[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70212-70213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-32526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Emergency Watershed Protection Program
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) announces
the availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS), in compliance with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for the Emergency Watershed
Protection (EWP) Program. The draft PEIS assesses the potential
environmental impacts of alternatives for administration of the EWP
Program, which provides funding and assistance to localities requesting
EWP assistance to address watershed impairments, caused by a natural
disaster, which pose an immediate threat to life and property.
The original PEIS for the EWP Program was prepared in 1975. NRCS
has conducted a comprehensive review of the program that has resulted
in changes to improve the environmental, economic, and technical
soundness of activities conducted under the program. This draft PEIS
supports management decisions on how best to revise the EWP Program to
continue to effectively and efficiently meet EWP statutory
requirements. It analyzes a range of reasonable alternatives to ensure
compliance with all applicable laws and regulations while minimizing,
to the greatest extent practicable, any potential adverse environmental
or socioeconomic impacts.
Comments Invited
To ensure that the full range of issues and alternatives related to
the EWP Program have been addressed, NRCS invites comments on this
draft PEIS. Written comments should be postmarked by close of business
on February 14, 2000, to ensure consideration. Comments postmarked
after this date will be considered to the extent practicable.
WHERE TO COMMENT: Written comments on the draft PEIS and requests for
copies of the draft PEIS should be directed to: EWP-PEIS, Post Office
Box 745, Falls Church, Virginia 22040-0745; telephone (toll free): 1-
877-534-8692; or e-mail at ewp@mangi.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For matters relating to the EWP
Program, please contact the Director, Watersheds and Wetlands Division,
USDA-NRCS, Post Office Box 2890, Washington, DC 20013-2890; telephone:
(202) 720-3527.
For matters relating to USDA/NRCS compliance with NEPA, please
contact: Andree DuVarney, National Environmental Specialist, Ecological
Sciences Division, USDA-NRCS, Post Office Box 2890, Washington, DC
20013-2890; telephone: (202) 720-4925.
Information may also be obtained from the NRCS Worldwide website
at: http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/BCS/enviro/nepa.htm (general NEPA
compliance information); http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/programs.html
(EWP Program).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EWP Program funds and provides technical
assistance to sponsoring organizations (entities of government) to
implement emergency measures for runoff retardation and soil erosion
prevention to assist in relieving imminent hazards to life and property
from floods, drought, and the products of erosion created by natural
disasters that have caused or are causing sudden impairment of a
watershed. The program is authorized by Section 216 of the Flood
Control Act of May 17, 1950 (Pub. L. 81-516; 33 U.S.C. 701b-1) and by
Section 403 of Title IV of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978, (Pub.
L. 95-334), as amended by Section 382 of the Federal Agricultural
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-127) 16 U.S.C. 2204.
NRCS regulations implementing the EWP Program are set forth in 7 CFR
part 624.
NEPA only requires a PEIS be prepared for major Federal actions
significantly affecting the environment. It is NRCS' preliminary
opinion that the programmatic decisions being made about the EWP
Program do not constitute such action, particularly when considered on
a nation-wide basis. Nonetheless, NRCS considers NEPA and the PEIS
process to be a useful tool to assist decision makers under certain
circumstances. Therefore, the agency has made the decision to prepare a
PEIS in this case to take full advantage of NEPA's public participation
provisions, as a means of considering the concerns of individual
members of the public and the State and local government sponsors who
play a critical role in the EWP Program and to fully consider the
impacts of alternative EWP Program policies and activities.
The final PEIS on the EWP Program will supersede the PEIS prepared
on the program in 1975. The purpose of the draft PEIS is to assess the
impacts of a range of EWP programmatic alternatives. It will also
factor in changes that are being proposed to the administrative rule,
such as the use of floodplain easements to address recurring hazards.
NRCS expects that States may desire to tier to the national
programmatic NEPA analysis to facilitate rapid response to EWP Program
emergency requirements in the future, while maintaining adequate
environmental review coverage for the necessary decision making.
Proposed Action Alternative
The proposed action is for NRCS to continue administering the EWP
Program but with some revision for efficiency and effectiveness in
program delivery, and to continue providing funding and technical
assistance to aid appropriately sponsored entities in restoring
watershed components to pre-disaster conditions.
Some of the changes NRCS is proposing action include:
1. Eliminate the terms ``exigency'' and ``non-exigency'';
2. Stipulate that ``Urgent and Compelling'' situations be addressed
immediately upon discovery;
3. Set priorities for funding EWP sites;
4. Establish a cost-share rate of up to 75 percent for all EWP
projects (except for projects in limited resource areas, where sponsors
may receive up to 90 percent);
5. Stipulate that measures be economically, environmentally, and
socially defensible;
6. Improve pre-disaster recovery readiness through interagency
coordination, training, and planning;
7. Allow repair of impairments to agricultural lands using sound
engineering alternatives;
8. Limit repair of sites to twice in a 10-year period;
9. Eliminate the requirement that multiple beneficiaries (property
owners) be threatened before a site would be eligible for EWP Program
repairs;
10. Apply principles of natural stream dynamics and bioengineering
to the design of EWP practices;
11. Simplify the purchase of agricultural easements;
12. Repair enduring (structural or long-life) conservation
practices;
13. Fund part of improved solutions;
[[Page 70213]]
14. Allow disaster recovery work in floodplain areas away from
streams and in upland areas; and
15. Purchase easements on non-agricultural lands.
Signed at Washington, DC, on December 9, 1999.
Pearlie S. Reed,
Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 99-32526 Filed 12-15-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
