97-33328. Enforceable Consent Agreement Development for Ethylene Dichloride; Solicitation of Interested Parties and Notice of Public Meeting  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 66626-66628]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-33328]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
     [OPPTS-42197B; FRL-5763-1]
    
    
     Enforceable Consent Agreement Development for Ethylene 
    Dichloride; Solicitation of Interested Parties and Notice of Public 
    Meeting
    
      AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
      ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
      SUMMARY: EPA is soliciting interested parties who want to monitor or 
    participate in negotiations on an enforceable consent agreement (ECA) 
    concerning the use of pharmacokinetics (PK) studies and mechanistic 
    data to help meet testing requirements for ethylene dichloride (CAS No. 
    107-06-02) in the proposed hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) test rule. 
    In addition, EPA invites all interested parties to attend a public 
    meeting to initiate negotiations on the ECA for ethylene dichloride.
    
      DATES: EPA must receive written notification requesting designation 
    as an interested party for ethylene dichloride on or before January 9, 
    1998. Those persons who identify themselves as interested parties for 
    ethylene dichloride may submit written comments to EPA on the PK 
    proposal for this chemical, on EPA's preliminary technical analysis, 
    and on other materials in the docket for the proposed HAPs test rule, 
    that relate to the ECA process for this chemical by January 9, 1998.
         The public meeting is scheduled from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. on January 
    12, 1998.
    
      ADDRESSES: Each comment must bear the docket control number, OPPTS-
    42197B. All comments should be sent in triplicate to: OPPT Document 
    Control Officer (7407), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Rm. G-099, East Tower, 
    Washington, DC 20460.
        EPA will address these comments at the public meeting.
         Comments and data may also be submitted electronically to: 
    oppt.ncic@epamail.epa.gov. following the instructions under Unit VI. of 
    this document. No Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be 
    submitted through e-mail.
         All comments which contain information claimed as CBI must be 
    clearly marked as such. Three sanitized copies of any comments 
    containing information claimed as CBI must also be submitted and will 
    be placed in the public record for this document.
    
    [[Page 66627]]
    
     Persons submitting information any portion of which they believe is 
    entitled to treatment as CBI by EPA must assert a business 
    confidentiality claim in accordance with 40 CFR 2.203(b) for each such 
    portion. This claim must be made at the time that the information is 
    submitted to EPA. If a submitter does not assert a confidentiality 
    claim at the time of submission, EPA will make the information 
    available to the public without further notice to the submitter.
         The public meeting will be held at EPA Headquarters, 401 M St., 
    SW., Washington, DC in the EPA Conference Center, North Conference Area 
    in Room 1.
    
      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For additional information: Susan 
    B. Hazen, Director, Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Rm. ET-
    543B, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: 
    (202) 554-1404, TDD: (202) 554-0551; e-mail address: TSCA-
    Hotline@epamail.epa.gov.
          For technical information: Richard W. Leukroth, Jr., Project 
    Manager, Chemical Control Division (7405), Office of Pollution 
    Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 260-0321; fax: (202) 260-8850; 
    e-mail address: leukroth.rich@epamail.epa.gov.
    
      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
     I. Electronic Availability
    
          Internet: Electronic copies of this document and various support 
    documents are available from the EPA Home Page at the  Federal Register 
    --Environmental Documents entry for this document under ``Laws and 
    Regulations'' (http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-TOX/1997/).
    
     II. Background
    
         EPA proposed health effects testing under section 4(a) of the 
    Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) on June 26, 1996, for a number of 
    HAPs chemicals (61 FR 33178) (FRL-4869-1). As indicated in the proposed 
    HAPs test rule, EPA would use the data obtained from testing to 
    implement several provisions of section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 
    including the determination of residual risk, the estimation of the 
    risks associated with accidental releases of chemicals, and 
    determinations whether substances should be removed from the CAA 
    section 112(b)(1) list of hazardous air pollutants (delisting). The 
    data also would be used by other Federal agencies (e.g. Agency for 
    Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), National Institute of 
    Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Safety and Health 
    Administration (OSHA), and Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)) 
    in assessing chemical risks and in taking appropriate actions within 
    their programs.
         In the proposed HAPs test rule, EPA invited the submission of 
    proposals for pharmacokinetics (PK) studies for the HAPs chemicals, 
    which could provide the basis for negotiation of ECAs. These PK studies 
    would be used to inform EPA about the use of route-to-route 
    extrapolation of toxicity data from routes other than inhalation to 
    predict the effects of inhalation exposure, as an alternative to 
    testing proposed under the HAPs test rule. EPA received a PK proposal 
    for ethylene dichloride from the HAP Task Force on November 25, 1996. 
    Based on the PK proposal received for ethylene dichloride, the Agency 
    developed a preliminary technical analysis. A copy of this preliminary 
    technical analysis was sent to the HAP Task Force on June 26, 1997. The 
    HAP Task Force reviewed EPA's analysis and notified EPA on July 31, 
    1997, that it has a continued interest in pursuing the ECA process. A 
    copy of the PK proposal, the EPA preliminary technical analysis and 
    related materials is contained in the public record for this ECA 
    process. These materials will be used during discussions at the 
    negotiating meeting. EPA has decided to proceed with the ECA process 
    for ethylene dichloride and is providing public notice that the Agency 
    is hereby initiating the procedures for ECA negotiations for the HAP 
    chemical, ethylene dichloride. The procedures for ECA negotiations are 
    described at 40 CFR 790.22(b). EPA intends to publish, as appropriate, 
    additional  Federal Register documents to solicit interested parties 
    and announce public meetings for other HAPs chemicals for which PK 
    proposals were submitted.
         The proposed HAPs test rule, and the ECA negotiations on chemicals 
    included in the proposed rule are separate and parallel activities. 
    While the Agency's objective of obtaining data could be accomplished by 
    either activity, EPA recognizes that the final testing program 
    performed by industry may differ depending on whether it is 
    accomplished under the final HAPs test rule or via the ECA process. 
    During the course of ECA negotiations, additional information may be 
    brought forward that could cause the Agency to re-evaluate the nature 
    of the testing requirements as stated in the proposed HAPs test rule. 
    This could result in the development of an ECA that would fulfill the 
    Agency's data needs in ways not stated in the proposed HAPs test rule. 
    It is therefore essential for all interested parties to recognize these 
    differences at the outset and respond accordingly within the framework 
    of these two separate and parallel activities. Comments on the proposed 
    HAPs test rule must be submitted under docket control number, OPPTS-
    42187A, as described in the proposed HAPs test rule published on June 
    26, 1996, and will be addressed by EPA via the rulemaking process, 
    which is separate and distinct from the ECA process. Participation in 
    the ECA process is described in Units II. through IV. of this preamble.
         Negotiations on developing an ECA for the HAP chemical, ethylene 
    dichloride, will focus on the use of PK studies and mechanistic data to 
    help meet testing requirements for ethylene dichloride. In addition, 
    discussion will include the adequacy of the available data base to be 
    used for extrapolation to obtain the data needs identified for ethylene 
    dichloride in the proposed HAPs test rule. The objective of the ECA 
    process is to conclude an ECA that will set in place an industry-
    sponsored testing program that will adequately address EPA's data needs 
    for ethylene dichloride.
    
     III. Identification of Interested Parties
    
         EPA is soliciting interested parties to monitor or participate in 
    testing negotiations on an ECA for ethylene dichloride. The HAP Task 
    Force, the submitter of the PK proposal for ethylene dichloride, and 
    the member companies of the HAP Task Force are already considered 
    interested parties and do not need to respond to this document. 
    Additionally, any persons who respond to this document on or before 
    January 9, 1998 will be given the status of interested parties. 
    Interested parties must respond in writing to the address specified in 
    the ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document. These interested 
    parties will not incur any obligations by being so designated. 
    Negotiations will be conducted in one or more meetings open to the 
    public. The negotiation time schedule for ethylene dichloride will be 
    established at the first negotiation meeting and will not exceed a 
    period of 4 months from the initial meeting. If an ECA is not 
    established in principle within this timeframe and EPA does not choose 
    to extend the negotiation time period, negotiations will be terminated 
    and testing will be required under the final HAPs test rule. If the 
    testing from the ECA does not meet the Agency's needs,
    
    [[Page 66628]]
    
    EPA reserves the right to enter into rulemaking.
    
     IV. Public Participation in Negotiations
    
         Under EPA regulations, the Agency is required to provide the 
    public with an opportunity to comment on and participate in the 
    development of ECAs. The procedural rule for ECAs (40 CFR part 790) 
    contains provisions to ensure that the views of interested parties are 
    taken into account during the ECA process.
         Individuals and groups who respond to this document will have the 
    status of interested parties. All negotiating meetings for the 
    development of this ECA for ethylene dichloride will be open to the 
    public and minutes of each meeting will be prepared by EPA and placed 
    in the public docket for this ECA process. The Agency will advise 
    interested parties of meeting dates and make available meeting minutes, 
    testing proposals, background documents, and other materials exchanged 
    at or prepared for negotiating meetings. Where tentative agreement is 
    reached on an acceptable testing program, a draft ECA will be made 
    available for comment by interested parties and, if necessary, EPA will 
    hold a public meeting to discuss any comments that have been received 
    and determine whether revisions to the ECA are appropriate. EPA will 
    not reimburse costs incurred by non-EPA participants in this ECA 
    negotiation process.
         ECAs will only be concluded where an agreement can be obtained 
    which is satisfactory to the Agency, manufacturers or processors who 
    are potential test sponsors, and other interested parties, concerning 
    the need for and scope of testing. In the absence of an ECA, EPA 
    reserves the right to proceed with rulemaking.
         A. The Agency will not enter into an ECA if either:
         1. EPA and affected manufacturers or processors cannot reach an 
    agreement on the provisions of the ECA; or
         2. The draft ECA is considered inadequate by other interested 
    parties who have submitted timely written objections to the draft ECA.
         B. EPA may reject these objections if the Agency concludes either 
    that:
         1. They are not made in good faith;
         2. They are untimely;
         3. They are not related to the adequacy of the proposed testing 
    program or other features of the agreement that may affect EPA's 
    ability to fulfill the goals and purposes of TSCA; or
         4. They are not accompanied by a specific explanation of the 
    grounds on which the draft agreement is considered objectionable.
         EPA will prepare an explanation of the basis for each ECA. The 
    explanatory document will summarize the agreement (including the 
    required testing), explain the objectives of the testing, and outline 
    the chemical's use and exposure characteristics. The document, which 
    will also announce the availability of the ECA, will be published in 
    the  Federal Register.
    
     V. Proposal of Export Notification Requirements for Ethylene 
    Dichloride
    
         EPA intends to publish a proposed rule in an upcoming  Federal 
    Register document to require export notification by all persons who 
    export or intend to export ethylene dichloride under TSCA section 12(b) 
    upon the successful conclusion of an ECA for ethylene dichloride.
    
     VI. Public Record and Electronic Submissions
    
         As described above, ethylene dichloride is listed as a chemical 
    that would be subject to testing requirements under the proposed HAPs 
    test rule. This ECA negotiation process and the proposed rule, are 
    separate and parallel activities. The official record for this ECA 
    action, including the public version, has been established under docket 
    control number OPPTS-42197B (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). The official record for this 
    document also includes all material and submissions filed under docket 
    control number OPPTS-42187A; FRL-4869-1, the record for the proposed 
    HAPs test rule, and all materials and submissions filed under docket 
    control number OPPTS-42187B; FRL-4869-1, the record for the receipt of 
    alternative testing proposals for developing ECAs for HAPs chemicals.
         The official record for this document, including the public 
    version, which does not include any information claimed as CBI, has 
    been established for this document under docket control number OPPTS-
    42197B. The public version of this record is available for inspection 
    from 12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The public record is located in the TSCA Nonconfidential 
    Information Center, Rm. NE B-607, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
         Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        oppt.ncic@epamail.epa.gov.
    
         Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding 
    the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comments and 
    data will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1/6.1 or ASCII 
    file format. All comments and data in electronic form must be 
    identified by the docket control number, OPPTS-42197B. Electronic 
    comments on this document may be filed online at many Federal 
    Depository Libraries.
         The record contains the following information:
         A.  Federal Register notices/EPA documents pertaining to this 
    notice consisting of:
         1. ``Proposed Test Rule for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Proposed 
    Rule'' (61 FR 33178, June 26, 1996).
         B. PK proposal materials consisting of:
         1. HAP Task Force, ``Proposal for Pharmacokinetics Study of 
    Ethylene Dicholoride'' (November 22, 1996) and cover letter (November 
    25, 1996).
         2. U.S. EPA, ``Preliminary EPA Technical Analysis of Proposed 
    Industry Pharmacokinetics (PK) Strategy for Ethylene Dichloride'' and 
    cover letter (June 26, 1997).
    
     List of Subjects
    
         Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: December 17, 1997.
    
    Charles M. Auer,
     Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention 
    and Toxics.
    
     [FR Doc. 97-33328 Filed 12-18-97; 8:45 am]
     BILLING CODE 6065-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
12/19/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-33328
Dates:
EPA must receive written notification requesting designation as an interested party for ethylene dichloride on or before January 9, 1998. Those persons who identify themselves as interested parties for ethylene dichloride may submit written comments to EPA on the PK proposal for this chemical, on EPA's preliminary technical analysis, and on other materials in the docket for the proposed HAPs test rule, that relate to the ECA process for this chemical by January 9, 1998.
Pages:
66626-66628 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OPPTS-42197B, FRL-5763-1
PDF File:
97-33328.pdf