98-29513. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Partial Approval to Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to the Small Firm Representative on NASD Board Portion of the Proposed Rule Change ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 213 (Wednesday, November 4, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 59614-59615]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-29513]
    
    
    
    [[Page 59614]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40615; File No. SR-NASD-98-56]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Partial Approval to 
    Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. Relating to the Small Firm Representative on NASD Board Portion of 
    the Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendment to Composition of NASD 
    Board to Include Members of New Amex LLC and for Other Purposes
    
    October 28, 1998.
        On August 10, 1998, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association'') filed with the Securities and 
    Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposed rule change 
    pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ In its proposal, among 
    other matters, the NASD proposed revision of its by-laws to reserve one 
    Industry Governor position on the NASD Board of Governors (``Board'') 
    for a representative of smaller NASD member firms. Notice of the 
    proposal was published in the Federal Register on August 26, 1998 
    (``Notice'').\3\ The Commission received one comment letter on the 
    filing.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40399 (August 19, 
    1998), 63 FR 22839 (File No. SR-NASD-98-56).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Introduction and Description of the Proposal
    
        In 1997, the NASD reorganized its corporate governance structure in 
    connection with a revision of its disciplinary process following 
    issuance of the Commission's Report Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the 
    Act and related order and undertakings.\4\ The changes streamlined the 
    NASD's decisionmaking process, improved communication among members of 
    the Board and Association staff and enabled the Association to act 
    quickly and decisively when appropriate.\5\ After the reorganization, 
    the NASD established the Small Firm Advisory Board \6\ to address 
    concerns raised by a number of smaller member firms about their 
    representation within the new NASD corporate structure.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ Report and Appendix to Report Pursuant to Section 21(a) of 
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Regarding the NASD and The 
    Nasdaq Stock Market (August 8, 1996) and Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 37538 (August 8, 1996) (SEC Order Instituting Public 
    Proceedings Pursuant to Section 19(h)(1) of the Securities Exchange 
    Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, In the 
    Matter of National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. 
    Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-9056), respectively. The 
    undertakings were included in the SEC Order.
        \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39326 (November 14, 
    1997), 62 FR 62385 (November 21, 1997) (File Nos. NASD-97-71, 96-29 
    and 96-20).
        \6\ Press Release, National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    NASD Creates Small Firm Advisory Board (Feb. 17, 1998).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Notice indicated that the NASD's experience under the new 
    corporate structure suggested that further participation by the small 
    member firm community in matters affecting their business and their 
    customers would be desirable. To provide this, the NASD filed the 
    proposed rule change, seeking amendment of its by-laws to include one 
    representative of member firms with 150 or fewer registered 
    representatives among the Industry positions on the Board of 
    Governors.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ To qualify for this position, a proposed nominee must be 
    associated with a member firm of 150 or fewer registered 
    representatives. The definition of an Industry Governor is set forth 
    in Article I of the NASD By-laws.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Summary of Comments
    
        The Commission received one comment letter from the Independent 
    Broker-Dealer Association (``IBDA'').\8\ The NASD responded to this 
    letter.\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ See Letter from Bill T. Singer, Singer Fumiento LLP to The 
    Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, dated September 11, 
    1998. The comment letter is composed of a cover letter from Mr. 
    Singer, counsel to the IBDA and a report to Alan Davidson, President 
    of the IBDA from Mr. Singer, addressing the small firm 
    representative and other issues, dated September 10, 1998.
        \9\ See Letter from T. Grant Callery, General Counsel, NASD to 
    Katherine England, Assistant Director, Division of Market 
    Regulation, Commission, dated October 22, 1998.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The comment letter expresses numerous concerns about the 
    representation of small firms within the NASD.\10\ Primarily, the 
    comment letter questions whether the proposed ``small firm Board 
    position,'' combined with the current Small Firm Advisory Board, 
    adequately represent the IBDA members within the NASD. The letter 
    stresses the need for enhanced representation of small firms and 
    asserts that IBDA members have been hurt by the lack of adequate 
    representation. The comment letter suggests that IBDA members would be 
    better represented if they were able to elect the members of the Small 
    Firm Advisory Board and the small firm Board representative directly. 
    The comment letter also suggests that the maximum number of registered 
    representatives allowed by the proposed definition of a small firm 
    should be reduced, to more adequately represent the majority of smaller 
    firms.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ The comment letter also questioned: (a) certain aspects of 
    the proposed NASD/Amex combination; (b) inclusion of the small firm 
    representative vote in the same filing as the combination; and (c) 
    the effects of the post 21(a) Report enhancement of the NASD 
    disciplinary process on OBDA members. That portion of SR-NASD-98-56 
    regarding the NASD/Amex combination, and any comment letters 
    received thereto, will be separately addressed by the Commission at 
    a later date, in connection with review of all filings addressing 
    the combination. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    40426 (September 10, 1998) (Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change 
    and Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the American Stock Exchange, Inc. 
    Relating to Changes to the Combination of the American Stock 
    Exchange, Inc. and the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. File No. SR-AMEX-98-32) and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    40443 (September 16, 1998.) (Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the National Association of 
    Securities Dealers, Inc. Relating to Policies Regarding Authority 
    Over American Stock Exchange LLC and Composition of Board of 
    Governors of American Stock Exchange LLC, File No. SR-NASD-98-67).
        The Association has indicated to the Commission that the small 
    firm representative Board member vote was included in the same 
    ballot as the NASD/Amex combination issues as a cost-savings 
    mechanism, to avoid incurring the expense of separate mailings to 
    the NASD membership on each issue. Conversation between Philip 
    Rosen, Associate General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, NASD 
    and Mandy S. Cohen, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, 
    Commission, on October 26, 1998.
        The comments on the post 21(a) Report disciplinary process 
    enhancements do not relate to the subject of SR-NASD-98-56, the 
    proposal currently under consideration. The Commission notes, 
    however, that enhancement of the disciplinary process is a favorable 
    outcome of the 21(a) Report and SEC Order.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Responding to the IBDA's concerns, the NASD points out that the 
    Commission approved its 1997 corporate structure and in doing so, found 
    the restructuring to be consistent with the requirements of Section 15A 
    of the Act, including the provisions requiring fair representation of 
    members in the governance of the NASD.\11\ In particular, the 
    Association responds that the Commission assessed the 1997 corporate 
    structure changes in terms of the fair representation requirement 
    before reservation of a small firm Board position. Additionally, the 
    NASD asserts that the Small Firm Advisory Board was voluntarily 
    established by the Board of Governors to provide a more effective voice 
    for the small firm member community, notwithstanding the minimum 
    requirements of the Act. Moreover, the NASD points out that, regardless 
    of the proposed definition, the current nominee for the small firm 
    Governor position is associated with a member firm of eight registered 
    representatives,\12\ and that eight of the twelve members of the Small 
    Firm
    
    [[Page 59615]]
    
    Advisory Board are from member firms with fewer than twenty registered 
    representatives. Finally, the NASD notes that its by-laws allow for the 
    nomination of dissident candidates for specific positions, such as the 
    small firm representative, through the by-laws' contested election 
    procedures.\13\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ See 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(4).
        \12\ See, e.g., Notice To Members 98-80 (Sept. 29, 1998); supra 
    note 9.
        \13\ See Article VII, Section 10 to the NASD by-laws. In this 
    context, dissident candidates are those not nominated by the NASD 
    Nominating Committee.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Discussion
    
        As discussed below, the Commission has determined to approve the 
    Association's proposal incorporating a small firm Board representative. 
    The standard by which the Commission must evaluate a proposed rule 
    change is set forth in Section 19(b) of the Act. The Commission must 
    approve a proposed NASD rule change if it finds that the proposal is 
    consistent with the requirements of Section 15A of the Act \14\ and the 
    rules and regulations thereunder that govern the NASD.\15\ In 
    evaluating a given proposal, the Commission examines the record before 
    it and all relevant factors and necessary information. In addition, 
    Section 15A of the Act establishes specific standards for NASD rules 
    against which the Commission must measure the proposal.\16\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
        \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
        \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission believes the creation of a small firm representative 
    is consistent with that portion of Section 15A requiring fair member 
    representation in the governance of the NASD.\17\ As discussed above, 
    the Association made substantial changes to its corporate governance 
    structure in 1997, many of which responded to the Commission's 21(a) 
    Report and related documents. After these changes, the NASD created the 
    Small Firm Advisory Board to address concerns raised by small firms 
    about their ability to participate in the new NASD corporate structure. 
    Today, the Commission approves the reservation of a Governor position 
    to represent member firms with 150 or fewer registered representatives. 
    The Commission agrees with the NASD that the changes, as proposed, will 
    enhance the representation of small firms within the NASD corporate 
    governance structure by inserting a small firm representative into the 
    center of the decisionmaking process, the NASD Board of Governors. As a 
    member of the Board of Governors, the small firm representative, unlike 
    a member of the Small Firm Advisory Board, will have an opportunity to 
    actively participate in the governance of the NASD and keep abreast of 
    the Association's new initiatives.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(4).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Additionally, the Commission believes that the NASD acted within 
    its discretion by defining a small member firm as one having 150 or 
    fewer registered representatives. Approval of the exercise of this 
    discretion is supported by the fact that the NASD by-laws include 
    contested election provisions approved in connection with the 1997 
    restructuring. These provision will allow organizations such as the 
    IBDA to present candidates for the NASD Board of Governors to the NASD 
    membership during the regular election process, if they do not like 
    those nominated by the NASD Nominating Committee. The existence of 
    these contested election procedures further supports the finding that 
    the amendments approved today satisfy the fair representation 
    requirements of the Act discussed above, since these provisions permit 
    presentation of an alternative nominee for the small firm 
    representative Board position.
    
    IV. Conclusion
    
        The Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the Act, and, particularly, with Section 15A thereof.\18\ In 
    approving the proposal, the Commission has considered its impact on 
    efficiency, competition, and capital formation.\19\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
        \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78(c)f.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\20\ that the portion of the proposed rule change (SR-NASD-98-56) 
    relating to reservation of a small firm representative on the NASD 
    Board of Governors, is approved.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant 
    to delegated authority.\21\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-29513 Filed 11-3-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/04/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-29513
Pages:
59614-59615 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40615, File No. SR-NASD-98-56
PDF File:
98-29513.pdf