95-29987. Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerances  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 63954-63956]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-29987]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 5F4584/R2190; FRL-4988-4]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerances
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes time-limited tolerances for residues of 
    the insecticide 1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-
    imidazolidinimine (also known as imidacloprid) and its metabolites in 
    or on barley forage, straw, and grain with an expiration date of 3 
    years after its effective date. Gustafson, Inc., submitted a petition 
    under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) that requested 
    this regulation to establish these maximum permissible levels for 
    residues of the insecticide.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATES: This effective date of this regulation is November 28, 
    1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    document control number, [PP 5F4584/R2190], may be submitted to: 
    Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any objections and hearing 
    requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the 
    document control number and submitted to: Public Response and Program 
    Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing 
    requests to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 
    22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance 
    Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting 
    Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, 
    PA 15251.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by sending 
    
    [[Page 63955]]
        electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 file format or ASCII file 
    format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by 
    the docket number [PP 5F4584/R2190]. No Confidential Business 
    Information (CBI) should be submitted through e-mail. Electronic 
    comments on this proposed rule may be filed online at many Federal 
    Depository Libraries. Additional information on electronic submissions 
    can be found below in this document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Dennis H. Edwards, Jr., 
    Product Manager (PM) 19, Registration Division (7505C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 207, CM 
    #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-6386; e-
    mail: edwards.dennis@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register 
    of November 2, 1994 (59 FR 54907), which announced that Gustafson, 
    Inc., P.O. Box 660065, Dallas, TX 75266-0065, had submitted a pesticide 
    petition (PP 4F4337) to amend 40 CFR part 180 by establishing a 
    regulation to permit residues of the insecticide 1-[6-chloro-3-
    pyridinyl) methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine in or on the raw 
    agricultural commodities wheat, forage at 7.0 ppm, wheat, straw at 0.3 
    ppm, wheat, grain at 0.1 ppm; barley, forage at 1.2 ppm, barley, straw 
    at 0.2 ppm, and barley, grain at 0.1 ppm; sorghum, forage at 0.2 ppm, 
    sorghum, straw at 0.1 ppm, and sorghum, grain at 0.1 ppm; and beet, 
    sugar (roots) at 0.1 pm and beets, sugar (tops) at 0.1 ppm. Gustafson, 
    Inc., later withdrew the proposed sorghum tolerances and resubmitted 
    them in a separate petition. On June 15, 1995, Gustafson amended this 
    petition to request a feed additive tolerance of 0.5 ppm on sugarbeets 
    and molasses. (See the Federal Register of June 15, 1995 (60 FR 
    31467)).
        On August 14, 1995, Gustafson submitted a revised Section F 
    deleting barley from this petition and stating it would be resubmitted 
    in a separate petition. EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of 
    October 25, 1995 (60 FR 54691), which announced that Gustasfson, Inc., 
    P.O. Box 660065, Dallas, TX 75266-0065, had submitted a tolerance 
    petition for premitting residues of insecticide imidacloprid in or the 
    raw agriculture commodites barley, forage at 1.5 ppm, barley, straw at 
    0.2 ppm, and barley, grain at 0.05 ppm.
        These tolerances are being established as 3-year time-limited 
    tolerances to enable Gustafson to complete additional residue trials 
    and present a final report. On June 2, 1994, the Agency issued a 
    guidance document on crop residue trials. Among other things, this 
    document provided guidance on the number and location of domestic crop 
    field trials for establishment of pesticide residue trials. Based on 
    this guidance document, the Agency determined that additional field 
    trials are needed for barley. However, the Agency does not believe that 
    this data will significantly change its risk assessment.
        All relevant materials have been evaluated. The toxicology data 
    considered in support of the tolerance include:
        1. A three-generation rat reproduction study with a no-observed-
    effect level (NOEL) of 100 ppm (8 mg/kg/bwt); rat and rabbit teratology 
    studies were negative at doses up to 30 mg/kg/ bwt and 24 mg/kg/bwt, 
    respectively.
        2. A 2-year rat feeding/carcinogenicity study that was negative for 
    carcinogenic effects under the conditions of the study and had a NOEL 
    of 100 ppm (5.7 mg/kg/bwt in males and 7.6 mg/kg/bwt in females) for 
    noncarcinogenic effects that included decreased body weight gain in 
    females at 300 ppm and increased thyroid lesions in males at 300 ppm 
    and females at 900 ppm.
        3. A 1-year dog-feeding study with a NOEL of 1,250 ppm (41/mg/kg/
    bwt).
        4. A 2-year mouse carcinogenicity study that was negative for 
    carcinogenic effects under conditions of the study and that had a NOEL 
    of 1,000 ppm (208/mg/kg/day).
        There is no cancer risk associated with exposure to this chemical. 
    Imidacloprid has been classified under ``Group E'' (no evidence of 
    carcinogenicity) by EPA's OPP/HED's Reference Dose (RFD) Committee.
        The reference dose (RfD) based on the 2-year rat feeding/ 
    carcinogenic study with a NOEL of 5.7 mg/kg/bwt and 100-fold 
    uncertainity factor is calculated to be 0.057 mg/kg/bwt. The 
    theoretical maximum residue contribution (TMRC) from published uses is 
    .000817 mg/kg/bwt/day utilizing 14.377% of the RFD. The proposed 
    tolerance will not significantly increase the TMRC. For exposure of the 
    most highly exposured subgroups in the population, children (ages 1 to 
    6 years), the TMRC for the published and proposed tolerances is 
    0.016934 mg/kg/day. This is equal to 29.709% of the RfD. Dietary 
    exposure from the existing uses and proposed use will not exceed the 
    reference dose for any subpopulation (including infants and children) 
    based on the information available from EPA's Dietary Risk Evaluation 
    System.
        The nature of the imidacloprid residue in plants and livestock is 
    adequately understood. The residues of concern are combined residues of 
    imidacloprid and its metabolites containing the 6-chloropyridinyl 
    moiety, all calculated as imidacloprid. The analytical method is a 
    common moiety method for imidacloprid and its metabolites containing 
    the 6-chloropyridiyl moiety using a permanganate oxidation, silyl 
    derivatization, and capillary GC-MS selective ion monitoring. 
    Imidacloprid and its metabolites are stable in the commodities when 
    frozen for at least 24 months. There are adequate amounts of 
    geographically representative crop field trial data to show that 
    combined residues of imidacloprid and its metabolites, all calculated 
    as imidacloprid, will not exceed the proposed tolerance when use as 
    directed.
        There are currently no actions pending against the continued 
    registration of this chemical.
        The pesticide is considered useful for the purposes for which the 
    tolerance is sought and capable of achieving the intended physical or 
    technical effect. Based on the information and data considered, the 
    Agency has determined that the tolerances established by amending 40 
    CFR part 180 will protect the public health. Therefore, the tolerances 
    are established as set forth below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections to the regulation and may also request a hearing on 
    those objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with 
    the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy 
    of the objections and/or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk 
    should be submitted to the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The 
    objections submitted must specify the provisions of the regulation 
    deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections (40 CFR 
    178.25). Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 
    CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a 
    statement of the factual issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
    requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence 
    relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A 
    
    [[Page 63956]]
    request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator determines 
    that the material submitted shows the following: There is genuine and 
    substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that 
    available evidence identified by the requestor would, if established, 
    resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking 
    into account uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and 
    resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner sought by the 
    requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 
    178.32).
         A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number [PP 5F4584/R2190] (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public 
    Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer all comments received electronically into printed, 
    paper form as they are received and will place the paper copies in the 
    official rulemaking record which will also include all comments 
    submitted directly in writing. The official rulemaking record is the 
    paper record maintained at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the 
    beginning of this document.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order 
    (i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines 
    ``significant'' as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an 
    annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and 
    materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, 
    competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
    local or tribal governments or communities (also known as 
    ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or 
    otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another 
    agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, 
    grants, user fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or 
    policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
    priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: November 28, 1995.
    
    Peter Caulkins,
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.472, paragraph (e) is amended by redesignating the 
    existing text as paragraph (e)(1), by revising the table therein, and 
    by adding paragraph (e)(2) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.472   1-[(6-Chloro-3-pyridinyl) methyl]-N-2-imidazolidinimine; 
    tolerances for residues.
    
    * * * * *
        (e) *  *  *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Parts per    Expiration
                       Commodity                      million        date   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Barley, forage................................          1.5     Nov. 28,
                                                                        1998
    Barley, grain.................................         0.05          Do.
    Barley, straw.................................          0.2          Do.
    Beets, sugar (roots)..........................         0.05   August 24,
                                                                        1998
    Beets, sugar (tops)...........................          0.1          Do.
    Wheat, forage.................................          7.0          Do.
    Wheat, grain..................................         0.05          Do.
    Wheat, straw..................................          0.3          Do.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (2) Residues in the commodities listed in paragraph (e)(1) of this 
    section not in excess of the established tolerances resulting from the 
    uses described in this paragraph (e) remaining after expiration of the 
    time-limited tolerances will not be considered to be actionable if the 
    insecticide is applied during the term of and in accordance with the 
    provisions of the above regulation in this paragraph (e).
    
    [FR Doc. 95-29987 Filed 12-12-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/28/1995
Published:
12/13/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-29987
Dates:
This effective date of this regulation is November 28, 1995.
Pages:
63954-63956 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 5F4584/R2190, FRL-4988-4
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
95-29987.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.472