95-30583. Carolina Power & Light Company; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 64456]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-30583]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324]
    
    
    Carolina Power & Light Company; Environmental Assessment and 
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its 
    regulations to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62 issued 
    to the Carolina Power & Light Company (the licensee) for operation of 
    the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (BSEP), Units 1 and 2, located in 
    Brunswick County, North Carolina.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is in response to the licensee's application 
    dated June 9, 1995, for exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 
    50.71(e)(4) regarding submission of revisions to the Final Safety 
    Analysis Report (FSAR) and design change reports for facility changes 
    made under 10 CFR 50.59 for the BSEP. Under the proposed exemption the 
    licensee would schedule updates to the single, unified FSAR for the two 
    units that comprise BSEP based on the refueling cycle of BSEP Unit 1.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) requires licensees to submit updates to their 
    FSAR within 6 months after each refueling outage providing that the 
    interval between successive updates does not exceed 24 months. Since 
    BSEP Units 1 and 2 share a common FSAR, the licensee must update the 
    same document within 6 months after a refueling outage for either unit. 
    Allowing the exemption would maintain the BSEP FSAR current within 24 
    months of the last revision and would not exceed a 24-month interval 
    for submission of the 10 CFR 50.59 design change report for either 
    unit.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        No changes are being made in the types or amounts of any 
    radiological effluent that may be released off site. There is no 
    significant increase in the allowable individual or cumulative 
    occupational radiation exposure. The Commission concludes that granting 
    the proposed exemption would result in no significant radiological 
    environmental impact.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    exemption does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no 
    other environmental impact. The Commission concludes that there are no 
    significant non-radiological impacts associated with the proposed 
    exemption.
    
    Alternative to the Proposed Action
    
        Because the staff has concluded that there is no significant 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed exemption, any 
    alternative to the exemption will have either no significantly 
    different environmental impact, or greater environmental impact.
        The principal alternative would be to deny the requested exemption. 
    Denial of the exemption would result in no change in current 
    environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed 
    exemption and this alternative are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action did not involve the use of any resources not previously 
    considered in the Final Environmental Statement related to Brunswick 
    Steam Electric Plant, dated January 1974.
    
    Agencies and Persons Contacted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on December 5, 1995, the 
    staff consulted with the North Carolina State official, Mr. J. James of 
    the Division of Radiation Protection, North Carolina Department of 
    Environmental, Commerce and Natural Resources, regarding the 
    environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no 
    comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission 
    has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed exemption.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's 
    request for the exemption dated June 9, 1995, which is available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington DC, and at the University of 
    North Carolina at Wilmington, William Madison Randall Library, 601 S. 
    College Road, Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8th day of December 1995.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    David B. Matthews,
    Director, Project Directorate II-1, Division of Reactor Projects-I/II, 
    Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 95-30583 Filed 12-14-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/15/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-30583
Pages:
64456-64456 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324
PDF File:
95-30583.pdf