 
    43.9).
        The only cost impact upon the public for airplanes other than the 
    affected Cessna Model 180K airplanes is the time it will take the 
    affected airplane owners/operators to incorporate these actions. 
    Therefore, this AD has no additional cost impact over that already 
    required by AD 80-10-01, except for the costs associated with the 
    affected Cessna Model 180K airplanes.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this 
    action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the 
    caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive 
    (AD)
    80-10-01, Amendment 39-3762, and by adding a new AD to read as 
    follows:
    
    98-23-02 Cessna Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-10865; Docket No. 97-
    CE-138-AD; Supersedes AD 80-10-01, Amendment 39-3762.
    
        Applicability: The following airplane models, all serial 
    numbers; certificated in any category, that have either Airglas 
    Engineering Company, Inc., (AECI) Model LW3600-180 (single position) 
    or Model LW3600-180A (two position) fixed penetration wheel skis 
    installed in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 
    SA213AL:
    
    Models
    
    180            180D           180H           185A           185E
    180A           180E           180J           185B           A185E
    180B           180F           180K           185C           A185F
    180C           180G           185            185D           ............
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 50 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already 
    accomplished.
        To prevent one or both wheel skis from rotating into a nose-down 
    position during flight, which could result in loss of control of the 
    airplane and/or possible airplane damage during flight or landing 
    operations, accomplish the following:
        (a) Modify the wheel ski bungee assemblies, safety cables, and 
    check cables, and their attachments to the airplane and the skis, in 
    accordance with Airglas Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI) Drawing No. 
    LW3600-180A-1 and -2, Revision ``B'', dated September 21, 1979; AECI 
    Drawing No. LW3600-180A-3, Revision ``A'', dated April 30, 1979; and 
    AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180, Revision ``F'', dated September 21, 
    1979 (for single position wheel ski installations) or AECI Drawing 
    No. LW3600-180A, Revision ``E'', dated September 21, 1979 (for two 
    position wheel ski installations).
    
        Note 2: AECI Service Bulletin (SB) No. LW3600-3, originally 
    issued: September 21, 1979; Amended: October 10, 1997, specifies 
    following the procedures provided in the drawings referenced in 
    paragraph (a) of this AD.
        (b) Fabricate a placard using letters at least \1/8\ inch in 
    height and install this placard adjacent to the airspeed indicator, 
    in accordance with AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180A-11, originally 
    issued: September 21, 1979, and AECI SB No. LW3600-3, originally 
    issued: September 21, 1979; Amended: October 10, 1997.
        (c) Re-mark the airspeed indicator to display the never exceed 
    airspeed (160 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS)) and the maximum 
    structural cruising speed (139 KIAS) with skis installed, in 
    accordance with AECI SB No. LW3600-3, originally issued: September 
    21, 1979; Amended: October 10, 1997.
        (d) Place AECI Document AE97-13FM, ``Supplemental Airplane 
    Flight Manual and Airplane Flight Manual Supplement'', dated October 
    10, 1997, in the airplane cockpit, in accordance with AECI SB No. 
    LW3600-3, originally issued: September 21, 1979; Amended: October 
    10, 1997.
        (e) The placard, airspeed indicator re-marking (provided the 
    indicator is re-marked
    
    [[Page 59463]]
    
    by painting the outside of the glass), and AFM supplement placement 
    requirements of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this AD, 
    respectively, can be accomplished by:
        (1) For airplanes operated in accordance with part 91 of the 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 91): An owner/operator who 
    holds at least a private pilot's certificate; and
        (2) For airplanes operated in accordance with part 135 of the 
    Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 135): An operator who 
    holds an operating certificate issued under part 135 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 135), as authorized by sections 
    43.3, 43.7, and 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    43.3, 43.7, and 43.9).
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Anchorage Aircraft Certification Office 
    (ACO), 222 West 7th Avenue, #14, Room 128, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-
    7587.
        (1) The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Anchorage ACO.
        (2) Alternative methods of compliance approved for AD 80-10-01 
    are not considered approved as alternative methods of compliance for 
    this AD.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Anchorage ACO.
    
        (h) The modifications, placard installation, airspeed indicator 
    re-marking, and AFM supplement placement required by this AD shall 
    be done in accordance with AECI SB No. LW3600-3, originally issued: 
    September 21, 1979; Amended: October 10, 1997; AECI Drawing No. 
    LW3600-180A-1 and -2, Revision ``B'', dated September 21, 1979; AECI 
    Drawing No. LW3600-180A-3, Revision ``A'', dated April 30, 1979; 
    AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180, Revision ``F'', dated September 21, 
    1979 (for single position wheel ski installations) or AECI Drawing 
    No. LW3600-180A, Revision ``E'', dated September 21, 1979 (for two 
    position wheel ski installations); AECI Drawing No. LW3600-180A-11, 
    originally issued: September 21, 1979; and AECI Document AE97-13FM, 
    ``Supplemental Airplane Flight Manual and Airplane Flight Manual 
    Supplement'', dated October 10, 1997. This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Airglas Engineering Company, Inc., P.O. Box 190107, 
    Anchorage, Alaska 99519-0107. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, 
    Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (i) This amendment supersedes AD 80-10-01, Amendment 39-3762.
        (j) This amendment becomes effective on December 22, 1998.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 27, 1998.
    James E. Jackson,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-29363 Filed 11-3-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/22/1998
Published:
11/04/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-29363
Dates:
Effective December 22, 1998.
Pages:
59460-59463 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-CE-138-AD, Amendment 39-10865, AD 98-23-02
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-29363.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13