98-32945. Power Authority of the State of New York; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 237 (Thursday, December 10, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 68315-68316]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-32945]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-286]
    
    
    Power Authority of the State of New York; Indian Point Nuclear 
    Generating Unit No. 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No 
    Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its 
    regulations for Facility Operating License No. DPR-64, issued to the 
    Power Authority of the State of New York (the licensee), for operation 
    of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3, located in 
    Westchester County, New York.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would exempt the licensee from the requirements 
    of 10 CFR 70.24, which requires a monitoring system that will energize 
    clear audible alarms if accidental criticality occurs in each area in 
    which special nuclear material is handled, used, or stored. The 
    proposed action would also exempt the licensee from the requirements to 
    maintain emergency procedures for each area in which this licensed 
    special nuclear material is handled, used, or stored to ensure that all 
    personnel withdraw to an area of safety upon the sounding of the alarm, 
    to familiarize personnel with the evacuation plan, and to designate 
    responsible individuals for determining the cause of the alarm, and to 
    place radiation survey instruments in accessible locations for use in 
    such an emergency.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for exemption dated September 24, 1998.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The purpose of 10 CFR 70.24 is to ensure that if a criticality were 
    to occur during the handling of special nuclear material, personnel 
    would be alerted to that fact and would take appropriate action. At a 
    commercial nuclear power plant the inadvertent criticality with which 
    10 CFR 70.24 is concerned could occur during fuel handling operations. 
    The special nuclear material that could be assembled into a critical 
    mass at a commercial nuclear power plant is in the form of nuclear 
    fuel; the quantity of other forms of special nuclear material that is 
    stored on site is small enough to preclude achieving a critical mass. 
    Because the fuel is not enriched beyond 5.0 weight percent Uranium-235 
    and because commercial nuclear plant licensees have procedures and 
    design features that prevent inadvertent criticality, the staff has 
    determined that it is unlikely that an inadvertent criticality could 
    occur due to the handling of special nuclear material at a commercial 
    power reactor. The requirements of 10 CFR 70.24, therefore, are not 
    necessary to ensure the safety of personnel during the handling of 
    special nuclear materials at commercial power reactors.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that inadvertent or accidental criticality will be 
    precluded through compliance with the Indian Point Unit No. 3 Technical 
    Specifications, through the design of the fuel storage racks, and 
    through administrative controls imposed on fuel handling procedures.
        The proposed action will not increase the probability or 
    consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of 
    any effluents that may be released off site, and there is no 
    significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. 
    Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts 
    associated with the proposed exemption.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not involve any historic sites. It does not affect 
    nonradiological plant effluents and has no other nonradiological 
    environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-
    radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
        Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed exemption, the staff considered 
    denial of the proposed action (i.e., the no action alternative). Denial 
    of the request would result in no change in current environmental 
    impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the 
    alternative action are similar.
    
    [[Page 68316]]
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement related to 
    the Indian Point Unit 3, dated February 1975.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on October 28, 1998, the 
    staff consulted with the New York State Official, Jack Spath, of the 
    New York State Research and Development Authority regarding the 
    environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no 
    comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        On the basis of the environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment, Accordingly, the Commission 
    has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated September 24, 1998, which is available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, which is 
    located at The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and 
    at the local public document room located at the 100 Martine Avenue, 
    White Plains Public Library, White Plains, New York, 10601.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of December, 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Alexander W. Dromerick,
    Acting Director, Project Directorate I-1, Division of Reactor 
    Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-32945 Filed 12-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/10/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-32945
Pages:
68315-68316 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-286
PDF File:
98-32945.pdf