97-32422. Information Collection To Be Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 65280]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-32422]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    Information Collection To Be Submitted to the Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction 
    Act
    
    SUMMARY: The collection of information described below will be 
    submitted to OMB for approval under the provisions of the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1995. Copies of specific information collection 
    requirements, related forms and explanatory material may be obtained by 
    contacting the Service Information Collection Clearance officer at the 
    address and/or phone numbers listed below.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 9, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments and suggestions on specific requirements should be 
    sent to the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish 
    and Wildlife Service, MS 222 ARLSQ, 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, DC 
    20240.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth L. Grannemann, Chief, Branch 
    of Visitor Services, Division of Refuges, 703/358-2029; or Phadrea 
    Ponds, Wildlife Biologist, U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO, 
    970/226-9445.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service proposes to submit the following 
    information collection clearance requirements to OMB for review and 
    approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of information is 
    necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
    including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the 
    accuracy of the agency's estimate of burden, including the validity of 
    the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 
    utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and, (4) ways 
    to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who 
    are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
    electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
    other forms of information technology.
        Congress authorized a recreation fee demonstration program in Pub. 
    L. 104-134. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was one of the four 
    agencies mandated to implement the program and evaluate its impact on 
    the visiting public. This study is designed to scientifically evaluate 
    visitor reactions and impact of the fees on visitation to the national 
    wildlife refuges (NWR); it will be conducted by the U.S. Geological 
    Survey Biological Resources Divisions Social Economic and Institutional 
    Analysis Section in Fort Collins, Colorado under a cooperative 
    agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
        To represent the various types of fee changes, as well as fee 
    demonstration refuges, six distinct fee programs and ten refuges were 
    selected for inclusion in the study. These include (1) new entrance 
    fees (Sacramento NWR, CA and Arkansas NWR, TX); (2) increased entrance 
    fees (Dungeness NWR, WA); (3) new annual passes (Chincoteaque NWR, VA 
    and Crab Orchard NWR, IL); (4) new hunt fees (St. Catherine's Creek 
    NWR, MS and Balcones NWR, TX); (5) non-hunt use permits (Buenos Aires 
    NWR, AZ and Fort Niobrara NWR, NE) and (6) non-fee adjustments 
    (Piedmont NWR, GA). Random samples of individuals using these refuges 
    will be surveyed. The Service plans to use as part of the evaluation 
    process a survey questionnaire to assess the different fee programs. An 
    on-site questionnaire will be distributed during the peak season to a 
    random sample of the visiting public. A minimum of 400 completed 
    surveys will be obtained for each fee type. An additional 200 surveys 
    will be obtained from Sacramento NWR to allow for examination of credit 
    card entrances as well as new entrance fees in general. Overall, this 
    will result in a total sample of 2,600 respondents. The margin of error 
    for each fee type is 5% at the 95% confidence level. The 
    information gained from this survey will provide a scientific basis for 
    evaluating the viability of the fee program among the visiting public. 
    The lead project officer is Dr. Jonathan G. Taylor, Research Social 
    Scientist, phone 970-226-9438, 4512 McMurry Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 
    80525-3400.
        Title: Evaluation of visitor responses to recreation fee 
    demonstration programs.
        Bureau form number: None.
        Frequency of collection: One time.
        Description of respondents: Individuals and households.
        Number of respondents: 2,600.
        Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
        Burden estimate: 433 hours.
    
        Dated: December 4, 1997.
    Jeffery M. Donahoe,
    Acting Assistant Director, Refuges and Wildlife.
    [FR Doc. 97-32422 Filed 12-10-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/11/1997
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-32422
Dates:
Comments must be submitted on or before February 9, 1998.
Pages:
65280-65280 (1 pages)
PDF File:
97-32422.pdf