98-33255. Tennessee Valley Authority; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 241 (Wednesday, December 16, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 69331]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-33255]
    
    
    
    [[Page 69331]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296]
    
    
    Tennessee Valley Authority; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 
    2 and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
    Introduction
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, or the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. 
    DPR-33, DPR-52 and DPR-68 issued to the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA 
    or the licensee) for operation of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) 
    Units 1, 2 and 3, located in Limestone County, Alabama.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is in response to the licensee's application 
    dated February 20, 1998, for exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 
    50.71(e)(4) regarding submission of revisions to the Updated Final 
    Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) and design-change reports for facility 
    changes made under 10 CFR 50.59 for the BFN units. Under the proposed 
    exemption, the licensee would schedule updates to the single, unified 
    FSAR for the three BFN units within 6 months following Unit 2 refueling 
    outages.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) requires licensees to submit updates to their 
    UFSAR within 6 months after each refueling outage provided that the 
    interval between successive updates does not exceed 24 months. Since 
    the BFN Units 1, 2, and 3 share a common UFSAR, the licensee must 
    update the same document within 6 months after a refueling outage for 
    each of the three units. Allowing the exemption would maintain the 
    UFSAR current within 24 months of the last revision.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        No changes are being made in the types or amounts of any 
    radiological effluent that may be released off site. There is no 
    significant increase in the allowable individual or cumulative 
    occupational radiation exposure. The Commission concludes that granting 
    the proposed exemption would result in no significant radiological 
    environmental impact.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    exemption does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no 
    other environmental impact. The Commission concludes that there are no 
    significant non-radiological impacts associated with the proposed 
    exemption.
    
    Alternative to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
    denial of the proposed action (no alternative action). Denial of the 
    exemption would result in no change in current environmental impacts. 
    The environmental impacts of the proposed exemption and this 
    alternative are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement dated 
    September 1, 1972 for BFN Units 1, 2 and 3.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on November 20, 1998, the NRC 
    staff consulted with the Alabama State official, Mr. Kirk Whatley of 
    the State Office of Radiation Control, regarding the environmental 
    impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for exemption dated February 20, 1998, which is available 
    for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the 
    Gelman Building, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC and at the local 
    public document room located at the Athens Public Library, 405 E. South 
    Street, Athens, Alabama.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of December 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Frederick J. Hebdon,
    Director, Project Directorate II-3, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, 
    Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-33255 Filed 12-15-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/16/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-33255
Pages:
69331-69331 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296
PDF File:
98-33255.pdf