94-27522. Milk in the Tennessee Valley Marketing Area; Proposed Temporary Revision of Certain Provisions of the Order  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 214 (Monday, November 7, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-27522]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: November 7, 1994]
    
    
                                                       VOL. 59, NO. 214
    
                                               Monday, November 7, 1994
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 1011
    
    [DA-95-02]
    
     
    
    Milk in the Tennessee Valley Marketing Area; Proposed Temporary 
    Revision of Certain Provisions of the Order
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed revision of rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document invites comments on a proposal to reduce the 
    supply plant shipping requirement of the Tennessee Valley Federal milk 
    order (Order 11) for the months of March through July 1995. The 
    proposed action was requested by Armour Food Ingredients Company 
    (Armour), which operates a proprietary supply plant pooled under Order 
    11. Armour contends the action is necessary to prevent the uneconomical 
    movement of milk and to ensure that producer milk associated with the 
    market in the fall will continue to be pooled in the spring and summer 
    months.
    
    DATES: Comments are due no later than December 7, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments (two copies) should be filed with the USDA/AMS/
    Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, Room 2971, South Building, 
    P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Memoli, Marketing Specialist, 
    USDA/AMS/Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, Room 2971, South 
    Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456, (202) 690-1932.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
    601-612) requires the Agency to examine the impact of a proposed rule 
    on small entities. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator of 
    the Agricultural Marketing Service has certified that this proposed 
    rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities. This rule would lessen the regulatory impact 
    of the order on certain milk handlers and would tend to ensure that 
    dairy farmers would continue to have their milk priced under the order 
    and thereby receive the benefits that accrue from such pricing.
        The Department is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with 
    Executive Order 12866.
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, 
    Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have a retroactive 
    effect. If adopted, this proposed rule will not preempt any state or 
    local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an 
    irreconcilable conflict with the rule.
        The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 
    U.S.C. 601-674), provides that administrative proceedings must be 
    exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 
    608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with 
    the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provisions of the 
    order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in 
    accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be 
    exempted from the order. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a 
    hearing on the petition. After a hearing, the Secretary would rule on 
    the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United 
    States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has 
    its principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review 
    the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is 
    filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the provisions of the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act and the provisions of 
    Sec. 1011.7(b) of the order, the proposed revision of certain 
    provisions of the order regulating the handling of milk in the 
    Tennessee Valley marketing area is being considered for the period of 
    March 1, 1995, through July 31, 1995.
        All persons who desire to submit written data, views or arguments 
    about the proposed revision should send two copies of their views to 
    USDA/AMS/Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, Room 2971, South 
    Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456, by the 30th day 
    after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
        All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made 
    available for public inspection in the Dairy Division during regular 
    business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).
    
    Statement of Consideration
    
        The proposed revision would reduce the supply plant shipping 
    requirement from 40 to 30 percent for the period of March through July 
    1995. The Tennessee Valley order requires that a supply plant ship a 
    minimum of 60 percent of the total quantity of milk physically received 
    at the supply plant during the months of August through November, 
    January, and February, and 40 percent in each of the other months. The 
    order also provides authority for the Director of the Dairy Division to 
    increase or decrease this supply plant shipping requirement by up to 10 
    percentage points if such a revision is necessary to obtain needed 
    shipments of milk or to prevent uneconomic shipments.
        Armour states that it would have to make uneconomical shipments of 
    milk to meet the 40 percent supply plant shipping requirement to 
    continue its pool status. Additionally, the proponent states that the 
    40 percent requirement could jeopardize the continued association of 
    producers who have supplied the Order 11 market in the fall.
        Armour anticipates that marketing conditions in 1995 will mirror 
    those in 1993 and 1994, when the shipping percentage was also reduced. 
    It expects milk supplies to be adequate to meet the Class I needs of 
    the market.
        In view of the current supply and demand relationship, it may be 
    necessary to reduce the supply plant shipping percentage as proposed to 
    provide for the efficient and economic marketing of milk during the 
    months of March 1 through July 31, 1995.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1011
    
        Milk marketing orders.
    
        The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 1011 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-
    674.
    
        Dated: November 1, 1994.
    Richard M. McKee,
    Director, Dairy Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-27522 Filed 11-4-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/07/1994
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed revision of rule.
Document Number:
94-27522
Dates:
Comments are due no later than December 7, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 7, 1994, DA-95-02
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 1011.7(b)