[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 240 (Tuesday, December 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69082-69102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-33168]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Job Training Partnership Act, Title III, Demonstration Program:
Dislocated Worker Manufacturing Technology Demonstration Program
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant
Applications (SGA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: All information required to submit a grant application is
contained in this announcement. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL),
Employment and Training Administration (ETA), announces a demonstration
program to test the ability of the workforce development system to
partner with employers, training providers and others to train
dislocated workers in the skills necessary to obtain work requiring
technology skills in occupations in manufacturing industry settings
with long-term growth potential. The program will be funded with
Secretary's National Reserve funds appropriated for Title III of the
Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and administered in accordance with
29 CFR part 95 and 97 as applicable.
This notice provides information on the process that eligible
entities must use to apply for these demonstration funds and how
grantees will be selected. It is anticipated that up to $10 million
will be available for funding demonstration projects covered by this
solicitation, with no award being more than $1 million.
DATES: The closing date for receipt of proposals is February 16, 1999
at 4 p.m. (Eastern Time).
ADDRESSES: Applications shall be mailed to: U.S. Department of Labor;
Employment and Training Administration; Division of Acquisition and
Assistance; Attention: Yvonne Harrell, Reference: SGA/DAA 99-001; 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-4203; Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fax questions to Yvonne Harrell,
Division of Acquisition and Assistance at (202) 219-8739 (this is not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This announcement consists of five parts.
Part I describes the authorities and purpose of the demonstration
program and identifies demonstration policy. Part II describes the
application process and provides guidelines for use in applying for
demonstration grants. Part III includes the statement of work for the
demonstration projects. Part IV describes the selection process,
including the criteria that will be used in reviewing and evaluating
applications. Part V discusses the demonstration program's monitoring,
reporting and evaluation.
[[Page 69083]]
Part I. Background
A. Authorities
Section 323(a)(6) of JTPA (29 U.S.C. 1662b) authorizes the use for
demonstration programs of funds reserved under section 302 of JTPA (29
U.S.C. 1652) and provided by the Secretary for that purpose under
section 322 of JTPA (29 U.S.C. 1662a). Demonstration program grantees
must comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations
in setting up and carrying out their programs.
B. Purpose
It is now well understood that the economy has transitioned from
the industrial age to the information age. In this age, the most valued
commodities are the skills and knowledge possessed by the individual.
Global competition has reached an unprecedented level. Technology plays
an increasingly important role in this global scenario as nations
strive to build things or provide services that are faster, better or
cheaper than their competitors.
In this era of global competition and rapid technological advances,
technology is the most critical driver of economic growth. The U.S.
Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy, has reported
advances in technology to be the single most important determining
factor in sustaining economic growth, estimated to account for as much
as half of the Nation's long-term economic growth over the past 50
years. Technology as a method for achieving a practical result
encompasses the techniques, machines and equipment, controls,
processes, and organization of work, as well as the ideas, skills, and
knowledge underlying the work process. Traditional work environments
have altered, as have the requisite skills needed by workers to succeed
in today's workplace. Technology provides the tools for creating a wide
array of new and improved products and new services that reach well
beyond the narrow confines of traditional labor markets. A product can
now be provided from almost any community, each with the potential to
reach global markets. The ability of a company to innovate, incorporate
technology, improve products or services, increase market share and
thus expand capacity and employment is the engine of economic growth.
Information technologies affect almost every sector and every
industry in the United States, in terms of digitally based products,
services, and production and work processes. The very nature of
advanced technology lies in the ability of a business or industry to
identify, assess, adopt and incorporate information based technologies
into everyday business and production processes. The information/
knowledge-based workplace of today's leading companies requires workers
to possess conceptual, analytical, communication, interpersonal, and
self-management skills beyond the basic academic and technical skills
of the traditional workplace. There is often a skills deficit
experienced by employers who continuously push the envelope to
innovate, and adopt new technology in order to stay ahead of
competitors, both domestic and international.
With accelerated changes in technology, America's workers often
discover their skill base has become out of date. New approaches are
needed to help American workers stay competitive. Workers need to know
and understand what skill standards employers are looking for, and they
need to have the means to raise their skills to match that demand.
Our Nation's workforce development system is working to meet this
need, but skill shortages in technology are currently very high in some
industry sectors and geographic areas. Severe shortages of workers who
can apply and use advanced technologies could undermine U.S.
innovation, productivity, and competitiveness in world markets. A
steady supply of skill workers will help our Nation's industries remain
competitive. More importantly, these workers need to possess the
appropriate skills demanded in the workplace. Ideally, a system of
``just in time'' training would be able to supply skilled workers that
meet industry driven standards and certifications.
The purpose of this demonstration is to test the ability of the
Nation's workforce development system to partner with employers,
training providers and others to train dislocated workers in the skills
necessary to obtain work requiring technology skills in manufacturing
occupations and industries experiencing shortages of such workers.
Industries such as aerospace, computers and electronics
manufacturing, machinery and motor vehicles, chemicals and petroleum,
and specialized instruments and devices as well as bio-technical/
biomedical could be among the manufacturing industries experiencing
technology skill shortages among those workers they seek to employ.
Manufacturing technologies have gone through several metamorphoses.
The impact of these technological trends is often felt as a loss in the
number of unskilled jobs with an increase in more technology-savvy jobs
required to control automated, computer-operated machinery. As the
tools and equipment become more automated, the skills needed for entry
level technicians and operators multiply. Increasing use of robotics
requires employees who once performed manual labor to become
technicians who control automatic processes remotely by computer.
Assemblers frequently are now required to possess computer skills for
controlling automatic processes remotely. The shift towards automating
the production line has resulted in a need for workers who are able to
work with computers, robotics, and Computer Numerically Controlled
(CNC) machines. Instead of interacting with the products, line workers
may now manage machines which perform the processes.
A large number of the layoffs that occur within a manufacturing
company are associated with elimination or reduction of a product and
changes in technology. They generally have the largest impact on those
with lower or outdated skills. Amid massive and continual restructuring
within manufacturing, it is imperative for manufacturing employees to
commit to lifelong learning. The technology and the push to produce a
particular product that created their present position is often soon to
be replaced by another generation of product and production process.
As a part of the Nation's Workforce Development System, programs
presently funded under Title III of the Job Training Partnership Act,
and soon to be funded under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998,
annually provide adjustment and training assistance to over 500,000
individuals who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own.
These employment and training funds targeted to serve dislocated
workers are managed through State and local workforce development
organizations who design and operate a national system for training and
reemployment programs based on: (1) The needs and characteristics of
the local dislocated worker population; (2) the needs of local
employers for skilled workers; and (3) the capabilities and capacities
of training institutions and other local service providers. The
emerging infrastructure of One-Stop/Career Center systems provides
comprehensive and integrated workforce development services to both
participants and employers.
Under this demonstration, the Department will fund projects that
[[Page 69084]]
specifically document the existence of and respond to the reported
shortages in their geographical area of workers in manufacturing jobs
requiring technology skills. For purposes of this solicitation, the
term ``technology'' may be viewed broadly as the link between people
and technology in the workplace.
Successful applications may be based on the use of new or
innovative service strategies such as the involvement of under
represented groups of dislocated workers for existing training
programs; the development and use of curricula geared specifically to
eligible groups of dislocated workers and the needs of employers with
openings in technology-related jobs; or the development of concentrated
training models for workers with a residue of skill knowledge from
previous related employment, or use of curriculum and skills training
interventions designed to impart knowledge, skills and abilities of
industry skill standards (where available or under development).
Each successful application will document where there are strong
linkages with specific employers' demand for workers with technology-
related skills. The demonstration program goals of placement of the
project participants in jobs using technology in manufacturing
industries which are targeted in the proposal must be clearly addressed
and sufficient assurance must be demonstrated that this goal can be
accomplished.
Participant satisfaction with project services and with their jobs,
as well as their employer's satisfaction with project services and with
the participants' skill level and work, should be measured not only at
the end of the project but also at critical points identified by the
applicant during the progress of the demonstration's implementation.
C. Demonstration Policy
1. Grant Awards
DOL anticipates awarding ten (10) to fifteen (15) grants, not to
exceed $1 million per grant. It is anticipated that awards will be made
by April 30, 1999. Award decisions will be published on the Internet at
ETA's Home Page at http://www.doleta.gov.
2. Eligible Applicants
Any organization capable of fulfilling the terms and conditions of
this solicitation may apply. Applicants who are not Substate grantees
under JTPA Title III, or One-Stop Career Center Operators or Workforce
Investment Boards under WIA must submit a letter from the authorized
signatory of one or more of such organizations continuing comments on
the applicant's proposal. Under Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995,
section 18, an organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which engages in lobbying activities
shall not be eligible for the receipt of Federal funds constituting an
award grant or loan. This is a risk free Federal program: Therefore,
all for profit organizations that apply will not be able to receive a
fee if awarded a grant.
3. Eligible Participants
All participants in projects funded under this demonstration
program must be either:
(a) Eligible dislocated workers as defined at JTPA section
301(a)(1), and 314(h)(1) of the Job Training Partnership Act. These
sections of the law may be viewed at http://doleta.gov/regs/statutes/
jtpalaw.htm. Proposed projects may target subgroups of the eligible
population based on factors such as (but not limited to) occupation,
industry, nature of dislocation, and reason for unemployment. Note:
Individuals whose eligibility is based upon their status as long-term
unemployed (section 301(a)(1)(C) JTPA) must have a demonstrated
attachment to the labor force.
(b) Incumbent workers. These are currently-employed workers whose
employers have determined that the workers require training in order to
help keep their firms competitive and the subject workers employed,
avert layoffs, upgrade workers' skills, increase wages earned by
employees and/or keep workers skills competitive. Such technology
training would support further job retention and career development for
improved economic self-sufficiency for employed workers, especially
those most vulnerable to job loss, and increase the capability of the
employing firm(s) to access and retain skilled workers.
4. Applicable Technology
Applicant's proposal must describe the technology skills to be
demonstrated in the grant in the context of the skills presently in use
in the industry or plants--e.g., how this demonstration is related to
the introduction of new equipment, upgrading incumbent workers,
development of a new product. If this technology application will
enable improvements in the manufacturing process, a description of such
benefits should be provided. If this technology is linked to a specific
employer or group of employers, discuss the impact on present skill
levels caused by the demonstration activities including changes caused
by equipment, materials or work organization. Where applicable, relate
changes to factors affecting workers such as increased or decreased
decision-making responsibility, changes in advancement opportunities or
transferability of new skills, changes in the pace of work, and wage
increases related to increased skill attainment. Indicate whether this
technology could be considered ``leading edge'' by the industry.
5. Allowable Activities
Funds provided through this demonstration may be used only to
provide services of the type described at section 314(c) and (d) of
JTPA. Supportive services may be provided when they are necessary to
enable an individual who is eligible for training but cannot afford to
pay for such supportive services, to participate in the training
program. These services are defined in section 4(24) of JTPA. (Use
ETA's web site reference above to view.)
Grant funds may be used to reimburse employers for extraordinary
costs associated with on-the-job training of program participants, in
accordance with the provisions of 20 CFR 627.240. In addition to the
limitations and requirements provided in JTPA, particularly at Part C
of Title I, prospective applicants should be aware that grant funds may
not be used for the following purposes: (a) For training that an
employer is in a position to provide and would have provided in the
absence of the requested grant; (b) to pay salaries for program
participants; and (c) for acquisition of production equipment.
Applicants may budget limited amounts of grant funds to work with
technical experts or consultants to provide advice and develop more
complete project plans after a grant award, however, the level of
detail in the project plan may affect the amount of funding provided.
Grant activities may include: (a) Development, testing and initial
application of curricula focused on intensive, short-term training to
get participants into productive, high demand information or advanced
technology employment as quickly as possible;
(b) Working with employers in develop and apply worksite-based
learning strategies that utilize cutting-edge technology and equipment;
(c) Development of employer-based training programs that will take
advantage of opportunities created by employers' needs for workers with
new technology skills;
(d) Development and initial application of contextual learning
opportunities for participants to learn
[[Page 69085]]
technology theory in a classroom setting while applying that learning
in an on-the-job setting;
(e) Use of curriculum and skills training programs that are
designed to impart learning to meet employer-specified or industry
specific skill standards or certification requirements;
(f) Convening of an Employer Advisory Board to identify skills gaps
of job applicants and present workers affecting the ability of the
employer to offer a competitive product and develop a strategy for
retraining;
(g) Innovative linkage and collaboration between employers and the
local Substate Grantee and/or One-Stop/Career Center system to ensure a
steady supply of high demand, high skill information or advanced
technology workers.
The above are illustrative examples and are not intended to be an
exhaustive listing of possible demonstration project designs or
approaches which may achieve the purpose of this solicitation. However,
successful applicants must demonstrate the direct involvement by
employers experiencing skill shortages in the design and operation of
the project as well as provide substantive documentation about the
existence of skill shortages for the industry or occupations to be
targeted by the proposed project. Documentation should include a
description of the employer involvement anticipated in the project. An
employer advisory committee may be one means of accomplishing employer
involvement.
6. Coordination
In order to maximize the use of public resources and avoid
duplication of effort, applicants will coordinate the delivery of
services under this demonstration with the delivery of services under
other programs (public or private), available to all or part of the
target group. Projects linking or collaborating with an existing USDOL
funded One-Stop/Career Center initiative and/or local JTPA Substate
Grantee located within a project area fulfill this requirement. The use
of Pell Grants for eligible workers or the use of State training or
education funds provided for dislocated workers or certain types of
employers should also be addressed in the application.
7. Period of Performance
The period of performance shall be 27 months from the date of
execution by the Government. Delivery of services to participants shall
commence within 90 days of execution of a grant unless a significant
portion of the grant implementation addresses the development of new
curriculum or planning strategies. If enrollments are not anticipated
to occur within 90 days, the circumstances should be specifically
addressed in the application with the reasons provided and an
alternative time frame provided.
8. Option to Extend
DOL may elect to exercise its option to extend these grants for an
additional one (1) or two (2) years of operation, based on the
availability of demonstration funding under the Workforce Investment
Act, successful program operation, and the determination that a
grantee's initial program findings could further inform the workforce
development system through refinement of the present demonstration.
Part II. Application Process and Guidelines
A. Contents
An original and three (3) copies of the application shall be
submitted. The application shall consist of two (2) separate and
distinct parts: Part I, the Financial Proposal, and Part II, the
Technical Proposal.
1. Financial Application
Part I, the Financial Proposal, shall contain the SF-424,
``Application for Federal Assistance''. (Appendix A) and the ``Budget
Information Sheet'' (Appendix B). The Federal Domestic Assistance
Catalog number is 17.246. The budget shall include on separate pages a
detailed breakout of each proposed budget line item found on the Budget
Information Sheet, including detailed administrative costs and costs
for one or more of the following categories as applicable: basic
readjustment services, supportive services, and retraining services.
The Salaries line item shall be used to document the project staffing
plan by providing a detailed listing of each staff position providing
more than .05 FTE support to the project, by annual salary, number of
months assigned to demonstration responsibilities, and FTE percentage
to be charged to the grant. In addition, for the Contractual line item,
list each of the planned contracts and the amount of the contract.
Where a contract amount exceeds $75,000, a detailed backup budget to
how the amount of the contract was derived must be included. For each
budget line item that includes funds or in-kind contributions from a
source other than the grant funds, identify the source, the amount, and
in-kind contributions, including any restrictions that may apply to
these funds.
Costs associated with the development of curriculum and other one-
time costs should be noted separately in order for reviewers to
identify costs associated with development and start-up as well as on-
going participant costs.
2. Technical Proposal
Part II, the technical proposal shall demonstrate the offeror's
capabilities in accordance with the Statement of Work in Part III of
this solicitation. A grant application shall be limited to twenty (20)
double-spaced, single-side, 8.5-inch x 11-inch pages with 1-inch
margins. Attachments shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Text type shall
be 12 point or larger. Applications that do not meet these requirements
will not be considered. Each application shall include the Checklist
provided as Appendix C, a Time line outlining project activities
provided as Appendix D, and an Executive Summary not to exceed two (2)
pages. NO COST DATA OR REFERENCE TO PRICE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
B. Hand-Delivered Applications
Applications should be mailed no later than five (5) days prior to
the closing date for the receipt of applications. However, if
applications are hand-delivered, they must be received at the
designated place by 4 p.m., Eastern Time on the closing date for
receipt of applications. All overnight mail will be considered to be
hand-delivered and must be received at the designated place by the
specified time and closing date. Telegraphed and/or faxed proposals
will not be honored. Applications that fail to adhere to the above
instructions will not be honored.
C. Late Applications
Any application received at the office designated in the
solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt will not be
considered unless it:
(1) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service registered or certified mail
not later than the fifth calendar day before the closing date specified
for receipt of applications (e.g., an offer submitted in response to a
solicitation requiring receipt of application by the 30th of January
must have been mailed by the 25th); or
(2) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail Next Day Service--
Post Office to Addressee, not later than 5 p.m. at the place of mailing
two working days prior to the date specified for receipt of
application. The term
[[Page 69086]]
``working days'' excludes weekends and U.S. Federal holidays.
The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a
late application sent by U.S. Postal Service registered or certified
mail is the U.S. postmark on the envelope or wrapper and on the
original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. Both postmarks must show
a legible date or the proposal shall be processed as if it had been
mailed late. ``Postmark'' means a printed, stamped, or otherwise placed
impression (exclusive of a postage meter machine impression) that is
readily identifiable without further action as having been supplied and
affixed by an employee of the U.S. Postal Service on the date of
mailing. Therefore, applicants should request the postal clerk to place
a legible hand cancellation ``bull's eye'' postmark on both the receipt
and the envelope or wrapper.
The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a
late application sent by ``Express Mail Next-Day Service--Post Office
to Addressee'' is the date entered by the post office receiving clerk
on the ``Express Mail Next Day Service--Post Office to Addressee''
label and the postmarks on both the envelope and wrapper and the
original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. ``Postmark'' has the
same meaning as defined above. Therefore, an applicant should request
the postal clerk to place a legible hand cancellation ``bull's eye''
postmark on both the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
D. Withdrawal of Applications
Applications may be withdrawn by written notice or telegram
(including mailgram) received at any time before award. Applications
may be withdrawn in person by the applicant or by an authorized
representative thereof, if the representative's identity is made known
and the representative signs a receipt for the proposal.
Part III. Statement of Work
Each grant application must follow the format outlined in this
Part. For sections A through G below, each application should include:
(1) Information that indicates adherence to the provisions
described in Part I, Background (Authorities, Purpose, and
Demonstration Policy) and Part II, Application Process and Guidelines,
of this announcement; and (2) other information that the applicant
believes will address the selection criteria identified in Part IV of
this solicitation.
Information required under A and B below shall be provided
separately for each labor market area where dislocated workers will be
served. To the extent that the project design differs for different
geographic areas, information required under section C below shall be
provided for each geographic area.
A. Target Population
Describe the characteristics of the proposed target population for
the project, e.g.,educational level, previous occupation, age range,
likely transferable skills, length of unemployment, and language
limitations. If that population is limited to one or more subgroups of
the dislocated worker population, explain the basis for such
limitation. Describe the size and needs of the target population in the
local area as they relate to the services available to the grant.
Provide documentation showing there is a significant number of
dislocated workers with the target population's characteristics in the
project area(s). If the project seeks to serve under represented
subgroups such as minority groups, women, older workers (50 years of
age and older), disabled individuals, within a particular occupation
and the selected subgroup has unique characteristics or needs such
characteristics or needs should be identified. Substantive and timely
documentation of the subgroup's under representation must be included.
Note: Up to 5 points of extra credit will be awarded when the targeted
population includes at least 40 percent planned enrollment of an under
represented subgroup for the occupation in which training will take
place.
Indicate how the number of workers to be enrolled was determined.
Sufficient documentation should be provided to show that workers with
appropriate characteristics to meet the purposes of this grant are
available in sufficient numbers to meet the recruitment goals of the
grant recognizing that not all workers with appropriate characteristics
will chose to participate.
No more than 20 percent of the total demonstration funding
allocated by the Department pursuant to this Solicitation for Grant
Applications shall be for incumbent workers.
B. Available Jobs
Jobs targeted for this demonstration must be related to the
manufacturing industry covered by the Standard Industrial
Classification(SIC) Codes 21-39 and must involve the use of technology
skills in a manufacturing setting. Describe the jobs that will be
available and targeted for placement to project participants upon
completion of training and placement services including the
strategy(ies) for identifying job openings that appear appropriate to
the training planned and meet the target wage at placement goals
established in the proposal. Include information about the number and
type of jobs, wage information and the specific set of skills,
knowledge or duties (industry-sponsored standards of certifications).
Provide documentation (Footnote sources) that a shortage of qualified
workers exists in the local area to fill positions in the targeted
occupations in the absence of the proposed project. Anecdotal data
should not be used. Information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS) available through a variety of web sites including BLS, O*NET and
America's Labor Market Information System (ALMIS), should be considered
as a key source of documentation. In addition, State Occupational
Information Coordinating Committee (SOICC) and JTPA Substate Grantee
local job training plan may also be considered. Other sources from the
private sector such as Chamber of Commerce or local Technology Council
surveys as well as university studies are also acceptable. Data must
relate to local employment shortages.
Substantive linkages with specific employers who are experiencing
skill shortages among their present workforce and/or the demand for
additional employees with technology skills in documented occupational
shortages must be provided. Letters from employers who have made a
commitment to the demonstration project are the most appropriate form
of documentation.
If some placements will be made with employers who have not been
identified at the time of application, describe the job development and
placement strategy to be used to assure placement of demonstration
participants.
C. Project Design
(1) Purpose. Describe the specific purpose or purposes of the
proposed project.
(2) Service Plan. Describe the services to be provided from the
time of selection of participants through placement of those
participants in jobs. Describe any services to be provided subsequent
to job placement. The descriptions shall provide a clear understanding
of the services and support that will be necessary for participants to
be placed successfully in jobs and to retain those jobs, including
services not funded under the grant, and
[[Page 69087]]
ways to address participants' financial needs during periods of
training. Grant-funded activities should, at a minimum, include
recruitment, eligibility determination, assessment, retraining, job
placement, and supportive services.
(a) Outreach and recruitment. Describe how eligible dislocated
workers will be identified and recruited for participation in the
project. Recruitment efforts may address public service communications
and announcements, use of media, coordination with the JTPA Service
Delivery Area or Substate Grantee, use of community-based organizations
and other service groups. Describe the applicant's experience in
reaching dislocated workers, especially the targeted population. It is
highly recommended that non-JTPA applicants partner with the
appropriate JTPA Title III Substate Grantee(s) or local One-Stop Career
Center system to plan and implement effective outreach and recruitment
strategies.
(b) Eligibility determination. Describe the process to be used in
determining the JTPA Title III eligibility of potential participants in
the project. It is highly recommended that non-JTPA applicants partner
with the appropriate JTPA Title III substate grantee(s) or local One-
Stop Career Center system to carry out eligibility determination.
(c) Selection criteria. Describe the criteria and process to be
used in selecting those individuals to be served by the project from
among the total number of eligible persons recruited for the project.
Explain how the selection criteria relate to the specific purpose of
the proposed project. Identify any assessment tools that will be used
as part of selection process.
(d) Training services. Describe the training to be provided--
classroom, experiential, on-the-job, internships, etc. Include the
length (days and hours) and schedule, any perquisite courses, and
customization to account for transferable skills, previous education
(note: whether the training requires new and higher educational levels
than previous skill training in the same industry), and particular
circumstances of the target population and the skill needs of the
hiring employer(s). Include information to demonstrate that any
proposed training provider is qualified to deliver training that meets
appropriate employment standards, and any applicable certification or
licensing requirement. Past performance, qualifications of instructors,
accreditation of curricula, and similar matters should be addressed if
appropriate. Address the costs of proposed training and other services
relative to the costs of similar training and services including
courses provided by both public and private providers in the local
area. If the training is to be customized to account for individual
differences in skills levels of participants or employer hiring needs,
describe how these considerations will be taken into account in the
delivery of the training.
The training provided must support the information provided
regarding skill shortages and demand for jobs using technology skills.
(e) Job Placement. Describe the role of the employer linkages
previously addressed in assuring the availability of jobs for
participants completing training. If an Employer Advisory Committee is
the primary employer linkage, the members of the committee should be
listed and the type of expertise they bring to the committee noted.
Provide a discussion of the role(s) of the advisory committee and its
projected meeting frequency. Describe any additional job seeking skills
training or assistance provided to participants completing training.
(f) Post placement services. Describe any post placement services
to be provided and explain their value to the achievement of the
project's purpose and planned outcomes.
(g) Supportive services. Describe those supportive services
determined to be appropriate to the target population's needs. Describe
policies and procedures to ensure that supportive services are provided
only when they are necessary to enable an individual who is eligible
for training but cannot afford to pay for such supportive services, to
participate in the training program. Indicate how the participants'
financial needs during the period of training will be addressed.
(h) Relocation. Describe the limitations and eligibility criteria
for relocation assistance, if such assistance is included in the
proposal.
(3) Participant flow. Provide a flowchart noting length of time for
various activities (such as one day for assessment, etc.) to illustrate
how the project will ensure access to necessary and appropriate
reemployment and retraining services. Show the sequence of services and
the criteria to be used to determine the appropriateness of specific
services for particular participants. Note where service choice options
will be available to participants. Indicate the average length of
participation from eligibility determination and enrollment in the
demonstration project to placement in an unsubsidized job.
(4) Relationship to prior experience. Discuss how the applicant's
prior experience in working with dislocated individuals affects or
influences the design of the proposed project. Note especially lessons
learned or positive experiences that will be replicated.
D. Planned Outcomes
A description of the project outcomes and of the specific measures,
and planned achievement levels, that will be used to determine the
success of the project. These outcomes and measures must include, but
are not limited to:
(1) The number of participants projected: To be enrolled in
services, to successfully complete services through the project, and to
be placed into new jobs; a minimum of 80 percent entered employment
rate is required;
(2) Measurable effects of the services provided to project
participants as indicated by gains in individuals' skills,
competencies, or other outcomes;
(3) Wages of participants prior to, at placement and 90 days after
placement: (a) For dislocated worker participants: a minimum of 90
percent wage replacement rate is required for at least 75 percent of
the participants and an average 90 percent wage replacement for the
overall demonstration project is required; (b) for incumbent worker
participants: a minimum of 100 percent wage retention is required for
all participants successfully completing training and meeting the
competencies/skills levels specified by the employer prior to the
training.
(4) For projects serving dislocated workers, as part of the
targeted outcome for wage at placement, each project should benchmark
at least two key wage averages for the labor market in which each
project will operate. Suggested benchmarks might include:
(a) The average weekly wage in the manufacturing sector, if the
project is focused on manufacturing technology; the average weekly wage
for technical and skilled trade jobs; or the average weekly wage for
computer programmers and (b) the average wage at placement for the JTPA
Title III, dislocated worker program operated by the local Substate
Grantee. Provide an explanation of the particular benchmarks chosen for
the project. For incumbent workers, indicate the present wage level of
the workers to be trained and discuss how this wage level compares with
the appropriate benchmark wage for the local labor market area.
(5) For each project serving dislocated workers, at least 80
percent of the individuals placed shall be placed at a wage that meets
or exceeds (a) the average benchmarked wage in the labor market area,
or (b) the average wage at placement for the last program year
[[Page 69088]]
completed (currently 1997) for the JTPA Title III dislocated worker
program operated by the local Substate Grantee in the targeted labor
market, whichever is greater. The manufacturing wage for any labor
market may be obtained from the Covered Wages and Employment Program
administered by each State's Employment Service.
(6) Customer satisfaction with the project services including
participant at critical points in the service delivery process as well
as upon placement and employer satisfaction with the skills and
preparation of the participants placed with their organization;
(7) Planned average cost per placement (amount of the grant request
divided by the number of program-related placements, and the cost per
placement for continued placements (the amount of the grant request
minus development/start-up costs divided by the number of program-
related placements); and
(8) Other additional measurable, performance-based outcomes that
are relevant to the project and which may be readily assessed during
the period of performance of the project, such as cost effectiveness of
services, comparison with other available service strategies. Where
possible, it would also be useful to look at production improvement and
other measures the employer uses regarding efficiency, product quality
and output.
Note: An explanation of how such additional measures are
relevant to the purpose of the demonstration program shall be
included in the application.
E. Collaboration
Describe the nature and extent of collaboration and working
relationships between the applicant and other workforce development
partners in the design and implementation of the proposed project.
Include services to be provided through resources other than grant
funds under this demonstration. Provide documentation that the
collaboration described can reasonably be expected to occur (signed
letters of agreement and/or the charter of a formally established
advisory council are considered the strongest evidence, while letters
of support are considered weaker evidence. Because a core purpose of
this demonstration program involves the publicly funded workforce
system, the applicant shall describe working relationships with local
Substate Grantee(s), including One-Stop/Career Center partners where
present.
Describe the number and types of employers to be directly involved
in implementation of the demonstration through activities as
participation on an advisory council, provision of input to curriculum
development and design, training provider, internship supervision,
participation in establishment of local skill standards, etc. Describe
activities, presently in place or to be undertaken to link activities
to program interventions under this grant to employers, industry, or
curriculum/learning centers currently designing and developing
occupational/job skill standards and certifications. Collaboration
should focus on linking employers involved in grant activities with any
employer, industry, or trade and worker association that has already
developed or is developing skill standards certifications. Employer
linkages must be specifically addressed in the application and
documentation provided of the specific role(s) the employer(s) will
play in implementation of the grant provided.
Skill standards play an important role in ensuring participants are
meeting the accepted standards of the industry. Grant applicants may
show how skills standards and O*NET are used to help dislocated/
incumbent workers acquire training and new jobs. Skill standards can
mean National Skill Standards (NSS) developed under the auspices of the
National Skill Standards Board or other skill standards recognized by
employers as valid requirements for jobs. O*NET refers to the
Occupational Information Network that replaces the Dictionary of
Occupational Titles and defines all jobs in terms of worker
requirements, occupational requirements, experience requirements,
worker characteristics, occupational characteristics and occupation-
specific requirements. The applicant may request a brochure explaining
O*NET at the following e-mail address: rannr@doleta.gov.
Skill standards and O*NET are useful for structuring training
curriculum, assessing dislocated/incumbent workers' skills and
interests, and defining career paths from one occupation to another.
Their application in the proposed project's training design would
indicate close links to employers and an understanding of the demands
faced by workers in high performance workplaces.
Applicants are encouraged to commit matching funds to the
implementation and management of their proposed programs. Matches may
be in the form of cash or in-kind contributions. These may include but
are not limited to such contributions as the development of training
modules; payment of tuition costs for training; support for child care
or transportation; and provision of staff time at no cost to the
project.
Sources of matching funds may include but are not limited to
employers, employer associations, labor organizations, and training
institutions. With reference to the sources and amounts of project
funds and in-kind contributions identified in the financial proposal as
being other than those requested under the grant applied for, describe
the basis for valuation of those funds and contributions.
Note: National Reserve Account grants for specific plant
closures and layoffs may not be used to match demonstration grant
funds, these grants provide sufficient funds to meet the needs of
any worker in the targeted dislocation event. However, NRA grant
funds may be used to purchase 50 percent or less of the total
training slots in a training developed with demonstration grant
funds.
Documentation of consultation on the project concept from
applicable labor organizations must be submitted when 20 percent or
more of the targeted population is represented by one or more labor
organizations, or where the training is for jobs where a labor
organization represents a substantial number of workers engaged in
similar work. Where the union has been involved in bargaining relative
to the introduction of either the technology or the addition of new
skilled workers at the workplace, provide information as to any role
the union played in the design and delivery of the training as well as
any impact on the workers with respect to the growth or shrinkage in
the number of jobs, the selection of workers for retraining,
F. Innovation
Describe key innovations in the proposed project, including (but
not limited to) innovations in concept to be tested, type of
participant to be served, services provided, delivery of services,
training methods, job development, or job retention strategies. These
innovations should be unique to the ongoing knowledge base of service
delivery and training presently available to the workforce system.
Explain the impact of such innovation on project costs to substantiate
the budget items designated as development and start-up costs.
G. Previous Experience
If the applicant has had a demonstration grant with the Department
of Labor, Education or HHS within the last three years, list the title
of the grant, the amount of the grant, the funding agency, a Federal
contact phone number and a brief summary of purpose of the grant. For
those grants, funded by
[[Page 69089]]
the Department of Labor explain how this grant application differs from
grant activity. Explain how the proposed project is similar to and
differs from the applicant's prior and current operations.
H. Project Management
(1) Structure. Describe the management structure for the project,
including a staffing plan that describes each position and the
percentage of its time to be assigned to this project and assures that
sufficient staff are available to implement the project in a timely and
effective manner. Provide an organizational chart showing the
relationship among project management and operational components,
including those at multiple sites of the project, in the overall
structure of the applicant's organization. Note: It is highly
recommended for applicants requesting $500,000 or more that a full-time
project director be available to ensure timely implementation of the
project.
(2) Program Integrity. Describe the mechanisms to ensure financial
accountability for grant funds and performance accountability relative
to job placements, in accordance with standards for financial
management and participant data systems in 29 CFR part 95 or 97, as
appropriate, and 20 CFR 627.425. Explain the basis for the applicant's
administrative authority over the management and operational
components.
Describe how information will be collected to determine the
achievement of project outcomes as indicated in section D of this part;
and report on participants, outcomes, and expenditures.
(3) Monitoring and Reporting. Describe how the project will keep
records of its activities, as required in 29 CFR parts 95 and 97 and 20
CFR 631.63 as appropriate, which will include information such as the
following:
(a) Benchmarks. Provide a Time Line of implementation and projected
performance benchmarks covering the period of performance of the
project (Appendix E). Include a monthly schedule of planned
implementation activities and start-up events (such as curriculum
development, selection of advisory council, advisory council meetings,
hiring of staff, and completion of lease arrangement for space,
development of an internal program progress reporting system, design of
customer satisfaction measures, initiation of customer satisfaction
activities for participants/for employers); quarterly projections of
planned participant activity, showing cumulative numbers of
enrollments, participation in training and other services, placements,
and terminations; and quarterly cumulative expenditure projections. The
quarterly performance projection data may be shown in the same
implementation benchmark timeline or separately.
(b) Participant progress. Describe how a participant's continuing
participation in the project will be monitored, including determination
of successful progress in training activities.
(c) Project performance. Identify the information on project
performance that will be collected on a short-term basis (e.g., weekly
or monthly) by program managers for internal project management to
determine whether the project is accomplishing its objectives as
planned and whether project adjustments are necessary.
Describe the process and procedures to be used to obtain feedback
from participants, employers, and any other appropriate parties on the
responsiveness and effectiveness of the services provided. The
description shall identify the types of information to be obtained, the
methods and frequency of data collection, and ways in which the
information will be used in implementing and managing the project.
Grantees may employ focus groups and surveys, in addition to other
methods, to collect feedback information. Technical assistance in the
design and implementation of customer satisfaction data collection and
analysis may be provided by DOL.
(d) Impact of Collaboration and Innovation. Describe the process
for assessing and reporting on the impact of collaboration and
innovation in the project with respect to the purpose and goals of the
demonstration program and the specific purpose and goals of the
project.
(4) Grievance Procedure. If the applicant is a JTPA administrative
entity or service provider, assure that a grievance procedure is
presently in place. Otherwise, describe the grievance procedure to be
used for grievances and complaints from participants, contractors, and
other interested parties, consistent with the requirements at Section
144 of JTPA and 20 CFR 631.64(b) and (c).
(5) Previous Project Management Experience. Provide an objective
demonstration of the grant applicant's ability to manage the project,
ensure the integrity of the grant funds, and deliver the proposed
performance. Indicate the grant applicant's past experience in the
management of grant-funded projects similar to that being proposed,
particularly regarding oversight and operating functions including
financial management.
(6) Sustainability and Replicability. Provide assurances that if
the project is successful, the demonstration partners will continue to
improve and develop the demonstrated approach. Describe the aspects of
the demonstration approach that will allow other work force development
entities to replicate the proposed project. Note: The cost per
participant will be a consideration in any replication consideration by
other entities. Discuss the potential applicability of the project, or
aspects of the project (such as new assessment tools, etc.), to other
dislocated worker programs.
Part IV. Evaluation Criteria
Selection of grantees for awards will be made after careful
evaluation of grant applications by a panel selected for that purpose
by DOL. Panel results will be advisory in nature and not binding on the
ETA Grant Officer. Panelists shall evaluate proposals for acceptability
based upon overall responsiveness in accordance with the factors below.
A. Target Population (10 Points)
The description of the characteristics of the target group to be
served is clear and meaningful, and sufficiently detailed to determine
the potential participants' service need. Documentation is provided
showing that a significant number of eligible dislocated workers who
possess these characteristics are available for participation within
the project area. Sufficient information is provided to explain how the
number of dislocated workers to be enrolled in the project was
determined. The recruitment plan supports the number of planned
enrollments. The target population is appropriate for the specific
purpose of the proposed project. The project identifies under
represented groups to be trained in the targeted occupation(s).
B. Targeted Jobs (15 Points)
The jobs in the manufacturing industry identified by SIC code are
clearly available to workers who have received appropriate training and
preparation given:
(1) The match between the documented skill shortage and the
training planned;
(2) The documentation provided specifying that training meets or is
developed based on industry driven skill standards or certifications;
(3) The substantial level of involvement of employers in making
known their needs regarding requisite worker skills necessary for
hiring program completers
[[Page 69090]]
(4) The documentation and reliability of job availability is based
upon recognized, reliable and timely sources of information
(5) Where appropriate, the role of workers or representatives of a
labor organization representing the workers in the design and/or
delivery of training in enhancing worker skills during workplace change
C. Service Plan (12 Points)
The scope of services to be provided is consistent with the
demonstration program and project purposes and goals. The scope of
services to be provided is adequate to meet the needs of the target
population given:
(1) Their characteristics and circumstances;
(2) The complexity of the training and the skills to be developed
relative to their characteristics and previous job experience
(3) The jobs in which they are to be placed relative to targeted
wage at placement goals;
(4) The length of program participation planned prior to placement.
D. Costs (20 Points)
Proposed costs are reasonable in relation to the characteristics
and circumstances of the target group, the services to be provided,
planned outcomes, the management plan, and coordination/collaboration
with other entities, including One-Stop/Career Center organizations.
The cost information provided regarding similar training available
through other training providers is within an acceptable range or
sufficient rationale is provided for the cost differences. The impact
of development/start-up and innovation on costs is explained clearly in
the proposal and is reasonable.
Identification is provided of the specific sources and amounts of
other funds which will be used, in addition to funds provided through
this grant, to implement the project. The application must include
information on any non-JTPA resources committed to this project,
including employer funds, grants, and other forms of assistance, public
and private. Value and level of external resources being contributed,
including employer contributions, to achieve program goals will be
taken into consideration in the rating process.
The degree to which other interested partners in the workforce
development system invest resources to test the concepts put forth in
the application.
D. Management (10 Points)
The project management plan is designed to track project
performance in such a way as to assure that benchmarks are achieved in
a timely manner, issues affecting performance such as employer
involvement, collaboration partners commitments, etc. are quickly
identified and addressed, and planned outcomes will be achieved in a
cost effective manner.
The applicant (as a part of a collaborative approach) has
experience working with technology training. The management structure
and management plan for the proposed project will ensure the integrity
of the funds requested. The project work plan demonstrates the
applicant's ability to effectively track project progress with respect
to planned expenditures. Sufficient procedures are in place to use the
information obtained by the project operator(s) to take corrective
action if indicated. In addition, review by appropriate labor
organizations, where applicable, is documented.
The proposal includes a method of assessing customer feedback for
both participants and employers involved, and establishes a mechanism
to take into account the results of such feedback as part of a
continuous system of management and operation of the project.
E. Collaboration (15 Points)
The proposal includes evidence of direct participation by JTPA
SubState Grantees and One-Stop/Career Center entities (where present)
in the planning and management of this grant. Evidence of participation
of employers whose positions are targeted under the grant is present.
Evidence of coordination with other programs and entities for project
design or provision of services is also be provided. Evidence is
presented that ensures cooperation of coordinating entities, as
applicable, for the life of the proposed project. The project includes
a reasonable method of assessing and reporting on the impact of such
coordination, relative to the demonstration purpose and goals and the
specific purpose and goals of the proposed project.
F. Innovation (13 Points)
The proposal demonstrates innovation in the concept(s) to be
tested, the project's design, and/or the services to be provided.
``Innovation'' refers to the degree to which such concept(s), design
and/or services are not currently found in dislocated worker programs.
The project includes a reasonable method of assessing and reporting on
the impact of such innovation, relative to the demonstration program
and project purposes and goals.
G. Sustainability and Replicability (5 Points)
The proposal provides evidence that, if successful, activities
supported by the demonstration grant will be continued after the
expiration date of the grant, using JTPA Title III formula-allotted
funds or other public or private resources. The likelihood that the
approach may be applicable to a broad range of dislocated worker
programs across the country. The proposal provides evidence that the
approach and training strategy(ies) used can be replicated by other
workforce development partners to address technology skill shortages in
their local area.
Grant applications will be evaluated for the reasonableness of
proposed costs, considering the proposed target group, targeted jobs,
services, outcomes, management plan, and coordination with other
entities.
Applicants are advised that discussions may be necessary in order
to clarify any inconsistency or ambiguity in their applications. The
final decision on awards will be based on what is most advantageous to
the Federal Government as determined by the ETA Grant Officer. The
Government may elect to award grant(s) without discussion with the
applicant(s). The applicant's signature on the Application for Federal
Assistance (Standard Form) SF-424 constitutes a binding offer.
Part V. Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation
A. Monitoring
The Department shall be responsible for ensuring effective
implementation of each competitive grant project in accordance with the
Act, the Regulations, the provisions of this announcement and the
negotiated grant agreement. Applicants should assume that at least one
on-site project review will be conducted by Department staff, or their
designees. This review will focus on the project's performance in
meeting the grant's programmatic goals and participant outcomes,
complying with the targeting requirements regarding participants who
are served, expenditure of grant funds on allowable activities,
collaboration with other organizations as required, and methods for
assessment of the responsiveness and effectiveness of the services
being provided. Grants may be subject to their
[[Page 69091]]
additional reviews at the discretion of the Department.
B. Reporting
DOL will arrange for or provide technical assistance to grantees in
establishing appropriate reporting and data collection methods and
processes taking into account the applicant's project management plan.
An effort will be made to accommodate and provide assistance to
grantees to be able to complete all reporting electronically.
Applicants selected as grantees will be required to provide the
following reports:
1. Monthly progress reports, during initial start-up and
implementation of the project, and Quarterly Progress Reports.
2. Standard Form 269, Financial Status Report Form, on a quarterly
basis.
3. Final Project Report including an assessment of project
performance. This report will be submitted in hard copy and on
electronic disk utilizing a format and instructions to be provided by
the Department.
C. Evaluation
DOL will arrange for or conduct an independent evaluation of the
outcomes, impacts, and benefits of the demonstration projects. Grantees
must agree to make available records on participants and employers as
well as project financial and management data and to provide access to
personnel, as specified by the evaluator(s) under the direction of the
Department.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of December, 1998.
Janice E. Perry,
Grant Officer.
Appendices
1. Appendix A--Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form
424)
2. Appendix B-- Budget Information Sheet
3. Appendix C--Application Checklist
4. Appendix D--Implementation Benchmarks and Time Line
BILLING CODE 4501-30-P
[[Page 69092]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.000
[[Page 69093]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.001
[[Page 69094]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.002
[[Page 69095]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.003
[[Page 69096]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.004
[[Page 69097]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.005
[[Page 69098]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.006
[[Page 69099]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.007
[[Page 69100]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.008
[[Page 69101]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.009
[[Page 69102]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15DE98.010
[FR Doc. 98-33168 Filed 12-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-C
