2015-31425. Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results, and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013
-
Start Preamble
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Commerce (the Department) completed its administrative review of the countervailing duty order [1] (CVD) on aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013 period of review (POR). We determined that the Guang Ya Group [2] and the Jangho Companies [3] (mandatory respondents) received countervailable subsidies during the POR. The final net subsidy rates are listed below in “Final Results of Administrative Review.”
DATES:
Effective date: December 14, 2015.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Davina Friedmann, Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0698, (202) 482-1121 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 9, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.[4] On October 7, 2015, the Department extended the final results of this administrative review until December 7, 2015. On October 27, 2015, the Department issued its post-preliminary results of review.[5] The Department invited interested parties to comment on both the Preliminary Results and Post-Start Printed Page 77326Preliminary Analysis and received case and rebuttal briefs from several parties.[6] There were no requests from interested parties to conduct a hearing.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other certifying body equivalents).[7]
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8515.90.20.00, 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8708.80.65.90, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.30, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with this notice, and which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice at Appendix I.[8] The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov;; the Issues and Decision Memorandum is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.[9] For a full description of the methodology underlying all of the Department's conclusions, including our reliance, in part, on adverse facts available pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Review
For those companies named in the Initiation Notice [10] for which all review requests have been timely withdrawn, we are rescinding this administrative review in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). These companies are listed at Appendix II to this notice. For these companies, countervailing duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the rates of the cash deposits for estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2).
Also, between August 1, 2014 and September 5, 2014, the Department received timely no-shipment certifications from certain companies. The Department confirmed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that these companies did not ship merchandise to the United States during this review period.[11] However, these no-shipment companies were also included in the Petitioner's timely withdrawal request, and because no party other than the Petitioner requested a review of the no-shipment companies, the Department is rescinding the administrative review of these companies pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
There are 38 companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, but were not selected as mandatory respondents. For these companies, we calculated the non-selected rate using a methodology of weight-averaging the rates of the Guang Ya Group and Jangho Group based on Start Printed Page 77327their publicly-ranged sales data for the POR because basing a weighted-average on their proprietary sales data for the POR risks disclosure of proprietary information. For further information on the calculation of the non-selected rate, refer to the section in the Issues and Decision Memorandum entitled, “Final Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review.”
For those companies that failed to respond to the Department's quantity and value questionnaire, we have relied on facts available, determined that those companies are non-cooperative and, on that basis, found that the application of adverse facts available is warranted in determining the net countervailable subsidy rate for those companies. For further discussion of this determination, refer to the section in the Issues and Decision Memorandum entitled, “Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences.”
Final Results of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we determine the following final net subsidy rates for the 2013 administrative review:
Company 2013 Ad valorem rate (percent) Guang Ya Group 12 3.59 Jangho Companies 13 64.14 Dynamic Technologies China Ltd 222.82 Foreign Trade Co. of Suzhou New & High Tech Industrial Development Zone 222.82 Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd 222.82 Golden Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group 222.82 WTI Building Products, Ltd 222.82 Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Ltd 222.82 Allied Maker Limited 61.36 Alnan Aluminum Co. Ltd 61.36 Barcalente Metal Producers (Suzhou) Co. Ltd 61.36 Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd 61.36 Classic & Contemporary Inc 61.36 Danfoss Micro Channel Heat Exchanger (Jia Xing) Co. Ltd 61.36 Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd 61.36 Ever Extend Ent. Ltd 61.36 Fenghua Metal Product Factory 61.36 Guandong JMA Aluminum Profile (Group) Co., Ltd 61.36 Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co. Ltd 61.36 Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Company Limited 61.36 Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd 61.36 Hangyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd 61.36 Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances, Co., Ltd 61.36 IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd 61.36 IDEX Technology Suzhou Co., Ltd 61.36 Jiangsu Susun Group (HK) Co., Ltd 61.36 Justhere Co., Ltd 61.36 Kromet International Inc 61.36 Metaltek Group Co. Ltd 61.36 North Fenghua Aluminum Limited 61.36 Nidec Sankyo Singapore Pte. Ltd 61.36 Nanhai Textiles Import & Export Co., Ltd 61.36 Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd 61.36 Permasteelisa South China Factory 61.36 Sapa Profiles (Shanghai) Co., Ltd 61.36 Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd 61.36 Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co., Ltd 61.36 Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusion Co., Ltd 61.36 Taizhou United Imp & Exp Co Ltd 61.36 tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd 61.36 Union Industry (Asia) Co., Limited 61.36 Whirlpool Microwave Products Development Ltd 61.36 Zhejiang Dongfeng Refrigeration Components Co. Ltd 61.36 Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Limited 61.36 Zhongshan Daya Hardware Co., Ltd 61.36 Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd 61.36 Assessment Rates
The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these final results of review, to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, at the ad valorem rates listed above.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts indicated above for each company listed on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, Start Printed Page 77328as appropriate. Accordingly, the cash deposit requirements that will be applied to companies covered by this order, but not examined in this administrative review, are those established in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for each company. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Start SignatureDated: December 7, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum
Summary
List of Comments
Scope of the Order
Partial Rescission of Review
Subsidies Valuation Information
Loan Benchmark Rates
Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
Analysis of Programs
Programs Determined Not to Confer Measurable Benefit or Not Used
Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
Ad Valorem Rate for Non-Cooperative Companies Under Review
Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether the Jangho Companies' Products are Subject to the Scope of the Order
Comment 2: Whether the Department Should Instruct CBP to Lift Suspension and Not Assess Duties Prior to the Date of Initiation of the Relevant Scope Ruling on Curtain Wall Units
Comment 3: Whether the GOC Provided Policy Loans to the Jangho Companies and GYG
Comment 4: Whether the Department's Benchmark Interest Rates are Arbitrary, Unsupported by Record Evidence, or Unlawful
Comment 5: Whether Preferential Tax Policies for High or New Technology Enterprises (HTNEs) Program is Specific
Comment 6: Whether Tax Offsets for Research and Development (R&D) Program is Specific
Comment 7: Alleged Ministerial Error in the Jangho Companies' Overall and Additional Subsidy Margin Calculations
Comment 8: Whether The Department May Countervail Provision of Glass for LTAR; Whether Glass is, Properly, an Input of the Subject Merchandise
Comment 9: Whether The Department May Countervail Provision of Aluminum Extrusions for LTAR; Whether Aluminum Extrusions are, Properly, Inputs of the Subject Merchandise
Comment 10: Whether the Department Should Include the Subsidy Rates for Glass and Aluminum Extrusions for LTAR Programs in the Rates for Non-Selected Companies
Comment 11: Whether the Jangho Companies' Glass and Aluminum Extrusions Producers and Suppliers and GYG's Primary Aluminum Producers and Suppliers are “Authorities”
Comment 12: Whether Specificity Exists for Primary Aluminum for LTAR, Glass for LTAR and Aluminum Extrusions for LTAR
Comment 13: Whether the Department may use a “tier two” Benchmark for Primary Aluminum for LTAR, Aluminum Extrusions for LTAR, and Glass for LTAR
Comment 14: Whether the Department Made a Ministerial Error in the Calculation of Benefits for the Aluminum Extrusions for LTAR and Glass for LTAR Programs.
Comment 15: Whether the Department Should Calculate Subsidies on Two Programs for Which It Sought Additional Information After Issuance of the Preliminary Results
Comment 16: Whether the Department Made a Ministerial Error in the Policy Lending Calculation for GYG
Comment 17: Whether the Department Should Allocate Benefits from GYG's Famous Brands Program over 2013 Sales
Comment 18: Whether the Department Should Countervail Non-Recurring Subsidies Received Prior to January 1, 2005
Comment 19: Whether TenKSolar Shanghai Should Receive the Cooperative Rate for Non-Selected Respondents
Comment 20: Whether the Department Should Use Aluminum Billet Purchases by Guang Ya in the Benchmark Calculation of Primary Aluminum for LTAR
Comment 21: Whether the Department Erred in Calculating the Benchmark for Primary Aluminum
Conclusion
Appendix II
List of Companies on Which We Are Rescinding This Administrative Review [14]
1. Acro Import and Export Co.
2. Activa International Inc.
3. Aluminicaste Fundicion de Mexico
4. Changshu Changshen Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
5. Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts Co., Ltd.
6. China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.
7. Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd.
8. Clear Sky Inc.
9. Cosco (J.M.) Aluminum Co., Ltd.
10. Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd.[15]
11. Dragonluxe Limited
12. Dynabright International Group (HK) Limited
13. First Union Property Limited
14. Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum alloy Co., Ltd.
15. Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd.
16. Foshan JMA Aluminum Company Limited
17. Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminum Co., Ltd.
18. Foshan Yong Li Jian Alu. Ltd.
19. Fujian Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
20. Global PMX Dongguan Co., Ltd.
21. Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited
22. Gold Mountain International Development, Ltd.
23. Gran Cabrio Capital Pte. Ltd.
24. Gree Electric Appliances
25. GT88 Capital Pte. Ltd.
26. Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
27. Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited
28. Guangdong Nanhai Foodstuffs Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
29. Guangdong Weiye Aluminum Factory Co., Ltd.
30. Guangdong Xingfa Aluminum Co., Ltd.
31. Guangdong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
32. Guangdong Yonglijian Aluminum Co., Ltd
33. Hangzhou Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd.
34. Hanwood Enterprises Limited
35. Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
36. Hao Mei Aluminum International Co., Ltd.
37. Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited
38. Honsense Development Company
39. Hui Mei Gao Aluminum Foshan Co., Ltd.
40. Idex Health
41. Innovative Aluminum (Hong Kong) Limited
44. iSource Asia
45. Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware Diecasting Co., Ltd.Start Printed Page 77329
46. Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd.
47. Jiangyin Trust International Inc
48. Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd.
49. Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd.
50. Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd.
51. Jiuyan Co., Ltd.
52. JMA (HK) Company Limited
53. Kam Kiu Aluminum Products Sdn Bhd
54. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co., Ltd.
55. Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
56. Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology Co., Ltd.
57. Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd.
58. Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profiled Co. Ltd.
59. Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd.
60. Massoud & Bros. Co., Ltd.
61. Metaltek Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
62. Midea Air Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd.
63. Midea International Trading Co., Ltd./Midea International Trading Co., Ltd.
64. Miland Luck Limited
65. New Asia Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
66. Nidec Sankyo (Zhejiang) Corporation
67. Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd.
68. Ningbo Hi Tech Reliable Manufacturing Company
69. Ningbo Lakeside Machiery Factory [16]
70. Ningbo Minmetals & Machinery Imp. & Exp. Corp.
71. Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd.
72. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
73. Northern States Metals
74. PanAsia Aluminum (China) Limited
75. Pengcheng Aluminum Enterprise Inc.
76. Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited
77. Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
78. Popular Plastics Company Limited
79. Press Metal International Ltd
80. Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.
81. Sanchuan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
82. Shangdong Huasheng Pesticide Machinery Co.
83. Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
84. Shanghai Automobile Air Conditioner Accessories Ltd.
85. Shanghai Canghai Aluminum Tube Packaging Co., Ltd
86. Shanghai Dongsheng Metal
87. Shanghai Shen Hang Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.
88. Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co., Ltd.
89. Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
90. Sihui Shi Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd.
91. Sincere Profit Limited
92. Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
93. Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co., Ltd.
94. Suzhou New Hongji Precesion Part Co
95. Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co. Ltd.
96. Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation
97. tenKsolar, Inc.
98. Taogoasei America Inc./Toagoasei America Inc.
99. Tianjin Ganglv Nonferrous Metal Materials Co., Ltd.
100. Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd.
101. Tianjin Ruxin Electric Heat Transmission Technology Co., Ltd.
102. Tianjin Xiandai Plastic & Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.
103. Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation/Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation, Ltd.
104. Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
105. Traffic Brick Network, LLC
106. USA Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd.
107. Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware
108. Whirlpool (Guangdong)
109. Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited
110. Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
111. Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd.
112. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.
113. Zhejiang Zhengte Group Co., Ltd.
114. Zhenjiang Xinlong Group Co., Ltd.
115. Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminum Factory Ltd.
116. Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd.
End Supplemental InformationFootnotes
1. See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order).
Back to Citation2. For purposes of this administrative review, the Guang Ya Group includes Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co. Ltd.; Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd.; and Yonghi Guanghai Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd. Also, these companies submitted responses on the record of this review clarifying the usage of “Aluminium” in its name, rather than “Aluminum,” the form on which we both received a request for review and/or on which we initiated this review.
Back to Citation3. For purposes of this administrative review, the Jangho companies includes Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd., (Guangzhou Jangho); Jangho Group Co., Ltd. (Jangho Group Co.); Beijing Jiangheyuan Holding Co., Ltd (Beijing Jiangheyuan); Beijing Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. (Beijing Jangho); and Shanghai Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd., (Shanghai Jangho).
Back to Citation4. See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Intent To Rescind, in Part, and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013, 80 FR 32528, dated June 9, 2015 (Preliminary Results).
Back to Citation5. See Memorandum from Scot Fullerton through Christian Marsh to Paul Piquado re: “Post-Preliminary Analysis Memorandum in the 2013 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China,” dated October 27, 2015 (Post-Preliminary Analysis).
Back to Citation6. For additional case history for this administrative review, see accompanying Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China, dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
Back to Citation7. See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a complete description of the scope of the Order.
Back to Citation8. See Memoradum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance regarding: “Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China, 2013 (Third Review),” December 7, 2015 (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
Back to Citation9. See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
Back to Citation10. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 36462 (June 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
Back to Citation11. On August 27, 2015, the Department issued the requisite “no-shipments” message to CBP inquiring whether certain companies shipped merchandise to the United States during the instant review period, which was subsequently confirmed by CBP. See public message number 5239314.
Back to Citation14. One company on which the review was initiated, tenKsolar Inc., provided a certified submission of its role as a U.S. importer located within the United States. See Letter from tenKSolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. regarding, “Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China—Quantity and Value Questionnaire Response,” dated September 4, 2014. Because tenKsolar is a U.S. importer, we are rescinding the review of this entity.
Back to Citation15. Petitioner requested a review of Dongguang Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd. See Letter from the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee regarding, “Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Request for Administrative Review,” dated June 2, 2014. However, in the Department's initiation notice, this company's name was spelled Dongguan Aoda Aluminum Co., Ltd. Accordingly, this notice serves as a correction to the spelling of this company's name.
Back to Citation16. Homax Group Inc. (Homax) requested a review of Ningbo Lakeside Machinery Factory. See Letter from the Homax regarding, “Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Request for Third Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order,” dated May 30, 2014. However, in the Department's initiation notice, this company's name was spelled Ningbo Lakeside Machiery Factory. Accordingly, this notice serves as a correction to the spelling of this company's name.
Back to Citation[FR Doc. 2015-31425 Filed 12-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Document Information
- Published:
- 12/14/2015
- Department:
- International Trade Administration
- Entry Type:
- Notice
- Document Number:
- 2015-31425
- Pages:
- 77325-77329 (5 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- C-570-968
- PDF File:
- 2015-31425.pdf
- Supporting Documents:
- » Requests for Nominations: Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
- » Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China; Recission
- » Determinations of Sales at Less than Fair Value: Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Brazil, South Africa, and Republic of Turkey
- » Meetings: United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board
- » Investigations; Determinations, Modifications, and Rulings, etc.: Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation
- » Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Republic of Turkey
- » Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from People's Republic of China
- » Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Pasta from Italy
- » Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Truck and Bus Tires From People's Republic of China
- » Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review