99-32222. Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 69487-69488]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-32222]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-549-807]
    
    
    Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand; Final 
    Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of final results of antidumping duty administrative 
    review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On August 6, 1999, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
    published preliminary results of an administrative review of the 
    antidumping duty order on certain carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings 
    (pipe fittings) from Thailand. This review covers Thai Benkan 
    Corporation (TBC), a manufacturer/exporter of this merchandise to the 
    United States, during the period July 1, 1997, through June 30, 1998. 
    We preliminarily determined that sales of the subject merchandise have 
    been made below normal value. We gave parties an opportunity to comment 
    on our preliminary results. No comments were submitted to the 
    Department. Additionally, we have changed our exchange rate methodology 
    for a portion of the period covered by this review. However, this 
    modification has not affected our results. Consequently, our 
    preliminary results remain unchanged. We will instruct the U.S. Customs 
    Service to assess antidumping duties based on the difference between 
    the export price and the normal value.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor or Tom Futtner, 
    Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Enforcement, Office 4, Group II, Import 
    Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
    Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
    20230; telephone: (202) 482-4114 or 482-3814, respectively.
    
    THE APPLICABLE STATUTE AND REGULATIONS: Unless otherwise indicated, all 
    citations to the statute are references to the provisions as of January 
    1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 
    1930 (the Act), as amended, by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). 
    In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the 
    Department's regulations refer to the regulations codified at 19 CFR 
    Part 351 (April 1998).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On July 6, 1992, the Department published in the Federal Register 
    an antidumping duty order on pipe fittings from Thailand (57 FR 29702). 
    On July 30, 1998, the respondent requested, in accordance with section 
    351.213(b) of the Department's regulations, an administrative review of 
    the antidumping duty order on pipe fittings from Thailand covering the 
    period July 1, 1997, through June 30, 1998. We published a notice of 
    initiation of the review on August 27, 1998, (63 FR 45796). On 
    September 15, 1998, the Department sent an antidumping questionnaire to 
    TBC. The Department received questionnaire responses in October and 
    November of 1998.
        Under section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department may extend 
    the deadline for completion of preliminary results if it determines 
    that it is not practicable to complete the review within the statutory 
    time limit. On March 10, 1999, the Department published notice of 
    extension of time limit for the preliminary results of this case (64 FR 
    11824). On May 7, 1999, we issued a supplemental questionnaire and 
    received a response to that questionnaire on May 27, 1999. On August 6, 
    1999, (64 FR 42902), the Department published preliminary results of 
    the administrative review. We gave interested parties an opportunity to 
    comment on the preliminary results. We received no comments. The 
    Department has now completed this administrative review in accordance 
    with section 751(a) of the Act.
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        The product covered by this order is certain carbon steel butt-weld 
    pipe fittings, having an inside diameter of less than 14 inches, 
    imported in either finished or unfinished form. These formed or forged 
    pipe fittings are used to join sections in piping systems where 
    conditions require permanent, welded connections, as distinguished from 
    fittings based on other fastening methods (e.g., threaded, grooved, or 
    bolted fittings). Carbon steel pipe fittings are currently classified 
    under subheading 7307.93.30 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). 
    Although the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
    purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is 
    dispositive. The review covers TBC and the period of review (POR) July 
    1, 1997, through June 30, 1998.
    
    Currency Conversion
    
        Effective July 2, 1997, the Thai government ended its restriction 
    on the movement of the dollar-baht exchange rate, thereby allowing the 
    rate to be determined by supply and demand. Our analysis of Federal 
    Reserve exchange rate data shows that the value of the Thai baht in 
    relation to the U.S. dollar fell on July 2, 1997, by about 18 percent 
    from the previous day and did not rebound significantly in a short 
    period of time. We have already concluded in another proceeding 
    involving Thailand that this drop constitutes a ``precipitous and 
    large'' decline for purposes of our exchange rate methodology. For a 
    more detailed discussion of the methodology used for periods of 
    ``precipitous and
    
    [[Page 69488]]
    
    large'' exchange rate declines, please refer to Certain Welded Carbon 
    Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review, 64 FR 56759 (October 21, 1999) (Pipes and Tubes 
    from Thailand). For these final results of review, we incorporated the 
    same methodology used in Pipes and Tubes from Thailand. However, the 
    results have not been affected. All of TBC's U.S. sales took place 
    during specific months in which we relied upon our ``standard'' 40-day 
    average benchmark.
    
    Final Results of the Review
    
        As a result of this review, we determine that the following 
    weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period July 1, 1997, 
    through June 30, 1998:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Weighted-
                                                                   Average
                       Manufacturer/exporter                        Margin
                                                                  (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Thai Benkan Corporation, Ltd...............................         0.94
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Department shall determine, and Customs shall assess, 
    antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Upon completion of this 
    review, the Department will issue appraisement instructions directly to 
    Customs. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the 
    assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by 
    the determination and for future deposits of estimated duties. For 
    assessment of EP sales we calculated a per-unit customer or importer-
    specific assessment rate by aggregating the dumping margins calculated 
    for all U.S. sales to each customer/importer and dividing this amount 
    by the total quantity of those sales.
        Furthermore, the following cash deposit requirements will be 
    effective upon completion of the final results of this administrative 
    review for all shipments of pipe fittings from Thailand entered, or 
    withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication 
    date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the 
    reviewed company will be the rate indicated above; (2) for exporters 
    not covered in this review, but covered in the original less than fair 
    value (LTFV) investigation or a previous review, the cash deposit rate 
    will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the most 
    recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
    review, a previous review, or the original LTFV investigation, but the 
    manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
    the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) 
    if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this 
    or any previous reviews or the original LTFV investigation, the cash 
    deposit rate will be 39.10 percent, the ``All Others'' rate from the 
    LTFV investigation (57 FR 29702, July 6, 1992). These requirements, 
    when imposed, shall remain in effect until publication of the final 
    results of the next administrative review.
        This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
    responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
    the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
    relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
    requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
    assessment of double antidumping duties.
        This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
    concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
    APO in accordance with section Sec. 353.34(d) of the Department's 
    regulations. Timely notification of return/destruction of APO materials 
    or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure 
    to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
    sanctionable violation.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    sections 751(a)(1) and 771(i)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1) and 
    1677f(i)(1)).
    
        Dated: December 6, 1999.
    Richard W. Moreland,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 99-32222 Filed 12-10-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/13/1999
Published:
12/13/1999
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of final results of antidumping duty administrative review.
Document Number:
99-32222
Dates:
December 13, 1999.
Pages:
69487-69488 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-549-807
PDF File:
99-32222.pdf