98-29467. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to Microcap Initiatives-Amendments to NASD Rules 6530 ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 213 (Wednesday, November 4, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 59610-59613]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-29467]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40606; File No. SR-NASD-98-51]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change and Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule Change by the National 
    Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to Microcap 
    Initiatives-Amendments to NASD Rules 6530 and 6540
    
    October 27, 1998.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act'' or ``Exchange Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice 
    is hereby given that on July 20, 1998, the National Association of 
    Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association''), through its 
    wholly-owned subsidiary, the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (``Nasdaq'') 
    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or 
    ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
    and III below, which Items have been prepared by the NASD. On October 
    7, 1998, the NASD filed with the Commission Amendment No. 1 to the 
    proposal.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
    comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ Letter from Robert E. Aber, General Counsel, Nasdaq, to 
    Katherine A. England, Assistant Director, Division of Market 
    Regulation (``Division''), Commission, dated October 7, 1998 
    (``Amendment No. 1''). The substance of Amendment No. 1 is 
    incorporated into this notice.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Association is proposing amendments to NASD Rules 6530 and 6540 
    to limit quotations on the OTC Bulletin Board (``OTCBB'') 
    to the securities of issuers that are current in their reports filed 
    with the SEC or other regulatory authority, and to prohibit a member 
    from quoting a security on the OTCBB unless the issuer has made current 
    filings, respectively. Proposed new language is in italics; proposed 
    deletions are in [brackets].
    * * * * *
    6530. OTCBB Eligible Securities
        A Member shall be permitted to quote the [The] following categories 
    of securities [shall be eligible for quotation] in the Service:
        (a) any domestic equity security that satisfies the requirements of 
    paragraph (1) and either paragraph (2) or (3) or (4) below;
        (1) the security is not listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market 
    (``Nasdaq'') or a registered national securities exchange in the U.S., 
    except that an equity security [securities that are] shall be 
    considered eligible if it:
        (A[1]) is listed on one or more regional stock exchanges, and
        (B[2]) [do] does not qualify for disseminating of transactions 
    reports via the facilities of the Consolidated Tape [shall be 
    considered eligible.]; and
        (2) the issuer of the security is required to file reports pursuant 
    to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act or the security is described in 
    Section 12(g)(2)(B) of the Act, and, subject to a thirty calendar day 
    grace period, the issuer of the security is current in its reporting 
    obligations, or
        (3) the security is described in Section 12(g)(2)(G) of the Act 
    and, subject to a sixty calendar day grace period, the issuer or the 
    security is current in its reporting obligations, or
        (4) the issuer of the security is a bank or savings association 
    that is not required to file reports with the Commission pursuant to 
    Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act and, subject to a sixty calendar day 
    grace period, the issuer of the security is current with all required 
    filings with its appropriate Federal banking agency or State bank 
    supervisor (as defined in 12 U.S.C. 1813).
        (b) any foreign equity security or American Depositary Receipt 
    (ADR) that meets all of the following criteria:
        (1) [prior to April 1, 1998, is not listed on Nasdaq or a 
    registered national securities exchange in the U.S., except that a 
    foreign equity security or ADR shall be considered eligible if it is:
        (A) listed on one or more regional stock exchanges, and
        (B) does not qualify for dessimination of transaction reports via 
    the facilities of the Consolidated Tape.
        (2) after March 31, 1998,] the security is registered with the 
    Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 12 of the 
    [Securities Exchange Act] Act [of 1934] and the issuer of the security 
    is current in its reporting obligating; or the security satisfies the 
    requirements of paragraph (a)(2) or (3) or (4) above; and
        (2) the security is not listed on Nasdaq or a registered national 
    securities exchange in the U.S., except that a foreign equity security 
    or ADR shall [be considered eligible] meet this subparagraph (2) \4\ if 
    it is:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ The proposed rule text was changed from ``subparagraph (3)'' 
    to ``subparagraph (2)'' to correct the internal cross-reference. 
    Telephone conversation between Sara Nelson Bloom, Associate General 
    Counsel, Nasdaq, and Robert B. Long, Attorney, Division Commission, 
    on October 28, 1998.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (A) listed on one or more regional stock exchanges, and
        (B) does not qualify for dissemination of transaction reports via 
    the facilities the Consolidated Tape.
        (c) any equity security that [is] meets the following criteria:
        (1) the security is undergoing delisting from either the New York 
    Stock Exchange, Inc. (NYSE) or the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (AMEX) 
    for non-compliance with maintenance-of-listing standards; and
        (2) the security is subject to a trading suspension imposed by the 
    NYSE or
    
    [[Page 59611]]
    
    AMEX preceding the actual delisting; and
        (3) the security satisfies the requirements of paragraph (a)(2) or 
    (3) or (4) above.
        (d) any Direct [District] Participation Program as defined in Rule 
    6910 that is not listed on Nasdaq or a registered national securities 
    exchange in the U.S. and that satisfies the requirements of paragraph 
    (a)(2) or (3) or (4) above.
        (e) Paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) and (4) above will not apply with 
    respect to any domestic equity security quoted in the Service on the 
    effective date of this rule change until six months after that date.
    * * * * *
    Rule 6540. Requirements Applicable to Market Makers
        (a) No change.
        (b) No change.
    
        (1) Permissible Quotation Entries: no change.
    
        (2) Impermissible Quotation Entries.
    
        (A) No member or person associated with a member shall enter into 
    the Service a priced bid and/or offer, an unpriced indication of 
    interest (including ``bid wanted'' or ``offer wanted'' indications), or 
    a bid or offer accompanied by a modifier to reflect unsolicited 
    customer interest in any security that does not satisfy the 
    requirements of Rule 6530.
        (B) No member or person associated with a member shall enter into 
    the Service a priced bid and/or offer, an unpriced indication of 
    interest (including ``bid wanted'' or ``offer wanted'' indications), or 
    a bid or offer accompanied by a modifier to reflect unsolicited 
    customer interest in any security of an issuer that does not make 
    filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission through the 
    Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (``EDGAR'') system 
    (or in paper format, if specifically permitted by Commission Rules) 
    unless the member:
        (i) notifies the Association of the issuer of the security's 
    schedule for the filing of all periodic reports or financial reports 
    required pursuant to the Act or regulatory authority, respectively, and 
    the identity of the regulatory authority with which such reports are 
    filed, or ensures that such notice is provided; and
        (ii) provides to the Association the issuer's periodic reports 
    required pursuant to the Act, or the issuer's financial reports 
    required by regulatory authority, prior to the expiration of the grace 
    period described in Rule 6530(a)(3), or ensures that the required 
    periodic reports are provided to the Association within that time 
    period.
        (3) [(2)] Voluntary Termination of Registration
        No change.
        (4) [(3)] More Than One Trading Location
        No change.
        (5) [(4)] Clearance and Settlement
        No change.
        (c) Compliance With Market Maker Requirements
        Failure of a member or a person associated with a member to comply 
    with this Rule may be considered conduct inconsistent with high 
    standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of 
    trade, in violation of Rule 2110.
    * * * * *
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the NASD included statements 
    concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item IV below. The NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections 
    A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        The NASD has actively studied the OTC market in an effort to 
    address abuses in the trading and sales of thinly traded, thinly 
    capitalized (microcap) securities. These securities are not listed on 
    Nasdaq or any exchange and trade on the OTCBB, in the ``pink sheets'' 
    published by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. (``Pink Sheets''), and 
    in other quotation media where there are no listing requirements. With 
    respect to its examination of the OTCBB in particular, the NASD noted 
    the lack of reliable and current financial information about the 
    issuers, and the perception by the public that the OTCBB is similar to 
    a highly regulated market, such as the registered exchanges or 
    Nasdaq.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ In addition, the NASD has filed a proposed rule change 
    through its subsidiary, NASD Regulation, to require a member to 
    review current financial statements and other business information 
    about the issuer of a security that is not listed on Nasdaq or a 
    national securities exchange before that member could recommend a 
    transaction to a customer in the security and to provide certain 
    disclosure information on the trade confirmation for all customer 
    transactions (solicited and unsolicited) in such securities. See SR-
    NASD-98-50.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The OTCBB provides a real-time quotation medium that NASD member 
    firms can use to enter, update, and retrieve quotation information 
    (including unpriced indications of interest) for equity securities 
    trade over-the-counter that are neither listed on Nasdaq nor on a 
    primary national securities exchange. Eligible securities include 
    national, regional, and foreign equity issues, warrants, units. Direct 
    Participation Programs (``DPPs''),\6\ and American Depositary Receipts 
    (``ADRs'')\7\ not listed on any other U.S. national securities market 
    or exchange. Unlike Nasdaq or registered exchanges where individual 
    companies apply for listing on the market--and must meet and maintain 
    strict listing standards--there are no listing standards for the OTCBB, 
    and there currently is no requirement that issuers of securities on the 
    OTCBB make current, publicly-available reports with the SEC or other 
    regulator. In fact, over half of the companies that are currently 
    quoted on the OTCBB are not subject to any public reporting 
    requirements.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ DPPs are securities offerings that permit investors to 
    directly participate in the cash flow and tax consequences of the 
    underlying investments. DPPs provide for the ``flow through'' of tax 
    results. Thus, gains and losses are taxed to the investor not the 
    issuer of the security.
        \7\ ADRs are receipts for shares of foreign corporations that 
    are held by U.S. banks and bought and sold in the U.S. by investors, 
    without utilizing overseas markets.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule change was developed in an effort to balance the 
    benefits that the transparency of the OTCBB provides with the public 
    need for information about the issuers being quoted. The NASD is 
    concerned that where there is no public information available regarding 
    a security, the broad-based automated display of quotations in that 
    security creates an unjustified perception of reliability. While the 
    NASD realizes that the new rule may result in the lack of real-time 
    quotations for those securities that become ineligible for the OTCBB, 
    it believe that this loss is outweighed by the benefit to investors who 
    would, under the proposed rule, have access to information about the 
    companies in which they may invest. In addition, transactions in 
    securities ineligible for the OTCBB would still be subject to real-time 
    last sale trade reporting. These reports are publicly disseminated 
    through market data vendors on a real-time basis.
    
    Amendment to Rule 6530
    
        This proposed amendment to rule 6530 would limit quotations on the 
    OTCBB to the securities of issuers that make current filings pursuant 
    to
    
    [[Page 59612]]
    
    Sections 13 \8\ and 15(d) of the Act,\9\ securities of depository 
    institutions that are not required to make filings under the Act, but 
    file publicly-available reports with their appropriate regulatory 
    agencies, registered closed-end investment companies, and insurance 
    companies that are exempt from registration under Section 12(g)(2)(G) 
    of the Act.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78m.
        \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-(d).
        \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78(g)(2)(G).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        To remain eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, as issuer must 
    remain current in its filings with the SEC or applicable regulatory 
    authority. A member would be required to inform the NASD of the 
    issuer's reporting schedule. Based upon that schedule, the NASD will 
    affix a modifier on the security's symbol if the NASD has not received 
    information that the report was timely filed.\11\ The addition of the 
    modifier to the symbol, as well as any changes to the symbol necessary 
    to accommodate the modifier, will be publicly reported on the OTCBB 
    Daily List, which is available to market makers and investors through 
    the OTCBB web site as http://www.otcbb.com. Once an issuer is 
    delinquent in filing a required report (e.g., Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, 
    Form 20-F, Insurance Company Annual Statement, or call report), a 
    security of the issuer may continue to be quoted on the OTCBB for a 30 
    or 60 calendar day grace period from the due date of the report, 
    depending on the type of issuer. After the grace period, quotations in 
    the security of the delinquent issuer would not be permitted on the 
    OTCBB.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ It is contemplated that the modifier will be affixed one to 
    two days after the report is due.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Filings for most OTCBB issuers are available through the SEC's 
    Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (``EDGAR'') 
    system.\12\ Foreign issuers are generally permitted to file in paper 
    format and copies of these filings are available from the Commission. 
    Exchange Act filings of banks and thrifts are available upon filing 
    from the financial institution's primary bank regulatory agency. The 
    grace period for these issuers is 30 days. In the case of banks and 
    thrifts that are not required to make Exchange Act filings, members can 
    obtain call report information from the National Information Center of 
    Banking Information website (http://www.ffiec.gov/nic) or the Federal 
    Deposit Insurance Corporation's website (http://www.fdic.gov). Call 
    reports are filed 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter and 
    are available to the public within 15 days of filing. Insurance 
    companies file annual statements with the National Association of 
    Insurance Commissioners (``NAIC'') by March 1 of each year. This 
    information is released to the public by NAIC by April 1. Because of 
    the delay in the availability of call reports and insurance company 
    annual statements, the proposed rule permits a 60 calendar day grace 
    period for the quotation of securities of these companies after the 
    deadline for the issuer to submit a report to the appropriate 
    regulator.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\ EDGAR is the SEC system for the receipt, acceptance, and 
    review of documents submitted in electronic format.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Amendment to Rule 6540
    
        This proposed amendment to Rule 6540 would prohibit member firms 
    from quoting an issuer's security if the issuer has not made current 
    reports with the SEC or the appropriate regulatory authority. Members 
    must also provide such reports to the NASD, although the reports may be 
    provided by any market maker in the security. The NASD is exploring 
    ways to reduce the burden of this requirement for members, particularly 
    with respect to issuers who are EDGAR filers. As discussed above, the 
    NASD will affix a modifier to the security's symbol if the NASD has not 
    received information that the report was timely filed. This indication 
    will provide members with notice that the NASD has not received 
    information that the issuer's report was timely filed. Once the NASD 
    provides this notice, the member will have the opportunity to acquire 
    the necessary report and provide it to the NASD before the end of the 
    grace period.
    
    Phase-In
    
        The new requirements will be immediately effective upon approval of 
    the rule for securities not previously quoted on the OTCBB. Securities 
    quoted on the OTCBB on the date the rule becomes effective will be 
    afforded at least six months to comply with the new requirements. 
    Specifically, and in order to accommodate the resource demands that may 
    be placed upon the SEC when certain issuers elect to file current 
    public reports, the new requirements will be applied in a month-by-
    month staggered manner for a period from six to eighteen months from 
    the date the rule is approved. The NASD will apply the new rule to 
    approximately the same number of issuers for each month during that 
    period in order to evenly distribute the SEC's anticipated work load. 
    The delayed effectiveness of the rule should also enable market makers, 
    investors, and issuers to take appropriate action. It should be noted 
    that for issuers who file a Form 10 or Form 10SB with the SEC to 
    register under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act,\13\ all SEC comments, 
    if any, must be cleared with the SEC before securities can be quoted on 
    the OTCBB.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(G).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Statutory Basis
        The NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) \14\ of the Act, which requires, 
    among other things, that the Association's rules be designed to prevent 
    fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and 
    equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors 
    and the public interest. In addition, Section 15A(b)(11) \15\ of the 
    Act requires that the rules of a registered national securities 
    association be designed to produce fair and informative quotations, 
    prevent fictitious or misleading quotations and to promote orderly 
    procedures for collecting, distributing, and publishing quotations. The 
    NASD believes the proposed rule change, which will address actual and 
    potential fraud in the quotation and trading of non-listed securities 
    and the investor perception that the OTCBB is equivalent to Nasdaq or 
    exchange markets in terms of standards, regulatory structure and 
    oversight, will accordingly protect investors and the public interest. 
    Further, the NASD believes limiting the OTCBB to companies that provide 
    public information will prevent fictitious and misleading quotations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
        \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(11).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose 
    any inappropriate burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        The proposed rule change was published for comment in NASD Notice 
    to Members 98-14 (``Notice'' or ``NTM'') in January, 1998. A total of 
    44 comments were received in response to the Notice.
        Of the 44 responses received, 18 responses (or 41%) were from 
    broker/dealer firms or registered persons and the balance of 26 
    comments (or 59%) were from individual investors, issuers, various 
    state agencies, trade associations, and other interested parties. In 
    providing comments, a majority of commenters expressed a
    
    [[Page 59613]]
    
    position (i.e., approval or disapproval) regarding each specific 
    proposal. Other commenters did not provide a stated position on each 
    proposal, but identified particular issues with certain proposals and 
    provided written comment.
        Twenty-two commenters opposed the proposal, 19 commenters supported 
    it, and three did not take a definitive position. Those commenters who 
    disapproved of the proposed changes generally believed that the changes 
    would decrease transparency and liquidity and would increase the 
    regulatory burden that small issuers face. One commenter opined that 
    the annual cost to an issuer to comply with the Exchange Act reporting 
    requirements would be $150,000.
        Those commenters supporting the proposed changes generally felt the 
    changes will help eliminate fraud by providing investors with reliable 
    information. These commenters thought the deterrence of fraud and 
    increased availability of information outweighed the increase burden on 
    companies.
        Commenters indicated that the rule as proposed in the Notice should 
    be modified to recognize issuers filing under Section 15(d) of the 
    Exchange Act.\16\ A commenter encouraged the NASD to accept reports 
    filed with regulatory agencies outside of the Exchange Act, such as 
    call reports filed by financial institutions. The rule as published in 
    the Notice would have permitted members to maintain quotes in a 
    security in which an issuer is delinquent in its reports with the SEC 
    or regulatory authorities for a period of ten days. Other commenters 
    supported an expansion of the grace period for filing a report with the 
    SEC to 30 days after its due date.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-(d).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        After the public comment process, the staff recommended and the 
    Boards of the NASD and Nasdaq approved the following modifications to 
    the proposed rules. As to NASD Rule 6530, the proposed delinquency 
    grace period was expanded from ten days to thirty days for issuers 
    filing Exchange Act forms and to sixty days for insurance companies and 
    financial institutions that do not file Exchange Act forms. This 
    extended grace period is consistent with the proposed review period in 
    the SEC's Rule 15c2-11 proposal.\17\ Further, in the original Notice, 
    the staff solicited comment on whether certain non-Exchange Act 
    depository institutions that provide publicly-available financial 
    reports to banking regulators should be eligible for quotation on the 
    OTCBB. Based on the comments received, the nature of the issuers, the 
    independent oversight of banking regulators, and the SEC's position 
    that reports filed with federal or state bank supervisory agencies 
    contain information analogous to Exchange Act reports,\18\ the proposed 
    rule allows securities of these issuers to be quoted on the OTCBB if 
    the issuer provides timely reports to the appropriate Federal banking 
    agency or State bank supervisor and the information is publicly 
    available. Finally, consistent with comments received, the proposed 
    rule includes securities of issuers who are currently filing reports 
    with the SEC pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act as eligible 
    securities for the OTCBB. An issuer becomes subject to Section 15(d) as 
    a result of registering securities under the Securities Act of 1933 
    (``Securities Act'') and is thereby required to make timely filings 
    with the SEC such as Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K or 20-F for at least a 
    year following the Securities Act registration.\19\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \17\ Exchange Act Release No. 39670 (February 17, 1998), 63 FR 
    9661 (February 25, 1998).
        \18\ Id. 9667-68.
        \19\ In addition to its requirements under Section 15(d), an 
    issuer may voluntarily register under Section 12(g) or be required 
    to register under Section 12(g) if it has 500 or more shareholders 
    of record and total assets of more than $10 million. Under both 
    scenarios, the issuer's securities would continue to qualify as 
    eligible securities for purposes of the OTCBB Rules if the issuer 
    maintains current filings with the SEC.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The staff and the NASD and Nasdaq Boards considered commenters' 
    objection that the proposed rule would decrease transparency for 
    securities no longer eligible for the OTCBB. However, this objection 
    was outweighed by the benefit of ensuring that there was publicly-
    available information regarding issuers that are afforded the 
    visibility and credibility of the OTCBB. In this regard, the NASD 
    considered that in granting permanent approval to the OTCBB, the SEC 
    noted: ``As a general matter, transparency benefits the markets. 
    However, in the context of the inclusion of unregistered foreign 
    securities on the OTCBB, the benefits may be outweighed by the 
    potential harm from including unregistered securities on a visible U.S. 
    market operated by a self-regulatory organization.'' \20\ The SEC also 
    noted that ``the OTCBB may be inconsistent with the full disclosure 
    goals of the securities laws in allowing a regulated public marketplace 
    for unregistered securities.'' \21\ While these comments were made in 
    the context of unregistered foreign securities, the NASD believes that 
    the same concerns exist with respect to domestic securities for which 
    no public information is available.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \20\ Exchange Act Release No. 38456 (March 31, 1997), 62 FR 
    16635 at 16638 (April 7, 1997).
        \21\ Id.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in Federal 
    Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) by order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is 
    consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file 
    six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
    Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the 
    submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with 
    respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, 
    and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change 
    between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be 
    withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
    552, will be available for inspection and copying at the Commission's 
    Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD.
        All submissions should refer to File SR-NASD-98-51 and should be 
    submitted by November 25, 1998.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-29467 Filed 11-3-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/04/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-29467
Pages:
59610-59613 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40606, File No. SR-NASD-98-51
PDF File:
98-29467.pdf