98-32811. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 239 (Monday, December 14, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 68672-68674]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-32811]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-NM-227-AD; Amendment 39-10941; AD 98-25-15]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-11 series airplanes. 
    This amendment requires inspections to detect attachment failures of 
    the 12 attachments located on the No. 4 banjo fitting/pylon carry-
    through cap, and to detect cracking of the forward and aft flanges and 
    bolt holes of the No. 4 banjo fitting; repair, if necessary; and 
    replacement of the 12 attachments with new or serviceable parts. Such 
    replacement terminates the repetitive inspections. This amendment is 
    prompted by a report indicating that attachment bolts on the forward 
    and aft flanges of the No. 4 banjo fitting and the pylon carry-through 
    cap failed due to fatigue cracking. The actions specified by this AD 
    are intended to prevent such cracking, which could result in reduced 
    controllability of the airplane during flight and ground operations.
    
    DATES: Effective January 19, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of January 19, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from The Boeing Company, Douglas Products Division, 3855 
    Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical 
    Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). This 
    information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration 
    (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John L. Cecil, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5229; fax (562) 627-
    5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model 
    MD-11 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on 
    September 17, 1998 (63 FR 49679). That action proposed to require 
    inspections to detect attachment failures of the 12 attachments located 
    on the No. 4 banjo fitting/pylon carry-through cap, and to detect 
    cracking of the forward and aft flanges and bolt holes of the No. 4 
    banjo fitting; repair, if necessary; and replacement of the 12 
    attachments with new or serviceable parts. Such replacement would 
    terminate the repetitive inspections.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the two comments received.
        Both commenters support the proposed rule.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 82 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 31 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    will be affected by this AD.
        The FAA estimates that it will take approximately 1 work hour per 
    airplane to accomplish the required external visual inspection, at an 
    average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on
    
    [[Page 68673]]
    
    these figures, the cost impact of the external visual inspection 
    required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,860, or $60 
    per airplane, per inspection cycle.
        The FAA estimates that it will take approximately 2 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required eddy current inspection, at an 
    average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact of the eddy current inspection required by this AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $3,720, or $120 per airplane.
        The FAA estimates that it will take approximately 6 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required replacement, at an average labor 
    rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately $250 
    per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the 
    replacement required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $18,910, or $610 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
    AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government.
        Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is 
    determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-25-15 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-10941. Docket 96-NM-227-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model MD-11 series airplanes; as listed in 
    McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-55-013, Revision 03, dated 
    May 15, 1998; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent failure of the attachment bolts on the forward and 
    aft flanges of the No. 4 banjo fitting and the pylon carry-through 
    cap due to fatigue cracking, and consequent reduced controllability 
    of the airplane during flight and ground operation, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Within 1,500 landings after the effective date of this AD, 
    perform an external visual inspection for attachment failures of the 
    12 attachments located on the No. 4 banjo fitting/pylon carry-
    through cap, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 
    MD11-55-013, Revision 02, dated October 28, 1996; or Revision 03, 
    dated May 15, 1998.
        (1) If no failed attachment is found, repeat the external visual 
    inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,500 landings 
    until the terminating action specified in paragraph (b) of this AD 
    is accomplished.
        (2) If any failed attachment is found, prior to further flight, 
    accomplish the actions specified in paragraph (b) of this AD.
        (b) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this AD: Within 5 
    years after the effective date of this AD, perform an eddy 
    inspection to detect cracking of the forward and aft flanges and 
    bolt holes of the No. 4 banjo fitting, in accordance with McDonnell 
    Douglas MD-11 Service Bulletin 55-13, Revision 1, dated December 17, 
    1993; or McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-55-013, Revision 
    02, dated October 28, 1996; or McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 
    MD11-55-013, Revision 03, dated May 15, 1998.
        (1) If no cracking is found, within 5 years after the effective 
    date of this AD, replace the 12 attachments located on the No. 4 
    banjo fitting/pylon carry-through cap with new or serviceable 
    attachments in accordance with Revision 03 of the service bulletin. 
    Such replacement constitutes terminating action for the repetitive 
    inspections required by paragraph (a)(1) of this AD.
        (2) If any cracking is found, prior to further flight, repair 
    the fitting, and replace the 12 attachments located on the No. 4 
    banjo fitting/pylon carry-through cap with new or serviceable 
    attachments in accordance with Revision 03 of the service bulletin. 
    Such replacement constitutes terminating for the repetitive 
    inspections required by paragraph (a)(1) of this AD.
        (c) For airplanes on which McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Service 
    Bulletin 55-13, dated December 22, 1992, has been accomplished, and 
    on which no failed attachment was found during the inspection 
    required by paragraph (a) of this AD: The eddy current bolt hole 
    inspection specified in paragraph (b) of this AD is not required 
    provided that all 12 attachments have been replaced in accordance 
    with the original issue of the service bulletin.
        (d) If the service bulletin specifies that the manufacturer may 
    be contacted for disposition of enlargement of holes beyond the 
    specifications of the service bulletin, or for an evaluation for 
    deferment of repairs: Those conditions shall be addressed in 
    accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los Angeles 
    Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (g) Except as provided by paragraph (d) of this AD, the actions 
    shall be done in accordance with McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Service 
    Bulletin 55-13, Revision 1, dated December 17, 1993; McDonnell 
    Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-55-013, Revision 02, dated October 28, 
    1996; or McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin MD11-55-013, Revision 
    03, dated May 15, 1998; as
    
    [[Page 68674]]
    
    applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by the 
    Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) 
    and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from The Boeing Company, 
    Douglas Products Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, 
    California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business 
    Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (h) This amendment becomes effective on January 19, 1999.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 4, 1998.
    John W. McGraw,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-32811 Filed 12-11-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/19/1999
Published:
12/14/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-32811
Dates:
Effective January 19, 1999.
Pages:
68672-68674 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-NM-227-AD, Amendment 39-10941, AD 98-25-15
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-32811.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13