98-33027. Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly Textron Lycoming) ALF502R-5 and ALF502R-3A Model Turbofan Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 239 (Monday, December 14, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 68708-68710]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-33027]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-ANE-42-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly Textron 
    Lycoming) ALF502R-5 and ALF502R-3A Model Turbofan Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to AlliedSignal Inc. ALF502R-5 and 
    ALF502R-3A model turbofan engines. This proposal would require 
    incorporation of an improved fan core inlet anti-ice system. This 
    proposal is prompted by reports of uncommanded reduction of engine 
    thrust (rollback) and loss of thrust control in icing conditions. The 
    actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent ice 
    accretion on the fan core inlet stator vane surfaces, which can result 
    in engine rollback and loss of thrust control in icing conditions.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by February 12, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
    
    [[Page 68709]]
    
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Regional 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-ANE-42-AD, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may also be sent 
    via the Internet using the following address: ``engineprop@faa.gov''. Comments sent via the Internet must contain the 
    docket number in the subject line. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from AlliedSignal Engines, Inc., P.O. Box 5218, Phoenix, AZ 
    85072-2181, telephone (602) 365-2493, fax (602) 365-5577. This 
    information may be examined at the FAA, New England Region, Office of 
    the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Triozzi, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781) 
    238-7148, fax (781) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 98-ANE-42-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-ANE-42-AD, 12 New England Executive 
    Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received reports of 
    uncommanded reduction of engine thrust (rollback), and loss of thrust 
    control on AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly Textron Lycoming) ALF502R-5 
    model turbofan engines. 12 rollback events have been recorded to date, 
    which all occurred in icing conditions at altitudes above 26,000 feet, 
    and generally near areas of weather conditions that can be described as 
    the anvil area of thunderstorm clouds. Seven events involved 
    simultaneous rollbacks of multiple engines on the four-engine British 
    Aerospace (BAe) 146 airplane.
        The FAA Transport Airplane Directorate (TAD) issued Airworthiness 
    Directive (AD) 94-07-09, effective on April 15, 1994, to require 
    airplane altitude restrictions and operating procedures, to prevent 
    engine rollbacks during flight in icing conditions. Following two 
    additional rollback events during aircraft operation in icing 
    conditions above 26,000 feet, the FAA TAD issued emergency AD 96-14-09 
    effective on July 2, 1997, to supersede AD 94-07-09. AD 96-14-09 
    carried over the earlier AD's altitude restrictions, and revised the 
    Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) airplane operating procedures.
        The FAA Engine Certification Office (ECO) has reviewed the results 
    of engine investigations, component icing tests, and in-flight engine 
    icing tests of the present ALF502R-5 engine, which showed that 
    accretion of ice may occur in the ALF502R-5 engine fan core inlet at 
    stator vane surfaces, under specific icing conditions identified as ice 
    crystals, which are likely to be encountered in weather occurring 
    within the approved engine operating envelope. This ice accretion 
    adversely restricts airflow to the engine core, causing rollback, 
    progressing to further ice accretion and worsening rollback severity. 
    This condition, if not corrected, can result in engine rollback and 
    loss of thrust control.
        The FAA ECO has reviewed the results of analyses, component tests, 
    and in-flight engine testing of modifications of the ALF502R-5 engine, 
    to incorporate an improved fan core inlet anti-ice system. These data 
    show the engine modifications to be acceptable to prevent adverse ice 
    accretion and engine rollback in icing conditions. The FAA ECO has 
    reviewed and approved the technical contents of AlliedSignal Inc. 
    Service Bulletin (SB) No. ALF/LF 72-1020, Revision 2, dated September 
    30, 1998, that describes procedures for installation of the improved 
    fan core inlet anti-ice system. Installation of modified ALF502 engines 
    onto BAe 146 aircraft also requires incorporation of two airframe 
    modifications, contained in BAe Regional Aircraft SB 26-40-01601A, 
    dated March 25, 1998, and SB 71-68-01581A, Revision 1, dated March 25, 
    1998.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, this 
    proposed AD would require installation of an improved fan core inlet 
    anti-ice system, at the next shop visit, but no later than December 31, 
    2002.
        The compliance end date of not later than December 31, 2002, was 
    determined based on safety analysis considering the projected ALF502R-5 
    engine fleet rollback rate and projected cumulative unmodified engine 
    operating hours.
        The requirement for compliance at next shop visit was determined 
    based upon average engine hourly usage between shop visits, and the 
    corresponding modification incorporation rate assumed by the safety 
    analysis. The shop visit requirement, rather than a specific hourly 
    usage, was intended to allow modifications to occur concurrently with 
    periodic maintenance.
        The actions would be required to be accomplished in accordance with 
    the SBs described previously.
        The FAA TAD is considering new rulemaking to allow BAe 146-100A, -
    200A and -300A aircraft, equipped with all four engines modified, to be 
    excluded from the altitude restrictions and operating procedures of AD 
    96-14-09. To be considered for that exclusion, modifications of the 
    aircraft associated with the engine modifications, changes to 
    limitations placards, and revisions of the AFM, will be required to be 
    accomplished on the aircraft in accordance with the previously 
    mentioned BAe SBs, BAe SB 71-72-30473A, and certain FAA approved AFM 
    revisions.
        There are approximately 982 engines of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 100 engines installed on 
    aircraft of U.S.
    
    [[Page 68710]]
    
    registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take 
    approximately 30 work hours per engine to accomplish the proposed 
    actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required 
    parts would cost approximately $75,000 per engine. Based on these 
    figures, the cost impact for incorporation of engine modifications 
    required by the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $7,680,000.
        In addition to the above engine modifications, further aircraft 
    modifications specified by BAe SB No. 71-68-01581A, and BAe SB No. 26-
    40-01601A, Revision 1, are required prior to installation of modified 
    engines onto BAe 146 aircraft. The FAA estimates that 20 aircraft of 
    U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take 
    approximately 33 work hours per aircraft to accomplish the proposed 
    actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required 
    parts would cost approximately $2,400 per aircraft. Based on these 
    figures, the cost impact for incorporation of aircraft modifications 
    required by the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $87,600.
        Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,767,600.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    AlliedSignal Inc.: Docket No. 98-ANE-42-AD.
    
        Applicability: AlliedSignal Inc. (formerly Textron Lycoming) 
    ALF502R-5 and ALF502R-3A model turbofan engines, installed on but 
    not limited to British Aerospace (BAe) 146100A, -200A and -300A 
    series aircraft.
    
        Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine 
    identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of 
    whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area 
    subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been 
    modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the 
    requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request 
    approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with 
    paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment 
    of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the 
    unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition 
    has not been eliminated, the request should include specific 
    proposed actions to address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent uncommanded reduction of engine thrust and loss of 
    thrust control in icing conditions, accomplish the following:
        (a) At the next engine shop visit, but not later than December 
    31, 2002, install an improved fan core inlet anti-ice system in 
    accordance with Accomplishment Instructions, Paragraphs 2.B. through 
    2.I.(1-4), of AlliedSignal Inc. Service Bulletin (SB) No. ALF/LF 72-
    1020, Revision 2, dated September 30, 1998. In order to install 
    engines with the required modifications onto BAe 146-100A, -200A and 
    -300A series aircraft, accomplish BAe Regional Aircraft SB No. 2640-
    01601A, dated March 25, 1998, and BAe Regional Aircraft SB No. 71-
    68-01581A, Revision 1, dated March 25, 1998.
        (b) For the purpose of this AD, an engine shop visit is defined 
    as maintenance that includes separation of either the fan module or 
    the combustor turbine module from the remainder of the engine.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. 
    Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Certification Office.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on December 7, 1998.
    David A. Downey,
    Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service
    [FR Doc. 98-33027 Filed 12-11-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/14/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
98-33027
Dates:
Comments must be received by February 12, 1999.
Pages:
68708-68710 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-ANE-42-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-33027.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13