98-29937. Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Relaxation of Quality Requirements for Fresh Nectarines and Peaches  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 216 (Monday, November 9, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 60209-60212]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-29937]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
    
    [Docket No. FV98-916-2 FIR]
    
    
    Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Relaxation of Quality 
    Requirements for Fresh Nectarines and Peaches
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting, as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    relaxing ``CA Utility'' quality requirements for California nectarines 
    and peaches for the remainder of the 1998 season. The ``CA Utility'' 
    quality requirements are based on minimum quality requirements 
    established under the California Agricultural Code, with a limitation 
    on the amount of fruit meeting U.S. No. 1 or higher grade requirements 
    that may be present in each container marked ``CA Utility.'' The 
    interim final rule increased that percentage to not more than 40 
    percent except that at least one-quarter of the fruit grading U.S. No. 
    1 in such containers must have non-scoreable blemishes. A non-scoreable 
    blemish is a defect that does not cause fruit to fail U.S. No. 1 grade 
    requirements. This rule continues in effect this relaxation for the 
    remainder of the 1998 season. This rule allows more U.S. No. 1 
    nectarines and peaches to be packed in containers marked ``CA 
    Utility.'' The added packing flexibility provided by this rule is 
    expected to benefit growers, handlers, and consumers.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: November 10, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Marketing Specialist, or 
    Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office, 
    Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
    AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; 
    telephone: (209) 487-5901; Fax: (209) 487-5906; or George Kelhart, 
    Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, 
    DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-6632. Small 
    businesses may request information on compliance with this regulation, 
    or obtain a guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty 
    crop marketing agreements and orders by contacting: Jay Guerber, 
    Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
    AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, Room 2525-S, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456; 
    telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-6632, or E-mail: 
    Jay__N__Guerber@usda.gov. You may view the marketing agreement and 
    order small business compliance guide at the following web site: http:/
    /www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement Nos. 124 and 85, and Marketing Order Nos. 916 and 917 (7 CFR 
    Parts 916 and 917) regulating the handling of nectarines and peaches 
    grown in California, respectively, hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``orders.'' The orders are effective under the Agricultural Marketing 
    Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter 
    referred to as the Act.
        The Department is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive 
    Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        This rule continues in effect, for the remainder of the 1998 
    season, the modification to the orders' administrative rules and 
    regulations relaxing the ``CA Utility'' quality requirement by allowing 
    more U.S. No. 1 grade nectarines and peaches in containers marked ``CA 
    Utility.'' Prior to the publication of an interim final rule (63 FR 
    50461, September 22, 1998), the term ``CA Utility'' meant that not more 
    than 30 percent of the nectarines and peaches in any container could 
    meet or exceed the requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade, and that the 
    fruit meet other specified requirements. The interim final rule 
    increased that percentage to 40 percent except that at least one-
    quarter of the fruit grading U.S. No. 1 in such containers must have 
    non-scoreable blemishes. A non-scoreable blemish is a defect that will 
    not cause the fruit to fail to meet the requirements of U.S. No. 1. 
    This relaxation is in effect for the remainder of the 1998 season only, 
    and allows more No. 1 grade fruit to be packed as ``CA Utility'' 
    quality.
        The Nectarine Administrative Committee (NAC) and Peach Commodity 
    Committee (PCC) (committees) met on September 15, 1998, to discuss this 
    relaxation. At that time, the NAC voted without opposition to recommend 
    the increased percentage of U.S. No. 1 nectarines with non-scoreable 
    blemishes. The PCC voted with eight in favor and one opposed to 
    recommend a similar change. The member opposed believed that it was too 
    late in the season to make such a change, that such a change would 
    disadvantage those who had already
    
    [[Page 60210]]
    
    shipped ``CA Utility'' fruit in 1998, and that more study and analysis 
    of the situation was needed.
        Sections 916.52 and 917.41 of the orders authorize the 
    establishment of grade and quality requirements for nectarines and 
    peaches, respectively. Prior to the 1996 season, Sec. 916.356 of the 
    order's rules and regulations required nectarines to meet a modified 
    U.S. No. 1 grade. Specifically, nectarines were required to meet U.S. 
    No. 1 grade requirements, except there was a slightly tighter 
    requirement for scarring and a more liberal allowance for misshapen 
    fruit. Under Sec. 917.459 of the order's rules and regulations prior to 
    the 1996 season, peaches were also required to meet the requirements of 
    a U.S. No. 1 grade, except there was a more liberal allowance for open 
    sutures that were not ``serious damage.''
        The minimum grade, size, and maturity requirements in Sec. 916.356 
    applicable to shipments of California nectarines apply during the 
    period April 1 through October 31 each year. The minimum grade, size, 
    and maturity requirements in Sec. 917.459 applicable to shipments of 
    California peaches apply during the period April 1 through November 23 
    each year.
        Since the 1996 shipping season, the nectarine and peach regulations 
    have allowed ``CA Utility'' quality to be shipped during the regulatory 
    periods. Utility quality is a lower-quality fruit than U.S. No. 1.
        Containers marked as ``CA Utility'' must be inspected by the 
    Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service and certified as meeting 
    the ``CA Utility'' quality requirements. Part of the inspection process 
    is to evaluate containers of fruit in accordance with the requirements 
    of the U.S. Standards for Grades of Nectarines, the U.S. Standards for 
    Grades of Peaches, and the orders. In conducting inspections, 
    inspectors are required to evaluate various blemishes. Some blemishes 
    are serious or severe enough to be ``scored'' as defects which are 
    damaging to the grade of the fruit, while some other blemishes are not 
    serious or severe enough to affect the grade of the fruit. In the first 
    instance, the blemishes are termed ``scoreable'' defects; and in the 
    second instance, the blemishes are termed ``non-scoreable.'' It was the 
    recommendation of the committees that such non-scoreable blemishes must 
    be present on at least one-quarter of the 40 percent of the fruit 
    grading U.S. No. 1 in boxes marked ``CA Utility.''
        While containers marked ``CA Utility'' fruit are subject to relaxed 
    quality requirements, all other requirements of the orders must be met.
        In addition to the grade requirements, Secs. 916.350 and 917.442 
    require each package or container of nectarines and peaches, 
    respectively, shipped which meets the requirements of ``CA Utility,'' 
    to be conspicuously marked with the words ``CA Utility'' on a visible 
    display panel.
        Through August 31 of the 1998 season, shipments of ``CA Utility'' 
    quality nectarines and peaches averaged about 4 percent of total 
    shipments. In prior seasons, utility quality shipments have been less 
    than 2 percent. The increase this season has been attributed to quality 
    problems resulting from heavy early season rains. Also, hail storms 
    later during the season damaged some fruit and rendered it unsalable, 
    while some fruit sustained only moderate scarring. This was especially 
    true for nectarines, whose smooth skin does not provide the same 
    protection as the fuzzy exterior of peaches.
        Preliminary studies conducted by the NAC and PCC indicate that some 
    consumers, retailers, and foreign buyers found the lower-quality fruit 
    acceptable in some markets. Shipments of ``CA Utility'' nectarines 
    represented 1.1 percent of all nectarine shipments, or approximately 
    210,000 boxes in 1996. In 1997, shipments of ``CA Utility'' nectarines 
    represented 1.1 percent of all nectarine shipments, or approximately 
    230,000 boxes. Shipments of ``CA Utility'' peaches represented 1.9 
    percent of all peach shipments, or 366,000 boxes in 1996. In 1997, 
    shipments of ``CA Utility'' peaches represented 1.0 percent of all 
    peach shipments, or approximately 217,000 boxes. By contrast, shipments 
    of ``CA Utility'' nectarines represented 4.0 percent of all nectarine 
    shipments, or approximately 694,881 boxes by August 31 of the 1998 
    season. Shipments of ``CA Utility'' peaches represented 4.0 percent of 
    all peach shipments, or approximately 544,065 boxes by August 31 of the 
    1998 season.
        The interim final rule amended Secs. 916.356 and 917.459 by 
    revising paragraph (a)(1) under each section to allow not more than 40 
    percent U.S. No. 1 grade fruit to be packed in containers marked as 
    ``CA Utility'' except that at least one-quarter of the fruit grading 
    U.S. No. 1 in such container must have non-scoreable blemishes. This 
    final rule continues in effect that revision.
        At the September 15, 1998, committee meetings, comments supporting 
    the recommendation were made by handlers who had experienced incidents 
    where the percentage of U.S. No. 1 fruit contained in their ``CA 
    Utility'' boxes was found to be higher than permitted by the orders' 
    rules and regulations. In those instances, they were forced to repack 
    the boxes, move blemished fruit to boxes containing all U.S. No. 1 
    fruit, or discard or donate the fruit.
        At least one handler complained that the fruit with non-scoreable 
    blemishes was unsightly in the type of U.S. No. 1 box he offered to the 
    marketplace and to his customers. His preference was to place the fruit 
    with non-scoreable blemishes in boxes marked ``CA Utility.'' The 
    limitation of not more than 30 percent U.S. No. 1 fruit in boxes marked 
    ``CA Utility'' became a greater hindrance as the season progressed. The 
    handler also noted that an unseasonable morning rain in late summer 
    caused dark stains on the skin of nectarines, rendering them unsuitable 
    for inclusion in his U.S. No. 1 boxes. He preferred including such 
    fruit in the ``CA Utility'' boxes, but doing so caused the ``CA 
    Utility'' boxes to contain more than the 30 percent U.S. No. 1 fruit 
    permissible.
        A niche market exists for utility quality fruit and the relaxation 
    provided by the interim final rule presented an opportunity for 
    handlers to market somewhat better quality ``CA Utility'' fruit to meet 
    demand. Allowing ten percent more U.S. No. 1 grade fruit to be packed 
    as ``CA Utility'' quality requirements allowed more fruit to be 
    marketed as ``CA Utility'' if handlers prefer to do so. ``CA Utility'' 
    quality fruit is generally made available at lower prices to especially 
    benefit lower-income consumers.
        Some committee members initially continued to support limiting the 
    amount of U.S. No. 1 grade fruit that can be included in a utility pack 
    to 30 percent of the total in any container to maintain distinct 
    differences between U.S. No. 1 containers and ``CA Utility'' 
    containers. However, after further discussion, it was agreed that a 
    greater percentage of U.S. No. 1 in a ``CA Utility'' container would 
    not be confusing if such fruit were also blemished. It was, therefore, 
    agreed that an additional 10 percent U.S. No. 1 would be permitted 
    except that every piece of fruit in that 10 percent must possess a non-
    scoreable blemish. This relaxation is in effect for the remainder of 
    the 1998 season. Boxes marked ``CA Utility'' should be clearly distinct 
    from boxes containing U.S. No. 1 grade. Failure to provide a clear 
    distinction could cause confusion in the marketplace and would not meet 
    the goal of providing low-cost fruit to low-income consumers. It was 
    the opinion of the committees that this relaxation would not cause 
    confusion among buyers.
    
    [[Page 60211]]
    
        Data on recent production and shipments of California nectarines 
    and peaches appear to indicate that ``CA Utility'' quality fruit can be 
    marketed successfully without interfering with sales of higher quality 
    fruit. In fact, some handlers noted that they used the ``CA Utility'' 
    box as a ``safety net.'' Fruit which was not good enough to meet their 
    own criteria for packing in U.S. No. 1 boxes could be better utilized 
    in boxes of ``CA Utility.'' The advent of ``CA Utility'' quality 
    requirements has given handlers the increased flexibility to improve 
    the overall appearance of their U.S. No. 1 shipments.
        For these reasons, the NAC and PCC recommended, for the remainder 
    of the 1998 season, that the percentage of U.S. No. 1 nectarines and 
    peaches permitted in containers marked as ``CA Utility'' quality be 
    increased from 30 percent to 40 percent except that at least one-
    quarter of the fruit grading U.S. No. 1 in such containers must have 
    non-scoreable blemishes. This relaxation remains in effect for the 
    remainder of the 1998 season. The committees also voted to review the 
    percentages during the winter.
        Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has 
    considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. 
    Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility 
    analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 300 California nectarine and peach handlers 
    subject to regulation under the orders covering nectarines and peaches 
    grown in California, and about 1,800 producers of these fruits in 
    California. Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers, 
    are defined by the Small Business Administration [13 CFR 121.601] as 
    those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. Small 
    agricultural producers have been defined as those having annual 
    receipts of less than $500,000. A majority of these handlers and 
    producers may be classified as small entities.
        Under Secs. 916.356 and 917.459 of the orders, grade and size 
    requirements are established for fresh shipments of California 
    nectarines and peaches, respectively. Such requirements are in effect 
    during the period April 1 through October 31 each year for nectarines, 
    and April 1 through November 23 for peaches. The interim final rule 
    relaxed, for the remainder of the 1998 season only, the definition of 
    ``CA Utility'' quality for California nectarines and peaches. The ``CA 
    Utility'' quality requirements are based on minimum quality 
    requirements established under the California Agricultural Code, with a 
    limitation on the amount of fruit meeting U.S. No. 1 or higher grade 
    requirements that may be contained in the utility pack. Prior to the 
    publication of the interim final rule, the ``CA Utility'' quality 
    requirement permitted not more than 30 percent of the nectarines or 
    peaches in any container to meet or exceed the requirements of a U.S. 
    No. 1. The interim final rule increased that percentage to not more 
    than 40 percent except that at least one-quarter of the fruit grading 
    U.S. No. 1 in such container must have non-scoreable blemishes. A non-
    scoreable blemish is a defect that does not cause the fruit to fail to 
    meet U.S. No. 1 grade requirements. This rule continues this relaxation 
    and is expected to benefit growers, handlers, and consumers.
        Since the 1996 shipping season, the nectarine and peach regulations 
    have allowed ``CA Utility'' quality fruit to be shipped during the 
    regulatory periods. Prior to the 1996 season, Sec. 916.356 of the 
    order's rules and regulations required nectarines to meet a modified 
    U.S. No. 1 grade. Specifically, nectarines were required to meet U.S. 
    No. 1 grade requirements, except there was a slightly tighter 
    requirement for scarring and a more liberal allowance for misshapen 
    fruit. Under Sec. 917.459 of the order's rules and regulations prior to 
    the 1996 season, peaches were also required to meet the requirements of 
    a U.S. No. 1 grade, except there was a more liberal allowance for open 
    sutures that were not ``serious damage.'' ``CA Utility'' quality is a 
    lower-quality fruit than U.S. No. 1 and has been regulated since its 
    inception in the 1996 season. Through August 31 of the 1998 season, 
    shipments of utility quality for both nectarines and peaches have 
    averaged about 4 percent of total shipments. In prior seasons, utility 
    quality shipments have been in the 1 to 2 percent range. The increase 
    so far this season is mostly attributed to quality problems resulting 
    from heavy early season rains.
        A niche market exists for ``CA Utility'' quality fruit and the 
    relaxation provided by the interim final rule presented an opportunity 
    for handlers to market somewhat better quality ``CA Utility'' fruit to 
    meet demand.
        According to comments made at the meeting on September 15, 1998, 
    changing the requirements to allow additional U.S. No. 1 fruit to be 
    packed in ``CA Utility'' containers did not disadvantage those handlers 
    who had already finished for the season. Those handlers were able to 
    put fruit grading U.S. No. 1 into their U.S. No. 1 containers. Since 
    they would have likely wanted to pack such fruit in these containers to 
    receive the higher return anticipated for U.S. No. 1 fruit, they have 
    not been harmed economically. Therefore, no harm was done by 
    implementing this relaxation that late in the season.
        Therefore, the NAC and PCC recommended changing the ``CA Utility'' 
    quality at their September 15, 1998, meetings by modifying the 
    percentage of U.S. No. 1 fruit in each box. The committees also voted 
    to review the percentages during the winter.
        In Secs. 916.350 and 917.442 of the orders regulating nectarines 
    and peaches, respectively, lower-quality nectarines and peaches were 
    authorized for shipment as ``CA Utility'' as an experiment for the 1996 
    season only. Such authorization was continued during the 1997 and 1998 
    seasons. The interim final rule increased the percentage of U.S. No. 1 
    nectarines and peaches which could be packed in a container marked ``CA 
    Utility'' for the remainder of the 1998 season except that the fruit 
    grading U.S. No. 1 must have a specified percentage of non-scoreable 
    blemishes.
        During the 1996 season, the Department authorized the shipment of 
    nectarines and peaches which were of a lower quality than the minimum 
    permitted for previous seasons. During 1996, there were approximately 
    210,000 boxes of nectarines and approximately 366,000 boxes of peaches 
    packed as ``CA Utility,'' or 1.1 percent and 1.9 percent of fresh 
    shipments, respectively. During 1997, there were approximately 230,000 
    boxes of nectarines and 217,000 boxes of peaches packed as ``CA 
    Utility,'' or 1.1 percent and 1.0 percent of fresh shipments, 
    respectively. By contrast, shipments of ``CA Utility'' nectarines 
    represented 4.0 percent of all nectarine shipments, or approximately 
    694,881 boxes by August 31 of the 1998 season. Shipments of ``CA 
    Utility'' peaches represented 4.0 percent of all peach shipments, or 
    approximately 544,065 boxes by August 31 of the 1998 season. Continued 
    availability of ``CA Utility'' quality fruit with the increased 
    percentage of non-scoreable defects is expected to have a positive 
    impact on producers, handlers, and consumers by
    
    [[Page 60212]]
    
    permitting more nectarines and peaches to be shipped into fresh market 
    channels, without adversely impacting the market for higher quality 
    fruit.
        The committees considered several alternatives at the meeting. One 
    alternative was to leave the percentage of U.S. No. 1 nectarines and 
    peaches permitted in ``CA Utility'' containers unchanged. It was 
    determined that alternative would not address the problem which faced 
    the industry. The NAC and PCC also considered increasing the 30 percent 
    U.S. No. 1 tolerance to not more than 40 percent or to not more than 50 
    percent, but determined that such a relaxation could render ``CA 
    Utility'' boxes less distinctive from U.S. No. 1 and create confusion 
    in the marketplace. Another alternative included a requirement that at 
    least 90 percent of the individual fruits in all boxes marked with ``CA 
    Utility'' possess defects. Such a requirement would create a box of 
    fruit which would be distinct from U.S. No. 1 due to a greater number 
    of defects present. However, this alternative was determined to be 
    unacceptable because it represented too radical a change of ``CA 
    Utility'' quality given the emergency nature of the recommendation. 
    This alternative failed to offer a sound basis for comparison with the 
    requirement of not more than 30 percent U.S. No. 1 because it did not 
    reference the U.S. No. 1 grade. Such comparison may be necessary as the 
    committees continue to study marketplace reaction to changes in quality 
    requirements of ``CA Utility.''
        This action does not impose any additional reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements on either small or large handlers. As with 
    all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are 
    periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
    duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In accordance with 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the 
    information collection requirements that are contained in Parts 916 and 
    917 have been previously approved by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB Nos. 0581-0072 and 0581-0080, 
    respectively.
        The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that 
    duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. However, as previously 
    stated, nectarines and peaches under the orders have to meet certain 
    requirements set forth in the standards issued under the Agricultural 
    Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 through 1627). Standards issued 
    under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 are otherwise voluntary.
        In addition, the committees' meetings were widely publicized 
    throughout the nectarine and peach industries and all interested 
    parties were invited to attend the meetings and participate in 
    committee deliberations on all issues. Like all committee meetings, the 
    September 15, 1998, meetings were public meetings and all entities, 
    both large and small, were able to express views on these issues. The 
    committees themselves are composed of producers, the majority of whom 
    are small entities.
        An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the 
    Federal Register on September 22, 1998. Copies of the rule were made 
    available to all committee members and nectarine and peach handlers by 
    the committees' staff. The rule was also made available through the 
    Internet by the Office of the Federal Register. That rule provided for 
    a 15-day comment period which ended October 7, 1998. No comments were 
    received.
        After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
    information and recommendations submitted by the committees, and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that finalizing the interim 
    final rule, without change, as published in the Federal Register (63 FR 
    50461, September 22, 1998) will tend to effectuate the declared policy 
    of the Act.
        It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the 
    Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because the changes made to the 
    regulations were to relax the ``California Utility'' quality 
    requirements for California nectarines and peaches for the remainder of 
    the 1998 season and the season has ended or will end shortly for these 
    commodities. Accordingly, this rule should be made final as soon as 
    possible. Also, a 15-day comment period was provided for in the interim 
    final rule and no comments were received.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    7 CFR Part 916
    
        Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    7 CFR Part 917
    
        Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    PART 916--NECTARINES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 916 which 
    was published at 63 FR 50461 on September 22, 1998, is adopted as a 
    final rule without change.
    
    PART 917--FRESH PEARS AND PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 917 which 
    was published at 63 FR 50461 on September 22, 1998, is adopted as a 
    final rule without change.
    
        Dated: November 4, 1998.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 98-29937 Filed 11-6-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/10/1998
Published:
11/09/1998
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-29937
Dates:
November 10, 1998.
Pages:
60209-60212 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV98-916-2 FIR
PDF File:
98-29937.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 916
7 CFR 917