97-32897. Computer Reservations System Regulations  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 66272-66274]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-32897]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Office of the Secretary
    
    14 CFR Part 255
    
    [Docket No. OST-97-3057]
    RIN 2105-AC67
    
    
    Computer Reservations System Regulations
    
    AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department is adopting a rule which amends its rules 
    governing airline computer reservations systems (CRSs) (14 CFR part 
    255) by changing their expiration date from December 31, 1997, to March 
    31, 1999. This amendment will keep the rules from terminating on 
    December 31, 1997, and will thereby cause those rules to remain in 
    effect while the Department carries out its reexamination of the need 
    for CRS regulations. The Department believes that the current rules 
    should be maintained during that reexamination because they appear to 
    be necessary for promoting airline competition and helping to ensure 
    that consumers and travel agents can obtain complete and accurate 
    information on airline services.
    
    DATES: This rule is effective on December 31, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Ray, Office of the General 
    Counsel, 400 Seventh St. SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-4731.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When the Department adopted its rules 
    governing CRS operations, 14 CFR part 255, in 1992, it included a 
    sunset date for the rules to ensure that the need for the rules and 
    their effectiveness would be reexamined within several years. The 
    sunset date is December 31, 1997. 14 CFR 255.12. We have begun the 
    process of reexamining the rules but cannot complete that task by the 
    rules' current
    
    [[Page 66273]]
    
    sunset date. We therefore proposed to change the sunset date to March 
    31, 1999. 62 FR 59313, November 3, 1997. We gave interested persons an 
    opportunity to comment on our proposal, but no one except America West 
    Airlines submitted comments. America West supports the proposal. We 
    have determined to adopt our proposed rule.
    
    Background
    
        As we explained in the notice of proposed rulemaking, in our last 
    major CRS rulemaking, and in recent CRS proceedings, CRS regulations 
    are necessary to protect airline competition and ensure that consumers 
    can obtain accurate and complete information on airline services. See, 
    e.g., 57 FR 43780, 43783-43787, September 22, 1992. CRSs have become 
    essential for the marketing of airline services, and market forces do 
    not discipline the price and quality of service offered airlines by the 
    systems. Furthermore, the systems operating in the United States are 
    each entirely or predominantly owned by one or more airlines or airline 
    affiliates. Without regulations, a system's owners could use it to 
    unreasonably prejudice the competitive position of other airlines or to 
    provide misleading or inaccurate information to travel agents and their 
    customers. 62 FR 59315, November 3, 1997.
        When we last reexamined the CRS rules, we readopted them with 
    changes designed to promote airline and CRS competition. 57 FR 43780, 
    September 22, 1992. Our rules included a sunset date, December 31, 
    1997, to ensure that we would reexamine them after several years. 14 
    CFR 255.12; 57 FR at 43829-43830, September 22, 1992.
        We have begun the process of reexamining our rules by publishing an 
    advance notice of proposed rulemaking asking interested persons to 
    comment on whether we should readopt the rules and, if so, whether 
    changes are needed. 62 FR 47606, September 10, 1997. At the request of 
    some parties, we gave the parties more time for submitting their 
    comments and reply comments on the advance notice. 62 FR at 58700, 
    October 30, 1997. We later invited interested persons to comment on a 
    rulemaking petition filed by America West Airlines in their comments on 
    our advance notice. 62 FR 60195, November 7, 1997.
    
    Our Proposed Extension of the Current Rules
    
        We obviously cannot complete the rulemaking proceeding for the 
    reexamination of our rules by December 31, 1997, the current sunset 
    date set forth in our rules. We therefore proposed to change the rules' 
    sunset date to March 31, 1999. The proposed amendment would keep the 
    current rules in force while we conducted our overall reexamination of 
    the rules.
        We reasoned that a temporary extension of the current rules would 
    preserve the status quo while we determine whether our existing rules 
    should be readopted. As we noted, the systems, airlines, and travel 
    agencies have been operating with the expectation that each system will 
    comply with the rules. They would be unduly burdened if the rules 
    expired and were later reinstated by us, since they could have changed 
    their method of operations in the meantime. 62 FR at 59315, November 3, 
    1997.
        We also tentatively determined that a short-term continuation of 
    the current rules was necessary to protect airline competition and 
    consumers against unreasonable practices. The findings made in our last 
    major CRS rulemaking on the need for CRS rules still appeared to be 
    valid. Those findings indicated that the rules should be maintained to 
    protect airline competition and consumers against the injuries that 
    could otherwise occur.
        We further found that an extension of the rules was unlikely to 
    impose significant costs on the systems and their owners, since they 
    had already adjusted their operations to comply with the rules and 
    since the rules did not impose costly burdens of a continuing nature on 
    the systems. 62 FR 59316, November 3, 1997.
        Finally, we suggested that our obligation under section 1102(b) of 
    the Federal Aviation Act, recodified as 49 U.S.C. 40105(b), to act 
    consistently with the United States' obligations under treaties and 
    bilateral air services agreements provided an additional ground for 
    maintaining our current rules during our reexamination of their need 
    and effectiveness. 62 FR 59316, November 3, 1997.
        Due to the need to make the proposed amendment effective by the end 
    of 1997, we shortened the comment period to fifteen days. As we noted, 
    however, the advance notice of proposed rulemaking for the 
    reexamination of the CRS rules had stated that we intended to propose 
    an extension of the current rules. 62 FR at 59314, November 3, 1997.
    
    Comments
    
        America West was the only party that filed comments on our proposal 
    to change the rules' sunset date. America West agrees with our 
    tentative findings in the notice of proposed rulemaking that the 
    systems have market power that requires continuing regulation and the 
    findings made in our parity clause rulemaking and in our last major CRS 
    rulemaking. America West further cites the complaints made by it in its 
    recent petition for a rulemaking on CRS booking fee practices and 
    travel agency transactions, Docket OST-97-3014, and asks that we act 
    promptly on that petition.
    
    Decision
    
        We will amend the rules' sunset date as proposed by our notice of 
    proposed rulemaking. America West supports our proposal, and no one 
    objected to it. The analysis underlying that proposal is consistent 
    with the findings made by us in other recent rulemakings on CRS issues, 
    as stated in our notice and America West's comments. We will, of 
    course, review our past findings on the need for continued CRS 
    regulation as part of our overall reexamination of the CRS rules.
        We recognize America West's interest in prompt action on its 
    rulemaking petition, but we plan to address its petition when we review 
    the comments and reply comments being filed in the proceeding for 
    reexamining all of the CRS rules. We have already asked parties to 
    include their responses to America West's petition in their comments on 
    our advance notice of proposed rulemaking. 62 FR 60195, November 7, 
    1997.
    
    Effective Date
    
        We have determined for good cause to make this amendment effective 
    on December 31, 1997, rather than thirty days after publication as 
    required by the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(d), except 
    for good cause shown. In order to maintain the current rules in effect 
    on a continuing basis, we must make this amendment effective by 
    December 31, 1997. Since the amendment preserves the status quo, it 
    will not require the systems, airlines, and travel agencies to change 
    their operating methods. As a result, making the amendment effective 
    less than thirty days after publication will not burden anyone.
    
    Regulatory Process Matters
    
    Regulatory Assessment
    
        This rule is a nonsignificant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
    of Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of 
    Management and Budget under that order. Executive Order 12866 requires 
    each executive agency to prepare an assessment of costs and benefits 
    for each significant rule under section 6(a)(3) of that order. The rule 
    is also not significant under the
    
    [[Page 66274]]
    
    regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation, 
    44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979.
        In our notice of proposed rulemaking we tentatively determined that 
    maintaining the current rules should impose no significant costs on the 
    CRSs. The systems have done the work necessary to comply with the 
    rules' requirements on displays and functionality. Continuing to 
    operate in compliance with the rules would not impose a substantial 
    burden on the systems. Maintaining the rules would benefit airlines 
    using CRSs, since otherwise they could be subjected to unreasonable 
    terms for participation, and would benefit consumers, who otherwise 
    might obtain incomplete or inaccurate information on airline services.
        We also noted that our notice of proposed rulemaking in our last 
    major rulemaking included a tentative regulatory impact statement whose 
    analysis we made final in adopting the rules. In proposing to change 
    the rules' sunset date, we stated our belief that the analysis remained 
    applicable to that proposal and that no new regulatory impact statement 
    therefore seemed necessary. We further stated our willingness to 
    consider any comments on that analysis before making our proposal 
    final.
        As indicated, no one filed any comments. We will therefore base 
    this rule on the analysis used in our last major CRS rulemaking, as 
    discussed in our notice of proposed rulemaking. We will, of course, 
    undertake a new regulatory assessment as part of our review of the 
    existing rules, if we determine that rules remain necessary.
        This rule does not impose unfunded mandates or requirements that 
    will have any impact on the quality of the human environment.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., was 
    enacted by Congress to ensure that small entities are not unnecessarily 
    and disproportionately burdened by government regulations. The act 
    requires agencies to review proposed regulations that may have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    For purposes of this rule, small entities include smaller U.S. and 
    foreign airlines and smaller travel agencies.
        Our notice of proposed rulemaking set forth the reasons for our 
    proposed extension of the rules' expiration date and the objectives and 
    legal basis for that proposed rule. We also pointed out that keeping 
    the current rules in force would not change the existing regulation of 
    small businesses. In addition, we presented a regulatory flexibility 
    analysis on the impact of the rules in our last major CRS rulemaking. 
    That analysis appeared to be valid for our proposed amendment of the 
    rules' sunset date. We therefore adopted that analysis as our tentative 
    regulatory flexibility statement and stated that we would consider any 
    comments submitted on that analysis in this proceeding.
        We noted that the continuation of our existing CRS rules will 
    primarily affect two types of small entities, smaller airlines and 
    travel agencies. To the extent that the rules enable airlines to 
    operate more efficiently and reduce their costs, changing the sunset 
    date of the CRS rules would also affect all small entities that 
    purchase airline tickets, since airline fares may be somewhat lower 
    than they would otherwise be.
        We reasoned that the rules would benefit smaller airlines without a 
    CRS ownership affiliation, by protecting them from certain potential 
    system practices that could injure their ability to operate profitably 
    and compete successfully. If there were no rules, the systems' airline 
    owners could use them to prejudice the competitive position of smaller 
    airlines. The rules protect smaller airlines, for example, by 
    prohibiting display bias and discriminatory fees for services provided 
    airlines. The rules also impose no significant costs on smaller 
    airlines.
        The CRS rules affect the operations of smaller travel agencies, 
    primarily by prohibiting certain CRS practices that could unreasonably 
    restrict the travel agencies' ability to use more than one system or to 
    switch systems. Among other things, the rules give travel agencies the 
    right to use third-party hardware and software and prohibit display 
    bias.
        No one filed comments on our Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis. 
    We will adopt the analysis set forth in the notice of proposed 
    rulemaking.
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act also requires each agency to 
    periodically review rules which have a significant economic impact upon 
    a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 610. Our rulemaking 
    reexamining the need for the CRS rules and their effectiveness will 
    constitute the required review of those rules. Our reexamination of the 
    rules will include a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis if we propose 
    new CRS rules.
        Our rule contains no direct reporting, record-keeping, or other 
    compliance requirements that would affect small entities. There are no 
    other federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with our 
    proposed rules.
        The Department certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. et seq.) that this regulation will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This proposal contains no collection-of-information requirements 
    subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, Pub. L. 96-511, 44 U.S.C. 
    Chapter 35.
    
    Federalism Implications
    
        This rule will have no substantial direct effects on the States, on 
    the relationship between the national government and the States, or on 
    the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels 
    of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12812, we 
    have determined that the rule does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 255
    
        Air carriers, Antitrust, Consumer protection, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements, Travel agents.
    
        Accordingly, the Department of Transportation proposes to amend 14 
    CFR part 255, Carrier-owned Computer Reservations Systems, as follows:
    
    PART 255--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 255 is revised to read as 
    follows:
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40101, 40102, 40105, 40113, 41712.
    
        2. Section 255.12 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 255.12  Termination.
    
        Unless extended, these rules on carrier-owned computer reservation 
    systems shall terminate on March 31, 1999.
    
        Issued in Washington, D.C. on December 11, 1997.
    Charles A. Hunnicutt,
    Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 97-32897 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/31/1997
Published:
12/18/1997
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-32897
Dates:
This rule is effective on December 31, 1997.
Pages:
66272-66274 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. OST-97-3057
RINs:
2105-AC67: Extension of Computer Reservations System Rules
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2105-AC67/extension-of-computer-reservations-system-rules
PDF File:
97-32897.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 255.12