99-32310. GPU Nuclear, Inc., et al; Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 69807]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-32310]
    
    
    
    [[Page 69807]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    DOCKET NO. 50-320
    
    
    GPU Nuclear, Inc., et al; Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 
    2, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering 
    issuance of an amendment to Possession Only License No. DPR-73, issued 
    to GPU Nuclear, Inc. (the licensee), for the Three Mile Island Nuclear 
    Station, Unit 2 (TMI-2), located in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would add a statement to existing License 
    Condition 2.B.(5) to ensure that the storage of certain radioactive 
    materials at TMI-2 from the co-located Three Mile Island, Unit 1, as 
    authorized under the Unit 1 license, does not result in a source term 
    that, if released, would exceed that previously analyzed in the Post-
    Defueling Monitored Storage Safety Analysis Report for TMI-2.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for amendment dated June 29, 1999, as supplemented by 
    letters dated August 27, October 29, and November 3, 1999.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is needed to ensure that activities conducted 
    under authorization of the TMI-1 license, which permits the movement to 
    and storage at TMI-2 of certain radioactive materials, do not 
    contravene the existing restrictions applicable to TMI-2.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and 
    concludes that the proposed action effectively places appropriate 
    limits on the radioactive materials that may be possessed by the TMI-1 
    licensee at TMI-2, and, further, has determined that the source term 
    from any accident involving radioactive material at TMI-2 under the 
    TMI-1 license would be within that assumed in the Post Defueling 
    Monitored Storage Safety Analysis Report for TMI-2.
        The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability 
    or consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of 
    any effluents that may be released off site, and there is no 
    significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. 
    Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts 
    associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not involve any historic sites, does not affect 
    nonradiological plant effluents, and has no other environmental impact. 
    Therefore, there are no significant, nonradiological environmental 
    impacts associated with the proposed action.
        Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
    denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). 
    Denial of the application would result in no change in current 
    environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action 
    and the alternative actions are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the 
    Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on October 20, 1999, the 
    staff consulted with the Pennsylvania State official, Stan Maingi of 
    the Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection, regarding the 
    environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no 
    comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined 
    not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed 
    action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated June 29, 1999, as supplemented by letters dated 
    August 27, October 29, and November 3, 1999, which are available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC. Publically available 
    records will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public Library 
    component on the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov (the Electronic 
    Reading Room).
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of December 1999.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    John L. Minns,
    Project Manager, Decommissioning Section, Project Directorate IV & 
    Decommissioning Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of 
    Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 99-32310 Filed 12-13-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/14/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-32310
Pages:
69807-69807 (1 pages)
PDF File:
99-32310.pdf