98-29851. Industrial Nitrocellulose From the Republic of Korea; Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 216 (Monday, November 9, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 60302-60303]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-29851]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-580-805]
    
    
    Industrial Nitrocellulose From the Republic of Korea; Notice of 
    Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
    Review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On July 10, 1998, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
    published the preliminary results of its administrative review of the 
    antidumping duty order on industrial nitrocellulose (INC) from the 
    Republic of Korea (Korea). This review covers one manufacturer/exporter 
    of the subject merchandise to the United States during the period July 
    1, 1996, through June 30, 1997.
        We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our 
    preliminary results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we 
    have changed the final results from those presented in the preliminary 
    results.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: November 9, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Todd Peterson or Thomas Futtner, Import Administration, International 
    Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
    Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
    4195 or 482-3814, respectively.
    
    Applicable Statute and Regulations
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
    references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
    date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
    Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise 
    indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to 19 CFR 
    Part 351 (62 FR 27296, May 19, 1997).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    Background
    
        On July 10, 1998, the Department published in the Federal Register 
    (63 FR 37329) the preliminary results of the administrative review of 
    the antidumping order on industrial nitrocellulose (INC) from Korea, 55 
    FR 28267 (July 10, 1990). On August 10, 1998, we received a case brief 
    from Daesang Corporation (respondent) as well as comments from Hercules 
    Incorporated (petitioner). Based on our analysis of the comments 
    received, we changed the final results from those presented in the 
    preliminary results.
    
    Scope of Review
    
        Imports covered by this review are shipments of INC from Korea. INC 
    is a dry, white amorphous synthetic chemical with a nitrogen content 
    between 10.8 and 12.2 percent, and is produced from the reaction of 
    cellulose with nitric acid. INC is used as a film-former in coatings, 
    lacquers, furniture finishes, and printing inks. The scope of this 
    order does not include explosive grade nitrocellulose, which has a 
    nitrogen content of greater than 12.2 percent.
        INC is currently classified under Harmonized Tariff System (HTS) 
    subheading 3912.20.00. While the HTS item number is provided for 
    convenience and Customs purposes, the written description remains 
    dispositive as to the scope of the product coverage. This review covers 
    one manufacturer/exporter of industrial nitrocellulose, Daesang 
    Corporation, and period July 1, 1996, through June 30, 1997.
    
    Analysis of Comments Received
    
    Comment 1
    
        Daesang states that the Department made a clerical error in its 
    preliminary results computer programming by erroneously adding both the 
    commission offset (OFFSETU) and U.S. indirect selling expenses 
    (INDEXUS) in its calculation of foreign net price expressed in dollars 
    (FUPDOL). Daesang states that OFFSETU correctly accounted for home 
    market commissions on two of the three matching control numbers 
    (CONNUMs) for the U.S. sales, which had no commissions. Adding the 
    variable INDEXUS in the calculation of FUPDOL would lead to a double 
    counting of the commission offset. While petitioner did not comment on 
    this specific issue, petitioner supports the Department's Preliminary 
    Determination.
    
    Department's Position
    
        We agree with Daesang Corporation that home market commissions or 
    U.S. indirect selling expenses, whichever is less, have been accounted 
    for in U.S. offsets (OFFSETU) applied to FUPDOL, and have revised our 
    programming language accordingly for these final results.
    
    Final Results of the Review
    
        As a result of our review, we determine that the following margin 
    exists:
    
    [[Page 60303]]
    
    
    
    Daesang Corporation..........................................        2.1
    
        The Department shall determine, and the Customs Services shall 
    assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entires. Individual 
    differences between export price and normal value may vary from the 
    percentage stated above. We have calculated an importer-specific duty 
    assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping 
    duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of 
    the same sales. The rates will be assessed uniformly on all entries of 
    that particular company made during the POR. The Department will issue 
    appraisement instructions directly to the Customs Service.
        The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
    publication of this notice of final results of review for all shipments 
    of industrial nitrocellulose from Korea entered, or withdrawn from 
    warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
    provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 
    rate for the reviewed company will be the rate listed above; (2) for 
    previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the 
    cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
    published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 
    covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than fair-
    value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 
    rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the 
    manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) for all other producers and/or 
    exporters of this merchandise, the cash deposit rate shall be 66.30 
    percent, the ``all others'' rate established in the LTFV investigation 
    (55 FR 21055, May 22, 1990). These deposit requirements shall remain in 
    effect until publication of the final results of the next 
    administrative review.
        This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
    reponsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
    the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
    relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
    requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
    assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
        This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
    concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
    APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.32 of the Department's regulations. 
    Timely notification of return/destruction of APO materials or 
    conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
    comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
    violation.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
    
        Dated: October 30, 1998.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Assistant Secretary, Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 98-29851 Filed 11-6-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/9/1998
Published:
11/09/1998
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
Document Number:
98-29851
Dates:
November 9, 1998.
Pages:
60302-60303 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-580-805
PDF File:
98-29851.pdf