99-28887. Glufosinate Ammonium; Pesticide Tolerance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 60112-60121]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-28887]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [OPP-300945; FRL-6391-5]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Glufosinate Ammonium; Pesticide Tolerance
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for combined residues 
    of glufosinate ammonium (butanoic acid, 2-amino-4-
    (hydroxymethylphosphinyl)-mono ammonium salt) and metabolite(s) (3-
    methylphosphinico-propionic acid and 2-acetamido-4-methylphosphinico-
    butanoic acid), expressed as 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl) 
    butanoic acid equivalents in or on almond hulls; apples; bananas; 
    cattle fat, meat and meat-byproducts; eggs; goat fat, meat, and meat-
    by-products; grapes, hog fat, meat, and meat-by-products; horse fat, 
    meat, and meat-by-products; milk; potatoes, potato chips and granules/
    flakes; poultry fat, meat, and meat-by-products; sheep fat, meat, and 
    meat-by-products; transgenic aspirated grain fractions, transgenic 
    corn, field, forage; transgenic corn, field, grain; transgenic corn, 
    field, stover; transgenic soybean hulls, transgenic soybeans, and tree 
    nuts group. AgrEvo USA Company requested these tolerances under the 
    Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Food Quality 
    Protection Act of 1996. This regulation also corrects the existing 
    regulation for time-limited tolerances for transgenic canola and sweet 
    corn commodities.
    DATES: This regulation is effective November 4, 1999. Objections and 
    requests for hearings, identified by docket control number OPP-300945, 
    must be received by EPA on or before January 3, 2000.
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests may be submitted by 
    mail, in person, or by courier. Please follow the detailed instructions 
    for each method as provided in Unit VI. of the ``SUPPLEMENTARY 
    INFORMATION'' section. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, your objections 
    and hearing requests must identify docket control number OPP-300945 in 
    the subject line on the first page of your response.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Joanne I. Miller, 
    Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460; 
    telephone number: (703) 305-6224 and e-mail address: 
    miller.joanne@epa.gov.
    
     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
     I. General Information
    
    A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
    
        You may be affected by this action if you are an agricultural 
    producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 
    affected categories and entities may include, but are not limited to:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Examples of Potentially
                  Categories                NAICS       Affected Entities
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Industry                                   111  Crop production
                                               112  Animal production
                                               311  Food manufacturing
                                             32532  Pesticide manufacturing
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
    a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
    action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be 
    affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
    codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
    whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have 
    questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular 
    entity, consult the person listed in the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
    CONTACT'' section.
    
    B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this 
    Document and Other Related Documents?
    
        1. Electronically.You may obtain electronic copies of this 
    document, and certain other related documents that might be available 
    electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/. 
    To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and 
    Regulations'' and then look up the entry for this document under the 
    ``Federal Register--Environmental Documents.'' You can also go directly 
    to the Federal Register listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
        2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for 
    this action under docket control number OPP-300945. The official record 
    consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, and 
    other information related to this action, including any information 
    claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official 
    record includes the documents that are physically located in the 
    docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those 
    documents. The public version of the official record does not include 
    any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official 
    record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic 
    comments submitted during an applicable comment period is available for 
    inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch 
    (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., 
    Arlington, VA, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
    
    II. Background and Statutory Findings
    
        In the Federal Register of October 8, l997, (62 FR 52544) (FRL- 
    5746-9) and July 14, l999 (64 FR 37973) (FRL-6085-5), EPA issued 
    notices pursuant to section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
    Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d) as amended by the Food Quality 
    Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) (Public Law 104-170) announcing the 
    filing of a pesticide petition (PP) for tolerance by AgrEvo USA 
    Company, Little Falls
    
    [[Page 60113]]
    
    Centre One, 2711 Centerville Road, Wilmington, DE 19808. These notices 
    included a summary of the petition prepared by AgrEvo USA Company, the 
    registrant. There were no comments received in response to the notices 
    of filing.
        These petitions requested that 40 CFR 180.473 be amended by 
    establishing permanent tolerances for combined residues of the 
    herbicide glufosinate ammonium and its metabolite(s) expressed as 2-
    amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl) butanoic acid in or on almond hulls 
    at 0.50 part per million (ppm), apples at 0.05 ppm, bananas at 0.3 ppm 
    (not more than 0.2 ppm shall be present in the pulp after peel is 
    removed), cattle, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; cattle, meat-by-products at 
    0.10 ppm; eggs at 0.05 ppm, goats, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; goats, 
    meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm; grapes at 0.05 ppm; hogs, fat and meat at 
    0.05 ppm; hogs, meat-by-product at 0.10 ppm; horses, fat and meat at 
    0.05 ppm; horses, meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm; milk at 0.02 ppm, 
    potatoes at 0.8 ppm, potato chips at 1.6 ppm, potato granules/flakes at 
    2.0 ppm, poultry, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; poultry, meat-by-products 
    at 0.10 ppm; sheep, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; sheep, meat-by-products 
    at 0.10 ppm; transgenic aspirated grain fractions at 25.0 ppm, 
    transgenic corn, field, forage at 4.0 ppm; trangenic corn, field, grain 
    at 0.2 ppm; transgenic corn, field stover at 6.0 ppm; transgenic 
    soybeans hulls at 5.0 ppm, transgenic soybeans at 2.0 ppm and tree nut 
    group at 0.1 ppm.
        Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
    tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
    food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
    408(b)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable 
    certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the 
    pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures 
    and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This 
    includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, 
    but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) 
    requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and 
    children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance 
    and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
    result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide 
    chemical residue....''
        EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from 
    aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the 
    regulatory requirements of section 408 and a complete description of 
    the risk assessment process, see the final rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide 
    Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-5754-7).
    
    III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
    
        Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 
    available scientific data and other relevant information in support of 
    this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to 
    make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section 
    408(b)(2), for permanent tolerances for combined residues of 
    glufosinate ammonium and its metabolite(s) in or on almond hulls at 
    0.50 ppm, apples at 0.05 ppm, bananas at 0.3 ppm (not more that 0.2 ppm 
    shall be present in the pulp after peel is removed), cattle, fat and 
    meat at 0.05 ppm; cattle, meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm, eggs at 0.05 
    ppm, goats, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; goats, meat-by-products at 0.10 
    ppm; grapes at 0.05 ppm, hogs, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; hogs, meat-by-
    product at 0.10 ppm; horses, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; horses, meat-by-
    products at 0.10 ppm; milk at 0.02 ppm; potatoes at 0.8 ppm; potato 
    chips at 1.6 ppm; potato granule/flakes at 2.0 ppm; poultry, fat and 
    meat at 0.05 ppm; poultry, meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm; sheep, fat and 
    meat at 0.05 ppm; sheep, meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm; transgenic 
    aspirated grain fractions at 25.0 ppm, transgenic corn, field, forage 
    at 4.0 ppm; transgenic corn, field, grain at 0.2 ppm; transgenic corn, 
    field, stover at 6.0 ppm; transgenic soybeans, hulls at 5.0 ppm; 
    transgenic soybeans at 2.0 ppm and tree nuts group at 0.1 ppm. The 
    addition (a corrective action on the Administrator's own initiative 
    under section 408(e)(A)(C) of a second metabolite (2-acetamido-4-
    methylphosphinico-butamoic acid, expressed as 2-amino-4-
    (hydroxymethylphosphinyl) butanoic acid equivalents) to the residues of 
    glufosinate ammonium found in transgenic canola and sweet corn 
    commodities is consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) and is appropriate 
    because the second metabolite consistently occurs in commodities 
    derived from transgenic plants. The risk assessment included the second 
    metabolite found in canola and sweet corn commodities. EPA's assessment 
    of the dietary exposures and risks associated with establishing these 
    tolerances follows.
    
    A. Toxicological Profile
    
        EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its 
    validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of 
    the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered 
    available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities 
    of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and 
    children. The nature of the toxic effects caused by are discussed in 
    this unit.
        1. Glufosinate ammonium (also referred to as DL-glufosinate 
    ammonium or HOE 039866 ) is toxicity category III for acute oral, 
    dermal, and eye irritation toxicities. It is toxicity category III for 
    inhalation toxicity. It is not a dermal irritant (toxicity category IV) 
    nor is it a dermal sensitizer.
        2. In a sub-chronic oral toxicity study, glufosinate-ammonium 
    (95.3% active ingredient (a.i.)) was administered to 10 NMRI mice/sex/
    dose in the diet at levels of 0, 80, 320 or 1,280 ppm (equivalent to 0, 
    12, 48 or 192 millgrams/kilogram/day (mg/kg/day)) for 13 weeks. 
    Significant (p< 0.05)="" increases="" were="" observed="" in="" serum="" aspartate="" aminotransferase="" and="" in="" alkaline="" phosphatase="" in="" high-dose="" (192="" mg/kg/="" day)="" males.="" also="" observed="" were="" increases="" in="" absolute="" and="" relative="" liver="" weights="" in="" mid-(48="" mg/kg/day)="" and="" high-dose="" males.="" the="" no="" observed="" adverse="" effect="" level="" (noael)="" is="" 12="" mg/kg/day,="" the="" lowest="" observed="" adverse="" effect="" level="" (loael)="" is="" 48="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" the="" changes="" in="" clinical="" biochemistry="" and="" liver="" weights.="" 3.="" in="" a="" 21-day="" repeated="" dose="" dermal="" toxicity="" study,="" groups="" of="" 6="" male="" and="" 6="" female="" wistar="" rats="" were="" treated="" with="" hoe="" 039866="" (95.3%)="" in="" deionized="" water="" by="" dermal="" occlusion="" at="" doses="" of="" 0,="" 100,="" 300="" or="" 1,000="" mg/kg/day,="" 6="" hours/day,="" 5="" days/week="" for="" 21="" applications="" in="" 30="" days.="" an="" additional="" five="" males="" and="" five="" females/dose="" group="" were="" dose="" and="" observed="" for="" 44="" days="" in="" a="" ``recovery="" study''.="" two="" of="" 6="" ldt="" males="" at="" 300="" mg/kg/day,="" and="" 4="" of="" 11="" males="" and="" two="" of="" 11="" females="" at="" 1,000="" mg/kg/day="" displayed="" aggressive="" behavior,="" piloerection="" and="" a="" high="" startle="" response.="" there="" were="" no="" effects="" of="" toxicological="" importance="" on="" body="" weights,="" food="" consumption,="" hematology,="" clinical="" chemistry,="" urinalysis,="" organ="" weights,="" or="" gross="" or="" microscopic="" pathology.="" based="" on="" clinical="" observations,="" the="" loael="" is="" 300="" mg/kg/day="" and="" the="" noael="" is="" 100="" mg/kg/="" day.="" 4.="" in="" an="" oncogenicity="" study,="" hoe="" 039866="" (glufosinate="" ammonium)="" was="" administered="" to="" 50="" nmri="" mice/sex/dose="" in="" the="" diet="" at="" dose="" levels="" of="" 0,="" 80,="" 160="" (males="" only)="" or="" 320="" (females="" only)="" ppm="" for="" 104="" weeks.="" dose="" levels="" corresponded="" to="" 0,="" 2.83,="" 10.82,="" 22.60="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" 0,="" 4.23,="" 16.19,="" 66.96="" mg/kg/="" [[page="" 60114]]="" day="" in="" females.="" the="" noael="" for="" systemic="" toxicity="" is="" 80="" ppm="" (10.82/16.19="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males/females="" (m/f)),="" and="" the="" loael="" is="" 160/320="" ppm="" (22.60/="" 63.96="" mg/kg/day="" in="" m/f),="" based="" on="" increased="" mortality="" in="" males,="" increased="" glucose="" levels="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" and="" consistent="" changes="" in="" glutathione="" levels="" in="" males.="" no="" increase="" in="" tumor="" incidence="" was="" found="" in="" any="" treatment="" group.="" 5.="" in="" a="" chronic="" feeding="" study,="" hoe="" 039866="" technical="" was="" fed="" to="" male="" and="" female="" beagle="" dogs="" for="" 12="" months="" in="" the="" diet="" at="" levels="" of="" 2.0,="" 5.0="" or="" 8.5="" mg/kg/day.="" there="" were="" no="" overt="" signs="" of="" toxicity="" or="" dose-="" related="" effects="" on="" body="" weight,="" food="" consumption,="" ophthalmology,="" hematology,="" clinical="" chemistry,="" urinalyses="" or="" organ="" weights.="" two="" dogs="" receiving="" 8.5="" mg/kg/day="" died="" during="" the="" study="" as="" a="" result="" of="" heart="" and="" circulatory="" system="" failure="" from="" rapid="" diet="" consumption="" and="" necrotizing="" aspiration="" pneumonia.="" electrocardiogram="" results="" of="" dosed="" males="" and="" females="" indicated="" a="" dose-related="" decrease="" in="" heart="" rate="" at="" 6="" months;="" heart="" rates="" of="" dosed="" animals="" at="" 12="" months="" were="" considered="" to="" be="" normal.="" the="" noael="" is="" 5.0="" mg/kg/day,="" the="" loael="" is="" 8.5="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" mortality.="" 6.="" in="" a="" rat="" oncogenicity="" study,="" glufosinate-ammonium="" (95.2-96.0%="" a.i.)="" was="" administered="" to="" wistar="" rats="" (60/sex/group)="" for="" up="" to="" 24="" months="" at="" 0,="" 1,000,="" 5,000,="" or="" 10,000="" ppm="" (equivalent="" to="" 0,="" 45.4,="" 228.9,="" or="" 466.3="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" 0,="" 57.1,="" 281.5,="" or="" 579.3="" mg/kg/day="" in="" females).="" the="" loael="" for="" chronic="" toxicity="" is="" 5,000="" ppm="" (equivalent="" to="" 228.9="" mg/kg/day="" for="" male="" rats="" and="" 281.5="" mg/kg/day="" for="" females),="" based="" on="" increased="" incidences="" of="" retinal="" atrophy.="" the="" chronic="" noael="" is="" 1,000="" ppm.="" under="" the="" conditions="" of="" this="" study,="" there="" was="" no="" evidence="" of="" carcinogenic="" potential.="" dosing="" was="" considered="" adequate="" based="" on="" increased="" incidences="" of="" retinal="" atrophy.="" 7.="" in="" a="" combined="" chronic="" toxicity/oncogenicity="" study,="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" was="" administered="" to="" 50="" wistar="" rats/sex/dose="" in="" the="" diet="" for="" 24="" months="" at="" dose="" levels="" of="" 0,="" 40,="" 140,="" or="" 500="" ppm="" (mean="" compound="" intake="" in="" males="" was="" 0,="" 1.9,="" 6.8,="" and="" 24.4="" mg/kg/day="" and="" for="" females="" was="" 0,="" 2.4,="" 8.2="" and="" 28.7="" mg/kg/day,="" respectively).="" the="" loael="" is="" 2.4="" mg/kg/day="" (ldt)="" based="" on="" the="" increase="" in="" kidney="" glutamine="" synthetase="" activity="" and="" increased="" kidney="" weights="" in="" females.="" a="" noael="" was="" not="" established.="" there="" was="" no="" clear="" demonstration="" of="" increased="" tumor="" incidence="" following="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium.="" dosing="" was="" considered="" adequate="" based="" on="" the="" increase="" in="" kidney="" glutamine="" synthetase="" activity="" and="" increased="" kidney="" weights="" in="" females.="" 8.="" in="" a="" developmental="" toxicity="" study,="" groups="" of="" 20="" pregnant="" female="" wistar="" rats="" were="" administered="" by="" gavage="" hoe="" 039866="" (glufosinate="" ammonium,="" 96.9="" a.i.)="" at="" doses="" of="" 0,="" 0.5,="" 2.24="" 10,="" 50="" and="" 250="" mg/kg/day="" from="" days="" 7="" to="" 16="" of="" pregnancy.="" the="" noael="" for="" maternal="" toxicity="" is="" 10="" mg/kg/day;="" the="" loael="" is="" 50="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" vaginal="" bleeding="" and="" hyperactivity="" in="" dams.="" in="" the="" fetus,="" the="" noael="" is="" 50="" mg/kg/day,="" based="" on="" dilated="" renal="" pelvis="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 250="" mg/kg/day.="" 9.="" in="" a="" developmental="" toxicity="" study,="" groups="" of="" 15="" pregnant="" female="" himalayan="" rabbits="" were="" administered="" by="" gavage="" hoe="" 039866="" at="" doses="" of="" 0,="" 2.0,="" 6.3="" or="" 20.0="" mg/kg/day="" from="" days="" 7="" to="" 19="" of="" pregnancy.="" the="" noael="" for="" both="" maternal="" toxicity="" and="" developmental="" toxicity="" was="" 2.0="" mg/kg/="" day.="" the="" loael="" is="" 6.3="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" reduced="" food="" consumption,="" body="" weight="" and="" weight="" gains="" and="" increased="" kidney="" weights="" in="" dams,="" and="" incomplete="" ossification="" in="" fetuses="" with="" fetal="" death="" at="" 20="" mg/kg/day.="" 10.="" in="" a="" multigeneration="" reproduction="" study,="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" was="" administered="" to="" groups="" of="" 30="" male="" and="" 30="" female="" wistar/han="" rats="" in="" the="" diet="" at="" concentrations="" of="" 0,="" 40,="" 120="" or="" 360="" ppm="" (approximately="" 2.0,="" 6.0,="" 18.0="" mg/kg).="" the="" loael="" for="" systemic="" toxicity="" is="" 120="" ppm="" (6="" mg/kg/="" day)="" based="" on="" increased="" kidney="" weights="" in="" both="" sexes="" and="" generations.="" the="" systemic="" toxicity="" noael="" is="" 40="" ppm="" (2="" mg/kg/day).="" the="" loael="" for="" reproductive/developmental="" toxicity="" is="" 360="" ppm="" (18="" mg/kg/day)="" based="" on="" decreased="" number="" of="" viable="" pups="" in="" all="" generations.="" the="" noael="" is="" 120="" ppm.="" 11.="" there="" is="" no="" concern="" for="" mutagenic="" activity="" in="" several="" studies,="" including:="" salmonella="" spp.,="" e.="" coli,="" in="" vitro="" mammalian="" cell="" gene="" mutation="" assays,="" mammalian="" cell="" chromosome="" aberration="" assays,="" in="" vivo="" mouse="" bone="" marrow="" micronucleus="" assays,="" and="" unscheduled="" dna="" synthesis="" assays.="" 12.="" a="" rat="" metabolism="" study="" with="" dermal="" application="" showed="" that="" about="" 50%="" of="" the="" given="" radioactivity="" is="" absorbed="" 48="" hours="" after="" a="" single="" dose="" application.="" in="" other="" metabolism="" studies,="" it="" was="" shown="" that="" over="" 80%="" of="" administered="" radioactivity="" is="" excreted="" within="" 24="" to="" 48="" hours="" as="" the="" parent="" compound="" in="" the="" feces="" and="" kidneys.="" highest="" tissue="" levels="" were="" found="" in="" liver,="" kidney="" and="" gonads.="" a="" consistent="" pattern="" of="" neurotoxicity="" was="" seen="" in="" several="" studies,="" including="" the="" subchronic,="" developmental="" and="" chronic="" studies="" in="" rats,="" mice="" and="" dogs.="" in="" addition="" to="" the="" clinical="" signs="" such="" as="" hyperactivity,="" aggressive="" behavior,="" piloerection,="" high="" startle="" response,="" retinal="" atrophy="" was="" observed.="" changes="" in="" glutamine="" synthetase="" levels="" were="" observed="" in="" liver,="" kidney="" and="" brain="" in="" rats.="" these="" occurrences="" raise="" concern="" for="" the="" mechanism="" of="" neurotoxicity="" in="" these="" studies,="" an="" area="" where="" there="" are="" data="" gaps.="" it="" is="" expected="" that="" the="" requested="" neurotoxicity="" studies="" will="" provide="" the="" information="" needed="" for="" further="" characterization="" of="" these="" effects.="" additional="" testing="" was="" conducted="" with="" the="" major="" metabolites,="" hoe="" 061517="" and="" hoe="" 099730,="" as="" well="" as="" the="" l-isomer,="" identified="" as="" hoe="" 058192.="" these="" compounds,="" tested="" in="" subchronic="" rat,="" mouse="" and="" dog="" studies,="" and="" in="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies="" in="" rat="" and="" rabbit="" showed="" a="" similar="" profile="" of="" toxicity="" as="" the="" parent="" compound="" (hoe="" 039866).="" b.="" toxicological="" endpoints="" 1.="" acute="" toxicity.="" an="" acute="" reference="" dose="" (rfd)="" was="" not="" established="" for="" the="" general="" population.="" no="" appropriate="" toxicological="" endpoint="" attributable="" to="" a="" single="" exposure="" was="" identified="" in="" the="" available="" toxicity="" studies.="" however,="" an="" acute="" rfd="" of="" 0.063="" mg/kg/day="" was="" established="" for="" the="" females="" 13+="" subgroup,="" based="" on="" a="" developmental="" noael="" of="" 6.3="" mg/kg/day="" in="" the="" rabbit="" and="" a="" 100x="" uncertainty="" factor="" (10x="" inter-="" 10x="" intra-species="" extrapolation).="" the="" developmental="" loael="" (20="" mg/kg/day)="" was="" based="" on="" reduced="" fetal="" body="" weight="" and="" increased="" fetal="" death.="" the="" fqpa="" safety="" factor="" of="" 10x="" was="" reduced="" to="" 3x="" because="" there="" was="" no="" qualitative="" or="" quantitative="" indication="" of="" increased="" susceptibility="" in="" the="" prenatal="" developmental="" toxicities="" in="" rats="" and="" rabbits="" or="" in="" the="" 2-generation="" reproductive="" study="" in="" rats="" with="" parent="" compound,="" the="" isomer="" or="" metabolites="" of="" concern.="" toxicological="" studies="" showed="" neurological="" effects="" in="" short="" term="" studies="" described="" as="" aggressive="" behavior,="" piloerection="" and="" a="" high="" startle="" response="" at="" dosages="" of="" 300="" mg/kg/day.="" based="" on="" these="" effects,="" epa="" determined="" that="" a="" 3x="" fqpa="" safety="" factor="" was="" appropriate="" for="" the="" risk="" assessment="" for="" the="" food="" and="" feed="" used="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium.="" using="" the="" 3x="" fqpa="" safety="" factor,="" the="" acute="" population="" adjusted="" dose="" (apad)="" for="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" 0.021="" mg/kg/day.="" 2.="" short-,="" intermediate-,="" and="" long-term="" toxicity.--i.="" dermal.="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" dermal="" toxicity="" risk="" assessments="" were="" recommended="" based="" on="" neurological="" clinical="" signs="" (hyperactivity,="" aggressive="" behavior,="" pilo="" erection)="" observed="" in="" the="" 21-day="" dermal="" study="" at="" 300="" mg/kg/day="" (loael).="" the="" noael="" was="" 100="" mg/kg/day.="" a="" long-="" [[page="" 60115]]="" term="" dermal="" risk="" assessment="" was="" recommended="" based="" on="" the="" noael="" of="" 2.1="" mg/kg/day="" established="" in="" the="" 2-year="" chronic="" study="" in="" rats="" (see="" chronic="" dietary;="" 50%="" dermal="" absorption).="" ii.="" inhalation.="" with="" the="" exception="" of="" an="" acute="" inhalation="" study,="" no="" other="" inhalation="" studies="" were="" available.="" therefore,="" oral="" noaels="" were="" selected="" for="" inhalation="" risk="" assessments.="" because="" an="" oral="" dose="" was="" used,="" the="" exposure="" assessments="" was="" conducted="" by="" converting="" the="" application="" rate="" to="" oral="" equivalents="" and="" assuming="" 100%="" absorption.="" short-term="" inhalation="" risk="" assessments="" were="" recommended="" based="" on="" the="" developmental="" noael="" of="" 6.3="" mg/kg/day="" in="" the="" rabbit="" (see="" acute="" dietary="" endpoint).="" intermediate-term="" inhalation="" risk="" assessments="" were="" recommended="" based="" on="" the="" noael="" of="" 2.1="" mg/kg/day="" from="" the="" 2-year="" chronic="" rat="" study="" (see="" chronic="" dietary="" endpoint="" below).="" 3.="" chronic="" toxicity.="" epa="" has="" established="" the="" rfd="" for="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" at="" 0.021="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" the="" noael="" of="" 2.1="" mg/kg/day="" in="" the="" 2-year="" chronic="" study="" in="" rats="" and="" a="" 100x="" uncertainty="" factor="" (10x="" inter-="" 10x="" intra-species="" extrapolation).="" the="" loael="" in="" the="" study="" was="" based="" on="" increased="" kidney="" weight="" and="" kidney/brain="" weight="" in="" males="" at="" 52="" weeks="" (6.8="" mg/kg/day)="" and="" decreased="" survival="" in="" females="" at="" 130="" weeks="" (8.2="" mg/="" kg/day).="" using="" the="" 3x="" fqpa="" safety="" factor,="" the="" chronic="" population="" adjusted="" dose="" (cpad)="" for="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" 0.007="" mg/kg/day.="" 4.="" carcinogenicity.="" based="" on="" a="" lack="" of="" mutagenic="" potential="" as="" assessed="" in="" a="" battery="" of="" mutagenicity="" assays="" and="" the="" absence="" of="" treatment-related="" tumors="" in="" rats="" and="" mice="" at="" dose="" levels="" adequate="" for="" assessment,="" the="" epa="" has="" determined="" that="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" not="" likely="" a="" carcinogen;="" and="" has="" classified="" it="" as="" a="" ``group="" e="" --="" evidence="" of="" non-carcinogenicity="" for="" humans''="" chemical.="" c.="" exposures="" and="" risks="" 1.="" from="" food="" and="" feed="" uses.="" tolerances="" have="" been="" established="" (40="" cfr="" 180.473="" for="" the="" combined="" residues="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" its="" metabolites,="" in="" or="" on="" a="" variety="" of="" raw="" agricultural="" commodities.="" all="" tolerances="" listed="" under="" unit="" iii="" of="" this="" rule="" except="" those="" for="" potatoes="" at="" 0.8="" ppm,="" potato="" chips="" at="" 1.6="" ppm,="" potato="" granules/flakes="" at="" 2.0="" ppm,="" were="" previously="" established="" as="" time-limited="" tolerances="" with="" expiration="" dates.="" this="" rule="" addresses="" a="" pending="" petition="" for="" these="" tolerances="" and="" the="" establishment="" of="" the="" time-limited="" tolerances="" as="" permanent="" tolerances="" for="" this="" pesticide.="" risk="" assessments="" were="" conducted="" by="" epa="" to="" assess="" dietary="" exposures="" from="" tolerance="" levels="" of="" residue="" as="" follows:="" section="" 408(b)(2)(f)="" states="" that="" the="" agency="" may="" use="" data="" on="" the="" actual="" percent="" of="" crop="" treated="" (pct)="" for="" assessing="" chronic="" dietary="" risk="" only="" if="" the="" agency="" can="" make="" the="" following="" findings:="" that="" the="" data="" used="" are="" reliable="" and="" provide="" a="" valid="" basis="" to="" show="" what="" percentage="" of="" the="" food="" derived="" from="" such="" crop="" is="" likely="" to="" contain="" such="" pesticide="" residue;="" that="" the="" exposure="" estimate="" does="" not="" underestimate="" exposure="" for="" any="" significant="" sub-population="" group;="" and="" that="" if="" data="" are="" available="" on="" pesticide="" use="" and="" food="" consumption="" in="" a="" particular="" area,="" the="" exposure="" estimate="" does="" not="" understate="" exposure="" for="" the="" population="" in="" such="" area.="" in="" addition,="" the="" agency="" must="" provide="" for="" periodic="" evaluation="" of="" any="" estimates="" used.="" to="" provide="" for="" the="" periodic="" evaluation="" of="" the="" estimate="" of="" pct="" as="" required="" by="" section="" 408(b)(2)(f),="" epa="" may="" require="" registrants="" to="" submit="" data="" on="" pct.="" the="" agency="" used="" pct="" information="" as="" follows:="" the="" chronic="" dietary="" exposure="" analysis="" assumed="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" for="" all="" registered="" and="" proposed="" commodities.="" the="" weighted="" average="" percent="" crop="" treated="" was="" incorporated="" for="" all="" registered="" commodities.="" sweet="" corn="" and="" proposed="" commodities="" were="" maintained="" at="" 100%="" crop="" treated.="" the="" agency="" believes="" that="" the="" three="" conditions="" listed="" above="" have="" been="" met.="" the="" percent="" of="" crop="" treated="" estimates="" are="" derived="" from="" federal="" and="" private="" market="" survey="" data,="" which="" are="" reliable="" and="" have="" a="" valid="" basis.="" epa="" uses="" a="" weighted="" average="" percent="" crop="" treated="" for="" chronic="" dietary="" exposure="" estimates.="" this="" weighted="" average="" percent="" crop="" treated="" figure="" is="" derived="" by="" averaging="" state-level="" data="" for="" a="" period="" of="" up="" to="" 10="" years,="" and="" weighting="" for="" the="" more="" robust="" and="" recent="" data.="" a="" weighted="" average="" of="" the="" percent="" crop="" treated="" reasonably="" represents="" a="" person's="" dietary="" exposure="" over="" a="" lifetime,="" and="" is="" unlikely="" to="" underestimate="" exposure="" to="" an="" individual="" because="" of="" the="" fact="" that="" pesticide="" use="" patterns="" (both="" regionally="" and="" nationally)="" tend="" to="" change="" continuously="" over="" time,="" such="" that="" an="" individual="" is="" unlikely="" to="" be="" exposed="" to="" more="" than="" the="" average="" percent="" crop="" treated="" over="" a="" lifetime.="" for="" acute="" dietary="" exposure="" estimates,="" epa="" uses="" an="" estimated="" maximum="" percent="" crop="" treated.="" the="" exposure="" estimates="" resulting="" from="" this="" approach="" reasonably="" represent="" the="" highest="" levels="" to="" which="" an="" individual="" could="" be="" exposed,and="" are="" unlikely="" to="" underestimate="" an="" individual's="" acute="" dietary="" exposure.="" the="" agency="" is="" reasonably="" certain="" that="" the="" percentage="" of="" the="" food="" treated="" is="" not="" likely="" to="" be="" an="" underestimation.="" the="" regional="" consumption="" information="" and="" consumption="" information="" for="" significant="" subpopulations="" is="" taken="" into="" account="" through="" epa's="" computer-based="" model="" for="" evaluating="" the="" exposure="" of="" significant="" subpopulations="" including="" several="" regional="" groups.="" use="" of="" this="" consumption="" information="" in="" epa's="" risk="" assessment="" process="" ensures="" that="" epa's="" exposure="" estimate="" does="" not="" understate="" exposure="" for="" any="" significant="" subpopulation="" group="" and="" allows="" the="" agency="" to="" be="" reasonably="" certain="" that="" no="" regional="" population="" is="" exposed="" to="" residue="" levels="" higher="" than="" those="" estimated="" by="" the="" agency.="" other="" than="" the="" data="" available="" through="" national="" food="" consumption="" surveys,="" epa="" does="" not="" have="" available="" information="" on="" the="" regional="" consumption="" of="" food="" to="" which="" pesticide="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" may="" be="" applied="" in="" a="" particular="" area.="" i.="" acute="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" the="" acute="" dietary="" exposure="" analysis="" for="" females="" 13+="" (no="" acute="" dietary="" endpoint="" was="" identified="" for="" the="" general="" u.s.="" population="" including="" infants="" and="" children)="" assumed="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" for="" all="" registered="" and="" proposed="" commodities="" (tier="" 1="" analysis).="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" was="" females="" 13+/nursing="" at="" 58%="" of="" the="" apad="" (95th="" percentile).="" acute="" dietary="" food="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" below="" epa's="" level="" of="" concern.="" ii.="" chronic="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" the="" chronic="" dietary="" exposure="" analysis="" assumed="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" for="" all="" registered="" and="" proposed="" commodities.="" the="" weighted="" average="" percent="" crop="" treated="" was="" incorporated="" for="" all="" registered="" commodities.="" sweet="" corn="" and="" proposed="" commodities="" were="" maintained="" at="" 100%="" crop="" treated.="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" was="" children="" 1-6="" years="" old="" at="" 71%="" of="" the="" cpad="" (0.004974="" mg/kg/day).="" chronic="" dietary="" food="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" below="" epa's="" level="" of="" concern.="" 2.="" from="" drinking="" water.="" aggregate="" exposures="" are="" generally="" calculated="" by="" summing="" dietary="" (food="" and="" water)="" and="" residential="" exposures.="" if="" the="" aggregate="" exposure="" is="" less="" than="" the="" specified="" pad,="" the="" exposure="" is="" not="" expected="" to="" be="" a="" concern.="" because="" epa="" does="" not="" have="" ground="" and="" surface="" water="" monitoring="" data="" to="" calculate="" a="" quantitative="" aggregate="" exposure,="" a="" drinking="" water="" level="" of="" concentration="" (dwloc)="" was="" calculated.="" the="" dwloc="" is="" the="" upper="" limit="" of="" a="" chemical's="" concentration="" in="" drinking="" water="" that="" will="" result="" in="" an="" acceptable="" aggregate="" exposure.="" the="" dwloc="" is="" used="" as="" a="" point="" of="" comparison="" against="" model="" estimates="" of="" a="" pesticide's="" concentration="" [[page="" 60116]]="" in="" water.="" dwloc="" values="" are="" not="" regulatory="" standards="" for="" drinking="" water.="" they="" do="" have="" indirect="" regulatory="" impact="" through="" aggregate="" exposure="" and="" risk="" assessments.="" to="" calculate="" the="" acceptable="" acute="" and="" chronic="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" in="" drinking="" water,="" the="" dietary="" food="" exposure="" estimate="" was="" subtracted="" from="" the="" appropriate="" pad="" (only="" short-term="" residential="" exposure).="" a="" dwloc="" was="" then="" calculated="" by="" using="" default="" body="" weights="" and="" drinking="" water="" consumption="" figures="" (70kg/2l="" (adult="" male),="" 60kg/2l="" (adult="" female)="" and="" 10kg/1l="" (infant/child)).="" the="" estimated="" maximum="" and="" average="" concentration="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" in="" ground="" and="" surface="" water="" are="" less="" than="" epa's="" dwloc="" for="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" as="" a="" contribution="" to="" acute="" and="" chronic="" aggregate="" exposure="" (for="" all="" population="" subgroups).="" i.="" acute="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" the="" agency's="" analysis="" based="" on="" the="" information="" available="" is="" presented="" in="" the="" following="" table="" 1:="" table="" 1.--="" acute="" dwlocs="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" food="" maximum="" apad="" exposure="" water="" dwloc\3\="" sci-="" przm-="" population="" subgroup\1\="" mg/kg/="" mg/kg/="" exposure\2\="" ppb="" grow="" exams="" day="" day="" mg/kg/day="" ppb="" ppb="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" females="" (13+,="" nursing)..................................="" 0.021="" 0.012131="" 0.008869="" 270="" 1.16="" 34.1="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" \1\="" highest="" exposed="" subgroup="" among="" females="" 13+="" \2\="" maximum="" water="" exposure="" (mg/kg/day)="0.021" mg/kg/day="" -="" acute="" food="" exposure="" (mg/kg/day)="" \3\="" dwloc="[(maximum" water="" exposure="" mg/kg/day)(body="" weight="" kg)/(water="" consumption="" liters)]="" *="" 1,000.="" ii.="" chronic="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" the="" agency's="" analysis="" based="" on="" the="" information="" available="" is="" presented="" in="" the="" following="" table.="" table="" 2.--="" chronic="" (non-cancer)="" dwloc="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" food="" maximum="" cpad="" exposure="" water="" dwloc\3\="" sci-="" przm-="" population="" subgroup\1\="" mg/kg/="" mg/kg/="" exposure\2\="" ppb="" grow="" exams="" day="" day="" mg/kg/day="" ppb="" ppb="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" u.s.="" population...........................................="" 0.007="" 0.002120="" 0.004880="" 170="" 1.16="" 0.79="" non-hispanic="" blacks.......................................="" 0.007="" 0.002246="" 0.004754="" 170="" 1.16="" 0.79="" non-hispanic/non-.white/non-black.........................="" 0.007="" 0.002256="" 0.004744="" 170="" 1.16="" 0.79="" non-hispanic="" whites.......................................="" 0.007="" 0.002132="" 0.004868="" 170="" 1.16="" 0.79="" children="" 1-6="" yrs..........................................="" 0.007="" 0.004974="" 0.002026="" 20="" 1.16="" 0.79="" females="" 13+="" nursing.......................................="" 0.007="" 0.002035="" 0.004965="" 150="" 1.16="" 0.79="" males="" 13-19="" yrs...........................................="" 0.007="" 0.002449="" 0.004551="" 160="" 1.16="" 0.79="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" \1\="" the="" subgroups="" listed="" above="" are="" the="" following:="" (1)="" u.s.="" population,="" (2)="" the="" other="" general="" subgroups="" for="" which="" the="" %cpad="" is="" greater="" than="" that="" of="" the="" u.s.="" population="" and="" (3)="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" among="" infants="" and="" children,="" females,="" and="" males.="" \2\="" maximum="" water="" exposure="" (mg/kg/day)="(0.007" mg/kg/day="" -="" acute="" food="" exposure,="" (mg/kg/day));="" no="" residential="" exposure.="" \3\="" dwloc="[(maximum" water="" exposure="" mg/kg/day)(body="" weight="" kg)/(water="" consumption="" liters)]*="" 1,000.="" 3.="" from="" non-dietary="" exposure.="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" currently="" registered="" for="" use="" on="" the="" following="" non-food="" sites:="" areas="" around="" ornamentals,="" shade="" trees,="" christmas="" trees,="" shrubs,="" walks,="" driveways,="" flower="" beds,="" farmstead="" buildings,="" in="" shelter="" belts,="" and="" along="" fences.="" it="" is="" also="" registered="" for="" use="" as="" a="" post-emergent="" herbicide="" on="" farmsteads,="" areas="" associated="" with="" airports,="" commercial="" plants,="" storage="" and="" lumber="" yards,="" highways,="" educational="" facilities,="" fence="" lines,="" ditch="" banks,="" dry="" ditches,="" schools,="" parking="" lots,="" tank="" farms,="" pumping="" stations,="" parks,="" utility="" rights-of="" -way,="" roadsides,="" railroads,="" and="" other="" public="" areas="" and="" similar="" industrial="" and="" non-food="" crop="" areas.="" it="" is="" also="" registered="" for="" lawn="" renovation="" uses.="" in="" a="" pharmacokinetics="" study="" with="" dermal="" application="" in="" rats="" radioactive="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" at="" levels="" of="" 0.1,="" 1.0,="" or="" 10.0="" mg/rat="" on="" 6="" cm="" square="" of="" shaved="" skin="" and="" exposed="" for="" 0.5,="" 1,="" 2,="" 4,="" 10,="" 24,="" or="" 168="" hrs.="" at="" the="" low="" dose="" (0.1="" mg)="" 42.5="" to="" 50.8%="" of="" the="" applied="" radioactivity="" was="" absorbed="" whereas="" at="" the="" high="" dose="" (10.0="" mg)="" 26%="" was="" absorbed.="" after="" removal="" and="" washing="" of="" the="" treated="" skin="" a="" substantial="" amount="" of="" the="" radioactivity="" still="" remained="" in="" the="" skin.="" and="" it="" was="" gradually="" absorbed="" and="" eliminated.="" radioactivity="" was="" found="" in="" both="" fecies="" and="" urine="" samples,="" but="" the="" majority="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" was="" eliminated="" in="" the="" urine.="" in="" all="" organs/tissues="" examined,="" radioactivity="" was="" found="" to="" reach="" a="" maximum="" level="" either="" at="" 4="" or="" 10="" hours="" after="" exposure.="" subsequently,="" the="" radioactivity="" dropped="" rapidly.="" the="" amount="" of="" radioactivity="" found="" in="" the="" brain="" was="" minimal="" relative="" to="" that="" of="" kidneys="" and="" liver.="" based="" on="" this="" study,="" a="" 50%="" dermal="" absorption="" factor="" was="" determined="" based="" on="" the="" range="" of="" 42.5%="" to="" 50.8%="" of="" radioactivity="" absorbed="" at="" 0.10="" mg/kg.="" i.="" acute="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" there="" are="" no="" acute="" non-dietary="" exposure="" scenarios.="" ii.="" chronic="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" there="" are="" no="" chronic="" non-dietary="" exposure="" scenarios.="" iii.="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" it="" is="" not="" appropriate="" to="" aggregate="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" non-dietary="" exposure="" with="" dietary="" exposures="" in="" this="" risk="" assessment="" because="" the="" end-points="" are="" different.="" iv.="" cumulative="" exposure="" to="" substances="" with="" common="" mechanism="" of="" toxicity.="" section="" 408(b)(2)(d)(v)="" requires="" that,="" when="" considering="" whether="" to="" establish,="" modify,="" or="" revoke="" a="" tolerance,="" the="" agency="" consider="" ``available="" information''="" concerning="" the="" cumulative="" effects="" of="" a="" particular="" pesticide's="" residues="" and="" ``other="" substances="" that="" have="" a="" common="" mechanism="" of="" toxicity.''="" epa="" does="" not="" have,="" at="" this="" time,="" available="" data="" to="" determine="" whether="" [[page="" 60117]]="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" has="" a="" common="" mechanism="" of="" toxicity="" with="" other="" substances="" or="" how="" to="" include="" this="" pesticide="" in="" a="" cumulative="" risk="" assessment.="" unlike="" other="" pesticides="" for="" which="" epa="" has="" followed="" a="" cumulative="" risk="" approach="" based="" on="" a="" common="" mechanism="" of="" toxicity,="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" does="" not="" appear="" to="" produce="" a="" toxic="" metabolite="" produced="" by="" other="" substances.="" for="" the="" purposes="" of="" this="" tolerance="" action,="" therefore,="" epa="" has="" not="" assumed="" that="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" has="" a="" common="" mechanism="" of="" toxicity="" with="" other="" substances.="" for="" information="" regarding="" epa's="" efforts="" to="" determine="" which="" chemicals="" have="" a="" common="" mechanism="" of="" toxicity="" and="" to="" evaluate="" the="" cumulative="" effects="" of="" such="" chemicals,="" see="" the="" final="" rule="" for="" bifenthrin="" pesticide="" tolerances="" (62="" fr="" 62961,="" november="" 26,="" 1997).="" d.="" aggregate="" risks="" and="" determination="" of="" safety="" for="" u.s.="" population="" 1.="" acute="" risk.="" the="" acute="" dietary="" exposure="" analysis="" assumed="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" for="" all="" commodities="" derived="" from="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" treated="" crops.="" for="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" subgroup="" among="" females="" 13+="" (nursing="" females),="" 58%="" of="" the="" apad="" is="" occupied="" by="" dietary="" (food)="" exposure,="" an="" acute="" rfd="" was="" not="" established="" for="" the="" general="" population="" including="" infants="" and="" children.="" the="" estimated="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" concentration="" in="" surface="" and="" ground="" water="" are="" less="" than="" epa's="" dwloc="" (for="" all="" population="" subgroups).="" acute="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" related="" metabolites,="" as="" a="" result="" of="" all="" registered="" and="" proposed="" uses,="" is="" below="" epa's="" level="" of="" concern.="" 2.="" chronic="" risk.="" there="" are="" no="" chronic="" non-dietary="" exposure="" scenarios.="" therefore,="" only="" food="" and="" water="" are="" included="" in="" the="" chronic="" aggregate="" risk.="" the="" chronic="" dietary="" exposure="" analysis="" assumed="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" for="" all="" commodities="" derived="" from="" the="" crop="" use="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" incorporated="" the="" weighted="" average="" percent="" crop="" treated="" for="" all="" commodities="" derived="" from="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" treated="" crops,="" except="" for="" sweet="" corn,="" registered="" under="" section="" 18="" of="" the="" federal="" insecticide,="" fungicide="" and="" rodenticide="" act="" (fifra),="" as="" amended.="" for="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" subgroup="" (children,="" 1-6="" years),="" 71%="" of="" the="" cpad="" is="" occupied="" by="" dietary="" (food)="" exposure.="" the="" estimated="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" concentrations="" in="" surface="" and="" ground="" water="" are="" less="" than="" epa's="" dwloc="" for="" all="" population="" subgroups.="" chronic="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" as="" a="" result="" of="" all="" registered="" and="" proposed="" uses="" is="" below="" epa's="" level="" of="" concern.="" epa="" generally="" has="" no="" concern="" for="" exposures="" below="" 100%="" of="" the="" cpad="" because="" the="" cpad="" represents="" the="" level="" at="" or="" below="" which="" daily="" aggregate="" dietary="" exposure="" over="" a="" life="" time="" will="" not="" pose="" appreciable="" risks="" to="" human="" health.="" despite="" the="" potential="" for="" chronic="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" in="" drinking="" water,="" after="" calculating="" a="" dwloc="" (236="" parts="" per="" billion="" (ppb))="" for="" the="" u.s.="" population="" and="" comparing="" it="" to="" conservative="" model="" estimates="" of="" concentrations="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" surface="" and="" ground="" water="" (59.43="" ppb="" and="" 1.16="" ppb,="" respectively),="" epa="" does="" not="" expect="" the="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" exceed="" 100%="" of="" the="" cpad.="" 3.="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" risk.="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" aggregate="" exposure="" takes="" into="" account="" chronic="" dietary="" food="" and="" water="" (consider="" to="" be="" a="" background="" exposure="" level)="" plus="" indoor="" and="" outdoor="" residential="" exposure.="" there="" are="" registered="" residential="" uses="" for="" glufosinate="" ammonium.="" the="" potential="" dermal="" exposures="" were="" not="" aggregated="" because="" the="" toxic="" effects="" for="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" exposure="" (neurological="" clinical="" signs)="" and="" chronic="" exposure="" (increases="" in="" absolute="" and="" relative="" kidney="" weights)="" are="" different.="" 4.="" aggregate="" cancer="" risk="" for="" u.s.="" population.="" there="" is="" no="" cancer="" concern="" based="" on="" negative="" results="" observed="" in="" three="" guideline="" studies="" available="" for="" the="" carcinogenicity="" screen:="" a="" chronic="" feeding="" study="" in="" rats,="" a="" carcinogenicity="" study="" in="" rats="" and="" a="" carcinogenicity="" study="" in="" mice,="" each="" described="" under="" the="" ``toxicology="" profile''="" of="" this="" rule.="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" has="" been="" classified="" as="" a="" ``not="" likely''="" carcinogen="" according="" to="" the="" epa="" proposed="" guidelines="" for="" carcinogn="" risk="" assessment.="" therefore,="" a="" cancer="" risk="" assessment="" was="" not="" necessary.="" 5.="" determination="" of="" safety.="" based="" on="" these="" risk="" assessments,="" epa="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" a="" reasonable="" certainty="" that="" no="" harm="" will="" result="" from="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" residues.="" e.="" aggregate="" risks="" and="" determination="" of="" safety="" for="" infants="" and="" children="" 1.="" safety="" factor="" for="" infants="" and="" children--="" i.="" in="" general.="" in="" assessing="" the="" potential="" for="" additional="" sensitivity="" of="" infants="" and="" children="" to="" residues="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium,="" epa="" considered="" data="" from="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies="" in="" the="" rat="" and="" rabbit="" and="" a="" 2-generation="" reproduction="" study="" in="" the="" rat.="" the="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies="" are="" designed="" to="" evaluate="" adverse="" effects="" on="" the="" developing="" organism="" resulting="" from="" maternal="" pesticide="" exposure="" during="" gestation.="" reproduction="" studies="" provide="" information="" relating="" to="" effects="" from="" exposure="" to="" the="" pesticide="" on="" the="" reproductive="" capability="" of="" mating="" animals,="" and="" data="" on="" systemic="" toxicity.="" ffdca="" section="" 408="" provides="" that="" epa="" shall="" apply="" an="" additional="" tenfold="" margin="" of="" safety="" for="" infants="" and="" children="" in="" the="" case="" of="" threshold="" effects="" to="" account="" for="" pre-and="" post-natal="" toxicity="" and="" the="" completeness="" of="" the="" data="" base="" unless="" epa="" determines="" that="" a="" different="" margin="" of="" safety="" will="" be="" safe="" for="" infants="" and="" children.="" margins="" of="" safety="" are="" incorporated="" into="" epa="" risk="" assessments="" either="" directly="" through="" use="" of="" a="" margin="" of="" exposure="" (moe)="" analysis="" or="" through="" using="" uncertainty="" (safety)="" factors="" in="" calculating="" a="" dose="" level="" that="" poses="" no="" appreciable="" risk="" to="" humans.="" epa="" believes="" that="" reliable="" data="" support="" using="" the="" standard="" uncertainty="" factor="" (usually="" 100="" for="" combined="" inter-="" and="" intra-species="" variability)="" and="" not="" the="" additional="" tenfold="" moe/="" uncertainty="" factor="" when="" epa="" has="" a="" complete="" data="" base="" under="" existing="" guidelines="" and="" when="" the="" severity="" of="" the="" effect="" in="" infants="" or="" children="" or="" the="" potency="" or="" unusual="" toxic="" properties="" of="" a="" compound="" do="" not="" raise="" concerns="" regarding="" the="" adequacy="" of="" the="" standard="" moe/safety="" factor.="" ii.="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies.="" two="" studies="" were="" described="" in="" the="" toxicology="" profile="" section="" (see="" unit="" iii.a.8.="" and="" 9.="" of="" this="" rule.).="" iii.="" reproductive="" toxicity="" study.="" a="" reproductive="" toxicity="" study="" was="" described="" in="" the="" toxicology="" profile="" (see="" unit="" iii.a.10.="" of="" this="" rule.).="" iv.="" pre-="" and="" post-natal="" sensitivity.="" the="" toxicological="" data="" base="" for="" evaluating="" prenatal="" and="" postnatal="" toxicity="" for="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" complete="" with="" respect="" to="" current="" data="" requirements.="" there="" are="" no="" prenatal="" or="" postnatal="" susceptibility="" concerns="" for="" infants="" and="" children,="" based="" on="" the="" results="" of="" the="" rat="" and="" rabbit="" developmental="" toxicity="" studies="" and="" the="" 2-generation="" reproduction="" study.="" v.="" other="" studies.="" based="" on="" clinical="" signs="" of="" neurological="" toxicity="" in="" short="" and="" intermediate="" dermal="" toxicity="" studies="" with="" rats,="" epa="" has="" determined="" that="" an="" added="" fqpa="" safety="" factor="" of="" 3x="" is="" appropriate="" for="" the="" risk="" assessment="" for="" the="" tolerances="" in="" the="" commodities="" listed="" in="" this="" final="" rule.="" the="" fqpa="" safety="" factor="" of="" 10x="" was="" reduced="" to="" 3x="" because="" there="" were="" no="" qualitative="" or="" quantitative="" indications="" of="" increased="" susceptibility="" in="" the="" prenatal="" developmental="" toxicities="" in="" rats="" and="" rabbits,="" or="" in="" the="" 2-generation="" reproductive="" studies="" in="" rats="" with="" the="" parent="" compound,="" the="" isomer="" or="" metabolites="" of="" concern.="" vi.="" conclusion.="" there="" is="" a="" complete="" toxicity="" database="" for="" glufosinate="" [[page="" 60118]]="" ammonium,="" and="" exposure="" data="" is="" complete="" or="" is="" estimated="" based="" on="" data="" that="" reasonably="" accounts="" for="" potential="" exposures.="" 2.="" acute="" risk.="" the="" acute="" dietary="" exposure="" analysis="" assumed="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" for="" all="" registered="" and="" proposed="" commodities.="" for="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" subgroup="" among="" females="" 13="" -="" 50="" (nursing="" females),="" 58%="" of="" the="" apad="" is="" occupied="" by="" dietary="" (food)="" exposure="" (no="" acute="" rfd="" was="" established="" for="" the="" general="" population="" including="" infants="" and="" children).="" the="" estimated="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" concentration="" in="" surface="" and="" ground="" water="" are="" less="" than="" epa's="" dwloc="" (for="" all="" population="" subgroups).="" acute="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" related="" metabolites,="" as="" a="" result="" of="" all="" registered="" and="" proposed="" uses,="" is="" below="" epa's="" level="" of="" concern.="" 3.="" chronic="" risk.="" based="" on="" exposure="" assumptions="" described="" above,="" epa="" has="" concluded="" that="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" from="" food="" will="" utilize="" 71%="" of="" the="" cpad="" for="" children="" 1-6="" years="" of="" age,="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" subgroup.="" epa="" generally="" has="" no="" concern="" for="" exposures="" below="" 100%="" of="" the="" cpad="" because="" the="" cpad="" represents="" the="" level="" at="" or="" below="" which="" daily="" aggregate="" dietary="" exposure="" over="" a="" lifetime="" will="" not="" pose="" appreciable="" risks="" to="" human="" health.="" despite="" the="" potential="" for="" chronic="" exposure="" to="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" in="" drinking="" water,="" after="" calculating="" a="" dwloc="" (64="" ppb)="" for="" non-nursing="" infants="" and="" comparing="" it="" to="" conservative="" model="" estimates="" of="" concentrations="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" in="" surface="" and="" ground="" water="" (59.43="" ppb="" and="" 11.16="" ppb,="" respectively),="" epa="" does="" not="" expect="" the="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" exceed="" 100%="" of="" the="" cpad.="" 4.="" short-="" or="" intermediate-term="" risk.="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" aggregate="" exposure="" takes="" into="" account="" chronic="" dietary="" food="" and="" water="" (considered="" to="" be="" a="" background="" exposure="" level)="" plus="" indoor="" and="" outdoor="" residential="" uses.="" there="" are="" registered="" residential="" uses="" for="" glufosinate="" ammonium,="" however,="" the="" potential="" dermal="" exposures="" were="" not="" aggregated="" because="" the="" toxic="" effects="" for="" short-="" and="" intermediate-term="" exposure="" (neurological="" clinical="" signs)="" and="" chronic="" exposure="" (increases="" in="" absolute="" and="" relative="" kidney="" weights)="" are="" different.="" 5.="" determination="" of="" safety.="" based="" on="" these="" risk="" assessments,="" epa="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" a="" reasonable="" certainty="" that="" no="" harm="" will="" result="" to="" infants="" and="" children="" from="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" residues="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" residues.="" iv.="" other="" considerations="" a.="" metabolism="" in="" plants="" and="" animals="" 1.="" plants.="" the="" nature="" of="" the="" residues="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" is="" considered="" to="" be="" understood.="" the="" agency="" has="" concluded="" that="" the="" residues="" of="" concern="" are="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" its="" metabolites="" 2-acetamido-4-="" methylphosphinico-butanoic="" acid="" and="" 3-methylphosphinico-propionic="" acid="" expressed="" as="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" free="" acid="" equivalents.="" 2.="" animals="" a="" rat="" metabolism="" study="" with="" dermal="" application="" indicated="" that="" about="" 50%="" of="" the="" given="" radioactivity="" was="" absorbed="" 48="" hours="" after="" a="" single="" dose="" application.="" in="" other="" metabolism="" studies,="" it="" was="" shown="" that="" over="" 80%="" of="" administered="" radioactivity="" is="" excreted="" within="" 24="" to="" 48="" hours="" as="" the="" parent="" compound="" in="" the="" feces="" and="" kidneys.="" highest="" tissue="" levels="" were="" found="" in="" liver,="" kidney="" and="" gonads.="" the="" nature="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" residues="" in="" lactating="" goats="" and="" hens="" is="" considered="" to="" be="" understood.="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" its="" metabolite="" (3-="" methylphosphinico="" propionic="" acid)="" are="" largely="" excreted="" and="" do="" not="" accumulate="" too="" any="" great="" degree="" in="" animal="" tissues.="" the="" only="" identifiable="" compounds="" in="" feces,="" urine,="" milk,="" eggs="" and="" tissues="" were="" the="" parent="" and="" 3-methylphosphinico="" propionic="" acid.="" epa="" has="" concluded="" that="" the="" residues="" of="" concern="" in="" commodities="" derived="" from="" ruminants="" and="" poultry="" are="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" its="" metabolite="" 3-methylphospinico="" propionic="" acid,="" expressed="" as="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" free="" acid="" equivalents.="" b.="" analytical="" enforcement="" methodology="" in="" pesticide="" analytical="" manual="" ii="" (pam="" ii),="" method="" hrav-5a="" describes="" an="" adequate="" analytical="" method="" for="" determining="" residues="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" its="" metabolite="" 3-methylphosphinico="" propionic="" acid="" in="" or="" on="" apples,="" bananas,="" grape,="" potatoes="" and="" tree="" nuts.="" in="" pam="" ii,="" method="" hrav-12,="" is="" an="" adequate="" method="" for="" determining="" residues="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" its="" metabolite="" 3-methylphosphinico-propionic="" acid="" in="" or="" on="" milk,="" eggs="" and="" tissues="" of="" ruminants="" and="" poultry.="" method="" xam-24a,="" which="" is="" a="" modification="" of="" method="" hrav-5a="" is="" an="" adequate="" method="" for="" determining="" residues="" of="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" and="" its="" metabolites="" in="" or="" on="" transgenic="" field="" corn,="" and="" transgenic="" soybeans.="" the="" method="" describes="" an="" additional="" post-extraction="" cation="" exchange="" procedure="" to="" allow="" for="" separate="" detection="" and="" measurement="" of="" each="" residue="" component.="" final="" determination="" is="" made="" by="" gas="" chromatography="" with="" flame="" photometric="" detection="" operating="" in="" the="" phosphorus="" selective="" mode="" (p-mode).="" residues="" are="" expressed="" as="" glufosinate="" ammonium="" free="" acid="" equivalents.="" adequate="" enforcement="" methodology="" (gas="" chromatography="" with="" mass="" spectrophotometry)="" is="" available="" to="" enforce="" the="" tolerances="" for="" commodities="" derived="" from="" potatoes.="" the="" method="" may="" be="" requested="" from:="" calvin="" furlow,="" prrib,="" irsd="" (7502c),="" office="" of="" pesticide="" programs,="" environmental="" protection="" agency,="" 401="" m="" st.,="" sw.,="" washington,="" dc="" 20460;="" telephone="" number:="" (703)="" 305-5229;="" e-mail="" address:="">furlow.calvin@epa.gov.
    
    C. Magnitude of Residues
    
         The residues established by this regulation are qualified and 
    quantified in Unit V of this Rule.
    
    D. International Residue Limits
    
         The Codex Alimentarius Commission has established maximum residue 
    limits (CODEX MRLs) for the combined residues of glufosinate ammonium 
    and 3-methylphosphinico propionic acid, expressed as glufosinate free 
    acid equivalents, in or on potatoes at 0.5 ppm. Because the appropriate 
    U.S. tolerance for potatoes (0.8 ppm) is greater than the CODEX MRL of 
    0.5 ppm and CODEX MRLs for residues in or on potato chips and potato 
    granules and flakes do not exist, harmonization is not possible. The 
    Codex Alimentarius Commission did not establish MRLs for glufosinate 
    ammonium in processed potato commodities because earlier processing 
    studies in cooked potatoes did not show any concentration of residues 
    after cooking in water. The difference in residues represented by the 
    CODEX MRL of 0.5 ppm and the 0.8 ppm tolerance for residues in or on 
    potatoes established by this Rule was apparently due to differences in 
    the methods used by the two Agencies in determining the level of 
    residues that would be appropriate. The EPA sets tolerances based on 
    the residue level from the highest average field trial where as the 
    CODEX and European authorities use statistical calculations derived 
    from all residue data covering one worst case label for the calculation 
    of MRL proposals.
    
     E. Rotational Crop Restrictions
    
         A 120 day plant-back interval is required for all crops with the 
    exceptions of buckwheat, barley, millet oats, rye, sorghum, triticale 
    and wheat that requires a 70-day plant-back interval. Field corn and 
    soybeans may be planted back any time.
    
    [[Page 60119]]
    
    V. Conclusion
    
        Therefore, permanent tolerances are established for combined 
    residues of glufosinate ammonium and its metabolite(s) in or on almond 
    hulls at 0.50 ppm, apples at 0.05 ppm, bananas at 0.3 (not more than 
    0.2 ppm shall be present in the pulp after peel is removed), cattle, 
    fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; cattle, meat by-products at 0.10 ppm; eggs at 
    0.05 ppm; goats, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; goats, meat-by-products at 
    0.10 ppm; grapes at 0.05 ppm; hogs, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; hogs, 
    meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm; horses, fat and meat at 0.05 ppm; horses, 
    meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm; milk at 0.02 ppm; potatoes at 0.8 ppm; 
    potato chips at 1.6 ppm; potato granule/flakes at 2.0 ppm; poultry, fat 
    and meat at 0.05 ppm; poultry, meat-by-products at 0.10 ppm; sheep, fat 
    and meat at 0.05 ppm; sheep, meat-by-products at 0.10 pm; transgenic 
    aspirated grain fractions at 25.0 ppm; transgenic corn, field, forage 
    at 4.0 ppm; transgenic corn, field, grain at 0.2 ppm; transgenic corn, 
    field, stover at 6.0 ppm; transgenic soybeans, hulls at 5.0 ppm; 
    transgenic soybeans at 2.0 ppm and tree nuts group at 0.1 ppm.
         The time-limited tolerances for residues in transgenic canola and 
    transgenic sweet corn commodities under Section 18 emergency exemptions 
    (64 FR 44829-44836, August 18, l999)) are not replaced, These time-
    limited tolerances will expire December 1, l999.
    
    VI. Objections and Hearing Requests
    
        Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any 
    person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may 
    also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural 
    regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for 
    hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. Although the procedures in those 
    regulations require some modification to reflect the amendments made to 
    the FFDCA by the FQPA of 1996, EPA will continue to use those 
    procedures, with appropriate adjustments, until the necessary 
    modifications can be made. The new section 408(g) provides essentially 
    the same process for persons to ``object'' to a regulation for an 
    exemption from the requirement of a tolerance issued by EPA under new 
    section 408(d), as was provided in the old FFDCA sections 408 and 409. 
    However, the period for filing objections is now 60 days, rather than 
    30 days.
    
    A. What Do I Need to Do to File an Objection or Request a Hearing?
    
        You must file your objection or request a hearing on this 
    regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in this unit 
    and in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must 
    identify docket control number OPP-300945 in the subject line on the 
    first page of your submission. All requests must be in writing, and 
    must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before January 
    3, 2000.
        1. Filing the request. Your objection must specify the specific 
    provisions in the regulation that you object to, and the grounds for 
    the objections (40 CFR 178.25). If a hearing is requested, the 
    objections must include a statement of the factual issues(s) on which a 
    hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on such issues, and a 
    summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). 
    Information submitted in connection with an objection or hearing 
    request may be claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that 
    information as CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except 
    in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
    information that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion 
    in the public record. Information not marked confidential may be 
    disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice.
        Mail your written request to: Office of the Hearing Clerk (1900), 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    You may also deliver your request to the Office of the Hearing Clerk in 
    Room M3708, Waterside Mall, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. The 
    Office of the Hearing Clerk is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the 
    Office of the Hearing Clerk is (202) 260-4865.
        2. Tolerance fee payment. If you file an objection or request a 
    hearing, you must also pay the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i) or 
    request a waiver of that fee pursuant to 40 CFR 180.33(m). You must 
    mail the fee to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, Office 
    of Pesticide Programs, P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Please 
    identify the fee submission be labeling it ``Tolerance Petition Fees.''
        EPA is authorized to waive any fee requirement ''when in the 
    judgement of the Administrator such a waiver or refund is equitable and 
    not contrary to the purpose of this subsection.'' (cite). For 
    additional information regarding the waiver of these fees, you may 
    contact James Tompkins by phone at (703) 305-5697, by e-mail at 
    tompkins.jim@epa.gov, or by mailing a request for information to Mr. 
    Tompkins at Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460.
        If you would like to request a waiver of the tolerance objection 
    fees, you must mail your request for such a waiver to: James Hollins, 
    Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460.
        3. Copies for the Docket. In addition to filing an objection or 
    hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in Unit VI.A. of 
    this preamble, you should also send a copy of your request to the PIRB 
    for its inclusion in the official record that is described in Unit 
    I.B.2. of this preamble. Mail your copies, identified by docket number 
    OPP-300945, to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch, 
    Information Resources and Services Division (7502C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person or by courier, bring a copy to the 
    location of the PRIB described in Unit I.B.2. of this preamble. You may 
    also send an electronic copy of your request via e-mail to: docket@epa.gov. Please use an ASCII file format and avoid the use of 
    special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of electronic 
    objections and hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in 
    WordPerfect 5.1/6.1 file format or ASCII file format. Do not include 
    any CBI in your electronic copy. You may also submit an electronic copy 
    of your request at many Federal Depository Libraries.
    
    B. When Will the Agency Grant a Request for a Hearing?
    
        A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator 
    determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a 
    genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable 
    possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would, 
    if established resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the 
    requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the 
    contrary; and resolution of the factual issues(s) in the manner sought 
    by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 
    CFR 178.32).
    
    VII. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
        This final rule establishes tolerances under section 408(d) of the 
    FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
    review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and 
    Review (58 FR 51735,
    
    [[Page 60120]]
    
    October 4, 1993). This final rule does not contain any information 
    collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or 
    contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the 
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor 
    does it require prior consultation with State, local, and tribal 
    government officials as specified by Executive Order 12875, entitled 
    Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, October 28, 
    1993) and Executive Order 13084, entitled Consultation and Coordination 
    with Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR 27655, May 19,1998), or special 
    consideration of environmental justice related issues under Executive 
    Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice 
    in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, 
    February 16, 1994) or require OMB review in accordance with Executive 
    Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health 
    Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, l997). The Agency has 
    determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect 
    on States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
    States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
    various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 12612, 
    entitled Federalism (52 FR 41685, October 30, l987). This action 
    directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and food 
    retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or 
    distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in 
    the preemption provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 
    21 U.S.C. 346a(b)(4). This action does not involve any technical 
    standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary 
    consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National 
    Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 
    104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). In addition, since 
    tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a 
    petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in this 
    final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
    requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
    seq.) do not apply.
    
    VIII. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
         The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by 
    the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 
    generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
    promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
    of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
    General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this 
    rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House 
    of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States 
    prior to publication of this rule in the  Federal Register. This rule 
    is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements
    
    
        Dated: October 26, 1999.
    
    James Jones,
    
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
        Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), (346a), and 371.
    
        2. By revising Sec. 180.473 to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180. 473  Glufosinate ammonium; tolerances for residues.
    
        (a) General.  (1) Tolerances are established for residues of the 
    herbicide glufosinate ammonium (butonoic acid, 2-amino-4-
    (hydroxymethylphosphinyl)-, monoammonium salt) and its metabolite, 3-
    methylphosphinico-propionic acid, expressed as 2-amino-4-
    (hydroxmethylphosphinyl) butanoic acid equivalents, in or on the 
    following food commodities:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Parts
                               Commodity                               per
                                                                     million
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Almond hulls...................................................    0.50
    Apples.........................................................    0.05
    Bananas........................................................    0.30
    Bananas, pulp..................................................    0.20
    Cattle, fat....................................................    0.05
    Cattle, meat...................................................    0.05
    Cattle, mbyp...................................................    0.10
    Eggs...........................................................    0.05
    Goats, fat.....................................................    0.05
    Goats, meat....................................................    0.05
    Goats, mbyp....................................................    0.10
    Grapes.........................................................    0.05
    Hogs, fat......................................................    0.05
    Hogs, meat.....................................................    0.05
    Hogs, mbyp.....................................................    0.10
    Horses, fat....................................................    0.05
    Horses, meat...................................................    0.05
    Horses, mbyp...................................................    0.10
    Milk...........................................................    0.02
    Potatoes.......................................................    0.80
    Potato chips...................................................    1.60
    Potato granules and flakes.....................................    2.00
    Poultry, fat...................................................    0.05
    Poultry, meat..................................................    0.05
    Poultry, mbyp..................................................    0.10
    Sheep, fat.....................................................    0.05
    Sheep, meat....................................................    0.05
    Sheep, mbyp....................................................    0.10
    Tree nuts group................................................    0.10
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (2) Tolerances are established for the combined residues of 
    glufosinate ammonium (butanoic acid, 2-ammino-4-
    (hydroxymethylphosphinyl)- monoammonium salt) and its metabolites, 2-
    acetamido-4-methylphosphinico-butanoic acid and 3-methylphosphinico-
    propionic acid, expressed as 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl) 
    butanoic acid equivalents, in or on the following raw agricultural 
    commodities derived from transgenic field corn and transgenic soybeans 
    and that are tolerant to the herbicide glufosinate ammonium as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per
                             Commodity                             million
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Aspirated Grain Fractions..................................         25.0
    Corn, field, forage........................................          4.0
    Corn, field, grain.........................................          0.2
    Corn, field, stover........................................          6.0
    Soybean hulls..............................................          5.0
    Soybeans...................................................          2.0
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. Time-limited tolerances are 
    established for combined residues of the herbicide (butanoic acid, 2-
    amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl) -monoamonium salt and its metabolites 
    , 2-acetamido-4-methylphosphinico-butamoic acid and 3-
    methylphosphinico-propionic acid, expressed as 2-amino-4-
    (hydroxymethylphosphinyl) butanoic acid equivalents in or on the 
    following raw agricultural commodities derived from transgenic canola 
    and transgenic sweet corn in connection with use of section 18 
    emergency exemptions granted by EPA. The tolerances will expire and are 
    revoked on the date specified in the following table:
    
    [[Page 60121]]
    
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Parts     Expiration/
                       Commodity                       per      Revocation
                                                     million       Date
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Canola meal....................................    1.1           12/1/99
    Canola Seed....................................    0.4           12/1/99
    Corn, sweet, forage............................    4.0           12/1/99
    Corn, sweet, kernels and cobs with husks           4.0           12/1/99
     removed.......................................
    Corn, sweet, stover............................    6.0           12/1/99
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (c) Tolerances with regional restrictions. [Reserved]
        (d) Indirect or inadvertent residues. [Reserved]
    
    [FR Doc. 99-28887 Filed 11-3-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/4/1999
Published:
11/04/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-28887
Dates:
This regulation is effective November 4, 1999. Objections and requests for hearings, identified by docket control number OPP-300945, must be received by EPA on or before January 3, 2000.
Pages:
60112-60121 (10 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OPP-300945, FRL-6391-5
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
99-28887.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180