98-31981. Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the People's Republic of China; Amendment of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 230 (Tuesday, December 1, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 66119-66120]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-31981]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-570-808]
    
    
    Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the People's Republic of China; 
    Amendment of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
    
    ACTION: Notice of Amendment to Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review of Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts from the People's 
    Republic of China.
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On October 7, 1998, the Department of Commerce (the 
    Department) published the final results of its administrative review of 
    the antidumping order on chrome-plated lug nuts (lug nuts) from the 
    People's Republic of China (PRC). See Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the 
    People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Review, 
    63 FR 53872 (October 7, 1998) (final results). The review covered the 
    period September 1, 1996 through August 31, 1997.
        We gave interested parties the opportunity to provide comments 
    concerning ministerial errors. We received comments from Jiangsu Rudong 
    Grease Gun Factory (Rudong) alleging a ministerial error. After 
    considering this comment, we have amended the final results of the 
    review.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: December 1, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Gilgunn or Maureen Flannery, 
    Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Enforcement Group III, Office 9, Import 
    Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
    Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; 
    telephone (202) 482-0648 and (202) 482-3020, respectively.
    
    Applicable Statute
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
    references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
    date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
    Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, 
    all citations to the Department's regulations are to the provisions 
    codified at 19 CFR part 353 (April 1, 1997).
    
    Scope of Review
    
        The products covered by this review are one-piece and two-piece 
    chrome-plated and nickel-plated lug nuts from the PRC. The subject 
    merchandise includes chrome-plated and nickel-plated lug nuts, finished 
    or unfinished, which are more than \11/16\ inches (17.45 millimeters) 
    in height and which have a hexagonal (hx) size of at least \3/4\ inches 
    (19.05 millimeters) but not over one inch (25.4 millimeters), plus or 
    minus \1/16\ of an inch (1.59 millimeters). The term ``unfinished'' 
    refers to unplated and/or unassembled chrome-plated lug nuts. The 
    subject merchandise is used for securing wheels to cars, vans, trucks, 
    utility vehicles, and trailers. Excluded from the order are zinc-plated 
    lug nuts, finished or unfinished, stainless steel capped lug nuts, and 
    chrome-plated lock nuts.
        The merchandise under review is currently classifiable under item 
    7318.16.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
    (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and 
    customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is 
    dispositive.
    
    Amendment of Final Results
    
        Rudong alleges that the Department made a clerical error in 
    calculating the Indian inflation factor it applied to certain surrogate 
    Indian data. In the preliminary results, Rudong states, for certain 
    inputs the Department used surrogate Indian data obtained from the 
    period September through December 1996. This surrogate Indian data was 
    adjusted upwards by an average inflation index for the period of 
    September through December 1996. In the final results, the Department 
    extended its use of surrogate Indian data to include newly available 
    data for the months of January through May 1997. Rudong contends that 
    the Department should have therefore extended its inflation index to 
    include inflation data for the months of January through May 1997.
        We agree with Rudong. The Indian inflation index should cover the 
    same period as the surrogate Indian data. Therefore, the Indian 
    inflation index applied to steel wire rod data should be extended to 
    include the months of January through May 1997. This affects the 
    calculations of steel wire rod value as this is the only value for 
    which the data period was expanded in the final results. As defined by 
    section 751(h)
    
    [[Page 66120]]
    
    Act, the term ``ministerial error'' includes errors ``in addition, 
    subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting 
    from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type 
    of unintentional error which the [Department] considers ministerial.'' 
    The Department's error in not extending the inflation index period when 
    it expanded the data period was clearly an oversight of this nature. 
    Therefore, we are amending the final results.
    
    Amended Final Results of Review
    
        We determine that the following dumping margins exist:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Margin
             Manufacturer/exporter              Time period       (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jiangsu Rudong, Grease Gun Factory.....     9/1/96-8/31/97          1.23
    PRC-Wide rate..........................     9/1/96-8/31/97         44.99
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Department shall determine, and the Customs Service shall 
    assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Individual 
    differences between export price and normal value (NV) may vary from 
    the percentage stated above for Rudong. We have calculated importer-
    specific duty assessment rates for lug nuts by dividing the total 
    dumping margins (calculated as the difference between NV and export 
    price) for each importer/customer by the total number of units sold to 
    that importer/customer. We will direct Customs to assess the resulting 
    per-unit dollar amount against each unit of merchandise in each of the 
    importer's/customer's entries during the review period. The Department 
    will issue appraisement instructions directly to the Customs Service.
        Furthermore, the following deposit rates will be effective upon 
    publication of this notice of final results of review for all shipments 
    of lug nuts from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
    consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by 
    section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Rudong, which was found to 
    merit a separate rate for the final results of this review, the cash 
    deposit rate will be 1.23 percent; (2) for all other PRC exporters, the 
    cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate; and (3) for non-PRC 
    exporters of subject merchandise from the PRC, the cash deposit rate 
    will be the rate applicable to a PRC supplier of that exporter.
        These deposit rates, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
    publication of the final results of the next administrative review.
        This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
    responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
    the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
    relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
    requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and subsequent assessment 
    of double antidumping duties.
    
    Notification to Interested Parties
    
        This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
    concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
    APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.306. See 63 FR 24391, 24403 (May 4, 
    1998). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO 
    materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
    requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
    APO is a sanctionable violation.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 351.221.
    
        Dated: November 23, 1998.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 98-31981 Filed 11-30-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/1/1998
Published:
12/01/1998
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Amendment to Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts from the People's Republic of China.
Document Number:
98-31981
Dates:
December 1, 1998.
Pages:
66119-66120 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-570-808
PDF File:
98-31981.pdf